Find a nursing home

Home / Texas / Claude

Palo Duro Nursing Home

405 S Collins St., Claude, TX 79019 · Armstrong County · (806) 226-5121

66 certified beds, about 32 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1986

Inside a hospital Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
1 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 455641 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on August 20, 2025, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 21 health citations since June 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.04 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.41 of those hours.

39.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).

CMS links it to Gulf Coast LTC Partners, an affiliated group of 20 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 21 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
11D
8E
2F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
August 20, 2025Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. E
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    F679 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 19, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observations and record review the facility failed to provide, based on the preferences of each resident, an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities, both facility-sponsored group and individual activities and independent activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging both independence and interaction in the community for 12 residents reviewed for activities. A. The facility failed to follow the activity calendar for August. B. The facility activity calendar for August failed to incorporate physical activities and interaction in the community into its activity programs. These failures could place residents at risk of reduced quality of life and boredom in life by not receiving activities to meet their individual needs.
  2. E
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    F727 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 19, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week for the months of April 2025, May 2025, June 2025, July 2025 and August 2025 .for weekend RN coverage. A. The facility failed to ensure they had RN coverage 8 hours a day, 7 days a week for the following days: April 202504/13/25, 04/19/25, 04/20/25 May 202505/03/25, 05/10/25, 05/11/25, 05/17/25, 05/18/25, 05/24/25, 05/25/25 June 202506/1/25, 06/7/25, 06/08/25, 06/14/25, 06/15/25, 06/22/25 July,2025 07/05/25, 07/6/24, 07/12/25,07/13/25, 07/19/25, 07/20/25, 07/26/25, 07/27/25 August,202508/02/25, 08/03/24, 08/09/25, 8/10/25, 08/16/25 and 08/17/25 This failure could place residents at risk for inconsistency in care and services.
  3. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 19, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment, that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's catheter drainage bag was covered and urine in the bag was not visually exposed. This failure could place residents at risk of feeling uncomfortable and disrespected and could decrease residents' self-esteem and/or quality of life.
  4. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 19, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an assessment accurately reflected resident's status for 2 (Resident #3 and #30) of 12 residents reviewed for accuracy of MDS assessments. -The facility failed to accurately assess Resident #3 for the use of oxygen on her 06/08/25 annual MDS. -The facility failed to accurately assess Resident #30 for wight loss on his 07/24/25 quarterly MDS. This failure could place residents at risk for inaccurate and incomplete MDS assessment which could result in residents not receiving correct care and services.
  5. D
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    F699 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 19, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were trauma survivors receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for residents' experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for 1 of 12 residents (Resident # 6) reviewed for trauma-informed care. The facility did not ensure Resident #6 had a trauma screening that identified possible triggers when Resident #6 had a history of trauma. This failure could put residents at an increased risk for severe psychological distress due to re-traumatization.
  6. D
    Employ staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
    F839 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 19, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 1 (CNA A) of 5 CNA's were certified in accordance with applicable state laws. CNA A worked 7 days in the facility with an expired CNA certification. The deficient practice of failing to ensure employee certifications could affect all residents by exposing them to inadequate care resulting in deterioration of their conditions.
July 15, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. E
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
    F940 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 8, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff, consistent with their expected roles. The facility failed to ensure Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Training, Fall Prevention, Restraint Reduction, HIV and Bloodborne Pathogens, Emergency Procedures, and Dementia Training were completed upon hire for 2 of 5 employees (Marketing/Admissions Coordinator and CNA A) reviewed for required trainings. Based on interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff, consistent with their expected roles. [...]
July 30, 2024Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 30, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in one of one kitchen observed for food storage, preparation, and distribution. A. The DM did not perform hand hygiene appropriately when preparing pureed foods. This failure could place residents who ate food served by the kitchen at risk of food-borne illness from cross-contamination.
  2. E
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    F638 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 30, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review the facility failed to assess a resident using the quarterly review instrument specified by the state and approved by CMS not less frequently than once every 3 months for 5 (Residents #4, #11, #18, #21, and #31) of 12 residents reviewed for quarterly MDS assessments. 1. The facility failed to complete a quarterly MDS for Resident #4 with ARD 06/13/24. 2. The facility failed to complete a quarterly MDS for Resident #11 with ARD 05/24/24. 3. The facility failed to complete a quarterly MDS for Resident #18 with ARD 05/07/24. 4. The facility failed to complete a quarterly MDS for Resident #21 with ARD 06/14/24. 5. The facility failed to complete two quarterly MDS' for Resident #31 with ARDs 05/20/24 and 06/14/24. These failures could lead to residents not receiving necessary/complete/correct care due to lack of current information for care plans.
  3. D
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    F644 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 30, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review the facility failed to refer all residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder for level II resident review for 2 (Resident #5 and Resident #11) of 12 residents reviewed for PASRR. 1. The facility failed to refer Resident #5 for PASRR level II review following a diagnosis of bipolar disorder one day after he was admitted to the facility. 2. The facility failed to refer Resident #11 for PASRR level II review following a diagnosis of psychotic disorder almost 6 years after he was admitted to the facility. These failures could place residents at risk of not having their mental health needs met by the facility and could place all residents at risk of harm by mentally unstable residents. Findings Included: 1. [...]
  4. D
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    F645 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 30, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to perform preadmission screening for individuals with a mental disorder and individuals with intellectual disability prior to admission for 1 (Resident #31) of 12 residents reviewed for preadmission screenings. The facility failed to perform a PASRR for Resident #31 until 27 days after he was admitted . This failure could place residents at risk of receiving inadequate care. Findings Included: [...]
  5. D
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 30, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete and accurately documented for 1 (Resident #5) of 12 residents who were reviewed for accuracy of medical records. The facility failed to recognize Resident #5's PASRR level 1 was incorrect in that he was positive for mental illness due to his diagnosis of bipolar disorder. This failure could place residents at risk of harm by mentally unstable residents and/or at risk of not having their mental health needs met. Findings Included: [...]
  6. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 30, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 4 (LVN B, CNA C, CNA D, and CNA E) of 4 staff members. -LVN B did not don PPE gown before or during performing ordered Wound Care to unstageable pressure ulcer to sacral area of Resident #187 who also had a Foley Catheter. -CNA C did not don PPE gown before or during assisting ordered Wound Care to unstageable pressure ulcer to sacral area of Resident #187 who also had a Foley Catheter. -CNA D did not don PPE gown before or during performing ordered Foley Catheter Care to Resident with unstageable pressure ulcer to sacral area on Resident #187. [...]
November 20, 2023Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 20, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment and described the services that were to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 (Resident #1) of 6 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. Resident #1 required partial/moderate and substantial assistance in self-care activities which were not documented in his care plan. Resident #1 had diagnoses of depression, anxiety and dementia(loss of memory)which were not documented in his care plan. [...]
June 1, 2023Standard inspection · 7 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 1, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen and 1 of 1 kitchen storage room reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure stored foods were properly labeled and dated. 2. The facility failed to ensure foods were sealed properly. 3. The facility failed to properly sanitize thermometer to check food temperatures. 4. The facility failed to ensure proper thawing procedures. 5. The facility failed to ensure proper infection control measures. 6. The facility failed to check expiration dates on foods. 7. The facility failed to properly cover/seal foods. These deficient practices could expose residents who consume food prepared in the facility's kitchen to food-borne illnesses. Findings Include : [...]
  2. E
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    F578 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 1, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents had the right to formulate an advance directive for 3 (Resident #22, Resident #31, and Resident #32) of 12 residents reviewed for DNR orders. Resident #22 had an OOH-DNR order that was not completed as it was not dated by the physician, did not have the printed name of the physician, and was not signed a second time by one of the witnesses. Resident #31 had an OOH-DNR order that was not completed as it was not dated by the physician, one of the witnesses did not sign a second time, and it was not dated in the final section titled, ALL PERSONS MUST SIGN HERE:. [...]
  3. E
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    F645 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 1, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that each resident was screened for a mental disorder or intellectual disability prior to admission for 3 of 12 residents (Residents #15, #22, and #29) reviewed for PASRR compliance. The facility failed to ensure that an initial PASRR screening (Level I screen) was completed for Resident #15 prior to admission to the facility. The facility failed to ensure that an initial PASRR screening (Level I screen) was completed for Resident #22 prior to admission to the facility. The facility failed to ensure that an initial PASRR screening (Level I screen) was completed for Resident #29 prior to admission to the facility. [...]
  4. E
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 1, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet residents' medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs for 5 of 12 residents (Residents #19, #22, #31, #32, #33) whose care plans were reviewed. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan indicating services as follows: 1. Failure to complete goals related to smoking for Residents #22, #32, #33 2. Failure to create goals of services being provided such as hospice care for Resident #31 3. [...]
  5. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 1, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 (CNA D, RN A and CNA E) of 3 staff observed for infection control practices. -CNA D failed to use proper hand hygiene techniques when providing incontinent care to Resident #30. -RN A failed to use proper hand hygiene when delivering meals in dining area. -CNA E failed to use proper hand hygiene when assisting resident with meal tray in resident room. This failure may place resident at an increased risk for transmissible diseases.
  6. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 1, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an assessment that accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for accuracy of MDS assessments. The facility failed to identify Resident #4's administration of Humalog Solution (insulin lispro) injections on his annual MDS assessment. This failure to ensure accurate assessments could affect residents by placing them at risk and could result in residents not receiving correct care and services.
  7. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 1, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep resident environment free of accidents and hazards and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #19) reviewed. The facility failed to provide a fall mat for Resident #19. This failure can increase the risk of injury for residents requiring assistance due to history of falls.

Fire safety inspections

4 fire safety citations on file: 2 on August 20, 2025, 1 on July 30, 2024, 1 on June 1, 2023.

Every fire safety citation4 citations
  1. D
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · August 20, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. C
    Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
    K 521 · August 20, 2025 · Not yet corrected
  3. C
    Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
    K 521 · July 30, 2024 · Waiver
  4. C
    Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
    K 521 · June 1, 2023 · Waiver

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeTexasUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.043.393.86
Registered nurses0.410.430.69
All nursing staff on weekends2.792.983.42
Nurse aides1.49
Licensed practical nurses1.13
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)39.1%55.3%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover66.7%54.6%42.9%
Administrators who left2

CMS expects 3.73 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.14 on weekdays and 2.79 on weekends, 11% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 6.3% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.79 in April to June 2025 to 3.04 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.040.413.142.79 6.3%0 of 9032
Oct to Dec 20253.050.473.172.73 0.5%0 of 9235
Jul to Sep 20252.950.713.132.49 1.1%13 of 9239
Apr to Jun 20252.790.702.962.36 0.0%0 of 9137
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Texas, Jan to Mar 20263.330.403.502.932.2%0.7% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeTexasUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
23.015.813.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.30.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.93.33.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
19.614.014.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.43.84.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
31.29.615.4
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.62.21.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.42.11.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: CHILDRESS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to Gulf Coast LTC Partners, a group of 20 nursing homes averaging 2.5 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Holcomb, HollyCorporate officerIndividual05/29/2021
Stratton, EmileeCorporate officerIndividual03/18/2018
Claudetx LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization04/01/2025
Gleisner, StoneyOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/01/2025
Mistretta, CassandraOperational/managerial controlIndividual04/01/2025
Pfeifer, MaryOperational/managerial controlIndividual04/01/2025
Stewart, RandyOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/01/2010
Claudetx LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization10/21/2025
Gleisner, StoneyAdp of the SNFIndividual10/01/2025
Stewart, RandyAdp of the SNFIndividual10/01/2010

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 9 problems in this area, most recently on August 20, 2025: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on August 20, 2025: "Provide activities to meet all resident's needs."
  3. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on August 20, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
  4. Who is the administrator and director of nursing, and how long have they been in the job?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on August 20, 2025: "Employ staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.79 hours per resident per day, below the Texas average of 2.98.
  6. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 2 administrators who left in the period it measured.

Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Palo Duro Nursing Home's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Palo Duro Nursing Home 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Palo Duro Nursing Home get at its last inspection?
6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on August 20, 2025. The Texas average is 9.4.
Has Palo Duro Nursing Home been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Palo Duro Nursing Home accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Palo Duro Nursing Home?
CMS lists 10 owners and managers, and links the home to Gulf Coast LTC Partners. Legal business name: CHILDRESS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection