Home / California / Lemon Grove
Bella Vista Health Center
7922 Palm Street, Lemon Grove, CA 91945 · San Diego County · (619) 644-1000
99 certified beds, about 89 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2011
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 555870 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on November 17, 2025, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the California average is 15.6, the national average 9.2).
None of its 22 health citations since January 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.87 hours per resident per day, against 4.52 across California and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.78 of those hours.
47.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (California average 36.7%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 22 health citations on file.
April 15, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer medication as ordered for one of four sampled residents (1). As a result, Resident 1 was at increased risk of medication side effects.
November 17, 2025Standard inspection · 6 citations
- E Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the dietary staff were competent on the ambient temperature (the temperature of the surrounding air, room temperature) food cool down process and cooked food cool down process for Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food (TCS- foods that can rapidly spoil and cause illness). These failures placed the facility's residents who consumed food prepared in the kitchen at risk of foodborne illness.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure practices that mitigated the risk of resident food contamination were followed when: Fruit flies were observed flying around the kitchen. An open food thickener container was placed right next to the open trash can. A staff food cart was stored in the kitchen. An expired cream cheese was found in the walk-in refrigerator. Tuna salad sandwiches and hard-boiled eggs were not cooled down (a two-stage method for rapidly cooling food to prevent the growth of bacteria) properly. Washed dishes were stacked wet and with food residue on them. Washed coffee mugs had residue on them. Cooked chicken did not have a temperature taken before being plated and placed in the meal cart. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses among residents who received food from the kitchen.
- E Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
Inspectors wroteBased on the observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe storage of resident food brought from outside of the facility when: Resident food was stored in the resident refrigerator for over 72 hours. Resident food containers were not properly labeled. The thermometer located in the resident food refrigerator was broken and the temperatures entered in the log were consistently over 41 degrees F (Fahrenheit). Staff food items were found in the designated resident refrigerator. The facility did not implement its policy titled Food Brought from Outside. As a result, the residents were at risk of consuming potentially contaminated food.
- D PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review Level II (PASARR II - an evaluation of the resident's psychiatric treatment requirements) was followed up on and completed for two of four residents (Resident 26 and 49) reviewed for PASARR.This failure had the potential for Resident 26 and Resident 49 to not receive necessary mental health care services in an appropriate healthcare setting.
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services according to acceptable standards of practice when the documentation on the Controlled Drug Record (CDR an accounting of controlled medications, drugs with a high abuse potential) and the Medication Administration Record (MAR documentation in the medical record that a resident received a medication) did not reconcile for one of three randomly selected residents (Resident 14). This failure had the potential for drug diversion (illegal acquisition, misuse, or transfer of prescription medication for an unauthorized purpose) and/or inadequate pain management.
- D Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide outside dental resources and services in a timely manner for one resident (Resident 6). As a result, Resident 6 waited over 11 months to be evaluated for a new denture and was at risk for potential issues with the fitting of the new denture caused by the delay in receiving dental care and treatment.
July 26, 2024Standard inspection · 2 citations
- D PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) accurately reflected the presence of a diagnosed mental disorder for 1 (Resident #44) of 5 residents reviewed for PASRR requirements.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure expired medications and/or biologicals were removed from 1 (Station 1) of 2 medication storage rooms and 1 of 1 central supply closet.
February 15, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and treatment to a resident's (1) identified skin issues (redness of the buttocks), for one of three sampled residents, when Resident 1's physician was not informed of the resident's skin condition during admission to the facility. The delayed care and treatment to Resident 1's skin issues had the potential to worsen Resident 1's skin condition.
January 27, 2022Standard inspection · 12 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper food handling practices, and sanitation requirements were met when: 1. Kitchen staff (KA 1) did not perform hand hygiene between kitchen tasks, and 2. Dishwashing racks (used for storing dinnerware, cups and glasses) were worn, and covered in a gray residue. These failures had the potential to cause the spread of food borne illness to residents in the facility.
- F Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide infection control standards of practice when; In the facility's designated Red Zone: 1a. CNA 6 and Maintenance (Mnt 6) staff was observed entering and exiting (clean to dirty area) the Red Zone not donning PPE (personal protective care equipment). 1b. A resident (Resident 58) was observed wandering the halls of the Red Zone without a mask. 1c. Social service (SS 6) staff member was observed exiting an isolation room and entering a clean room without performing handwashing. 1d. CNA 8 was observed entering an isolation room not donning PPEs. 2. During lunch meal service a CNA 7 did not perform handwashing when passing resident meal trays. 3. [...]
- E Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to support four of seven residents (Residents 26, 47, 56, and 254), reviewed for resident rights, when their normal activity of smoking was not permitted. This failure resulted in Residents 26, 47, 56, and 254 to experience increased anxiety and anger.
- E Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently offer snacks to five of six confidential residents (CR 1, CR 2, CR 3, CR 4, CR 5 ) and two unsampled residents (55, 90) reviewed for evening snacks. This failure had the potential for residents to experience hunger between meals.
- D Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Provide dignity and privacy to one of three residents (Resident 249) reviewed for urinary catheter (a flexible tube that collects urine from the bladder and leads to a drainage bag) care, when a dignity bag, (a solid colored bag, which covers the urine collection bag) was not properly placed over the catheter collection bag and was viewable from the hallway;. and 2. A resident's property was not safeguarded by having the property identified, inventoried and properly secured for one of one sampled residents (Resident 297), when a bag of prescription medications was found in a the residents' room. These failures had the potential to effect Resident 249's self esteem and for Resident 297's property to be lost or stolen.
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess and document the dental needs for one of three residents (Resident 32) reviewed for accuracy of MDS assessment. As a result, Resident 32's dental needs went unrecognized and untreated.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan regarding refusal of care, for one of eight residents (64) reviewed for individualized care plans. This failure had the potential to deny Resident 64 the care required to meet her daily needs.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to secure a resident's personal medications, including a controlled substance for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 297), reviewed for accidents. In addition, residents and staff were at risk for injuries related to exposed sharps in one of two shower rooms. This failure puts residents at risk for accidents and hazards.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer the appropriate amount of oxygen (O2), ordered by the physician and the oxygen was administered when there was no indication of need, for one of two residents (Resident 62), reviewed for oxygen administration This failure had the potential for Resident 62 to experience hypercapnia (high carbon dioxide levels in the blood).
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a residents property was properly secured for one of one sampled resident (Resident 297) when a bag of prescription medications including a narcotic was found in a the residents' room. This failure had potential for health and safety risk to other residents.
- D Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' food brought into the facility from the outside, was dated and discarded timely. This failure had the potential to cause the spread of food borne illness in the facility if residents consumed spoiled food.
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately record the amount of food consumed by one of eight residents (64), reviewed for meal intake. This failure had the potential to affect Resident 64's health because the RD and physician were unaware of the resident's lack of food intake.
Fire safety inspections
14 fire safety citations on file: 4 on November 17, 2025, 6 on July 26, 2024, 4 on January 27, 2022.
Every fire safety citation14 citations
- F Conduct risk assessment and an All-Hazards approach.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- D Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- C Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
- F To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
- D Use approved construction type or materials.
- D Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- D Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- D Meet requirements for operating features, such as evacuation plans, fire drills, smoking regulations, draperies, decorations and the inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors.
- E Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
- D Use approved construction type or materials.
- D Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- D Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | California | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.87 | 4.52 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.78 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.54 | 4.09 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.83 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.26 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 47.6% | 36.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 37.5% | 38.1% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 5.18 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.01 on weekdays and 4.54 on weekends, 9% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 1.3% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.86 in April to June 2025 to 4.87 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.87 | 0.78 | 5.01 | 4.54 | 1.3% | 0 of 90 | 89 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.62 | 0.80 | 4.74 | 4.32 | 2.3% | 0 of 92 | 90 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.86 | 0.79 | 5.07 | 4.34 | 1.7% | 0 of 92 | 86 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.86 | 0.93 | 5.11 | 4.23 | 2.4% | 0 of 91 | 86 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| California, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.36 | 0.59 | 4.52 | 3.97 | 2.3% | 0.5% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | California | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 23.7 | 10.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.2 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.2 | 9.8 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.6 | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.8 | 12.0 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 16.7 | 22.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 9.1 | 11.2 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.7 | 2.3 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: AETAS HEALTH SERVICES.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Floyd, Susan | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 10/07/2014 | |
| Hassel, Evelyn | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 10/01/2014 | |
| Floyd, Susan | Corporate director | Individual | 10/07/2014 | |
| Bari, Mohammed | General partnership interest | Individual | 07/10/2010 | |
| Ishaque, Saleem | General partnership interest | Individual | 07/10/2010 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on November 17, 2025: "Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on November 17, 2025: "PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities"
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on April 15, 2026: "Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on November 17, 2025: "Provide or obtain dental services for each resident."
Other nursing homes nearby
- La Mesa Healthcare Center La Mesa, 1 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 42 citations
- Lemon Grove Care and Rehabilitation Center Lemon Grove, 1.1 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 53 citations
- Amaya Springs Health Care Center Spring Valley, 1.2 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 32 citations
- Brighton Place Spring Valley Spring Valley, 2.1 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 36 citations
- Community Care Center La Mesa, 2.7 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 28 citations
- Parkway Hills Nursing & Rehabilitation La Mesa, 2.7 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 51 citations
- Arbor Hills Nursing Center La Mesa, 2.7 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 37 citations
- Mount Miguel Covenant Village Spring Valley, 2.8 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 28 citations
California contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in California. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: California Department of Public Health, Center for Health Care Quality, Licensing and Certification Program, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: California Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, 1-800-231-4024. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Cal Health Find, where California publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Bella Vista Health Center's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Bella Vista Health Center 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Bella Vista Health Center get at its last inspection?
- 6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on November 17, 2025. The California average is 15.6.
- Has Bella Vista Health Center been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Bella Vista Health Center accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Bella Vista Health Center?
- CMS lists 5 owners and managers. Legal business name: AETAS HEALTH SERVICES.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.