McCamey Convalescent Center
2500 Hwy 305 S, McCamey, TX 79752 · Upton County · (432) 652-8628
30 certified beds, about 27 residents a day · Government - Hospital district · Medicaid since 1975
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 45E761 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on December 5, 2025, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 14 health citations since November 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.85 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.44 of those hours.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 14 health citations on file.
December 5, 2025Standard inspection · 7 citations
- F Keep all essential equipment working safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain essential mechanical and electrical equipment in safe operating condition for 1 kitchen of 1 reviewed for essential equipment. The facility failed to ensure the dishwasher worked. This failure could place residents at risk of malfunctioning equipment being used for their service/care.
- E Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident medical and nursing needs to be furnished to attain or maintain the residents highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 5 of 13 residents (Resident #3, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #11, and Resident #15) reviewed for accurate care plans. Resident #3, #6, #7, and #15's care plan did not address their current code status. Resident #6 and #11's Care Plan did not address ADL Status Resident #11's Care Plan did not address wander guard use. Resident #11's Care Plan did not address her choice of Authorized Electronic Monitoring. [...]
- E Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 out of 1 med rooms reviewed for medication storage and 1 of 1 medication carts reviewed. The facility failed to ensure the medication cart and refrigerator in the medication room did not contain expired medications and unlabeled medications. These failures could place residents at risk of adverse medication reactions.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #6 and Resident #9) reviewed for infection control in that:CNA A failed to wash or sanitize her hands after removing her soiled gloves and then putting on a new pair of gloves when she provided peri-care for Resident #9. CNA C and CNA D failed to wash or sanitize their hands after removing their soiled gloves and then putting on a new pair of gloves when they provided peri-care for Resident #9. The facility ADON failed to use PPE while performing wound care on Resident #6 These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection.
- D Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from any physical or chemical restraints imposed for the purpose of discipline or convenience for 1 (Resident #27) of 2 residents reviewed for chemical restraints. The facility failed to ensure Resident #27's Seroquel 200mg at bedtime (atypical antipsychotic medication used to treat several mental health conditions by balancing the levels of dopamine and serotonin in the brain) was only used to treat as indicated for use. The facility failed to ensure that documentation in Resident #27's was done in the clinical record. The facility failed to ensure Resident #27's had documentation on a rationale for the continued provision of the medication. [...]
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary treatment and services based on the comprehensive assessment and consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing and prevent worsening of pressure injuries for 1 (Resident #3) of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 6 received care and services to meet professional standards of practice to heal his pressure ulcer. Resident #6 did not receive wound care to prevent the spread of infection.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 (Resident #3) of 4 residents observed for oxygen management. 1esident #15's oxygen nasal cannula and tube were not covered in a bag when it was not being used. The facility failed to ensure there was oxygen in use sign posted outside Resident #15's room. This failure could affect residents who required respiratory care and place them at risk of not having their needs met.
December 30, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 4 citations
- E Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records for 3 of 13 residents (#4, #5, #6) reviewed for privacy. 1. CMA F failed to protect Resident #4's record by not locking the screen of her laptop, while CMA F was in a resident's room administering medication. 2. CMA G failed to protect Resident #5's record by not locking the screen of her laptop when going to the restroom. 3. CMA G failed to protect Resident #6's record by not locking the screen of her laptop while in a room checking vital signs. These deficient practices could place residents at-risk of loss of dignity due to lack of privacy.
- E Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 4 of 5 (Residents # 116, 122, 126, and 127) reviewed for indwelling catheters. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 116, 122, 126, and 127's indwelling catheter were secured to prevent pulling or tugging. The failure could place residents at risk for discomfort, urethral trauma, and urinary tract infections.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 ( #116 and #122) of 10 residents reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure CNAs A, C, D and E use PPE during urinary catheter care performed for Residents #116 and #122 as the residents were on EBP precautions. This failure could place residents at risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for two (Residents #12 and #127) of three residents reviewed for Respiratory Care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #12's and #127's nasal cannula was properly stored when not in use. This failure could place residents at risk for respiratory infection and not having their respiratory needs met.
November 9, 2023Standard inspection · 3 citations
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure that expired foods were discarded. This failure could affect residents who received meals prepared meals from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness and cross-contamination.
- D Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a RN for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for Licensed Nursing coverage for 1 of 3 months reviewed for RN coverage. (April 2023), (May 2023), and (June 2023). The facility did not have the required 8 consecutive hours of RN coverage during the month of April 2023 (April 29th). This failure could place residents at risk for not having their nursing care and medical needs met.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (Resident #9) of 1 resident reviewed for infection control. LVN A failed to sanitize the treatment cart prior to putting down a barrier to prevent cross contamination. LVN A failed to sanitize scissors prior to wound care and after they became contaminated after wound care for Resident #9 prior to placing them back into the treatment cart. This failure could place resident's risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection. Findings Included: [...]
Fire safety inspections
7 fire safety citations on file: 2 on December 5, 2025, 1 on December 30, 2024, 4 on November 9, 2023.
Every fire safety citation7 citations
- E Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
- E Have a fire alarm with audible and visual signals that transmits the alarm automatically to notify emergency forces in event of fire.
- F To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
- F Implement emergency and standby power systems.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- E Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.85 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.44 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.47 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.54 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.87 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | not reported | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS expects 3.29 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.01 on weekdays and 3.47 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.75 in April to June 2025 to 3.85 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.85 | 0.44 | 4.01 | 3.47 | 0.0% | 6 of 90 | 27 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.75 | 0.59 | 4.86 | 4.48 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 28 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 23.9 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.7 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.8 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.7 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 28.8 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.2 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 18.7 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.0 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 7.3 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: Legal Business Name Not Available.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership data not available |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on December 5, 2025: "Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on December 5, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- Can we see a resident room, a shower room and the dining room on this visit?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on December 5, 2025: "Keep all essential equipment working safely."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on December 5, 2025: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Focused Care at Crane Crane, 21.2 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 33 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is McCamey Convalescent Center's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates McCamey Convalescent Center 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 1 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did McCamey Convalescent Center get at its last inspection?
- 7 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on December 5, 2025. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has McCamey Convalescent Center been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does McCamey Convalescent Center accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns McCamey Convalescent Center?
- CMS lists 1 owner or manager. Legal business name: Legal Business Name Not Available.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.