Stonebridge Health Rehab
11127 Circle Dr, Austin, TX 78736 · Travis County · (512) 288-8844
116 certified beds, about 49 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1996
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 675649 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 23, 2026, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 21 health citations since December 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $39,258 in the last three years; the largest was $21,593, and the latest is dated April 23, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.28 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.45 of those hours.
35.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Caraday Healthcare, an affiliated group of 8 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 21 health citations on file.
July 22, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) program to the maximum extent practicable to avoid duplicative testing and effort, which included incorporating the recommendations from the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review level II determination and the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review evaluation report into a resident's assessment, care planning and transitions of care for one (Resident #1) of six residents reviewed for PASARR assessments. The facility failed to submit the Medicaid recertification in a timely manner resulting in Resident # 1's loss of eligibility for PASRR services. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving services that would enhance his or her quality of life.
April 23, 2026Standard inspection · 3 citations
- G Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #16 reviewed for pain. The facility failed to ensure Resident #16 received pain management to the fullest extent possible, resulting in her experiencing pain on 04/22/2026. This failure placed residents at risk of uncontrolled pain.
- D Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #36) reviewed for medication errors. 1. The facility failed to administer the correct dosage of medication to Resident #36 on 04/22/26. 2. The facility failed to administer the medication to Resident #36 at the time ordered by Physician 04/22/26. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medications and supplements, worsening or exacerbation of chronic medical conditions, and hospitalization.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #22) observed for infection prevention. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA H was following the infection control procedures during peri-care when CNA H cleaned Resident #22's anal area first before cleaning his scrotum. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA H and CNA I were following the infection control procedures when the same wipe was folded multiple times and used for multiple strokes while providing peri-care to Resident #22. 3. [...]
June 17, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Help the resident with transportation to and from laboratory services outside of the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to assist a resident in making transportation arrangements to an outside provider for one (Resident #1) of seven residents interviewed for transportation services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received transportation to his scheduled medical appointment after being provided with adequate notice. This failure could lead to the worsening of acute or chronic health conditions and a decreased quality of life.
February 14, 2025Standard inspection · 8 citations
- J Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to residents who required such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 5 (Resident #195) residents reviewed for pain. The facility failed to provide scheduled Morphine and Tramadol for Resident #195 from 02/07/2025-02/09/2025 which resulted in mental anguish and untreated pain. An IJ was identified on 02/11/2025. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 04:56 PM. While the IJ was removed on 02/14/2025, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of 1 because all nursing staff had not been trained on pain assessments and the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. [...]
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen. The cook was not wearing hair restraints while in the kitchen. The cook did not practice appropriate hand washing prior to preparing and cooking food. The cook did not wash hands or wear gloves when moving from one operation to another. The DA did not wash hands or wear gloves when moving from one operation to another. Non-dietary staff, CNA entered the kitchen without hair restraint. Non-dietary staff did not wash hands. The DM improperly cleaned the thermometer while checking holding temperatures of foods prior to meal service. The DM did not have knowledge of cleaning and sanitization of the thermometer. [...]
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 of 1 medication storage room and 2 of 3 medication carts. A) The facility failed to ensure expired supplies and medications were removed from the medication storage room. B) The facility failed to ensure expired supplies and medications were removed from the nurses' medication cart for 400 hall. C) The facility failed to ensure that the nurses medication cart for 100 hall was secured by a lock when it was left unattended by LVN A. These failures could place residents at risk of contamination causing illness, decreased effectiveness of medication, and risk of injury to other residents if medication left unsecured were consumed.
- E Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prepare foods by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance in the facility's only kitchen. The DM prepared food 2 1/2 hours prior to meal service. The DM held food in a convection steamer and/or on a hot food table for more than 2 1/2 hours prior to meal service. Food service started 150 minutes after food was placed on the steam table. Food item not being pureed with adequate and appropriate liquids. Pureed foods were prepared with water. Liquids for pureed foods were not measured. Thickener for pureed foods was not measured. Pureed and mechanical soft foods did not follow policy/procedures of determining number of servings needed to determine the portion size method. Condiments and seasonings used on regular textured foods was not used on puree and mechanical soft foods. [...]
- D Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to privacy during personal care for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for privacy. The facility failed to ensure RN G provided and continued to provide privacy during wound care for Resident #5, by ensuring the door and privacy curtain remained closed throughout the procedure. This failure could place residents at risk of having their bodies exposed to the public, resulting in low self-esteem and diminished quality of life.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the residents who needed respiratory care were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, for 1 of 4 (Resident #22) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #22 received adequate physical assessment, including vital signs and lung sounds, prior to and after she received medications through a nebulizer and while on antibiotics for an upper respiratory infection. The failure could place resident at an increased risk for an adverse reaction to medication.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure RN G and CNA H followed enhanced barrier precautions when they provided wound care for Resident #5 on 02/13/2025. 2. The facility failed to ensure RN G followed infection control precautions when she performed wound care on Resident #5. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and infection.
- D Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to establish an infection prevention and control program (ICPC) that included, at a minimum, an antibiotic stewardship program that included antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use for 1 of 5 resident (Resident #22) reviewed for antibiotic stewardship program. The facility failed to follow antibiotic stewardship policy for Resident #22 by not ensuring an infection surveillance was performed per facility policy. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for unnecessary antibiotic use, inappropriate antibiotic use, and increased multi drug resistant organisms.
April 4, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store and label biologicals for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for improper medication storage, in that: The facility failed to remove Resident #1's narcotics (Hydrocodone) from the medication cart when it was discontinued July of 2023 which resulted in a medication diversion on 03/09/24. This noncompliance was identified as PNC. The deficient practice began on 03/09/24 and ended on 03/12/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents whose narcotics have been discontinued at risk of receiving discharged discontinued medication, medication errors, and drug diversion.
February 6, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide and document sufficient preparation and orientation to residents to ensure safe and orderly transfer or discharge from the facility for 1 of 1 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for discharge rights. The facility failed to document in Resident #1's chart actions made to ensure a safe and orderly discharge, and to find alternate placement for Resident #1. This failure placed residents at risk of being improperly discharged .
- D Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide and document sufficient preparation and orientation to residents to ensure safe and orderly transfer or discharge from the facility for 1 of 1 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for discharge rights. The facility failed to provide their bed hold policy to Resident #1 or her RP, in writing, upon Resident #1's discharge from the facility on 1/03/2024. This failure placed residents at risk of being improperly discharged .
December 21, 2023Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 5 citations
- E Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents had a right to be treated with respect and dignity for three of eight (Resident #3, Resident #46, and Resident #158) residents reviewed for dignity. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3, Resident #46 and Resident #158 were not referred to as feeders. This failure placed residents at risk of not being treated with dignity.
- E Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure all residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene for 5 of 8 (Resident #35, Resident #55, Resident #52, Resident #27 and Resident #108) residents reviewed for activities of daily living. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #35 received regular showers or baths. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #55 and Resident #52 received nail care. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #27 and Resident #108 received a shave. These failures placed residents at risk of not receiving help with activities of daily living.
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments and inaccessible to unauthorized staff, visitors, and residents for 3 (100, 300, and 400 hallway medication cart) of 5 medication carts reviewed for medication storage. LVN E failed to ensure that the Medication Cart for the 100 Hallway was not left unattended and unlocked. RN A failed to ensure that the Medication Cart for the secured 300 Hallway was not left unattended and unlocked. MA F failed to ensure that the Medication Cart for the 400 Hallway was not left unattended and unlocked. These failures could place residents at risk of misappropriation of medications or harm due to accidental ingestion of unprescribed and over-the-counter medications.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that meets a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs for two of two residents (Resident #55 and Resident #33) reviewed for pressure ulcers. 1. Resident #55 had three wounds which did not appear on the most recent comprehensive are plan last revised on 12/05/2023. 2. Resident #33 had a right buttock Stage II Pressure Ulcer (partial thickness skin and underlying tissue loss) which was not included in the comprehensive Care Plan revised on 12/20/2023. These failures could place residents at risk for pain from the wound, pain from any debridement procedures (sharp instrument or chemical excision of dead tissue often used to promote healing of pressure ulcers) and pain from the wound care required to promote healing. [...]
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections for three of seven residents (Resident #7, Resident #12, and Resident #14) observed while receiving direct resident care by facility staff. The facility failed to disinfect a wrist blood pressure cuff and a Hoyer lift (a manual or electronic metal frame with wheels and a sling-fastening device that is used to lift residents out of bed or a chair to be transferred to another bed or chair) before and after use on Resident #7. Failure to disinfect reusable resident-care items could affect all residents who required a blood pressure check or required use of a transfer assistive device, in the form of a Hoyer lift, by promoting the spread of potential pathogens contained on those items. [...]
Fire safety inspections
3 fire safety citations on file: 2 on April 23, 2026, 1 on February 14, 2025.
Every fire safety citation3 citations
- E Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- D Install a fire alarm system that can be heard throughout the facility.
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| April 23, 2026 | Fine | $17,665 |
| April 23, 2026 | Payment Denial | 8 days from May 23, 2026 |
| February 14, 2025 | Fine | $21,593 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.28 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.45 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.94 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.11 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.72 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 35.3% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 40.0% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 4.54 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.42 on weekdays and 2.94 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 1.8% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.08 in April to June 2025 to 3.28 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.28 | 0.45 | 3.42 | 2.94 | 1.8% | 0 of 90 | 49 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.31 | 0.46 | 3.50 | 2.84 | 2.8% | 1 of 92 | 46 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.20 | 0.47 | 3.38 | 2.75 | 1.6% | 1 of 92 | 42 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.08 | 0.46 | 3.26 | 2.62 | 0.0% | 2 of 91 | 41 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 27.6 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.1 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 21.1 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.1 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 24.4 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 21.5 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 12.0 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.6 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: STRATFORD HOSPITAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to Caraday Healthcare, a group of 8 nursing homes averaging 2.8 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stratford Hospital District | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 06/01/2020 |
| Granite Stonebridge Health Center, LLC | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 06/01/2020 | |
| Chumley, Richard | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/01/2020 | |
| Caraday Stonebridge LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 06/01/2020 | |
| Moore, Gregory | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2020 | |
| Choi, Maryann | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/05/2025 | |
| Choi, Robert | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/05/2025 | |
| Cunningham, Ernest | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/05/2025 | |
| O'Donoghue-Stallard, Maire | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/05/2025 | |
| Stallard, Thomas | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/05/2025 | |
| Wood, Stephen | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/05/2025 | |
| Granite Stonebridge Health Center, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/01/2020 | |
| Castro Pou, Graciela | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2025 | |
| Regier, Verna | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/01/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on April 23, 2026: "Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on April 23, 2026: "Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on April 23, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on February 14, 2025: "Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.94 hours per resident per day, below the Texas average of 2.98.
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Park Manor Bee Cave Bee Cave, 6.5 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 37 citations
- Brush Country Nursing and Rehabilitation Austin, 6.6 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 46 citations
- Querencia at Barton Creek Austin, 6.7 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 8 citations
- West Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Austin, 7.2 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 30 citations
- Marbridge Villa Manchaca, 8.3 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 14 citations
- Brodie Ranch Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Austin, 8.5 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 29 citations
- Vista Ridge Senior Care Lakeway, 8.5 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 23 citations
- Barton Valley Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center Austin, 8.7 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 23 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Stonebridge Health Rehab's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Stonebridge Health Rehab 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Stonebridge Health Rehab get at its last inspection?
- 3 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 23, 2026. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has Stonebridge Health Rehab been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 2 fines totaling $39,258 in the last three years.
- Does Stonebridge Health Rehab accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Stonebridge Health Rehab?
- CMS lists 14 owners and managers, and links the home to Caraday Healthcare. Legal business name: STRATFORD HOSPITAL DISTRICT.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.