Sharpview Residence and Rehabilitation Center
7505 Bellerive, Houston, TX 77036 · Harris County · (713) 774-9611
134 certified beds, about 100 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1976
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 455333 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 29, 2025, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 17 health citations since April 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,431 in the last three years; the largest was $8,431, and the latest is dated July 29, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.07 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.31 of those hours.
35.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Chambers County Public Hospital District No. 1, an affiliated group of 7 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 17 health citations on file.
May 27, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1medication cart (200 Hall Nurse Cart) reviewed for pharmacy services . LVN A failed to ensure the 200 Hall Medication Nursing Cart was locked when not under direct supervision of authorized staff ON 5/27/26 at 10:26 AM. This failure could place residents at risk of adverse reactions to medications and misappropriation of medications.
July 29, 2025Standard inspection · 8 citations
- J Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care, including tracheostomy care, is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 (CR #1) of 4 residents reviewed for tracheostomy care.-LVN A failed to provide emergency tracheostomy (surgical hole in the windpipe to assist with breathing when the usual way is blocked) reinsertion for CR #1 after the resident accidentally removed their tracheostomy on 04/27/2025. LVN A did not use an obturator (an instrument used to guide the cannula (tubing that allows oxygen to go through the windpipe) back into a resident's opening (the surgical hole in the windpipe also called a stoma) during reinsertion) and did not know what it was or how to use an obturator. [...]
- E Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to refer all level II residents and all residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for level II resident review upon a significant change in status assessment for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for coordination of PASARR and assessments. -The facility failed to conduct the PASARR Level I assessment Form 1012-Mental Illness/Dementia Resident Review for Resident #8 until 7/24/25.-The facility failed to request, submit and coordinate the PASARR assessment and screening in the Simple LTC portal to ensure therapeutic services (physical, speech and occupational) were completed for Resident #8. This failure could place residents requiring PASARR services at risk of not having their special needs assessed and met by the facility. [...]
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices based on the resident's comprehensive assessment for 1 (Resident #9) of 5 residents reviewed for quality of care. -Resident #9 was found with a skin tear on 07/24/2025 after surveyor intervention . LVN B, CNA G and CNA V cared for Resident #9 and did not document the skin tear prior to 07/24/2025. This failure could lead to residents not receiving timely wound interventions and could cause further wound deterioration, infection and decline in health. Record review of Resident #9's face sheet dated 07/26/2025 revealed a [AGE] year-old male originally admitted on [DATE] and last re-admitted on [DATE] . [...]
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including adminstering drugs and biologicals to meet the needs for each resident for 1 (Resident #105) of 4 residents reviewed for medication administration. LVN F did not correctly check Resident #105's g-tube placement before medication administration. LVN F did not stir the medications before administering it through the g-tube. LVN F left a substantial amount of medication residue in the medication cups after Allopurinol 100 mg give 0.5 tablet and Amoxicillin-Pot Clavulanate tablet 500-125 mg were administered through a g - tube to Resident #105. These failures could place residents at risk of inadequate therapeutic outcomes, increased negative side effects, and a decline in health. [...]
- D Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 6%, based on 2 errors out of 31 opportunities, which involved 1 (Resident #105) of 4 residents reviewed for medication errors. - LVN F left a substantial amount of medication residue in the medication cups after Allopurinol 100 mg give 0.5 tablet and Amoxicillin-Pot Clavulanate tablet 500-125 mg were administered through a g - tube to Resident #105.- LVN F did not stir the medications before administering it through the g-tube. These failures could place residents at risk of inadequate therapeutic outcomes, increased negative side effects, and a decline in health.
- D Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from any significant medication errors for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #25) reviewed for significant medication errors.- LVN S failed to administer medication as ordered to Resident # 25 when she injected insulin Lispro 5 units subcutaneously (below the top skin layer) and all the insulin was not administered to the resident. This failure could place residents at risk of hyperglycemia, and potential hospitalization. Record review of Resident #25's face sheet dated 07/24/25 revealed a 51year old male was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE]. His diagnoses included: diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia (persistently high blood sugar), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and metabolic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction due to chemical imbalance in the body). [...]
- D Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 (Freezer A) of 1 freezer observed for food storage.-There were 3 packets of onion soup base which had best used by dates of 07/11/2025 in Freezer A. This failure could put residents at risk of food contamination and illness due to being served food past the best used by date. Observation of Freezer A on 7/22/2025 at 8:25am, revealed there were 3 5.4 oz. packets of onion base soup powder dated best if used by 07/11/2025 and labelled 11-12 in black ink pen. During observation and interview with the Dietary Manager on 7/22/2025 at 8:25am, the Dietary Manager said those packets should be thrown away and that everyone in the kitchen was responsible for checking for dates. [...]
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Hall A) of 3 halls observed for infection control.-There was a trash bag with white and blue linen left outside Resident #12's room by the doorway on the floor. This failure could place residents at risk of contagious diseases and spread of illness when infection control protocols are not followed. Observation and interview in Hall A on 7/23/2025 at 3:40pm, revealed there was a trash bag on the floor outside Resident #12'sroom. The bag was tied up and contained white and blue linen. MA V saw the bag and took it and walked it down the hall to the trash room. [...]
June 14, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 5 citations
- E Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who needed respiratory care were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, for oxygen therapy for two of two residents (Resident # 29 and Resident #186) reviewed for respiratory care. -The facility failed to follow the physician orders for Resident #29's oxygen administration. -The facility failed to provide tracheal care and suctioning according to professional standards for Resident #186. These deficient practices could result in the resident's not receiving the care and services ordered by the physician and a decline in health status and oxygen deprivation.
- E Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent (%) or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 9% based on 3 errors out of 32 opportunities, which involved 3 of 9 residents (Resident #29, Resident #14 and Resident #6) reviewed for medication errors. 1. RN A did not administer Sodium Chloride (a prescription medicine used to replenish lost water and salt in your body due to certain conditions like low salt syndrome) to Resident #29 as ordered by the physician. 2. MA A did not administer Losartan Potassium ( a drug used to lower blood pressure) to Resident #14 as ordered by the Physician. 3. RN B did not administer Valproic Acid ( a drug works by lowering seizures) to Resident #6 as ordered by the physician. [...]
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food procurement. 1. The facility failed to ensure expired foods were discarded. 2. The facility failed to ensure foods were labeled and dated. 3. The Facility failed to ensure food was stored in designated areas at all times. 4. The facility failed to thaw frozen 2-5 lb. rolls of frozen ground beef. These failures could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk of food borne illness and disease. Findings Included: Observation of the facility kitchen on 06/11/24 at 8:15 AM revealed the following. 1. A Plastic Container of Pureed sausage saved from breakfast dated 6/05/24 use by date 06/10/24 2. A Plastic container of Sour cream dated 5/21/24 no use by date 3. [...]
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, for five of six residents, (Resident #5, Resident #10, Resident #13, Resident #136 and Resident #186) and three of four staff (LVN A, LVN B, CNA A, RN A) reviewed for infection control and prevention, in that: 1. Resident #186's pressure sore treatment was not done with the clean technique. 2. CNA A did not perform hand hygiene before or after Resident #10 nor Resident #13's incontinence/indwelling catheter care. 3.4. LVN did not follow proper technique in cleaning accu-check machine between Resident #136 and Resident #5. [...]
- D Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of its residents for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #29) reviewed for laboratory services. The facility did not obtain CBC levels for Resident #29 following orders on 6/6/2024. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving treatment and services to meet their needs.
October 19, 2023Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pharmacy services, in that: -The facility failed to ensure Resident #1was monitored during medication administration. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving their medications, chocking and respiratory distress.
April 18, 2023Standard inspection · 2 citations
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored securely in locked compartments for one (Nurse Medication Cart [NAME] Hall) of four medication carts observed for storage of medications. The facility failed to ensure the Nurse Medication Cart [NAME] Hall was secured when unattended. This failure could place residents at risk for loss of prescribed medications, resident's safety, and drug diversion.
- D Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food procurement in that: -The facility failed to ensure food items with an expired use by date were removed from the refrigerator. -A food item was not cooled properly before being placed in the walk-in refrigerator and was 100 degrees Fahrenheit when tested with a thermometer. These failures could affect residents who ate food from the facility kitchen and place them at risk of food borne illness and disease.
Fire safety inspections
8 fire safety citations on file: 4 on July 29, 2025, 3 on June 14, 2024, 1 on April 18, 2023.
Every fire safety citation8 citations
- E Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- E Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
- D Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| July 29, 2025 | Fine | $8,431 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.07 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.31 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.83 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.03 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.73 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 35.9% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 4.02 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.17 on weekdays and 2.83 on weekends, 11% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.39 in April to June 2025 to 3.07 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.07 | 0.31 | 3.17 | 2.83 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 100 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.28 | 0.36 | 3.36 | 3.09 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 93 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.38 | 0.33 | 3.47 | 3.15 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 94 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.39 | 0.32 | 3.47 | 3.18 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 94 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 19.7 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.2 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 18.4 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.4 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 21.5 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 13.1 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: CHAMBERS COUNTY PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT NO. 1. CMS links this home to Chambers County Public Hospital District No. 1, a group of 7 nursing homes averaging 3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooper, Kimberly | Corporate director | Individual | 01/29/2024 | |
| Newton, Elizabeth | Corporate director | Individual | 02/22/2024 | |
| Sharpview Healthcare Management LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 05/01/2021 | |
| Garrett, Chandra | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/22/2025 | |
| Goldman, Michal | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2021 | |
| Guerrero, Milton | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2021 | |
| Garrett, Chandra | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/22/2025 | |
| Guerrero, Milton | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2021 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on May 27, 2026: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on July 29, 2025: "Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on July 29, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on July 29, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.83 hours per resident per day, below the Texas average of 2.98.
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Clarewood House Extended Care Center Houston, 0.2 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 6 citations
- The Lev at Town Park Houston, 1.6 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 25 citations
- Woodway Nursing & Rehab Houston, 1.7 mi · not rated · 55 citations
- Ffiii Houston SNF Tenant LLC Houston, 2 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 25 citations
- Houston Transitional Care Houston, 2 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 19 citations
- Treemont Health Care Center Houston, 2.1 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 18 citations
- Seven Acres Jewish Senior Care Services Houston, 2.6 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 14 citations
- The Vosswood Nursing Center Houston, 3.4 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 3 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Sharpview Residence and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Sharpview Residence and Rehabilitation Center 1 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Sharpview Residence and Rehabilitation Center get at its last inspection?
- 8 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on July 29, 2025. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has Sharpview Residence and Rehabilitation Center been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,431 in the last three years.
- Does Sharpview Residence and Rehabilitation Center accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Sharpview Residence and Rehabilitation Center?
- CMS lists 8 owners and managers, and links the home to Chambers County Public Hospital District No. 1. Legal business name: CHAMBERS COUNTY PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT NO. 1.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.