What is Community Pride Care Center's Medicare star rating?

CMS rates Community Pride Care Center 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).

How many deficiencies did Community Pride Care Center get at its last inspection?

3 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on December 31, 2025. The Nebraska average is 7.4.

Has Community Pride Care Center been fined?

CMS lists no fines in the last three years.

Does Community Pride Care Center accept Medicaid?

It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.

Who owns Community Pride Care Center?

CMS lists 32 owners and managers. Legal business name: CITY OF BATTLE CREEK.

Community Pride Care Center: Inspections, Staffing & Ratings

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on December 31, 2025, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Nebraska average is 7.4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 9 health citations since November 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.23 hours per resident per day, against 3.98 across Nebraska and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.61 of those hours.

46.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Nebraska average 48.7%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

311/23

204/24

111/24

312/25

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 9 health citations on file.

Severity

Isolated

Pattern

Widespread

Immediate jeopardy

Actual harm

Potential for more than minimal harm

Potential for minimal harm

December 31, 2025Standard inspection · 3 citations

F

Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 23, 2026

Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to implement their water management policy to prevent the potential growth of bacteria such as Legionella (bacteria naturally found in fresh water and can grow in man-made water systems and can cause serious lung infections) in the facility water system and failed to COVID test Resident 6 when the resident had signs and symptoms of a respiratory illness. This had the potential to affect all facility residents. The facility census was 45.
E

Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.

F881 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 21, 2026

Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have documented duration of use for all prescribed antibiotics or documented rationale to continue antibiotics indefinitely for Residents 15, 31 and 37. The sample size was 8 and the facility census was 45.
D

Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 23, 2026

Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number 175 NAC175 12-006.(D)(vi) Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility failed to date a multi-dose medications for Resident 2 and 21 after medication was opened or accessed to ensure manufacturer recommendations and professional standards were followed. The sample size was 3 and the facility census was 45.

November 13, 2024Standard inspection · 1 citation

D

Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 27, 2024

Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18(B) Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility failed to implement the required Personal Protective Equipment (PPE-items such as gowns, gloves, face shield that are worn to protect care givers) during the provision of cares for Resident 12 for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-involve gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities for residents known to be colonized or infected with a multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO-bacteria that have become resistant to certain antibiotics) as well as those at increased risk for MDRO, residents with wounds or indwelling medical device/s). The sample sizes was 4 with a census of 42.

April 1, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations

D

Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 6, 2024

Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02(8) Based on record review and interview the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation following a fall with injury for Resident 1. The sample size was 4 and the facility census was 44.
D

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 6, 2024

Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D7 Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the safety of Resident 1 during bathing resulting in an injury. The sample size was 4 and the facility census was 44.

November 2, 2023Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 3 citations

E

Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 13, 2023

Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09C Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to develop comprehensive Care Plans to accurately reflect the current status for 4 of 12 sampled residents (Resident 2's infection, and use of antianxiety medications, Resident 32's skin integrity, Resident 37's edema (fluid retention of tissue), and Resident 36's Hospice (end-of life) care). The facility census was 41.
D

Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 13, 2023

Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number NAC 12-006.02(8) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate Resident 192's potential misappropriation related to missing money in order to prevent further incidents. The total sample size was 17 and the facility census was 41.
D

Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.

F644 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 13, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure to accurately code Resident 23's Preadmission Assessment and Annual Resident Review (PASARR) status on the Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used for care planning) and Care Plan the results. The total sample size was 12 and the facility census was 41.

Fire safety inspections

14 fire safety citations on file: 4 on December 31, 2025, 2 on November 13, 2024, 8 on November 2, 2023.

Every fire safety citation14 citations

F
Develop and maintain an Emergency Preparedness Program (EP).

E 4 · December 31, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Establish policies and procedures including evacuation.

E 20 · December 31, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.

K 923 · December 31, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Ensure that sources of ignition are removed from patients receiving respiratory therapy.

K 925 · December 31, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.

K 353 · November 13, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Meet requirements for the use and maintenance of medical gas equipment.

K 922 · November 13, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Develop and maintain an Emergency Preparedness Program (EP).

E 4 · November 2, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Conduct testing and exercise requirements.

E 39 · November 2, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.

K 222 · November 2, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.

K 374 · November 2, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.

K 712 · November 2, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.

K 353 · November 2, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.

K 363 · November 2, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
C
Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.

K 321 · November 2, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

Measure	This home	Nebraska	United States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)	2.23	3.98	3.86
Registered nurses	0.61	0.67	0.69
All nursing staff on weekends	1.81	3.48	3.42
Nurse aides	1.38
Licensed practical nurses	0.24
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)	46.2%	48.7%	45.8%
Registered nurse turnover	42.9%	44.1%	42.9%
Administrators who left	1

CMS expects 3.19 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 2.40 on weekdays and 1.81 on weekends, 25% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.23 in April to June 2025 to 2.23 in January to March 2026.

Quarter	All nursing staff	Registered nurses	Weekdays	Weekends	Contract staff share	Days with no RN hours	Residents a day
Jan to Mar 2026	2.23	0.61	2.40	1.81	0.0%	17 of 90	46
Oct to Dec 2025	3.05	0.65	3.25	2.54	8.2%	0 of 92	45
Jul to Sep 2025	3.20	0.74	3.40	2.72	5.9%	0 of 92	45
Apr to Jun 2025	3.23	0.84	3.48	2.60	2.2%	0 of 91	45
United States, Jan to Mar 2026	3.75	0.62	3.92	3.33	5.3%	0.5% of days
Nebraska, Jan to Mar 2026	4.01	0.66	4.21	3.53	7.1%	1.6% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

Measure	This home	Nebraska	US
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	21.1	19.0	13.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	1.0	1.4	0.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	4.3	2.8	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.6	4.5	3.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.0	2.0	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	10.1	18.2	14.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	3.1	4.0	4.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	2.7	20.7	15.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	12.5	20.7	23.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	9.4	11.4	12.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	2.1	1.8	1.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	0.6	1.9	1.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: CITY OF BATTLE CREEK.

Name	Role	Type	Since
City of Battle Creek	Direct ownership interest	Organization	04/01/1989
Barry, Tammi	Managing control - governing body	Individual	01/01/2022
Bomar, John	Managing control - governing body	Individual	01/01/2025
Bussey, Layne	Managing control - governing body	Individual	12/11/2023
Fleer, Michael	Managing control - governing body	Individual	01/01/2017
Hrabanek, Barb	Managing control - governing body	Individual	12/11/2023
Hrbanek, John	Managing control - governing body	Individual	01/01/2021
Kraft, Eric	Managing control - governing body	Individual	01/01/2017
McIntosh, Shelley	Managing control - governing body	Individual	03/10/2024
Mettler, Heath	Managing control - governing body	Individual	01/01/2022
Murphy, Allan	Managing control - governing body	Individual	08/14/2023
Nygren, Brent	Managing control - governing body	Individual	01/01/2025
Schnoor, Kelsey	Managing control - governing body	Individual	12/11/2023
City of Battle Creek	Operational/managerial control	Organization	04/01/1989
Bode, Tanya	Operational/managerial control	Individual	09/11/2024
Hirschman, Bryon	Operational/managerial control	Individual	01/01/2010
McIntosh, Shelley	Operational/managerial control	Individual	03/10/2024
City of Battle Creek	Adp of the SNF	Organization	04/01/1989
Barry, Tammi	Adp of the SNF	Individual	01/01/2022
Bode, Tanya	Adp of the SNF	Individual	09/11/2024
Bomar, John	Adp of the SNF	Individual	01/01/2025
Bussey, Layne	Adp of the SNF	Individual	12/11/2023
Fleer, Michael	Adp of the SNF	Individual	01/01/2017
Hirschman, Bryon	Adp of the SNF	Individual	01/01/2010
Hrabanek, Barb	Adp of the SNF	Individual	12/11/2023
Hrbanek, John	Adp of the SNF	Individual	01/01/2021
Kraft, Eric	Adp of the SNF	Individual	01/01/2017
McIntosh, Shelley	Adp of the SNF	Individual	03/10/2024
Mettler, Heath	Adp of the SNF	Individual	01/01/2022
Murphy, Allan	Adp of the SNF	Individual	08/14/2023
Nygren, Brent	Adp of the SNF	Individual	01/01/2025
Schnoor, Kelsey	Adp of the SNF	Individual	12/11/2023

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on December 31, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on April 1, 2024: "Respond appropriately to all alleged violations."
When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on November 2, 2023: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on December 31, 2025: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."
Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 1.81 hours per resident per day, below the Nebraska average of 3.48.
How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

St. Joseph's Rehabilitation and Care Center
Norfolk, 9.1 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 31 citations
Heritage of Bel Air
Norfolk, 9.7 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 11 citations
Arbor Care Centers-Countryside LLC
Madison, 13 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 32 citations
Accura Healthcare of Pierce
Pierce, 14.9 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 18 citations
Stanton Health Center
Stanton, 19.1 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 16 citations
Mid-Nebraska Lutheran Home
Newman Grove, 19.3 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 23 citations
Accura Healthcare of Neligh
Neligh, 24.6 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 19 citations

Nebraska contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Nebraska. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Inspections and complaints: Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services, Licensure Unit, Long Term Care Facilities, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
Resident advocate: Nebraska Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, (800) 942-7830. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.

Common questions

What is Community Pride Care Center's Medicare star rating?: CMS rates Community Pride Care Center 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Community Pride Care Center get at its last inspection?: 3 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on December 31, 2025. The Nebraska average is 7.4.
Has Community Pride Care Center been fined?: CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Community Pride Care Center accept Medicaid?: It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Community Pride Care Center?: CMS lists 32 owners and managers. Legal business name: CITY OF BATTLE CREEK.

Sources

Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.