8820 Town Park Dr, Houston, TX 77036 · Harris County · (713) 777-7241
180 certified beds, about 86 residents a day · Government - Hospital district · Medicare and Medicaid since 1989
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 455800 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 13, 2025, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 25 health citations since March 2023, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (2 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $31,485 in the last three years; the largest was $31,485, and the latest is dated November 17, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.92 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.41 of those hours.
42.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Oakbend Medical Center, an affiliated group of 5 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 25 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to immediately consult with the resident's physician when there was a significant change in the resident's condition or need to alter treatment significantly for 1 of 10 residents (CR#1) reviewed for physician notification. 1. The facility failed to notify or seek medical guidance from the Medical Doctor or Nurse Practitioner for a change of condition after CR #1 complained of pain and a swollen knee on 11/5/25 at approximately 10:00pm. 2. The facility failed to immediately notify or seek medical guidance from the Medical Doctor or Nurse Practitioner after CR #1's left knee was observed swollen and painful at level 8 out of 10 (most severe) on 11/07/2025 at approximately 2:27 p.m, 3:41pm, and 4:18pm. 3. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the residents' choices for 1 of 10 residents (CR# 1) reviewed for quality of care. 1. The facility failed to immediately seek medical guidance or send CR#1 out for higher level of care (ER) after receiving results of CR#1's x-ray, which revealed a Left Displaced distal femoral shaft spiral fracture . 2. The facility failed to notify the physician or NP of CR#1's change in condition, failed to monitor, and complete assessments on 11/5/25 and 11/6/25. 3. The facility failed to immediately transport CR#1 to the hospital on [DATE] after becoming aware of the result of an xray, which reflected an acute fracture. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to protect the personal and medical records of residents reviewed for privacy and confidentiality in that: On 06/11/25 MA B was not at her medication cart when her computer screen was showing numerous profiles on the computer screen of resident's pictures. This failure placed residents at risk of breach in confidentiality of medical information.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet a resident's medical, mental, and psychosocial needs for 3 (Resident #17, Resident #31, Resident #48) of 5 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. - Resident #17 was not care-planned for exit-seeking when she was documented in her progress notes as pushing on the exit door by her room as a behavior. - Resident #31 did not have a comprehensive care plan in place with interventions to address oxygen use or anticoagulant use. -Resident #48 did not have a comprehensive care plan to address his advanced directive status of DNR This deficient practice could place residents at risk of their behaviors and needs being monitored and cared for at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to provide necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 (Resident #21) of 6 residents reviewed for activities of daily living in that: -The NF failed to remove unwanted facial hair from Resident #21's chin area and above the resident's top lip. This failure placed resident at risk for psychological embarrassment, sadness, and decrease in quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 2 (Med Carts A and B) of 3 medication carts reviewed for pharmacy services. 1. Med Cart A had 3 blister packs of Tramadol 50 mg tablets totaling 68 tablets with an expiration date of 05/20/2025 for Resident #53. 2. Med Cart B had 1 blister pack with 9 tablets of Hyoscyamine Sulfate .125 mg tablets totaling 1 tablet and 1 blister pack of Haloperidol 1 mg oral tablet totaling 1 tablet with an expiration date of 05/25/2025 for Resident #68. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of their medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection program designed to provide safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections for 2 (Resident #29, Resident #42) of 7 residents and two staff members reviewed for infection control in that: -CNA KK was observed on 06/10/24 coming out of Resident # 42's room with a folded sheet placing the sheet back on the clean cart. -CNA D and Restorative Aide CNA E did not wear a disposable gown when providing Foley catheter for Resident #42 who was on enhanced barrier precautions. -CNA D and CNA E was not familair with EBP. -Resident #29's bathroom there was a gray wash pan sitting on side of the commode on the floor and a urinal sitting on top of the sink countertop not labeled or bag. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure resident who is incontinent of bladder receives appropriate treatment and service to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 (Resident #42) of 6 residents reviewed for incontinent care in that: -CNA D placed Resident #42s Foley bag on the bed during Foley catheter care. This failure placed resident at risk for urinary tract infection, unwanted antibiotic therapy, and decrease in quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who are fed by enteral means receive the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding including but not limited to aspiration pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, metabolic abnormalities, and nasal-pharyngeal ulcers for 1 (Resident #29) of 7 residents for the administration of medication via gastrostomy in that: -LVN A did not check for gastrostomy placement, per the facility policy, prior to administering Resident #29's medication on 06/10/25. This failure placed resident at risk for aspiration, unwanted hospitalization, and decrease in quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility was adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area for one resident (Resident #48) of 10 residents reviewed for resident call system in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #48's call light was in working order. This failure could place residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance for activities of daily living or in the event of an emergency.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 (CR #1) of 5 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility failed to ensure CR#1's behavior was coded on the quarterly MDS dated [DATE]. This failure could place residents with behavior at risk of not receiving care and intervention that could meet their behavioral needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent (%) or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 18% based on 6 errors out of 32 opportunities, which involved 3 of 9 residents (Resident #57, Resident #55 and Resident #13) reviewed for medication errors. MA A did not administered Metoprolol (a prescription medicine used to lower blood pressure and heart rate) and Metformin ( medication used to decrease the amount of glucose - a type of sugar released into the blood stream) to Resident #57 as ordered by the physician. MA B administered Levetiracetam ( a drug used to treated seizures( involuntary muscle movements -caused by epilepsy ( a group of brain disorders) to Resident #55 instead of Levetiracetam 5ml as ordered by the Physician. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food procurement. 1. The facility failed to maintain proper temperature for leftover food from the breakfast tray line serving cart. 2. The facility failed to ensure frozen food was safely thawed. These failures could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk of food borne illness and disease. Findings Included: Observation and record temperature of the facility's food saved from the breakfast tray line serving cart on 05/05/24 at 1:15 PM revealed it was below the recommended temperature. During the observation dietary cook A took food temperature. Temperature of food taken were as follow: 1. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, comfortable, and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases for 2 of 2 Residents (Residents #46, and #16) and 2 of 2 staffs (CNA A and LVN A) reviewed for infection control. 1. CNA A failed to perform hand hygiene between glove changes when providing incontinent care for Resident #46. 2. LVN A failed to maintain a sterile technique while providing tracheostomy care to Resident #16. These failures could place residents at risk for spread of infection and cross contamination.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection and prevention control program that included, at a minimum, a system for preventing and controlling infections for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #46) reviewed for incontinent care and indwelling catheter. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA A cleaned Resident #46's indwelling Foley catheter properly and followed proper hand hygiene during incontinent care. These failures could place residents at risk for pain, infection, injury, and hospitalization.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a who needs respiratory care, including tracheotomy care and tracheal suctioning, is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for one of two residents reviewed for tracheotomy care (Resident #16) A) The facility failed to ensure LVN A used sterile technique during tracheotomy suctioning for Resident #16. B) The facility failed to ensure Resident #16's oxygen was set per physician orders. These failures placed residents with tracheostomies requiring suctioning at risk for respiratory infections, hospitalizations, and a decline in their quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to ensure the accurate administration of medications for 1 of 9 residents (Resident #13) reviewed for medication administration. MA C administered Minocycline ( a drug works by killing bacteria or preventing their growth), along with one daily Multi-Vitamin and Iron tablet to Resident #13, which the medication label warned against it. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the therapeutic benefits of their medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 resident (Resident #2) of 8 residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure each resident was free from abuse when Resident #2 was physically abused by CNA E on 10/16/2023 during her shift. This failure placed residents at risk of physical harm, emotional distress, mental anguish and death from possible abuse and neglect. The noncompliance was identified as past noncompliance and began on 10/16/2023 and ended on 10/18/2023. The facility corrected the noncompliance before the investigation began. Findings Include: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and provide care in a manner that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure certified nursing assistant (CNA) A knocked on Resident #1's door prior to entering his room. This failure could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life, loss of dignity and loss of self-worth.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary services for residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 2 (Resident #3 and Resident #4) of 2 residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Resident #3, who required extensive assistance, was provided with timely incontinence care on 01/01/2024. 2. Resident #4 was provided with timely incontinence care on 01/01/2024. These failures could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for loss of dignity, risk for infections and a decreased quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 did not have a working and running electric space heater in his room. This failure could place residents at risk of harm or injury and contribute to avoidable accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of each resident's needs, for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for call light access. The facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for physically impaired resident (Resident #1) who needed assistance with incontinent care. This failure could place residents at risk for not being able to call for assistance from staff.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feedings for 3 (Resident #8, #62, #78) of 4 residents reviewed for feeding tubes, in that: The facility staff failed to verify placement of the feeding tube prior to medication administration for Resident # 78 and Resident #62 LVN A plunged 60 ml's of water into Resident #8's gastrostomy tube via syringe instead of via gravity flow when there is an interruption of feeding to maintain tube patency for administration. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was not five percent (%) or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 7%, based on 3 errors out of 38 opportunities, which involved 3 of 11 residents (Resident #8, #62, and #78) reviewed for medication administration. LVN A did not administer Resident #8's Levetiracetam medication ( medication used to treat seizures epilepsy , is classified as anticonvulsants) according to Physician orders RN A did not administer Resident #62's Levetiracetam medication ( medication used to treat seizures epilepsy , is classified as anticonvulsants)) according to Physician orders. RN A did not administer the prescribed amount of Senna syrup ( a laxative medication) to Resident # 78 according to Physician orders. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were secured properly for one of fifteen rooms (Resident #61's room) as evidenced by: -Resident #61 had medication on top of bedside table and was unattended. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for harm and place the facility at risk for a possible drug diversion.
9 fire safety citations on file: 4 on June 13, 2025, 2 on May 8, 2024, 3 on March 30, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| November 17, 2025 | Fine | $31,485 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 2.92 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.41 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.50 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.53 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.97 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 42.4% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 20.0% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.01 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.09 on weekdays and 2.50 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.86 in April to June 2025 to 2.92 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 2.92 | 0.41 | 3.09 | 2.50 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 86 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.07 | 0.38 | 3.21 | 2.71 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 81 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.04 | 0.34 | 3.18 | 2.67 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 84 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.86 | 0.30 | 3.04 | 2.42 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 89 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $16.97 to $20.71 | 88,680 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.92 | $27.46 to $32.89 | 57,560 |
| Registered nurses | $46.14 | $38.06 to $50.53 | 271,380 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.7 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.9 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.0 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.9 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for The Lev at Town Park's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 9 eligible stays.
10.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 25 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 16 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 9 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 15 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 15 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 3 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: OAKBEND MEDICAL CENTER. CMS links this home to Oakbend Medical Center, a group of 5 nursing homes averaging 3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oakbend Medical Center | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 06/01/2015 |
| Freudenberger, Joseph | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 06/19/2007 | |
| Beard, Barry | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2012 | |
| Freudenberger, Joseph | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/19/2007 | |
| Ssc Houston Southwest Operating Company LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 06/01/2015 | |
| The Lev at Town Park LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/01/2022 | |
| Shkop, Aharon | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/01/2022 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.