Cedar Pointe Health and Wellness Center
1301 Cottonwood Creek Trail, Cedar Park, TX 78613 · Williamson County · (737) 757-3100
122 certified beds, about 111 residents a day · Government - Hospital district · Medicare and Medicaid since 2017
Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
2 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676432 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 8, 2026, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 9 health citations since August 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.48 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.31 of those hours.
27.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to The Ensign Group, an affiliated group of 344 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
208/23
103/24
010/24
401/26
201/26
Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 9 health citations on file.
Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
6D
2E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
January 23, 2026Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs that were identified for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's fall interventions listed in the comprehensive care plan (fall mat at bedside) were in place on 01/23/2026 and failed to ensure Resident #1's brakes were locked when he was not in his wheelchair were added to his comprehensive care plan after his fall on 1/17/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions to meet their current needs.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #1 had a fall mat next to his bed while he was in bed and failed to ensure Resident #1's brakes was locked on his wheelchair 01/23/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of unsafe transfers, injuries, and/or hospitalization.
January 8, 2026Standard inspection · 4 citations
- E Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services timely to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 5 of 10 residents (Resident #35, and Resident #48, Resident #107, Resident #114, and Resident #117) reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #35, Resident #48, Resident #107, Resident #114, and Resident #117 briefs were changed timely. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care services, diminished quality of life, and decreased self-esteem.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of one kitchen reviewed for nutrition services. 1. The facility failed to ensure sanitation practices (cleaning the ice machine).2. The facility failed to label and date all food items in the kitchen. These failures could place residents at risk of foodborne illness.
- D Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations to meet the needs and preferences for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #16) reviewed for accommodations. The facility failed to ensure Resident #16 had the call light button in reach while lying in bed. This failure could place residents at risk of injury, not receiving timely care or receiving nursing interventions to meet the resident's needs, and/or it could make the resident feel neglected affecting their mental health.
- D Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #63) reviewed for medication errors. The facility failed to ensure Resident #63 received unexpired insulin glargine (long-acting insulin) required for treating Type 1 Diabetes. This failure could place residents at risk of complications such as increased blood sugar and decline in health.
October 17, 2024Standard inspection · 0 citations
March 4, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- G Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice reviewed for pressure ulcers. A facility staff failed to ensure Resident #1's orders for a low air loss mattress (LAL) to treat an unavoidable pressure ulcer was placed in the resident's electronic health records, and for the mattress to be ordered. Resident #1's pressure ulcers increased in size. This failure could place residents at risk of improper pressure ulcer management, deterioration of existing pressure injuries, infection, and pain.
August 30, 2023Standard inspection · 2 citations
- D Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #23 and Resident #38) reviewed for accommodation of needs. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #23 and Resident #38 had properly fitting bariatric briefs available regularly for incontinent episodes to meet the needs of each resident. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving safe and comfortable incontinent care.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #60) reviewed for oxygen in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #60's O2 tubing was dated. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #60's humidifier bottle and oxygen tubing were changed as ordered. These failures placed residents receiving oxygen as needed at risk for infections.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.48 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.31 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.08 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.25 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.92 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 27.2% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 37.5% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.01 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.64 on weekdays and 3.08 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.9% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.37 in April to June 2025 to 3.48 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.48 | 0.31 | 3.64 | 3.08 | 0.9% | 0 of 90 | 111 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.59 | 0.34 | 3.72 | 3.24 | 1.5% | 0 of 92 | 109 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.48 | 0.32 | 3.59 | 3.18 | 2.5% | 0 of 92 | 110 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.37 | 0.34 | 3.50 | 3.04 | 0.7% | 0 of 91 | 110 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.1 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 21.4 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.5 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.8 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 26.6 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 11.3 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.0 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.3 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: HAMILTON COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to The Ensign Group, a group of 344 nursing homes averaging 3.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baldwin, Shaun | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Philip, Anjana | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 12/27/2024 | |
| Burnam, Soon | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Hooper, Grady | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Keetch, Chad | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2011 | |
| Apple Springs Healthcare, Inc. | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 12/01/2023 | |
| Baldwin, Shaun | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Philip, Anjana | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/27/2024 | |
| Apple Springs Healthcare, Inc. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/31/2025 | |
| Caretrust Gp LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2023 | |
| Caretrust Reit Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2023 | |
| Ctr Partnership LP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2023 | |
| Ensign Services Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/18/2021 | |
| Baldwin, Shaun | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Philip, Anjana | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/27/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on January 23, 2026: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on January 8, 2026: "Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on January 23, 2026: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on January 8, 2026: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
Other nursing homes nearby
- The Springs Healthcare and Rehabilitation Cedar Park, 0.2 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 24 citations
- Sagebrook Nursing and Rehabilitation Cedar Park, 1.1 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 30 citations
- New Hope Manor Cedar Park, 2.9 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 21 citations
- The Center at Parmer Austin, 4.3 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 21 citations
- Park Valley Inn Health Center Round Rock, 5.4 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 42 citations
- Ignite Medical Resort Round Rock, LLC Austin, 5.5 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 37 citations
- Hearthstone Nursing and Rehabilitation Round Rock, 5.9 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 24 citations
- Austin Wellness & Rehabilitation Austin, 7.1 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 66 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Cedar Pointe Health and Wellness Center's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Cedar Pointe Health and Wellness Center 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Cedar Pointe Health and Wellness Center get at its last inspection?
- 4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on January 8, 2026. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has Cedar Pointe Health and Wellness Center been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Cedar Pointe Health and Wellness Center accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Cedar Pointe Health and Wellness Center?
- CMS lists 15 owners and managers, and links the home to The Ensign Group. Legal business name: HAMILTON COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.