Alice Byrd Tawes Nursing Home
201 Hall Highway, Crisfield, MD 21817 · Somerset County · (410) 968-1200
76 certified beds, about 69 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1968
CMS high performing icon Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 215058 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 6, 2026, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Maryland average is 17, the national average 9.2).
Of 31 health citations since September 2019, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.46 hours per resident per day, against 3.87 across Maryland and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.10 of those hours.
41.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Maryland average 40.2%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
1009/19
1311/24
703/26
105/26
Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 31 health citations on file.
Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
25D
5E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
May 20, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to report an allegation of seclusion/abuse immediately or no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made aware to the facility's Administration team. This was evident for 1 (#4) out of 1 resident reviewed for allegations of abuse during the complaint survey.
March 6, 2026Standard inspection · 7 citations
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and facility staff interview, the facility staff failed to protect and value resident's dignity (Resident #38). This was evident for 1 out of 1 resident reviewed for dignity.
- D Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on random observations it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment for the residents of the 3rd floor. This was evident for 1 of 2 units ( 3rd floor).
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and interview with the facility staff it was determined that the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected the resident's status. This was found to be evident for 1out of 5 residents (R # 4) reviewed during the investigative stage of the survey.
- D Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor a resident's nutrition status and failed to recognize a resident's need for feeding assistance and inform the dietitian/physician. This was evident for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for nutrition.
- D Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain ongoing communication with the dialysis facility. This was evident during the review of 1 of 1 Residents (#11), (all residents) who currently attend dialysis.
- D Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interviews of facility staff, it was determined that food service employees failed to ensure that sanitary practices were followed and safe food handling practices were followed to reduce the risk of foodborne illness. This was evident during the initial tour of the kitchen and only 1 observation.
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurate. This was evident for 1 (Resident #5) of 1 Residents reviewed for complete and accurate medical record documentation.
November 20, 2024Standard inspection · 13 citations
- E Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of reporting data, clinical records and interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure assessments were sent to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services as required. This was evident for 4 (#11, #51, #56, and #69) out of the 7 residents reviewed for late reporting.
- E Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
Inspectors wroteBased on review of medical records and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a baseline care plan summary to residents and/or resident's representative within 48 hours after admission. This was evident for 6 (#57, #8, #19, #36 # 30, and #10) out of 12 residents reviewed for baseline care plans during the recertification survey.
- E Post nurse staffing information every day.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to post required staffing information. This was evident for 3 out of 3 floors of the facility during the recertification survey.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store, date, and label food items to prevent food from being served that may be unsafe to eat and to prevent cross contamination. This was evident by the initial kitchen observations of the facility's dessert freezer during the recertification survey.
- D Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure advance directives for a resident were maintained and readily retrievable by any facility staff in their medical record. This was evident for 1 (Resident #50) out of 4 residents reviewed for advanced directives during the facility's recertification survey.
- D Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the medical record and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to document in the medical record when the determination was made that a resident met the criteria for a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA). This was evident for 1 (Resident #24) out of 33 residents reviewed during the recertification survey.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's care plan was comprehensively developed and person centered. This was evident for 1 (Resident #50) out of 1 resident reviewed for activities during the facility's recertification survey.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, review of the medical record, and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to hold care plan meetings for residents and/or their representatives at the time of their admission. This was evident for 1 (Resident #18) out of 33 residents reviewed during the recertification survey.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to: 1) ensure and monitor the implementation of fall interventions, and 2) monitor for effectiveness of fall interventions. This was evident for 1(Resident #25) out of 2 residents reviewed for accidents during the facility's recertification survey.
- D Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the implementation of a nutrition intervention for a resident to prevent further weight loss. This was evident for 1 (Resident #53) out of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition during the facility's recertification survey.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and medical record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to 1) label the oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle and 2) failed to follow the physician's orders to label the oxygen tubing and humidifier when changed. This was evident for one (Resident #30) of one resident reviewed for respiratory care during the recertification survey.
- D Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility 1) failed to ensure monthly Medication Regimen Reviews were completed by the pharmacist and 2) failed to respond to recommendations made by consulting pharmacists in a timely manner. This was evident for 1 (Resident #18) out of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the recertification survey.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure all employees' required immunizations and screenings were up to date, as it relates to infection prevention and control. This was evident for 2 (GNA #34 and LPN #35) of 5 employees reviewed during the recertification survey.
September 20, 2019Standard inspection · 10 citations
- G Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical records review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility staff failed to notify the physician when there was an acute change in the resident's condition after a fall. This was found to be true for 1 out of 22 residents (Resident #4) reviewed during the investigation stage of the long-term care survey process. This failure resulted in actual harm to Resident #4.
- E Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observations and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to complete the facility matrix accurately. This was found to be evident during the survey and has the potential to impact all residents in the facility.
- D Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, family interview and interview with the facility staff it was determined that the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure that the Surrogate Decision Maker and resident wishes expressed under the Maryland Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) was followed. This was true for 1 out of 22 residents (Resident #18) reviewed during the survey.
- D Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, observation, record review and staff interview it was determined that after a resident to resident altercation, the facility staff failed to put adequate interventions in place to prevent further potential abuse while the investigation was in progress. The facility staff also did not provide a timely and thorough investigation to evaluate the perpetrator and determine potential mitigating factors that triggered the event and application of appropriate interventions. This was found to be true in 1 of 1 facility reportable incident reviewed during the survey.
- D Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure that the resident and/or resident's representative were notified in writing of the resident's transfer and the rationale for the transfer. This was found to be evident for 2 out of the 2 (Resident #24 and #60) residents reviewed for hospitalization during the investigative portion of the survey.
- D Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to transmit a discharge summary timely. This was evident during the review of 1 of 1 resident assessments (Resident #1)
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to develop a care plan that would ensure that a resident with cognitive impairment was kept safe and free of an alert and oriented resident who admired and was in pursuit of the cognitively impaired resident. This was found to be evident for 1 of 22 residents (Resident #49) who was reviewed for care plans during the survey.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, record review, and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to update and ensure the plan of care was reviewed and revised timely by an interdisciplinary team for residents. This was true for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #18) reviewed for care plan revision during the survey.
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to: 1. have consistent documentation on the chart and the electronic medical record regarding a residents Medical Order of Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) forms and 2. obtain a resident consult from the pain clinic and have it on the resident's medical record. This was evident during the review of 2 of 22 residents (Resident # 24 and Resident # 40) in the investigative portion of the survey.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to adhere to infection control practices and guidelines while administering medications. This was found to be evident for 2 of 7 residents (Resident # 176 and Resident # 74) observed during medication administration observation.
Fire safety inspections
10 fire safety citations on file: 6 on March 6, 2026, 2 on November 20, 2024, 2 on September 20, 2019.
Every fire safety citation10 citations
- F Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
- F Ensure receptacles at patient bed locations and where general anesthesia is administered, are tested after initial installation, replacement or servicing.
- F Have a battery powered remote alarm panel in a location accessible by operating personnel.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- D Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Meet other general requirements that are deficient.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Maryland | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.46 | 3.87 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.10 | 0.84 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.08 | 3.47 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.62 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.75 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 41.3% | 40.2% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 36.8% | 38.7% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.46 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.62 on weekdays and 3.08 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 2.7% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.53 in April to June 2025 to 3.46 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.46 | 1.10 | 3.62 | 3.08 | 2.7% | 0 of 90 | 69 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.69 | 1.11 | 3.88 | 3.22 | 3.6% | 0 of 92 | 67 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.69 | 1.04 | 3.87 | 3.21 | 4.8% | 0 of 92 | 68 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.53 | 0.89 | 3.69 | 3.12 | 3.5% | 0 of 91 | 70 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Maryland, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.73 | 0.74 | 3.88 | 3.34 | 8.0% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Maryland | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 25.0 | 20.4 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.9 | 2.4 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 30.9 | 22.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.6 | 5.9 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.9 | 13.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 13.7 | 21.0 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 10.1 | 9.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: MCCREADY FOUNDATION INC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tidalhealth, Inc | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 03/01/2020 | |
| Truist Commercial Equity, Inc | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 02/08/2021 | |
| Diriker, Mehmet | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2024 | |
| Fiddler, Kathryn | Corporate director | Individual | 03/01/2020 | |
| Gary, Stephanie | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2024 | |
| Rommel, David | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2024 | |
| Trumble, James | Corporate director | Individual | 03/01/2020 | |
| Williams, Andrea | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2024 | |
| Fiddler, Kathryn | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2020 | |
| Leonard, Steven | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2020 | |
| Spence, Camesha | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2014 | |
| McCready Foundation Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/27/1984 | |
| Tidalhealth, Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/01/2020 | |
| Butler, Gerrod | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Collins, Franklin | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2014 | |
| Gary, Stephanie | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2024 | |
| Johnson, Marcia | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/07/2024 | |
| Karumbunathan, Vijaykumar | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2020 | |
| King, Audrey | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2024 | |
| Leonard, Steven | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2020 | |
| McGonigle, Jami | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/07/2024 | |
| Miller, Laurie | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/07/2024 | |
| Sipe, Richard | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2020 | |
| Spence, Camesha | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2014 | |
| Tull, Lisa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/07/2024 | |
| Ward, Lori | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2020 | |
| Yanus, Scott | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2020 | |
| McCready Foundation Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/27/1984 | |
| Tidalhealth, Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2020 | |
| Butler, Gerrod | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Collins, Franklin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/01/2014 | |
| Gary, Stephanie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/01/2024 | |
| Johnson, Marcia | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/07/2024 | |
| Karumbunathan, Vijaykumar | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/09/2025 | |
| Leonard, Steven | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2020 | |
| McGonigle, Jami | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/07/2024 | |
| Spence, Camesha | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2020 | |
| Tull, Lisa | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/07/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 11 problems in this area, most recently on March 6, 2026: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on March 6, 2026: "Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on March 6, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
- How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on May 20, 2026: "Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.08 hours per resident per day, below the Maryland average of 3.47.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Hartley Nursing and Rehab Pocomoke City, 16.8 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 37 citations
- Manokin Nursing and Rehab Princess Anne, 16.9 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 75 citations
- Shore Health & Rehab Center Parksley, 20.6 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 34 citations
Maryland contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Maryland. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Maryland Department of Health, Office of Health Care Quality, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Maryland Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, Maryland Department of Aging, 800-243-3425. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Maryland Health Care Commission, Maryland Quality Reporting, Nursing Homes, where Maryland publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Alice Byrd Tawes Nursing Home's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Alice Byrd Tawes Nursing Home 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Alice Byrd Tawes Nursing Home get at its last inspection?
- 7 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on March 6, 2026. The Maryland average is 17.
- Has Alice Byrd Tawes Nursing Home been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Alice Byrd Tawes Nursing Home accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Alice Byrd Tawes Nursing Home?
- CMS lists 38 owners and managers. Legal business name: MCCREADY FOUNDATION INC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.