Find a nursing home

Home / Texas / Olton

Runningwater Draw Care Center, Inc.

800 W 13th St., Olton, TX 79064 · Lamb County · (806) 285-2677

75 certified beds, about 66 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1993

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
1 of 5
CMS note: The accuracy of the staffing data for this measure could not be validated by CMS.
Quality measures
5 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 675117 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on May 7, 2026, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).

Of 22 health citations since September 2023, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (3 immediate jeopardy).

CMS lists 1 fine totaling $15,672 in the last three years; the largest was $15,672, and the latest is dated May 31, 2024.

49.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 22 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
3J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
13D
3E
3F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
May 7, 2026Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 8, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with the professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen (Kitchen #1) reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure refrigerated, freezer and pantry food items were properly stored, labeled, and dated. The facility failed to ensure refrigerator and freezer temperatures were monitored and logged per their policy. These failures place residents at risk for food borne illness.
  2. D
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    F578 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 12, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents had the right to formulate an advanced directive for 2 (Resident #35 and #43) of 17 residents reviewed for advanced directives. Resident #35 had a DNR in her record that had no date of when the notary witnessed Resident #35 sign the document. Resident #43 had a DNR in her record that had no information for the physician. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving healthcare as per their or their legal representatives' wishes.
  3. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 31, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that an assessment accurately reflected a resident's status for 1 (Resident #2) of 17 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility failed to accurately assess Resident #2 for the use of a restraint. This failure could place residents at risk not receiving appropriate care and services.
  4. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 31, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment and describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 2 (Resident #30 and #42) of 17 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. -The facility failed to address the use of halo bedrails in Resident #30 and Resident #42's care plans. This failure could result in residents not being able to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.
  5. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 25, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Resident #16) of 4 residents observed for infection control. -Resident #16 had her catheter bag on the floor for 3 hours. This failure could place residents at risk for the spread of infections, tissue breakdown, and feelings of isolation related to poor hygiene.
February 27, 2025Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 3, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure foods were properly stored, labeled, and dated. These failures placed all residents who ate food served by the kitchen at risk of cross contamination and food-borne illness. Findings Include: Observation of the walk-in refrigerator on 02/25/2025 at 9:50 AM revealed the following: 1. 1 ziplock bag with a square yellow substance no label, no date. 2. 1 open bag of turkey breast lunch meat in a ziplock bag, no open date, no received date. 3. 1 bag of turkey breast lunch meat no received date. 4. 1 ziplock bag of small round meat no label, no date. Observation of the walk-in pantry on 02/25/2025 at 10:00 AM revealed the following: [...]
  2. E
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 3, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored under proper temperature, and the expiration date when applicable on 2 of 2 medication carts and 1 of 1 medication rooms reviewed for medication storage. - Medication cart for Side B revealed a Breo Ellipta inhaler for Resident #8 with no open date on inhaler. - Medication cart for Side A revealed a Novolin R insulin bottle for Resident #10 with no open date on bottle. - Refrigerator in medication room was below 36 degrees for 2 days. Refrigerator contained insulins for the following residents: [...]
  3. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 3, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 1 (Resident #45) of 15 residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to prevent LVN B from referring to Resident #45's table in the dining room as the feeder table. The facility failed to prevent labelling 10-12 residents at the center table in the dining room as Feed/Assist on a large whiteboard diagram on the wall of the dining room. These failures could negatively impact the self-esteem, self-worth, and identity of residents who need assistance with eating. Findings Included: [...]
  4. D
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    F636 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 3, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review the facility failed to conduct a comprehensive assessment of a resident within 14 calendar days after admission for 1 (Resident #214) of 15 residents reviewed for comprehensive assessments. The facility failed to complete an admission MDS on Resident #214 within 14 calendar days after admission date of 02/11/25. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their needs met due to lack of information. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #214's admission record dated 02/25/25 revealed an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition resulting from not enough oxygen in the tissues of the body) and melena (dark, tarry stool). [...]
  5. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 (Resident #11 and Resident #36) of 15 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility failed to remove diagnoses of Wound Infection (other than foot) from Resident #11 and Resident #36's MDS' when said diagnoses were inactive. This failure could lead to residents receiving unnecessary care or not receiving necessary care. Findings Included: 1. [...]
  6. D
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    F645 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 19, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to perform a preadmission screening for individuals with a mental disorder and individuals with intellectual disability for 1 (Resident #214) of 15 residents reviewed for preadmission screening. The facility failed to perform a preadmission screening for Resident #214 prior to or at admission of 02/11/25. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving needed services. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #214's admission record dated 02/25/25 revealed an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition resulting from not enough oxygen in the tissues of the body) and melena (dark, tarry stool). Record review of Resident #214's EHR revealed no completed MDS assessment. [...]
May 31, 2024Complaint inspection · 3 citations
  1. J
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident was free from neglect for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for neglect. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was free from neglect. On 5/15/24 after lunch, CNA B performed a 1-person transfer of Resident #1, who was a 2-person transfer. The transfer resulted in CNA B and Resident #1 falling to the floor, causing the fracture of Resident #1's right femur. CNA B did not report the fall. CNA C, who was in the room with CNA B at the time of the incident, did not report the fall until approximately 7 hours after the inappropriate transfer and fall occurred. This failure could place residents at risk of major injury due to neglect in their care. The non-compliance was identified as Past Non-Compliance (PNC). The IJ began on 5/15/24 at approximately 1:30PM and ended on 5/16/24 at 9:53AM. [...]
  2. J
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that all allegations involving neglect are reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the event, if the resident sustains serious bodily injury, to the Administrator of the facility and the State Survey Agency for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for neglect. The facility failed to report an allegation of neglect for Resident #1 within 2 hours of the event. CNA C did not report a fall with potential injury until approximately 7 hours after the inappropriate transfer and fall occured. CNA B did not report the fall. This failure could place residents at risk of not having incidents of neglect reported and investigated in a timely manner and delay in proper treatment of injury. The non-compliance was identified as Past Non-Compliance (PNC). [...]
  3. J
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remains free of accidents and hazards, as possible, and each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for adequate supervision to prevent accidents and hazards. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #1 was assisted x 2 staff for all transfers and movement between surfaces. CNA B transferred Resident #1 independently which resulted in CNA B and Resident #1 falling to the floor. As a result of the fall, Resident #1 suffered a fractured right leg. This failure could place residents at risk for falls with serious injuries. The non-compliance was identified as Past Non-Compliance (PNC). The IJ began on 5/15/24 at approximately 1:30PM and ended on 5/16/24 at 9:53AM. [...]
January 18, 2024Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 22, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure stored food was properly labeled and dated. The facility failed to store food at least 6 inches above the floor. This failure could place Residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings Included: Observation of shelved/refrigerated foods on 1/16/2024 beginning at 10:03 am revealed the following: Observation of pantry on 1/16/24 at 10:06 am revealed 1 container of Jif peanut butter individual packs with no label or date. Observation of pantry on 1/16/ 24 at 10:11 am revealed 1 container of individual jelly packets with no label or date. [...]
  2. D
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    F637 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 22, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to conduct a comprehensive, accurate, standardized, reproducible assessment of each resident's functional capacity within 14 days after the facility determines, or should have determined, that there has been a significant change in the resident's physical or mental condition for one (Resident #54) of 18 residents reviewed for significant change. The facility failed to update Resident #54's MDS assessment within 14 days of Resident #54 being admitted to hospice. This failure could result in residents not receiving the care and coordination of services necessary to meet their needs and/or desires. Findings Included: [...]
  3. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 22, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for one (Resident #26) of 18 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. Resident #26 had an order for continuous oxygen dated 08/29/23 and her MDS with a completion date of 11/10/23 did not indicate she received oxygen while a resident. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their needs identified and therefore not receiving necessary care. Findings Included: [...]
  4. D
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    F645 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 22, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform a preadmission screening for individuals with a mental disorder and individuals with intellectual disability prior to admission for 1 of 18 residents (Resident #41) reviewed for PASRR requirements. The facility failed to ensure Resident #41 had an initial PASRR Level 1 before admission on [DATE]. This failure could place residents with an MI (Mental Illness), ID (Intellectual Disability) or DD (Developmental Disability) at risk for not receiving PASRR related services, if qualified.
  5. D
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 22, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for each resident that are complete, accurately documented, readily accessible, and systemically organized for one (Resident #26) of 18 residents reviewed for medical records. The facility failed to ensure Resident #26 had the most current physician's order in her chart for oxygen. The order in Resident #26's chart was for continuous oxygen but the most recent verbal order from the physician was to begin weaning Resident #26 off continuous oxygen. This failure could place residents at risk of having records that do not reflect their current status or needs. Findings Included: [...]
December 1, 2023Complaint inspection, Infection control · 1 citation
  1. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · infection control inspection · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 4, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 10 of 10 residents (#1,#2,#3, #4,#5,#6,#7,#8,#9,#10) residents reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure staff (HK A, Unit Clerk, HK B, CNA C, CNA D, CNA E, HK F) utilized Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) appropriately to prevent cross contamination between residents' positive with COVID-19 and residents who were not positive for the virus. 2. The facility failed to ensure staff (CNA D and CNA E) practiced hand hygiene by using hand sanitizer or washing their hands after exiting positive COVID-19 resident rooms or touching COVID negative resident food trays. [...]
September 12, 2023Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 20, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #2 and Resident #3) who were positive for COVID 19. Facility staff failed to follow the facility's COVID-19 policy regarding patient isolation protocols by failing to close doors to COVID positive patient rooms or precautions placed on door prior to entering for Resident #2 and Resident #3. This failure can place residents at risk of COVID- 19 or any airborne transmitted diseases in the facility. Findings Included: [...]
  2. D
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 20, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are accurately documented for 1 of 7 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for medical records. The facility failed to accurately document elopement information in Resident #1's records. This could place all residents at risk for elopement for inaccurate assessments in medical records.

Fire safety inspections

4 fire safety citations on file: 1 on May 7, 2026, 3 on February 27, 2025.

Every fire safety citation4 citations
  1. D
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · May 7, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · February 27, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. E
    Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
    K 351 · February 27, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. D
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · February 27, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
May 31, 2024Fine $15,672

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeTexasUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)not reported3.393.86
Registered nursesnot reported0.430.69
All nursing staff on weekendsnot reported2.983.42
Nurse aidesnot reported
Licensed practical nursesnot reported
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)49.2%55.3%45.8%
Registered nurse turnovernot reported54.6%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS note on this home's staffing data: The accuracy of the staffing data for this measure could not be validated by CMS.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.69 on weekdays and 2.94 on weekends, 20% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.5% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.49 in April to June 2025 to 3.47 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.470.123.692.94 0.5%0 of 9066
Oct to Dec 20253.900.364.113.39 6.3%0 of 9261
Jul to Sep 20253.700.273.893.22 4.5%0 of 9263
Apr to Jun 20253.490.253.683.03 4.7%0 of 9164
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Texas, Jan to Mar 20263.330.403.502.932.2%0.7% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeTexasUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
15.815.813.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.70.30.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.10.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.53.33.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
18.514.014.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.83.84.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.09.615.4
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.02.21.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.52.11.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: RUNNINGWATER DRAW CARE CENTER, INC..

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Pirtle, FloydContracted managing employeeIndividual08/01/2005
Adams, KelliW-2 managing employeeIndividual11/19/1996
Riney, LaureyW-2 managing employeeIndividual10/23/2021
Debnam, AlanCorporate directorIndividual04/01/2017
Hoskins, MelanieCorporate directorIndividual08/01/2020
Hukill, DeweyCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2021
Johnson, DoniceCorporate directorIndividual05/01/2023
Parish, MarkCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2021
Perry, MichaelCorporate directorIndividual08/01/2020
Ramage, FranCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2021
Roberson, PamCorporate directorIndividual04/01/2019
Villanueva, HortensiaCorporate directorIndividual06/01/2022
Byers, DannyCorporate officerIndividual10/01/2021
Runningwater Draw Care Center, Inc.Operational/managerial controlOrganization01/01/1993
Runningwater Draw Care Center, Inc.Adp of the SNFOrganization01/21/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 10 problems in this area, most recently on May 7, 2026: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."
  2. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on May 7, 2026: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  3. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on May 7, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  4. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on May 7, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive."

Other nursing homes nearby

Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Runningwater Draw Care Center, Inc.'s Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Runningwater Draw Care Center, Inc. 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Runningwater Draw Care Center, Inc. get at its last inspection?
5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on May 7, 2026. The Texas average is 9.4.
Has Runningwater Draw Care Center, Inc. been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $15,672 in the last three years.
Does Runningwater Draw Care Center, Inc. accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Runningwater Draw Care Center, Inc.?
CMS lists 15 owners and managers. Legal business name: RUNNINGWATER DRAW CARE CENTER, INC..

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection