Home / California / Fresno
Stonehaven Senior Living
1717 S Winery Avenue, Fresno, CA 93727 · Fresno County · (559) 251-8417
Beds not reported, about 48 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2025
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 555935 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 16, 2025, inspectors cited 0 health deficiencies (the California average is 15.6, the national average 9.2).
None of its 6 health citations since June 2025 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.18 hours per resident per day, against 4.52 across California and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.32 of those hours.
CMS links it to Jericho Care Group, an affiliated group of 7 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 6 health citations on file.
June 3, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program to provide a safe and sanitary environment for three of five sampled residents (Residents 2, 3, and 4) when:1. Housekeeping Staff (HS) 1 did not perform hand hygiene after removing his gloves when he cleaned Residents 4's bathroom then proceeded in cleaning Resident 4's bedside table on 6/3/26.2. HS 1used the same pair of gloves and disinfectant wipe (pre-moistened disposable cloths treated with active cleaning agents that kill bacteria, .) for cleaning and disinfecting (uses chemicals (disinfectants) to kill germs on surfaces and objects) call light buttons and bed rail for Residents 2 and 3 on 6/3/26. [...]
June 16, 2025Standard inspection · 5 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have a sanitary environment in the kitchen when: 1. Discoloration was observed in the ice machine in the kitchen. This failure had the potential risk of exposing residents in the facility to contaminate the ice which could result in foodborne illness (is a sickness caused by eating or drinking food or water that has germs) 2. Floors in the dry food storage room in the kitchen had food crumbs. This failure had the potential risk for pest infestation and led to contamination of food and food preparation areas which could result in compromise resident safety and health.
- F Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the facility was maintained in a clean and sanitary condition for eight of eight sampled residents when the laundry room floor had an accumulation of a brown sludge-like residue approximately six inches wide and 30 inches long. This failure had the potential risk of cross contamination (the harmful transfer of germs from one surface object or substance to another) from contaminated laundry which could lead to spread of infection and compromise resident health and safety.
- F Keep all essential equipment working safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain essential equipment in safe operating condition for eight of eight residents, when the facility walk-in freezer had ice builds in several areas. This failure had the potential risk to result in unsafe food storage temperatures and foodborne illnesses (getting sick from eating contaminated foods) affecting all residents receiving meals from the facility.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to properly ensure medications were stored in accordance with pharmaceutical standards when one of 30 Ipratropium bromide and albuterol sulfate medication (a combination medication used to treat difficult breathing associated with respiratory diseases) vials was out of the manufacturer provided foil packaging. This failure had the potential to cause the medication to lose effectiveness as a result of not being stored in its intended packaging.
- D Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
Inspectors wrote2. During an observation on 6/10/25 at 11:55 a.m. in the kitchen, Resident 53's meal tray did not include the chocolate ice cream dessert. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/10/25 at 12:03 p.m. with Resident 53 and IP 1, Resident 53 was not served a chocolate ice cream cup as listed on her meal ticket. IP 1 stated Resident 53 should have been served ice cream because it was listed on her meal ticket, and it was her preference. Resident 53 stated she wanted to eat her ice cream over the rest of her food. During an interview on 6/12/25 at 8:56 a.m. with the CDM, the CDM stated Resident 53 should have received her listed preference of chocolate ice cream. The CDM stated resident meal tickets were person centered, and residents had the right to receive the food they wanted. During an interview on 6/16/25 at 11:07 a.m. [...]
Fire safety inspections
12 fire safety citations on file: 12 on June 16, 2025.
Every fire safety citation12 citations
- F Implement emergency and standby power systems.
- F Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- F Have a complete alarm system manually initiated and initiated by fire sprinkler system connection.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- D Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- D Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- D Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- D To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
- D Meet requirements for the use of electrical equipment.
- C Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | California | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.18 | 4.52 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.32 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.65 | 4.09 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.58 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.28 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | not reported | 36.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 38.1% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS expects 3.78 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.39 on weekdays and 3.65 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 4.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.72 in October to December 2025 to 4.18 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.18 | 0.32 | 4.39 | 3.65 | 4.4% | 0 of 90 | 48 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.72 | 0.40 | 3.90 | 3.25 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 44 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| California, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.36 | 0.59 | 4.52 | 3.97 | 2.3% | 0.5% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | California | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.1 | 10.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.8 | 1.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.5 | 12.0 | 15.4 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: WINERY SKILLED CARE LLC. CMS links this home to Jericho Care Group, a group of 7 nursing homes averaging 2.3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winery Skilled Care LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 02/01/2025 |
| Bayshire Central Valley LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 02/01/2025 |
| Winery Skilled Care LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 02/01/2025 | |
| Carter, Benjamin | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2025 | |
| Grossman, Stephen | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2025 | |
| Kirby, Scott | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2025 | |
| Parrott, Jason | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2025 | |
| Salow, Donald | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2025 | |
| 1717 Haven Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/07/2024 | |
| Winery Skilled Care LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/01/2025 | |
| Carter, Benjamin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/07/2024 | |
| Grossman, Stephen | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2025 | |
| Kirby, Scott | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/07/2024 | |
| Parrott, Jason | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2025 | |
| Salow, Donald | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/07/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on June 3, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on June 16, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- Can we see a resident room, a shower room and the dining room on this visit?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on June 16, 2025: "Keep all essential equipment working safely."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on June 16, 2025: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.65 hours per resident per day, below the California average of 4.09.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Pacific Gardens Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Fresno, 0.9 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 48 citations
- Evergreen Care Center Fresno, 1 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 34 citations
- Sierra Vista Healthcare Fresno, 1.1 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 53 citations
- Orchard Post Acute Fresno, 1.1 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 44 citations
- Grace Healthcare Center Fresno, 2.2 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 73 citations
- California Home for the Aged Fresno, 3.4 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 35 citations
- Healthcare Centre of Fresno Fresno, 3.5 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 47 citations
- Fresno Postacute Care Fresno, 3.9 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 46 citations
California contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in California. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: California Department of Public Health, Center for Health Care Quality, Licensing and Certification Program, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: California Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, 1-800-231-4024. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Cal Health Find, where California publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Stonehaven Senior Living's Medicare star rating?
- CMS does not give Stonehaven Senior Living an overall star rating in the data as of September 1, 2026.
- How many deficiencies did Stonehaven Senior Living get at its last inspection?
- 0 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on June 16, 2025. The California average is 15.6.
- Has Stonehaven Senior Living been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Stonehaven Senior Living accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Stonehaven Senior Living?
- CMS lists 15 owners and managers, and links the home to Jericho Care Group. Legal business name: WINERY SKILLED CARE LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.