Bennett Hills Rehabilitation and Care Center
1220 Montana Street, Gooding, ID 83330 · Gooding County · (208) 934-5601
80 certified beds, about 54 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2008
Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
2 of 5
Health inspections
2 of 5
Staffing
2 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 135134 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 30, 2026, inspectors cited 10 health deficiencies (the Idaho average is 10.3, the national average 9.2).
Of 38 health citations since May 2024, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $10,628 in the last three years; the largest was $10,628, and the latest is dated April 30, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.85 hours per resident per day, against 4.04 across Idaho and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.45 of those hours.
51.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Idaho average 50.3%).
CMS links it to The Ensign Group, an affiliated group of 344 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
2005/24
803/25
1004/26
Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 38 health citations on file.
Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
23D
11E
3F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
April 30, 2026Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 10 citations
- G Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of the State Agency's Long-Term Care Reporting Portal, staff interviews, and review of the facility policies, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from accidents. This was true for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for transportation. This failure caused injury for this resident.
- E Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with a clean, safe, homelike environment. This was true for all residents who resided in the facility whose environment were observed. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if residents were embarrassed by and/or felt the disrepair in the facility was unacceptable, disrespectful, or undignified or residents were injured due to unsafe areas in the facility.
- E PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to refer residents for further mental health evaluation when residents stayed beyond a 30 day exemption for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #7) and the facility failed to request a Level II Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for 2 of 3 residents (#10 and #38) reviewed for PASARR screenings. This failure created the potential for harm if residents required but did not receive specialized services for mental health while residing in the facility.
- E Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were followed for 2 of 2 Residents (#7 and #26) reviewed for quality of care. This failed practice had the potential to adversely affect or harm residents whose care and services were not delivered according to accepted standards of clinical practices.
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, record review, and policy review it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored, locked, and controlled medications were stored and kept secure from potential theft and/or diversion. This was true for 2 of 17 Residents (#18 and #26) and the facility. These deficient practices created the potential for adverse effects if residents self-administered medications inappropriately, undetected misuse of medications and/or diversion of controlled medications and had the potential to affect all residents who receive medication in the facility.
- D Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was within reach for 1 of 17 residents (Resident #45) reviewed for residents' rights. This deficient practice had the potential to cause harm if the resident could not call for assistance when needed or experienced an adverse medical event that required attention.
- D Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to refer residents for further evaluation when residents were diagnosed with a major mental illness, intellectual disability, or a related condition. This was true for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #7) reviewed for Level II PASARR evaluations. This deficient practice had the potential to cause harm if resident's specialized services for mental health needs were not evaluated by an appropriate state-designated authority.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' care plans were developed or revised to reflect current needs and interventions. This was true for 2 of 6 residents (#10 and #38) whose care plans were reviewed. This placed residents at risk of adverse outcomes if care and services were not provided due to care plans not being developed or revised as residents' needs changed.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide respiratory services as ordered by the physician. This was true for 2 of 5 residents (#7 and #9) whose records were reviewed for respiratory services. This failure created the potential for residents to experience increased fatigue and low oxygen levels.
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview, and policy review it was determined the facility failed to ensure controlled medications were tracked and kept secure from potential theft and/or diversion. This was true for 1 of 2 medication carts reviewed. This failure created the potential for undetected misuse and/or diversion of controlled medications and had the potential to affect all residents who received controlled medication in the facility.
March 21, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 8 citations
- E Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive resident-centered care plans. This was true for 6 of 17 residents (#3, #14, #16, #47, #52, and #108) whose care plans were reviewed. These failures placed residents at risk of negative outcomes if services were not provided or provided incorrectly due to lack of information in their care plan.
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident's rights to be free from abuse were protected. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #36) reviewed for abuse. This failure placed all residents at risk for ongoing abuse and potential physical and psychosocial harm.
- D Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, policy review, employee record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure policies were implemented to protect residents from potential physical and/or psychosocial harm. This was true for 1 of 6 facility staff (NA #1), whose personnel files were reviewed for pre-employment background checks. This had the potential to place each of the residents residing in the facility at increased risk for physical and/or psychosocial harm.
- D Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the State Operations Manual-Appendix PP, the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI), record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's diagnosed medical condition was documented on the resident's comprehensive MDS assessment. This was true for 1 of 7 residents, (Resident #9) whose MDS assessments were reviewed. This failure created the potential for harm if care decisions were based upon inaccurate or lack of information.
- D Post nurse staffing information every day.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing information was accurate and posted daily for each shift. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility and their representatives, visitors, and others who wanted to review the facility's staffing levels.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications available for residents were labeled, dated, and stored appropriately, this was true for 2 of 2 medication carts audited for labeling and storage of medication. This failure created the potential for residents to have missed doses of medication.
- D Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and review of the Idaho Food Code, the facility failed to appropriately store and label food products, and cover meal trays correctly. This failure had the potential to impact all residents in the facility. This placed residents at risk for use of spoiled foods, and potential contamination, and adverse health outcomes including food-borne illnesses.
- D Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, homelike environment. This failure had the potential to impact all residents, by placing them at risk for injury and infections.
May 17, 2024Standard inspection · 20 citations
- F Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the job description for the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure there was a qualified Dietary Manager with required competencies and skills. This had the potential to affect the meal/food satisfaction of all 52 residents residing in the facility who received food from the kitchen.
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the dish machine was monitored adequately in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications for temperature and sanitizer concentration; sanitizing solutions for wiping kitchen surfaces and for pot washing were adequate in sanitizer concentration; and foods in the residents' refrigerator on the nursing unit were labeled and dated in the facility's kitchen. These deficiencies placed the 52 residents residing in the facility who received meals from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness.
- F Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure waste was properly contained with lids or otherwise covered. This created the potential for insect and pest infestation of the facility's premises and had the potential to adversely affect all 52 residents residing in the facility.
- E Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with a safe, homelike environment. This was true for 2 of 3 shower rooms observed in the facility. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if: a) residents were injured due to unsafe areas in the facility and b) residents were embarrassed by and/or felt the disrepair in the facility was unacceptable, disrespectful, or undignified.
- E Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive resident-centered care plans. This was true for 4 of 13 residents (#17, #24, #31, and #198) whose care plans were reviewed. These failures placed residents at risk of negative outcomes if services were not provided or provided incorrectly due to lack of information in their care plan.
- E Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure controlled medications were tracked and kept secure from potential theft and/or diversion. This was true for 1 of 2 medication carts reviewed. This failure created the potential for undetected misuse and/or diversion of controlled medications and had the potential to affect all residents who received controlled medication in the facility.
- E Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5%. This was true for 3 of 45 medications (6.67%) which affected 2 of 6 residents (#17 and #24) whose medication administration was observed. This failed practice placed residents at risk of not receiving their prescribed medication or dosage of their medication.
- E Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, policy review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were provided nourishing, palatable, well-balanced meals that met their daily special dietary needs and specific preferences as documented on the residents' meal ticket. This was true for 5 of 14 residents (#2, #19, #25, #26, and #39) reviewed for food and nutrition services. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if residents experienced dissatisfaction, hunger and/or weight loss from not having complete meals served.
- E Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, policy review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide nutritionally comparable and sufficient alternate meals to residents. This was true for 5 of 14 residents (#2, #14, #19, #25 and #39) reviewed for food preferences. This created the potential for dissatisfaction, and decreased meal intake.
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure to respect and maintain residents' dignity. This was true for 8 of 8 residents (#20, #27, #35, #36, #40, #41, #45 and #99) reviewed for respect and dignity who required assistance with their meals. This deficient practice created the potential for psychosocial harm if residents experienced embarrassment or lack of self-esteem.
- D Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, record review, review of facility grievances, and staff and resident interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure grievances were responded to and investigated, and prompt corrective action was taken to resolve them. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #37) reviewed for grievances. This failure created the potential for psychological harm if residents' grievances were not acted upon.
- D Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, policy review, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a seatbelt used for a resident was assessed as a potential restraint. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #29) reviewed for restraints. This deficient practice had the potential for adverse outcomes if the seatbelt was improperly used and if the resident experienced physical deterioration due to lack of movement.
- D Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, record review. and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure information was provided to the receiving hospital for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #9) reviewed for transfers. This deficient practice had the potential to cause harm if the resident was not treated in a timely manner due to lack of information.
- D Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure transfer notices were provided to the ombudsman. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #9) reviewed for transfers to the hospital. This deficient practice had the potential for harm if residents were not aware of or able to exercise their rights related to transfers.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, policy review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure professional standards of nursing practice were followed for 3 of 13 residents (#31, #37, and #43) reviewed for quality of care. Resident # 31 was at risk of wound infection when his wound dressing was not dated. Resident #37 was at risk for adverse outcomes when his physician was not notified of Resident #37's refusal of medication. Resident #43 was at risk of adverse outcomes when his physician was not notified of hyperglycemic (low blood sugar) episodes.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, policy review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received oxygen therapy per physician's orders. This was true for 1 of 14 residents (Resident #16) reviewed for oxygen therapy. This failure created the potential for Resident #16 to experience respiratory distress for not receiving the sufficient amount of oxygen to maintain oxygen levels.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications available for residents were labeled and had not expired. This was true for 2 of 2 medication storage rooms inspected. This failure created the potential for residents to receive medication used for another resident presenting a risk for cross-contamination or to receive expired medications with decreased efficacy.
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for dialysis had an accurate medical record to include documentation of the dates she failed to attend dialysis. This deficient practice created the potential for her healthcare provider to be unaware of the extent of her non-compliance.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure infection control prevention practices were maintained to provide a safe and sanitary environment. These failures had the potential to impact all 52 residents residing in the facility by placing them at risk for cross contamination and infection.
- D Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents who were offered and consented to the pneumococcal vaccine, received the vaccine. This was true for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #17) whose records were reviewed for pneumococcal vaccinations. This failure created the potential for residents to have an increased risk of pneumococcal (bacterial) pneumonia and the potential for severe illness or death.
Fire safety inspections
10 fire safety citations on file: 6 on April 30, 2026, 4 on May 17, 2024.
Every fire safety citation10 citations
- F Conduct testing and exercise requirements.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- E Establish emergency prep training and testing.
- E Establish staff and initial training requirements.
- E Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
- D Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F Ensure receptacles at patient bed locations and where general anesthesia is administered, are tested after initial installation, replacement or servicing.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- D Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| April 30, 2026 | Fine | $10,628 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Idaho | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.85 | 4.04 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.45 | 0.86 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.30 | 3.49 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.73 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.67 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 51.4% | 50.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 50.0% | 40.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.08 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.07 on weekdays and 3.30 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.85 in April to June 2025 to 3.85 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.85 | 0.45 | 4.07 | 3.30 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 54 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.00 | 0.38 | 4.25 | 3.35 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 50 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.91 | 0.35 | 4.16 | 3.25 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 50 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.85 | 0.45 | 4.14 | 3.10 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 54 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Idaho, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.90 | 0.80 | 4.11 | 3.37 | 4.9% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
Staff pay at this home
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
Official wage estimates for Idaho
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Idaho, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.58 | $17.45 to $22.23 | 7,910 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.67 | $28.04 to $35.60 | 1,880 |
| Registered nurses | $44.45 | $38.90 to $49.19 | 16,880 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Idaho | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 24.7 | 15.6 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 17.5 | 16.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 3.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.7 | 20.1 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 13.3 | 17.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 17.8 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.5 | 1.7 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: BENNETT HEALTHCARE LLC. CMS links this home to The Ensign Group, a group of 344 nursing homes averaging 3.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allen, Daniel | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Ord, Richard | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 10/01/2018 | |
| Burnam, Soon | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/18/2018 | |
| Farnsworth, Stephen | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/11/2018 | |
| Hawkins, Isaiah | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/09/2024 | |
| Sato, Ami | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/09/2024 | |
| Allen, Daniel | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Ord, Richard | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/01/2018 | |
| Gooding Health Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2022 | |
| Standard Bearer Healthcare Op LP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2022 | |
| The Ensign Group Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2022 | |
| Allen, Daniel | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Ord, Richard | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/09/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on April 30, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on April 30, 2026: "PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities"
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on April 30, 2026: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on March 21, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.30 hours per resident per day, below the Idaho average of 3.49.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Lincoln County Care Center Shoshone, 15.7 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 30 citations
- Cascades at Desert View Buhl, 23.6 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 52 citations
Idaho contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Idaho. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, Bureau of Facility Standards, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Idaho Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, Idaho Commission on Aging, (877) 471-2777. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Bennett Hills Rehabilitation and Care Center's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Bennett Hills Rehabilitation and Care Center 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Bennett Hills Rehabilitation and Care Center get at its last inspection?
- 10 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 30, 2026. The Idaho average is 10.3.
- Has Bennett Hills Rehabilitation and Care Center been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $10,628 in the last three years.
- Does Bennett Hills Rehabilitation and Care Center accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Bennett Hills Rehabilitation and Care Center?
- CMS lists 13 owners and managers, and links the home to The Ensign Group. Legal business name: BENNETT HEALTHCARE LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.