Park View Home
220 Lockwood St., Woodville, WI 54028 · St. Croix County · (715) 698-2451
50 certified beds, about 44 residents a day · Non profit - Other · Medicare and Medicaid since 1990
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 525458 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 28, 2026, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the Wisconsin average is 9.5, the national average 9.2).
None of its 7 health citations since June 2024 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.38 hours per resident per day, against 4.21 across Wisconsin and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.72 of those hours.
40.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Wisconsin average 46.9%).
CMS links it to Health Dimensions Group, an affiliated group of 10 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 7 health citations on file.
July 28, 2026Standard inspection · 2 citations
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 2 of 2 residents (R) reviewed for pressure injuries (PI) (R4 and R7) received care consistently with professional standards of practice to prevent further deterioration and promote healing of an existing PI.The facility did not complete weekly comprehensive skin assessments with staging of the PI for R4 and R7. This is evidenced by Facility's policy titled Skin Management with review date of 06/22/26 documented, Assessment/Treatment/Documentation: ~The nurse will complete and document a skin assessment weekly. ~Skin injury, or signs of impaired skin integrity, will be reported promptly to the Director of Nursing, or designee, and documented accordingly.~A wound assessment will be completed and documented by the nurse (i.e. [...]
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate medical record for 2 of 3 residents (R) reviewed. (R4 and R2)The facility failed to completely describe an accurate description of a fall and document immediate interventions to protect R4 and R2. This is evidenced by: Facility's policy titled Fall Assessment for Injury with review date of 07/09/26 documented: Document the incident and outcome in the resident's EMAR including all relevant post-fall clinical findings, such as vital signs, pain, swelling, bruising, body positioning, environmental surroundings, possible cause and changes in function or cognitive status. Update a fall risk assessment and the residents care plan with intervention[s] to prevent reoccurrence. Example 1 R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. [...]
September 24, 2025Standard inspection · 2 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, policy review and interview, the facility did not ensure food was stored, prepared, and served with proper food handling practices to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illness. This has the potential to affect all 44 residents (R) residing in the facility. 1. Staff did not follow safe food cooling protocols. Staff did not monitor and document cooling temperatures. Hot food was mixed with cool food, increasing risk for harmful bacteria growth in the leftovers.2. The dry storage area and kitchen cooler contained multiple food items not labeled with open or use-by dates. Bulk food removed from original packaging and not labeled with date or use by dates. 3. An employee walked through the kitchen with no hairnet4. [...]
- D Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure its medication error rate was less than 5%. The facility medication error rate was 5.88%.Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C administered insulin in deltoid muscle instead of subcutaneous tissue per physician order. According to Diabetes Strong article, dated 07/02/24, indicated, Why it matters where you inject your insulin. Insulin is designed to be injected (or delivered via an insulin pump) into body fat - also known as subcutaneous tissue. The rate at which your insulin is absorbed is largely based on the assumption that it's being injected into fat, rather than muscle. When a pharmaceutical company tells you that the onset of your Novolog or Humalog insulin is 15 minutes, for example, that is based on when it is injected into body fat. [...]
January 23, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a thorough investigation was conducted to prevent further abuse for 1 of 3 residents (R) R2 reviewed for abuse. -The facility did not thoroughly investigate to rule out abuse to other residents. No interviews were conducted with other residents to ensure there had been no further incidents of abuse.
June 20, 2024Standard inspection · 2 citations
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Staff touched ready-to-eat foods with bare hands and did not perform hand hygiene. This affected 5 of 21 residents (R) served meals from the 100-hall dining room. (R94, R32, R21, R35, and R31). Staff touched ready-to-eat biscuits with contaminated bare hands and served to residents on the 100-hall. Staff performed inadequate hand hygiene during breakfast service and clean up in the dining room on the 100-hall.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Staff did not perform hand hygiene between glove changes during wound care and during bathing observations for 2 of 2 observations. (R25 and R11)
Fire safety inspections
5 fire safety citations on file: 1 on July 28, 2026, 1 on September 24, 2025, 3 on June 20, 2024.
Every fire safety citation5 citations
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
- C Install a fire alarm system that can be heard throughout the facility.
- C Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- C Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Wisconsin | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.38 | 4.21 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.72 | 0.99 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.74 | 3.77 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 3.12 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.54 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 40.0% | 46.9% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 11.1% | 39.7% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.04 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.64 on weekdays and 3.74 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.69 in April to June 2025 to 4.38 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.38 | 0.72 | 4.64 | 3.74 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 44 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.21 | 0.77 | 4.47 | 3.54 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 45 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.72 | 0.79 | 5.17 | 3.55 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 43 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.69 | 0.81 | 5.08 | 3.72 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 41 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Wisconsin, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.19 | 0.95 | 4.36 | 3.74 | 8.8% | 0.3% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Wisconsin | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 22.6 | 16.1 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.7 | 2.1 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.0 | 18.4 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.6 | 5.0 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 22.6 | 15.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 17.5 | 23.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 15.9 | 15.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.1 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: PARK VIEW HOME, INC.. CMS links this home to Health Dimensions Group, a group of 10 nursing homes averaging 3.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stene, Sue | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Albrightson, Lance | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Jacobsen, Greg | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Knegendorf, Larry | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Walthall, Melissa | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/1997 | |
| Field, Thomas | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/01/2017 | |
| Field, Thomas | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/01/2018 | |
| Walthall, Melissa | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/05/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on September 24, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on July 28, 2026: "Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on July 28, 2026: "Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on September 24, 2025: "Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.74 hours per resident per day, below the Wisconsin average of 3.77.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Baldwin Care Center Baldwin, 3.9 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 19 citations
- Hammond Health Services Hammond, 7.3 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 3 citations
- Spring Valley Health and Rehab Center Spring Valley, 8.3 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 37 citations
- Glenhaven Glenwood City, 9.5 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 33 citations
- Kinnic Health and Rehabilitation Center River Falls, 16.6 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 24 citations
- Deerfield Care Center, LLC New Richmond, 16.9 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 13 citations
- Ellsworth Health Services Ellsworth, 17.8 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 3 citations
- St. Croix Health Center New Richmond, 17.9 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 15 citations
Wisconsin contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Wisconsin. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Wisconsin Department of Health Services, Division of Quality Assurance, Nursing Homes, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Wisconsin Board on Aging and Long Term Care, Ombudsman Program, 1-800-815-0015. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Wisconsin DHS Provider Search (Survey History), where Wisconsin publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Park View Home's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Park View Home 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Park View Home get at its last inspection?
- 2 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on July 28, 2026. The Wisconsin average is 9.5.
- Has Park View Home been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Park View Home accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Park View Home?
- CMS lists 8 owners and managers, and links the home to Health Dimensions Group. Legal business name: PARK VIEW HOME, INC..
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.