Find a nursing home

Home / Ohio / Howland

Shepherd of the Valley Howland

4100 North River Road, Howland, OH 44484 · Trumbull County · (330) 856-9232

65 certified beds, about 52 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2003

Part of a continuing care retirement community Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 366258 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on June 5, 2025, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).

None of its 11 health citations since January 2020 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.29 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.91 of those hours.

32.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 11 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
10D
0E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
June 5, 2025Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. D
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    F578 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 1, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #36's advance directives were accurate. This affected one (Resident #36) out of two residents reviewed for advance directives. The facility census was 44.
  2. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 1, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #27's bowel elimination was monitored effectively. This affected one (Resident #27) out of one resident reviewed for constipation. The facility census was 44.
  3. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 1, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to post oxygen safety signs per acceptable standards of nursing practice. This affected three (Residents #101, #103 and #105) out of three residents reviewed for respiratory care. There were eight (Residents #4, #5, #10, #13, #33, #101, #103 and #105) who received oxygen therapy. The facility census was 44.
  4. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 1, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to perform adequate infection control practices during urinary catheter care for Resident #3. This affected one (Resident #3) out of two residents reviewed for urinary catheter care. There were two (Residents #3 and #36) who had urinary catheters. The census was 44.
January 19, 2023Standard inspection · 1 citation
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 27, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food items were dated when opened. This had the potential to affect the 52 residents who ate food from the kitchen. Resident #37 was identified by the facility as receiving nothing by mouth. The facility census was 53.
January 2, 2020Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. D
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    F561 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 20, 2020
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #40 received reading material as requested and was not given the opportunity to implement her normal bowel regimen. The facility failed to ensure Resident #256 received showers as preferred. This affected two of three residents reviewed for choices. The facility census was 55.
  2. D
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 20, 2020
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin to the State agency as required. This finding affected two (Residents #12 and #257) of five resident records reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 55.
  3. D
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 20, 2020
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an injury of unknown origin for Resident #257. This affected one of two residents reviewed for IUO. The facility census was 55.
  4. D
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 20, 2020
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure Resident #252's wound care was completed as indicated in the physician orders. This finding affected one (Resident #252) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 55.
  5. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 20, 2020
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident's #40, #256 and #257 were transferred according to their care plans for optimal safety. This affected three of five residents revealed for accidents. The facility census was 55.
  6. D
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 20, 2020
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure proper justification for the continued use of Resident #256 indwelling urinary catheter. This affected one of one residents reviewed for indwelling catheters. The facility census was 55.

Fire safety inspections

7 fire safety citations on file: 1 on June 5, 2025, 4 on January 19, 2023, 2 on January 2, 2020.

Every fire safety citation7 citations
  1. E
    Install a fire alarm system that can be heard throughout the facility.
    K 341 · June 5, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
    K 351 · January 19, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. F
    Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
    K 372 · January 19, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · January 19, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. E
    Meet requirements for sections of health care facilities separated by fire resistive construction.
    K 131 · January 19, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. E
    Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
    K 211 · January 2, 2020 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. E
    Install properly constructed and protected linen or trash chutes.
    K 541 · January 2, 2020 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeOhioUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.293.693.86
Registered nurses0.910.640.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.623.283.42
Nurse aides2.18
Licensed practical nurses1.20
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)32.1%48.7%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover27.3%43.9%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 4.20 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.55 on weekdays and 3.62 on weekends, 20% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.47 in April to June 2025 to 4.29 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.290.914.553.62 0.4%0 of 9052
Oct to Dec 20254.300.814.513.73 1.9%0 of 9251
Jul to Sep 20254.130.884.383.50 1.3%0 of 9249
Apr to Jun 20254.470.924.783.68 0.4%0 of 9147
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Ohio, Jan to Mar 20263.640.603.803.244.6%0.4% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeOhioUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
8.75.313.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.20.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.90.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.83.23.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.03.44.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.68.815.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
27.424.923.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
13.712.912.0

Owners and operators

Legal business name: SHEPHERD OF THE VALLEY LUTHERAN RETIREMENT SERVICES, INC..

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Adamic, PaulW-2 managing employeeIndividual06/20/2022
Filip, ChrisitneW-2 managing employeeIndividual06/28/2013
Limongi, RichardW-2 managing employeeIndividual01/01/2015
Salvino, TamaraW-2 managing employeeIndividual11/18/1998
Deabate, GiuseppeCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2019
Earnheardt, AdamCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2020
Limongi, RichardCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2015
Quaintance, RobertCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2023
Salvino, TamaraCorporate directorIndividual11/18/1998
Thompson, RichardCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2019
Adamic, PaulCorporate officerIndividual06/20/2022
Deabate, GiuseppeCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2020
Earnheardt, AdamCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2020

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on June 5, 2025: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
  2. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on June 5, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive."
  3. How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on January 2, 2020: "Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities."
  4. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on June 5, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."

Other nursing homes nearby

Ohio contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Shepherd of the Valley Howland's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Shepherd of the Valley Howland 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Shepherd of the Valley Howland get at its last inspection?
4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on June 5, 2025. The Ohio average is 10.5.
Has Shepherd of the Valley Howland been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Shepherd of the Valley Howland accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Shepherd of the Valley Howland?
CMS lists 13 owners and managers. Legal business name: SHEPHERD OF THE VALLEY LUTHERAN RETIREMENT SERVICES, INC..

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection