Find a nursing home

Home / Oklahoma / Shattuck

Shattuck Nursing Center

211 North Alfalfa, Shattuck, OK 73858 · Ellis County · (580) 938-2501

60 certified beds, about 44 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2015

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
1 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
1 of 5
CMS note: This facility reported a high number of days without a registered nurse onsite.
Quality measures
1 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 375564 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on October 24, 2024, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Oklahoma average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 14 health citations since June 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.67 hours per resident per day, against 3.79 across Oklahoma and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.25 of those hours.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 14 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
4D
9E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
October 24, 2024Standard inspection · 7 citations
  1. E
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    F640 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 20, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments were completed and submitted to CMS for nine (#13, 17, 21, 23, 25, 37, 40, 42, and #45) of 13 sampled residents who were reviewed for resident assessments. The DON identified 45 residents resided in the facility.
  2. E
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 20, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments were accurate for two (#15 and #30) of 13 sampled residents whose resident assessments were reviewed for accuracy. The DON identified 45 residents who resided in the facility.
  3. E
    Ensure a qualified health professional conducts resident assessments.
    F642 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 20, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments were not back dated for three (#23, 37 and #45) of 13 sampled residents who were reviewed for resident assessments. The DON identified 45 residents resided in the facility.
  4. E
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 20, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were updated for use of alarms for one (#3) and failed to ensure the care plan specified what behaviors were being treated with psychotropic medications for one (#30) of eight sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed for behaviors and alarms. The DON identified 45 residents resided in the facility.
  5. E
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 20, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow their protocol and the resident's care plan by not completing weekly wound assessments for one (#15) of two sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care. The Resident Matrix, dated 10/22/24, documented two residents had pressure ulcers.
  6. D
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    F580 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 20, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified when a medication was unavailable for one (#44) of five sampled residents reviewed for medications. The DON stated 45 residents resided in the facility.
  7. D
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 20, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication was available for one (#44) of five sampled residents reviewed for medications. The DON stated 45 residents resided in the facility.
August 4, 2023Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. E
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 7, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide privacy for two (#11 and #13) of five sampled residents reviewed for privacy. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/01/23, documented 31 residents resided in the facility. Seven residents had seizure disorders.
  2. E
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    F578 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 7, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to: a. ensure staff were aware of the system used to identify CPR/DNR status, and b. ensure clinical health records correctly identified CPR/DNR status for three (#3, 17 and #19) of twelve sampled residents reviewed for advanced directives. The Resident Census and Condition of Residents report, dated [DATE], documented 31 residents resided in the facility. Five residents had advanced directives.
  3. E
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 7, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure MDS assessments were accurate for two (#7 and #23) of 12 residents sampled for accuracy of MDS assessments. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/01/23, documented 31 residents resided in the facility. The DON identified nine residents used oxygen.
  4. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 7, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain infection control during medication observation for two (#17, and #28) of four sampled residents reviewed during medication observation. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/01/23, documented 31 residents resided in the facility. 1. Resident #17 had diagnoses which included high blood pressure, chronic kidney disease, and abnormal coagulation profile. 2. Resident #28 had diagnoses which included high blood pressure, dementia, and anxiety. On 08/03/23 at 7:04 a.m., CMA #1 was observed to remove the b/p cuff from the top of the cart and obtained a blood pressure on Resident #17. CMA #1 was observed to return to the medication cart and placed the b/p cuff on top of the cart. CMA #1 was not observed to sanitize the b/p cuff. [...]
  5. D
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    F883 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 7, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to administer a pneumococcal vaccination for one (#32) of five sampled residents reviewed for immunizations. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents documented 31 residents resided in the facility and 21 residents had receive the pneumococcal vaccination.
June 24, 2022Standard inspection · 2 citations
  1. F
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    F838 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 22, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a facility risk assessment had been completed and updated. The DON identified 36 residents resided in the facility.
  2. E
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    F727 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 22, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a RN eight consecutive hours a day for three of 22 days in June 2022. The DON reported 36 residents resided in the facility.

Fire safety inspections

7 fire safety citations on file: 1 on October 24, 2024, 1 on August 4, 2023, 5 on June 24, 2022.

Every fire safety citation7 citations
  1. E
    Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
    K 374 · October 24, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · August 4, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. F
    Develop Emergency Preparedness policies and procedures.
    E 13 · June 24, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. F
    Install a fire alarm system that can be heard throughout the facility.
    K 341 · June 24, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. E
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · June 24, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. E
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · June 24, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. E
    Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
    K 511 · June 24, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeOklahomaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.673.793.86
Registered nurses0.250.340.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.273.443.42
Nurse aides2.74
Licensed practical nurses0.67
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)not reported55.5%45.8%
Registered nurse turnovernot reported53.6%42.9%
Administrators who leftnot reported

CMS expects 3.31 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.83 on weekdays and 3.27 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.82 in April to June 2025 to 3.66 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.660.253.833.27 0.0%5 of 9044
Oct to Dec 20253.610.243.713.35 0.0%12 of 9245
Apr to Jun 20253.820.273.933.54 0.0%11 of 9145
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Oklahoma, Jan to Mar 20263.790.323.943.422.2%1.6% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeOklahomaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
19.413.613.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.51.90.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
8.02.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.84.73.2
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
12.813.714.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.64.74.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
32.017.515.4
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.72.31.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
6.73.01.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: SHATTUCK NURSING CENTER INC.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Brown, JamesCorporate officerIndividual07/31/1990
Dout, AlexanderCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2002
Fogle, KimberlyCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2002
Bohnsack, BerniceOperational/managerial controlIndividual08/15/1995
Helfenbein, CandiceOperational/managerial controlIndividual02/22/2024
Hill, DebraOperational/managerial controlIndividual05/16/2007
Jacobs, AmberOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/29/2016
Jacons, BradleyOperational/managerial controlIndividual02/17/2025
Kuhlman, GlennellOperational/managerial controlIndividual09/01/2015
Stuart, DannaOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2020
Watson, KasandraOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/17/2022
AllshiftsAdp of the SNFOrganization12/01/2022
Forvis Mazars LLPAdp of the SNFOrganization05/28/2015
Nutrition Systems Consulting IncAdp of the SNFOrganization09/09/2024
Brown, JamesAdp of the SNFIndividual07/31/1990
Kuhlman, GlennellAdp of the SNFIndividual11/12/2025
Stuart, DannaAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2020

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on October 24, 2024: "Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment."
  2. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on October 24, 2024: "Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident."
  3. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on August 4, 2023: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  4. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on October 24, 2024: "Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.27 hours per resident per day, below the Oklahoma average of 3.44.

Oklahoma contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Oklahoma. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Shattuck Nursing Center's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Shattuck Nursing Center 1 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 1 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Shattuck Nursing Center get at its last inspection?
7 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on October 24, 2024. The Oklahoma average is 6.4.
Has Shattuck Nursing Center been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Shattuck Nursing Center accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Shattuck Nursing Center?
CMS lists 17 owners and managers. Legal business name: SHATTUCK NURSING CENTER INC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection