Find a nursing home

Home / Wisconsin / Ladysmith

Care & Rehab - Ladysmith 2

1001 E 11th St. N, Ladysmith, WI 54848 · Rusk County · (715) 532-5546

30 certified beds, about 29 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2013

CMS high performing icon Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
5 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 525710 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on May 5, 2026, inspectors cited 1 health deficiency (the Wisconsin average is 9.5, the national average 9.2).

None of its 4 health citations since February 2024 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.46 hours per resident per day, against 4.21 across Wisconsin and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.99 of those hours.

15.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Wisconsin average 46.9%).

CMS links it to Care & Rehab, an affiliated group of 6 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 4 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
3D
1E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
May 5, 2026Standard inspection · 1 citation · risk-based survey (a shorter visit CMS gives only to higher performing homes)
  1. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 20, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for 1 of 1 resident (R) reviewed. (R1) R1's comprehensive MDS assessment indicated a PASARR level 2 screen had not been completed. R1's medical record included a PASARR screen was completed on 2/17/25. This is evidenced by: On 05/05/26, Surveyor reviewed R1's medical record. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, dementia with anxiety, adjustment disorder, anxiety disorder, and other psychotic disorders. Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 12/30/25 documented section A1500 as No for currently considered by the state level II PASRR process to have serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or a related condition. [...]
March 6, 2025Standard inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 19, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility did not provided the needed services and assistive devices. The facility practice had the potential to affect 1 of 5 residents (R) (R17) observed for transfer and ambulation This is evidenced by: Surveyor reviewed the facility policy titled Gait belts dated 7/24. The policy in part read: Policy: A gait belt provides a firm, grasping surface for the caregiver, protects the resident from accidental trauma to the skin, provides a sense of security to the resident, and protects the caregiver and resident from injury while transferring or ambulating. Suveyor reviewed the facility policy titled Fall Risk Management Policy dated 11/24. The policy in part read: Policy: It is the policy of Care and Rehab-Ladysmith to promote resident safety by identifying residents at risk for falling; assessing fall risk factors: [...]
  2. D
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 19, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on random observation, record review and interview, the facility did not distribute foods in a sanitary manner. The facility practice affected one of one resident's (R) tray line service observed, (R17). This is evidenced by: Surveyor requested and reviewed the facility policy titled Food Handling Techniques For All Staff. which is not dated. The policy in part read: 1. What foods may not be touched with your bare hands? Answer: READY-TO-EAT FOODS Examples include: .Bread, toast, rolls, baked goods 2. What methods may be used to handle READY TO EAT FOODS? Answer: Utensils, tongs, napkins or disposable gloves. 3. Why is bare hand contact prohibited with READY-TO-EAT FOODS? Answer: Employees may transmit disease through unwashed or poorly washed hands. Wearing Gloves or using utensils protects the resident from germs the employee may be carrying on their hands. [...]
February 8, 2024Standard inspection · 1 citation
  1. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 22, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility did not establish and implement an ongoing infection prevention and control program to prevent and control the onset and spread of infection as evidenced by the following observations. The facility did not ensure 12 of 16 residents (R) (R3, R6, R9, R12, R15, R16, R17, R18, R20, R23, R24, R25) were given the opportunity to conduct hand hygiene prior to meal services. The facility staff did not perform sanitization of durable medical equipment to prevent the spread of infection when warranted between resident transfers affecting 2 of 2 resident (R7 and R12). This is evidenced by: The Facility Policy entitled Hand Hygiene - Skilled Nursing Facility Resident, revised 01/24, states: Hand washing is considered to be the single most important task that can be done to help prevent the transmission of infection. [...]

Fire safety inspections

1 fire safety citation on file: 1 on May 5, 2026.

Every fire safety citation1 citation
  1. F
    Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
    K 351 · May 5, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeWisconsinUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.464.213.86
Registered nurses0.990.990.69
All nursing staff on weekends4.123.773.42
Nurse aides2.78
Licensed practical nurses0.70
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)15.4%46.9%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover16.7%39.7%42.9%
Administrators who leftnot reported

CMS expects 4.04 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.60 on weekdays and 4.12 on weekends, 10% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 2.6% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.49 in April to June 2025 to 4.46 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.460.994.604.12 2.6%0 of 9029
Oct to Dec 20254.520.904.654.17 7.8%1 of 9229
Jul to Sep 20254.390.824.534.05 4.8%0 of 9229
Apr to Jun 20254.490.894.624.18 4.3%0 of 9129
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Wisconsin, Jan to Mar 20264.190.954.363.748.8%0.3% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeWisconsinUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
12.616.113.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.12.10.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.92.61.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.03.33.2
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
12.318.414.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.55.04.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
21.815.815.4

Owners and operators

Legal business name: SENIOR MANAGEMENT INC. CMS links this home to Care & Rehab, a group of 6 nursing homes averaging 3.5 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Thayer, Grant5% or greater direct ownership interestIndividual100%12/08/2021
Thayer, GrantCorporate officerIndividual12/08/2021
Bechtel, JessicaOperational/managerial controlIndividual03/10/2025
Hautamaki, RachelOperational/managerial controlIndividual12/08/2021
Novak, AnnmarieOperational/managerial controlIndividual12/08/2021
Sadowska, TimothyOperational/managerial controlIndividual12/08/2021
Thayer, GrantOperational/managerial controlIndividual12/08/2021
Winiarczyk, KatherineOperational/managerial controlIndividual12/08/2021
Ladysmith Campus LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization12/08/2021
Bechtel, JessicaAdp of the SNFIndividual03/10/2025
Hautamaki, RachelAdp of the SNFIndividual12/08/2021
Novak, AnnmarieAdp of the SNFIndividual12/08/2021
Sadowska, TimothyAdp of the SNFIndividual12/08/2021
Thayer, GrantAdp of the SNFIndividual12/08/2021
Winiarczyk, KatherineAdp of the SNFIndividual12/08/2021

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on May 5, 2026: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on March 6, 2025: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
  3. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on March 6, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  4. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on February 8, 2024: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."

Other nursing homes nearby

Wisconsin contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Wisconsin. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Care & Rehab - Ladysmith 2's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Care & Rehab - Ladysmith 2 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Care & Rehab - Ladysmith 2 get at its last inspection?
1 health deficiency at the standard inspection on May 5, 2026. The Wisconsin average is 9.5.
Has Care & Rehab - Ladysmith 2 been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Care & Rehab - Ladysmith 2 accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Care & Rehab - Ladysmith 2?
CMS lists 15 owners and managers, and links the home to Care & Rehab. Legal business name: SENIOR MANAGEMENT INC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection