Diversicare of Luling
208 Maple St., Luling, TX 78648 · Caldwell County · (830) 875-5219
60 certified beds, about 36 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1992
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 675075 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 8, 2025, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 15 health citations since January 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.96 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.41 of those hours.
CMS links it to Diversicare Healthcare, an affiliated group of 44 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 15 health citations on file.
July 23, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- G Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #35) reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to ensure Resident #35 received 2 persons assistance during bed mobility using a draw sheet when an unnamed male staff member pulled on his hand and/or arm, resulting in a fracture on or about July 7-10, 2026. This failure could place residents at risk of injury or accidents.
July 10, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review; the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment were reported immediately but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made if the events that cause the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, to other officials (Including the State Agency) for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse .The facility failed to report an allegation of abuse immediately, but not later than 2 hours, to the state agency, after the allegation that occurred 6/25/26 in that Resident #2 blocked Resident #1's entrance to the facility, grabbed Resident #1's wrist which resulted in a bruise. The facility reported the incident to the state agency on 7/1/2026. [...]
May 8, 2025Standard inspection · 6 citations
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of one kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure Dietary [NAME] G, and Dietary Aide H used proper hand hygiene during food preparation. These failures could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk for foodborne illness.
- E Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly for one of one kitchen. The facility failed to keep overflowing garbage in a container without a lid on the kitchen utility cart away from clean dishes and the food prep area where dietary staff was preparing food for lunch. The failure could place residents at risk for exposure of germs and diseases carried by vermin and rodents.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 4 of 10 residents (Resident #27, Resident #22, Resident #32 and Resident #31) reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure MA C cleaned the blood pressure cuff before using it on Residents #27, #22 and #32 during the AM medication pass on 5/07/2025. 2. The facility failed to ensure the ADON, ICP identified a resident who met the criteria for EHP during wound care. The facility failed to ensure RN A and LVN B performed Enhanced Barrier Precaution steps while providing wound care to Resident #31. [...]
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment for 1 (Resident #14) of 6 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to update Resident #14's care plan to reflect current needs for oxygen as needed. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving the appropriate care and services to maintain the highest practical well-being.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, for 1 of 2 residents (Resident # 93) reviewed for the use of oxygen concentrator. The facility failed to ensure Resident #93 had continuous oxygen therapy. This failure could place residents that receive oxygen therapy at risk for inadequate care and respiratory distress.
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 1 medication room reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure an expired medication was removed from the medication storage room. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving an expired medication, not reaching the intended therapeutic dose and possible exacerbation of health conditions.
March 21, 2024Standard inspection · 6 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for foods safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food safety and sanitation. The facility failed to ensure employees were sanitizing their hands in between tasks. This failure placed residents at risk of foodborne illness.
- E Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a private space for residents' monthly council meetings and the confidential resident group meeting during survey for five of five residents reviewed for resident council. The facility did not provide a private space for resident council meetings. This failure could place residents, who attended resident council meetings, at risk of not being able to exercise their rights of being able to voice their grievances in private without uninvited staff being present. Findings Included: In an interview on 03/19/2024 at 10:12 am, the Activity Director when asked to set up Resident Council meeting revealed the Resident Council meetings were held in the dining room. She stated there was not another area for the residents to meet in private. She stated she would place signs on the privacy curtain. [...]
- E Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents unable to conduct activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for three of six residents (Resident # 26, Resident #32, and Resident #140). 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #26's facial hair was removed. 2. The facility failed to ensure Residents # 32's and #140's nails were cleaned and trimmed. These failures could place residents at risk for poor hygiene, dignity issues, and decreased quality of life.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Control Program designed to ensure hand hygiene procedures were followed by staff in the direct care of 3 of 3 residents (Resident #10, Resident #26, and Resident #30) reviewed for infection control in that: CNA G and Speech Therapist did not sanitize or wash hands after touching contaminated items before feeding resident or touching residents' food placing residents at risk of food contamination This failure could place all residents at risk of getting sick from staff not performing proper hand hygiene.
- D Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prepared puree food by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance as evidence by mixing the hamburger meat with water The extent is no actual harm with the possibility of more than minimal harm. The puree diet hamburger meat was mixed with water instead of thickener or a broth with nutrient value. This failure could affect residents on puree diet at risk of receiving inadequate diet that could affect their health.
- D Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the physician prescribed therapeutic diet to 1 of 8 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for therapeutic diets, in that: Resident #3 was given salt when her meal ticket stated no added salt as ordered. This failure could place residents at risk for further health issues.
November 14, 2023Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- E Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for two (Resident #1 and Resident #2) out of five residents reviewed for showers, in that: The facility failed to provide showers to Resident #1 and Resident #2 in compliance with their shower schedules. This failure placed residents at risk of a decline in hygiene, at risk of skin breakdown, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth.
January 25, 2023Standard inspection · 0 citations
Fire safety inspections
4 fire safety citations on file: 2 on May 8, 2025, 2 on January 25, 2023.
Every fire safety citation4 citations
- D Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
- D Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
- E Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- C Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 2.96 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.41 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.71 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.92 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.64 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | not reported | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 4 |
CMS expects 3.75 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.07 on weekdays and 2.71 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.12 in April to June 2025 to 2.96 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 2.96 | 0.41 | 3.07 | 2.71 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 36 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.05 | 0.45 | 3.19 | 2.68 | 0.0% | 1 of 92 | 38 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 2.97 | 0.56 | 3.11 | 2.62 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 39 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.12 | 0.75 | 3.35 | 2.53 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 39 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 22.1 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.6 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.4 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.2 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.3 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.0 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.7 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: DEWITT MEDICAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to Diversicare Healthcare, a group of 44 nursing homes averaging 2.5 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Williamson, Amber | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 04/01/2019 | |
| Frels, John | Corporate director | Individual | 11/04/2014 | |
| Papacek, Charles | Corporate director | Individual | 10/01/1997 | |
| Sheppard, Cynthia | Corporate director | Individual | 06/25/2013 | |
| Stakes, Harry | Corporate director | Individual | 02/01/2016 | |
| Wheeler, Richard | Corporate director | Individual | 07/27/2010 | |
| Papacek, Charles | Corporate officer | Individual | 10/01/1997 | |
| Pritchett, Gregory | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/29/1994 | |
| Sheppard, Cynthia | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/25/2013 | |
| Weishaar, Matthew | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/01/2003 | |
| Wheeler, Richard | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/27/2010 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on May 8, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on July 23, 2026: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on May 8, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on July 10, 2026: "Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.71 hours per resident per day, below the Texas average of 2.98.
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 4 administrators who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Avir at Magnolia Luling, 2 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 37 citations
- Avir at Luling Luling, 2.2 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 41 citations
- Parkview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Lockhart, 13.7 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 17 citations
- Chisolm Trail Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Lockhart, 14.9 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 26 citations
- The Heights of Gonzales Gonzales, 15 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 23 citations
- Avir at Gonzales Gonzales, 15.6 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 41 citations
- Avir at Walnut Springs Seguin, 20 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 14 citations
- River Bend Healthcare Seguin, 20.2 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 49 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Diversicare of Luling's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Diversicare of Luling 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Diversicare of Luling get at its last inspection?
- 6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on May 8, 2025. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has Diversicare of Luling been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Diversicare of Luling accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Diversicare of Luling?
- CMS lists 11 owners and managers, and links the home to Diversicare Healthcare. Legal business name: DEWITT MEDICAL DISTRICT.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.