Newton Presbyterian Manor
1200 E 7th Street, Newton, KS 67114 · Harvey County · (316) 283-5400
60 certified beds, about 54 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1994
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 175302 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on February 25, 2026, inspectors cited 11 health deficiencies (the Kansas average is 9.5, the national average 9.2).
Of 21 health citations since August 2022, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $17,225 in the last three years; the largest was $17,225, and the latest is dated February 25, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.84 hours per resident per day, against 4.07 across Kansas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.64 of those hours.
65.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Kansas average 48.1%).
CMS links it to Presbyterian Manors of Mid-America, an affiliated group of 13 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 21 health citations on file.
February 25, 2026Standard inspection · 11 citations
- G Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 53 residents, with 14 residents sampled, including two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify and implement pressure ulcer preventative measures, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent the development of a facility acquired stage three pressure ulcer to Resident (R)53's left heel after R53 returned from the hospital, due to surgical repair of her left hip fracture.
- G Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 53 residents and the sample included 14 residents. Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an environment free of accident hazards for Resident R 53 who obtained ahip fracture during a fall and R23 when a Certified Nurse Aide transferred her without a gait belt causing a fall.
- F Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 53 residents with 14 residents included in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to effectively utilize Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms which employ targeted gown and glove use during high care) and failed to follow established infection control practices related to hand hygiene, peri-care, medication administration, and cleaning of resident nebulizers. The facility further failed to cover resident clean clothing while transporting it through the hallway.
- F Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 53 residents with 14 included in the sample. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure staff adhered to the principles of antibiotic stewardship through the lack of monitoring for the appropriate use of prescribed antibiotics to prevent antibiotic resistance and the spread of multidrug resistant organisms within the facility.
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 53 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Resident (R)1 who had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, which indicated moderately impaired cognition, care in a dignified manner during administration of medication.
- D Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 53 residents, with 14 residents sampled. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to identify a significant change and complete an assessment for one resident reviewed for significant change assessments. Resident (R) 53 had a decline with ambulation, toileting hygiene, transfers, and bed mobility.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 53 residents; there were 14 residents in the sample. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to update Resident (R) 36's Care Plan with interventions for R36's right hand positioning device to prevent contractions (abnormal fixations of a joint or muscle) indwelling urinary catheter (a device inserted into the bladder that drains urine into a collection bag).
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 53 residents, with 14 residents sampled, including two residents reviewed for quality of care. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a mechanical lift transfer for Resident (R) 53 which resulted in an injury.
- D Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 53 residents. The sample included 14 residents, with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1's hypoglycemic (medication used to lower blood glucose levels) medication levels were monitored to determine the effectiveness of her ordered hypoglycemic medication.
- C Post nurse staffing information every day.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 53 residents. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the posted daily nurse staffing sheets were posted daily as required.
- C Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 53 residents. Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain and or dispose of kitchen garbage refuse properly.
December 18, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- G Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 49 residents. The sample included three residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent an injury to dependent Resident (R) 1 when staff failed to transfer the resident according to the resident's plan of care with two staff present. This failure resulted in R1 obtaining a 2-to-3-centimeter (cm) laceration (a cut in body skin) on her left lower extremity, which required transport to the Emergency Department and 10 sutures to treat the wound.
April 15, 2024Standard inspection · 3 citations
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 55 residents. The sample included 14 residents, with six reviewed for falls. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 40 remained free from avoidable falls when staff failed to provide R40 with the necessary equipment to ensure safety, including a call light and mobility devices, on two separate occasions which resulted in falls on both occasions. This placed the resident at risk for avoidable injury.
- D Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 55 residents. The sample included 14 residents, with one reviewed for hydration. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to establish the physician-ordered fluid restriction for one resident, Resident (R) 40. This placed the resident at risk for dehydration (a harmful reduction in the amount of water in the body) or fluid overload (too much fluid in the body).
- D Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 55 residents. The sample included 14 residents, with seven reviewed for behaviors. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete a trauma-informed care assessment and failed to develop a comprehensive trauma-informed care plan for Resident (R) 35, who had a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD-psychiatric disorder characterized by an acute emotional response to a traumatic event or situation involving severe environmental stress, such as natural disaster, military combat, serious automobile accident, airplane crash or physical torture). This placed R35 at risk for unmet behavioral and mental health needs and retraumatization.
August 25, 2022Standard inspection · 6 citations
- E Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 55 residents with 22 selected for review which included 12 residents reviewed for medications. Based on observation, interview and record review, staff failed to follow physician orders for ten of the 12 residents(R)4, R10, R11, R18, R20, R29, R35, R31, R38, and R 50 reviewed for medications.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 55 residents with 22 selected for review. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the plan of care for one resident (R)2's with a pressure ulcer.
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 55 residents with 22 selected for review which included two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided care and interventions to prevent pressure ulcers for one of two sampled at risk residents (R)2 in which staff identified a blood blister on her foot and subsequently developed an unstageable pressure ulcer (coverage of a wound by slough and/or eschar) on the same area of the foot.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 55 residents with 22 selected for review including six residents reviewed for accident hazards. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow and implement care plan interventions following a fall for Resident (R)7 and failed to ensure the oxygen tubing for R14 was off the floor to reduce a tripping hazard.
- D Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 55 residents with 22 selected for review including 12 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to act upon the pharmacy recommendation for one of the residents, Resident (R)20.
- D Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 55 residents with 22 residents selected for review including 12 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide adequate monitoring for Lasix, Potassium, and Metoprolol medications for one of the sampled residents, Resident (R)20, to ensure no unnecessary medication usage.
Fire safety inspections
20 fire safety citations on file: 3 on April 15, 2024, 5 on August 25, 2022, 12 on June 30, 2021.
Every fire safety citation20 citations
- F Follow proper procedures when the automatic sprinkler systems was out of service for more than 10 hours.
- E Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
- E Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
- F Address patient/client population and determine types of services needed.
- F Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- E Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- E Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
- F Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- F Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
- F Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
- E Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
- E Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- E Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- D Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- D Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- D Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| February 25, 2026 | Fine | $17,225 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Kansas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.84 | 4.07 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.64 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.48 | 3.60 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.71 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.49 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 65.4% | 48.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 83.3% | 42.0% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.05 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.98 on weekdays and 3.48 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 27.6% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.44 in April to June 2025 to 3.84 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.84 | 0.64 | 3.98 | 3.48 | 27.6% | 0 of 90 | 54 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.55 | 0.57 | 4.71 | 4.12 | 22.4% | 0 of 92 | 54 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.40 | 0.42 | 4.53 | 4.08 | 21.9% | 0 of 92 | 53 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.44 | 0.63 | 4.58 | 4.10 | 14.4% | 0 of 91 | 52 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Kansas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.01 | 0.67 | 4.19 | 3.56 | 4.8% | 0.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
Staff pay at this home
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
Official wage estimates for Kansas
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kansas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.27 | $17.41 to $21.24 | 24,610 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.69 | $27.05 to $33.40 | 7,530 |
| Registered nurses | $38.14 | $35.24 to $45.53 | 33,800 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Kansas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 21.4 | 17.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.0 | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 2.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.1 | 4.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.5 | 1.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.6 | 16.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.7 | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.2 | 18.1 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 13.2 | 22.4 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 8.1 | 11.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: PRESBYTERIAN MANORS INC. CMS links this home to Presbyterian Manors of Mid-America, a group of 13 nursing homes averaging 3.8 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Presbyterian Manors Inc | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 03/30/1989 |
| Bonney, Robert | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 07/01/2019 | |
| Brennecke, Gary | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 07/01/2015 | |
| Cook, Patricia | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Duling, Nancy | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 07/01/2020 | |
| Farmer, Carla | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/01/2025 | |
| Goodwin, John | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 07/01/2018 | |
| Harris, Daniel | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 07/01/2019 | |
| Schendel, Rob | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/15/2023 | |
| Hind, Sherry | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/1989 | |
| Miller, Joan | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/01/1997 | |
| Owens, Melanie | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/10/2017 | |
| Shogren, Bruce | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/05/1996 | |
| Taylor, William | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2015 | |
| Presbyterian Manors of Mid-America Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/30/1989 | |
| Liepins, Richard | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/31/2024 | |
| Owens, Melanie | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/10/2017 | |
| Shogren, Bruce | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2011 | |
| Taylor, William | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2015 | |
| Trask, Emily | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/18/2017 | |
| Liepins, Richard | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/01/2025 | |
| Trask, Emily | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/01/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 9 problems in this area, most recently on February 25, 2026: "Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on February 25, 2026: "Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on February 25, 2026: "Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition"
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on February 25, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.48 hours per resident per day, below the Kansas average of 3.60.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Kansas Christian Home Newton, 0.7 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 27 citations
- Paramount Community Living and Rehab Inc Newton, 2 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 33 citations
- Bethel Health Care Center North Newton, 2.3 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 5 citations
- Schowalter Villa Hesston, 8 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 6 citations
- Halstead Health and Rehabilitation Center Halstead, 10.3 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 31 citations
- Wheat State Manor Whitewater, 11.6 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 37 citations
- Diversicare of Sedgwick Sedgwick, 12.5 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 32 citations
- Bethesda Home Goessel, 13.5 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 5 citations
Common questions
- What is Newton Presbyterian Manor's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Newton Presbyterian Manor 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Newton Presbyterian Manor get at its last inspection?
- 11 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on February 25, 2026. The Kansas average is 9.5.
- Has Newton Presbyterian Manor been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $17,225 in the last three years.
- Does Newton Presbyterian Manor accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Newton Presbyterian Manor?
- CMS lists 22 owners and managers, and links the home to Presbyterian Manors of Mid-America. Legal business name: PRESBYTERIAN MANORS INC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.