Find a nursing home

Home / Idaho / Mountain Home

St. Luke's Elmore Long Term Care

895 North 6th East, Mountain Home, ID 83647 · Elmore County · (208) 587-0360

38 certified beds, about 16 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1967

CMS high performing icon Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 135006 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on January 23, 2026, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Idaho average is 10.3, the national average 9.2).

None of its 8 health citations since August 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 6.99 hours per resident per day, against 4.04 across Idaho and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 2.25 of those hours.

34.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Idaho average 50.3%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 8 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
6D
0E
2F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
January 23, 2026Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 11, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and the FDA Food Code, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions to prevent contamination and ensure food was safe and unadulterated. These failures had the potential to expose residents to foodborne illness.
  2. F
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 11, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident records were safeguarded to prevent unauthorized access. This failure had the potential to allow misuse or disclosure of resident information.
  3. D
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    F554 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 11, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident who was self-administering a medication was assessed to effectively do so. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #4), whose record was reviewed for self-administration of medications assessment. This failure placed Resident #4 at risk for adverse outcomes if she were to use the medication inappropriately.
  4. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 11, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident assessments accurately reflected their diagnoses and specialized services. This was true for 2 of 8 residents (#1 and #5) whose Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments were reviewed. This failure placed Resident #1 and #5 at risk for adverse outcomes if their needs were to go unmet.
  5. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 11, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's care plan was comprehensive. This was true for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #5) whose care plans were reviewed. This failure placed Resident #5 at risk for her mental health needs to go unmet because her mental health diagnoses were not included in her care plan.
January 24, 2025Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 5, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' Minimum Data Set (MDS) had correct assessment information. This was true for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #4) whose records were reviewed for accuracy. This deficient practice had the potential for negative outcomes if residents were not assessed and/or monitored due to inaccurate assessments.
  2. D
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 5, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, policy review and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to professional standards of practice. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #7) whose medications were observed in the medication cup inside the medication cart. This failed practice created the potential for residents to experience adverse effects when their medications were not administered according to the physician's order.
  3. D
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    F760 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 5, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of facility policies and procedure, review of Incidents and Accidents (I&As) reports, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were protected from significant medication errors. This was true for 2 of 3 residents (#14 and 170) reviewed for medication errors. This deficient practice created the potential for Resident #170 to experience harm when he was administered another resident's medications, and for Resident #14 when he received the wrong dose of insulin.
August 11, 2022Standard inspection · 0 citations

Fire safety inspections

3 fire safety citations on file: 3 on July 23, 2021.

Every fire safety citation3 citations
  1. F
    Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
    K 293 · July 23, 2021 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Ensure that any exit in an area undergoing construction, repair, or improvements shall be inspected daily to ensure its ability to be used instantly in case of emergency.
    K 791 · July 23, 2021 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. D
    Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
    K 923 · July 23, 2021 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeIdahoUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)6.994.043.86
Registered nurses2.250.860.69
All nursing staff on weekends5.733.493.42
Nurse aides3.90
Licensed practical nurses0.85
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)34.5%50.3%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover16.7%40.9%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.62 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 7.51 on weekdays and 5.73 on weekends, 24% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 6.07 in April to June 2025 to 6.99 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20266.992.247.515.73 0.0%0 of 9016
Oct to Dec 20256.701.667.085.73 0.0%0 of 9216
Jul to Sep 20256.001.476.345.14 0.0%0 of 9217
Apr to Jun 20256.071.626.495.01 0.0%0 of 9118
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Idaho, Jan to Mar 20263.900.804.113.374.9%0.2% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeIdahoUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
27.715.613.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.61.20.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.02.01.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
10.33.03.2
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
6.516.114.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.03.24.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
8.320.115.4

Owners and operators

Legal business name: ST LUKES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Baker, EmilyCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2021
Corrick, ThomasCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2018
Davila, RosaCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2021
Gilbert, WilliamCorporate directorIndividual11/01/2022
Grow, LisaCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2018
Krahn, DanielCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2018
Lokken, RobertCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2018
McGeorge, LauraCorporate directorIndividual07/01/2024
Raimondi, RichardCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2018
Reid, JacobCorporate directorIndividual09/01/2023
Scoggin, AndrewCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2018
Twedt, JillCorporate directorIndividual11/01/2022
Whitacre, WilliamCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2018
Ystueta Jr, WilliamCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2023
Fowler, KathrynCorporate officerIndividual02/01/2021
Grant, JaredCorporate officerIndividual01/19/2023
Roth, ChristopherCorporate officerIndividual01/31/2020
St. Lukes Health System LtdOperational/managerial controlOrganization04/01/2013
Fowler, KathrynOperational/managerial controlIndividual02/01/2021
Grant, JaredOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/19/2023
Melchiorre, LisaOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/01/2019
Reid, JacobOperational/managerial controlIndividual09/01/2023
Roth, ChristopherOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/01/2015
Sandmann, MeganOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/19/2019
St. Lukes Health System LtdAdp of the SNFOrganization04/01/2013
Fowler, KathrynAdp of the SNFIndividual02/01/2021
Grant, JaredAdp of the SNFIndividual01/19/2023
Melchiorre, LisaAdp of the SNFIndividual10/01/2019
Reid, JacobAdp of the SNFIndividual09/01/2023
Roth, ChristopherAdp of the SNFIndividual01/31/2020
Sandmann, MeganAdp of the SNFIndividual07/19/2019

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on January 23, 2026: "Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards."
  2. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on January 23, 2026: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  3. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on January 23, 2026: "Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate."
  4. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on January 24, 2025: "Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors."

Idaho contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Idaho. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is St. Luke's Elmore Long Term Care's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates St. Luke's Elmore Long Term Care 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did St. Luke's Elmore Long Term Care get at its last inspection?
5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on January 23, 2026. The Idaho average is 10.3.
Has St. Luke's Elmore Long Term Care been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does St. Luke's Elmore Long Term Care accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns St. Luke's Elmore Long Term Care?
CMS lists 31 owners and managers. Legal business name: ST LUKES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection