107 North Medina Street, Lockhart, TX 78644 · Caldwell County · (512) 398-5213
96 certified beds, about 69 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1992
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 675053 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 7, 2025, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 26 health citations since May 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $37,541 in the last three years; the largest was $37,541, and the latest is dated August 31, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.72 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.50 of those hours.
CMS links it to Diversicare Healthcare, an affiliated group of 44 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 26 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for use of mechanical lifts. The facility failed to ensure mechanical lifts were always operated by two staff members during transfer of residents for Resident #3 on 04/17/2026 (by CNA A) and 06/14/2026 (by CNA B). This failure placed residents at risk of injury.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 2 of 8 residents (Residents #1 and 2) reviewed for access to their call system. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 and Resident #2's call button was in reach when they were alone in their rooms on 07/14/2026. This failure could residents at risk of not having their care needs met.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident and determined by considering the number, acuity, and diagnoses of the facility's resident population with accordance for 2 (03/30/2026 and 03/31/2026) of 31 days reviewed for sufficient staffing. The facility failed to provide sufficient CNAs on 03/30/2026 and 03/31/2026 leaving the secured unit without a CNA on the overnight shift of 10 p.m. to 6 a.m., leaving residents without proper supervision and care. This failure could place residents at risk of inadequate supervision and an unsafe environment which could lead to falls, serious harm and injury, exacerbations of disease processes, and abuse and neglect.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in experimental research, and to formulate advance directives for 3 of 10 residents (Resident #1, #4 and #65) reviewed for advance directives. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #1's out of hospital DNR was uploaded to the electronic health record and the care plan was updated. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #4's out of hospital DNR was signed by the physician and uploaded to the electronic health record on [DATE]. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #65's out of hospital DNR was signed by the physician and uploaded to the electronic health record on [DATE]. These failures could place residents at-risk of having their wishes dishonored, and of having CPR performed against their wishes.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen and 1 of 1 nourishment room reviewed for food and nutrition services. 1) The facility failed to properly seal food product bags in the walk-in freezer to prevent exposure to air. 2) The facility failed to label and date food items in the walk-in freezer, and the nourishment refrigerator. 3) The facility failed to maintain the proper temperature of the refrigerator in the nourishment room. This failure could have placed residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure it formulated, adopted, and enforced policies regarding smoking, smoking areas, and smoking safety for 3 of 5 residents (Residents #5, Resident #20, and Resident #78) reviewed for smoking. The facility failed to keep Residents #5, Resident #20, and Resident #78's cigarettes and lighters in a safe place per their policy. This failure placed all residents at risk for serious injury, harm, and/or death due to possible fire or smoking inside the building. Findings Included: Resident #5 Record review of Resident #5's Face sheet dated 08/06/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the residents' medical, nursing, and mental and psychological needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 2 of 10 residents (Residents #1 and #7).1. The facility failed to ensure the care plan was updated when Resident #7's code status was changed from full code to DNR on [DATE].2. The facility failed to ensure the care plan was updated when Resident #1's code status was changed from full code to DNR on [DATE]. This failure could place residents at-risk of having their wishes dishonored, and of having CPR performed against their wishes.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice to promote wound healing and to prevent new pressure ulcers from developing for one of two residents (Resident #4) reviewed for pressure injuries. The facility failed to ensure wound care was performed as ordered by the wound care doctor for Resident #4. Resident #4 missed 6 wound care treatments in July 2025 and August 2025. This failure could place residents at risk of improper wound management, the development of new pressure injuries, deterioration in existing pressure injuries, infection, and pain.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) (for Resident #8) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 1 medication storage room and 1 of 3 (hall 1 nurses' medication cart) medications cart reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure expired medications were removed from the medication storage room and the hall 1 nurses' medication cart on 08/07/2025. The facility failed to ensure that the narcotic count sheet accurately reflected the amount of Resident #8's phenobarbital (a controlled medication used in the treatment of seizures) stored in the hall 5 nurses' medication cart. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 of 3 (hall 1 nurse's medication cart) Nurse's medication carts reviewed. 1. The facility failed to ensure the nurses' medication cart for hall 1 was secured by a lock when it was left unattended by LVN G on 08/07/2025. These failures could place residents at risk of illness or injury due to missing medication or if unattended medication were consumed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to complete an accurate skin assessment on Resident #1 on 07/17/25 which did not include multiple red small scratches underneath both of her eyes. This failure could place residents at risk of skin integrity issues not being addressed, infection, and hospitalization.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours if the alleged violation involved abuse or neglect resulted in bodily injury, to other officials (including the State Agency) for 4 of 6 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3 and Resident #4) reviewed for abuse and neglect. 1. The facility failed to report to the State Agency an incident that involved Resident #1 on 05/25/2025 within the allotted timeframe. 2. The facility failed to report to the State Agency an incident that involved Resident #2 and Resident #3 on 04/06/2025. 3. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents had the right to be free from physical abuse and neglect for two (Resident #1 and Resident #3) of five residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was not physically abused by FM on 05/25/2025 when FM hit Resident #1 after Resident #1 became agitated and hit the FM. 2. The facility failed to protect Resident #3 from physical abuse by Resident #2. Resident #3 wandered into Resident #2's room and was hit by Resident #2 after Resident #2 stated I'm going to hit you. These failures placed residents at risk of abuse, neglect, trauma, and psychosocial harm.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had a physician's order for suctioning, and order for monitoring for secretions, or an order for when to replace the suction machine's cannister and tubing. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of aspiration, aspiration pneumonia, or hospitalization. Findings Included: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice to promote wound healing and to prevent new pressure ulcers from developing for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for pressure injuries. The facility failed to reinstate Resident #1's wound treatment orders after she was readmitted from the hospital on [DATE] until 07/16/24. Her wounds worsened and a new pressure injury was acquired during that timeframe. These failures resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 08/30/24 at 1:44 PM. While the IJ was removed on 08/31/24 at 12:55 PM, the facility remained at a level of actual no actual harm at a scope of pattern that was not immediate jeopardy due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure resident rights for personal privacy for 4 of 6 residents (Resident # 6, Resident # 14, Resident #20, and Resident # 43) residents reviewed for personal privacy. The facility failed to knock on Resident #6, #14, #20, and #43's room when going into the residents' rooms. The deficient practice could affect all residents right to privacy in the facility and cause the resident to feel like their privacy was being invaded or the facility was not their home.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection and prevention control program that included, at a minimum, a system for preventing and controlling infections for 4 of 6 residents (Residents #10, Resident #60, Resident#131, and Resident #39) reviewed for the usage of wrist blood pressure monitor. LVN C and LVN D did not clean and disinfect the wrist blood pressure monitor while using it on Resident #10, Resident # 39, Resident #60, and Resident #131. This failure could place the residents at the facility at risk of transmission of disease and infection.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 of 20 (Resident #15) residents reviewed for dining services in 1 of 1 dining room. The facility failed to promote Resident #15's dignity while dining when staff did not serve the resident their lunch tray at the same time as other residents at the same table for lunch on 07/09/2024. This failure could affect all residents who were eat in the dining room, by contributing to poor self-esteem, and unmet needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodations of resident's needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health and safety of the resident or other residents for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #47) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #47's call light was within reach on 07/11/24. This failure could place residents at risk of needs not being met.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (Resident #57) out of five residents reviewed for activities of daily living received care and services for nail care. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #57's fingernails and/or toenails were cleaned and trimmed. This failure placed residents at risk for not receiving adequate care and services to prevent infection, injury, and diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide specialized rehabilitative services such as but not limited to physical therapy, speech-language pathology, occupational therapy, respiratory therapy, and rehabilitative services for mental illness and intellectual disability of services of a lesser intensity, for two of four residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for specialized rehabilitative services, in that: The facility failed to: - Ensure Resident #1 received PT and OT as ordered. - Ensure Resident #2 was evaluated for PT, OT, or ST upon admission as ordered in her admission clinical records. This failure could place residents at risk of decline or decrease in their physical capabilities.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that each resident receives an accurate assessment, reflective of the resident's status at the time of the assessment for 4 of 18 (resident # 8, # 24, # 45, and #55,) residents reviewed for accuracy of assessment. -The facility failed to ensure that for Residents # 8, # 24, # 45, and #55, the MDS assessment correctly noted the resident's lack of natural teeth, tooth fragments, and/or dentures. -The facility failed to accurately assess Resident #24 for his mental illness (qualifying diagnoses) on his annual MDS assessment. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food preparation and storage in that: -One of one commercial can opener was not kept clean and in a sanitary condition. -The facility failed to ensure expired food items were removed from the walk-in cooler. -All food items in walk in cooler were properly sealed, labeled and dated with expiration date. These failures could affect residents who ate food from the facility kitchen and place them at risk of food borne illness and disease.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the (PASARR) program under Medicaid in subpart C to the maximum extent practicable to avoid duplicative testing and effort. in that -The facility failed to update the PASRR Level 1 forms for Resident #24 after a diagnoses of mental illness This failure could place residents requiring PASRR services at risk of not having their special needs assessed and met by the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene for 1of 5 residents (Resident #45) reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #45 was provided personal grooming (shower and shaving) by facility staff. This failure could place residents at risk for discomfort, and dignity issues.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications were not given unless the medication was necessary to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record for 1 of 18 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident #55) The facility failed to have an appropriate diagnosis or adequate indication for the use of Resident #55's Seroquel (antipsychotic medication used to treat certain mental/mood disorders such as schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder). This failure could place residents at risk of receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications with possible medication side effects, adverse consequences, decreased quality of life and dependence on unnecessary medications.
12 fire safety citations on file: 5 on August 7, 2025, 4 on July 11, 2024, 3 on May 25, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| August 31, 2024 | Fine | $37,541 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 2.72 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.50 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.28 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.80 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.42 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | not reported | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 3.87 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 2.90 on weekdays and 2.28 on weekends, 21% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.15 in April to June 2025 to 2.72 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 2.72 | 0.50 | 2.90 | 2.28 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 69 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 2.63 | 0.41 | 2.81 | 2.17 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 69 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 2.91 | 0.46 | 3.10 | 2.44 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 68 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.15 | 0.57 | 3.39 | 2.56 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 72 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $16.97 to $20.71 | 88,680 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.92 | $27.46 to $32.89 | 57,560 |
| Registered nurses | $46.14 | $38.06 to $50.53 | 271,380 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.2 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.8 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.8 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 19.1 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.2 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.3 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 18.4 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.0 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.1 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.8 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Chisolm Trail Nursing and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it worse than the national rate (27.7% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
27.7% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 31 eligible stays.
10.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 61 eligible stays.
10.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 39 eligible stays.
60.9% this home
Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 23 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 32 residents counted.
3.5% this home
Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 32 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 5 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: DIVERSICARE CHISOLM, LLC. CMS links this home to Diversicare Healthcare, a group of 44 nursing homes averaging 2.5 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diversicare Leasing LP | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 05/04/2006 |
| Advocat Finance, LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 12/18/1996 | |
| Dac Newcorp Inc | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 04/04/2022 | |
| Diversicare Healthcare Services LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/10/1994 | |
| Diversicare Management Services LP. | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 10/10/1996 | |
| Perkins, Tiffany | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 03/27/2017 | |
| Kohn, Brian | Corporate director | Individual | 11/19/2021 | |
| Ratner, Eran | Corporate director | Individual | 11/19/2021 | |
| Bodie, Rebecca | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/02/2020 | |
| Nee, Stephen | Corporate officer | Individual | 02/20/2023 | |
| Weishaar, Matthew | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/01/2003 | |
| Dlc Gp LLC | General partnership interest | Organization | 04/04/2022 | |
| Dms Gp LLC | General partnership interest | Organization | 04/04/2022 | |
| Chudleigh, James | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/21/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.