San Juan Nursing Home, Inc.
300 N Nebraska Ave., San Juan, TX 78589 · Hidalgo County · (956) 787-1771
114 certified beds, about 75 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1984
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 455484 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on December 11, 2025, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 11 health citations since June 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.35 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.30 of those hours.
45.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 11 health citations on file.
June 18, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that care and services were provided by qualified persons in accordance with the written plan of care for 1 or 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for qualified persons. The facility failed to provide direct supervision to a student nurse while the student nurse administered a gastrostomy tube bolus feeding. This failure could place residents with a G-tube at risk of abdominal discomfort, aspiration, and decreased quality of life.
December 11, 2025Standard inspection · 6 citations
- E Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to complete a significant change MDS assessment within 14 days after a significant change in the resident's mental and physical condition for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #12, #4, and #2) reviewed for assessments.1. The facility failed to complete a Significant Change in Status MDS Assessment after Resident #12 admitted to hospice services on [DATE].2. The facility failed to complete a Significant Change in Status MDS Assessment after Resident #2 had four new diagnoses changes: Klebsiella Pneumoniae ([DATE]), Urinary Tract Infection (UTI [DATE]), Do Not Resuscitate (DNR [DATE]), and Pleural Effusion ([DATE]).3. [...]
- E Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) program to the maximum extent practicable to avoid duplicative testing and effort for 5 of 16 residents reviewed for PASRR. (Residents #2, 7, 8, 9, and 11) 1. The facility failed to refer Resident #2 for PASRR Level II assessment when the facility incorrectly coded his PASRR Level I assessment. 2. The facility failed to refer Resident #7 for PASRR Level II assessment when the facility incorrectly coded her PASRR Level I assessment. 3. The facility failed to refer Resident #8 for PASRR review following new mental illness diagnosis. After admission, he was diagnosed with mood disorder due to known physiological condition, delusional disorders, and insomnia. 4. [...]
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed and 1 of 1 nutrition rooms for storage, preparation, and sanitation. The facility failed to discard damaged pans and utensils. The facility failed to keep food products in the refrigerators and freezers sealed properly. The facility failed to follow a cleaning schedule. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments for 1 of 6 medication carts (Nurse Med-Cart, [NAME] Wing, Long Hall) reviewed for labeling and storage. The facility failed to ensure the Nurse Medication Cart for the long hall in Wing 1 was locked and secured. This failure could place the residents at risk of gaining access to unlocked medications which were not prescribed to them.
- D Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a QAPI plan that described the process for conducting quality assessment and assurance activities, including the process on how the committee would identify and correct quality deficiencies for 3 of 16 residents. The facility did not have a QAPI plan process for conducting change in condition assessments. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving quality care and services.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program, designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, for one of six Residents (Resident #5) that were reviewed for infection control and transmission-based precautions policies and practices. 1) The facility failed to ensure LVN performed hand hygiene after removing gloves prior to and after setting up Resident #5's wound care supplies. 2) The facility failed to ensure LVN used a sterile, individually wrapped applicator to apply medication to Resident #5's wound. [...]
September 6, 2024Standard inspection · 3 citations
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable in 7 of 12 boxes of medical supplies (200 hallway) reviewed for medication storage and labeling. The facility failed to ensure7 boxes of medical supplies in the medication storage room, on the 200 hallway, had current usage dates and expired supplies were stored along with current medications/supplies. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving expired medical supplies, wound dressings that past expiration date would not have the intended therapeutic level or effect on a resident's wound.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #71) reviewed for care plans: The facility failed to ensure Resident #71's care plan reflected her diagnosis of Dementia. This deficient practice could place residents in the facility at risk of not being provided with the necessary care or services and not having personalized plans developed to address their specific needs.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #12) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #12 received oxygen at the prescribed rate. This failure could place residents at risk for respiratory distress.
June 2, 2023Standard inspection · 1 citation
- D Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop a base line care plan that included instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident for 1 resident (Resident #117) of 17 residents reviewed for base line care plans. The facility did not develop a base line care plan for Resident #117 that addressed Resident #117's use of antipsychotic medication. This failure could place resident receiving antipsychotic medications of not receiving the necessary care required to maintain psychosocial well-being.
Fire safety inspections
7 fire safety citations on file: 5 on December 11, 2025, 1 on September 6, 2024, 1 on June 2, 2023.
Every fire safety citation7 citations
- F Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
- E Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- D Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- D Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
- D Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
- E Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.35 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.30 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.78 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.72 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.32 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 45.1% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 33.3% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.85 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.58 on weekdays and 3.78 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.46 in April to June 2025 to 4.35 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.35 | 0.30 | 4.58 | 3.78 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 75 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.28 | 0.28 | 4.53 | 3.64 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 79 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.68 | 0.31 | 4.97 | 3.96 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 73 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.46 | 0.36 | 4.76 | 3.73 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 75 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.4 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.1 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.9 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 21.5 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.6 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.1 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: SAN JUAN NURSING HOME, INC..
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roman Catholic Diocese of Brownsville | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 01/01/1966 |
| Roman Catholic Diocese of Brownsville | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 01/01/1966 |
| Arcaute, Raquel | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 04/30/2018 | |
| Garza, Alma | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/21/2013 | |
| Garza, Javier | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/21/2013 | |
| Medina, Trinidad | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/21/2013 | |
| Munoz, Jaime | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/21/2013 | |
| Rigsby, Jan | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/17/2022 | |
| Tamez, Carlos | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/17/2022 | |
| Flores, Daniel | Corporate director | Individual | 10/01/2010 | |
| Roman Catholic Diocese of Brownsville | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/1966 | |
| Bermudez, Yuri | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/15/2016 | |
| Contreras, Alejandra | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/25/2012 | |
| Dominguez, Natalia | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/06/2025 | |
| Bermudez, Yuri | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/15/2016 | |
| Contreras, Alejandra | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/25/2012 | |
| Dominguez, Natalia | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/06/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on June 18, 2026: "Provide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on December 11, 2025: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on December 11, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- Who is the administrator and director of nursing, and how long have they been in the job?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on December 11, 2025: "Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities."
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- The Heights of Alamo Alamo, 2.7 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 12 citations
- Windsor Las Palmas Nursing and Rehabilitation Cent McAllen, 3.4 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 7 citations
- McAllen Transitional Care Center McAllen, 3.5 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 20 citations
- McAllen Nursing Center McAllen, 3.9 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 30 citations
- Colonial Manor Advanced Rehab & Healthcare Pharr, 4.1 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 37 citations
- Alfredo Gonzalez Texas State Veterans Home McAllen, 4.2 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 33 citations
- Grand Terrace Rehabilitation and Healthcare McAllen, 4.6 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 16 citations
- Edinburg Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Edinburg, 4.8 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 32 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is San Juan Nursing Home, Inc.'s Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates San Juan Nursing Home, Inc. 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did San Juan Nursing Home, Inc. get at its last inspection?
- 6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on December 11, 2025. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has San Juan Nursing Home, Inc. been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does San Juan Nursing Home, Inc. accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns San Juan Nursing Home, Inc.?
- CMS lists 17 owners and managers. Legal business name: SAN JUAN NURSING HOME, INC..
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.