Find a nursing home

Home / Texas / Woodville

Dogwood Trails Manor

647 Highway 190 West, Woodville, TX 75979 · Tyler County · (409) 283-8147

90 certified beds, about 50 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1993

CMS abuse icon: cited for abuse in a recent inspection Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
1 of 5
Health inspections
2 of 5
Staffing
1 of 5
Quality measures
1 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 675152 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on August 20, 2025, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).

Of 18 health citations since May 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (2 immediate jeopardy).

CMS lists 2 fines totaling $23,104 in the last three years; the largest was $13,849, and the latest is dated July 11, 2025.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.38 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.19 of those hours.

93.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).

CMS links it to Creative Solutions in Healthcare, an affiliated group of 149 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 18 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
2J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
14D
1E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
March 4, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    F602 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 5, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to be free from misappropriation of resident property for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for misappropriation of resident property. (Resident #1) The facility failed to keep Resident #1 free of misappropriation of property when HSK A took Resident #1's Android cell phone, changed her account password, ordered an iPhone 15, and was having it delivered to his address, and was trying to order an IPhone 17. This failure could place residents at risk for decreased quality of life, misappropriation of property, and compromised dignity.
November 21, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    F655 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 22, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan, or comprehensive care plan with necessary information within 48 hours of the resident's admission for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #101) reviewed for new admissions. The facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for Resident #101 when the resident was admitted on [DATE]. This failure could lead to residents not receiving necessary care and decreased quality of life.
August 20, 2025Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 21, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate MDS was completed for 2 of 12 residents (Residents #6 and #11) reviewed for MDS assessment accuracy. The facility did not accurately code Resident #6 for dialysis care on 3 quarterly, 1 annual/Medicare 5 day and 1 Medicare 5 day MDS assessments. The facility did not accurately code Resident #11's quarterly MDS assessment for hospice care. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving the appropriate care and services to maintain the highest level of well-being.
  2. D
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 21, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for medical records accuracy. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6's order for dialysis treatments was accurately reflected in the facility's electronic health records. This deficient practice could affect residents whose records are maintained by the facility and could place them at risk for errors in care and treatment.
  3. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 21, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #10) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions for Resident #10. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination, spread of infection and sepsis.
  4. D
    Include as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
    F945 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 21, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to include mandatory training as part of its infection prevention and control program for staff reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to implement EBP training to all staff members and an upon hire and refresher training annually thereafter. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination, spread of infection and sepsis.
July 11, 2025Complaint inspection · 3 citations
  1. J
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 12, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 2 of 8 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for supervision to prevent accidents. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was free from physical abuse when Resident #1 hit Resident #2 on 06/08/25 on the secure unit. The facility failed to provided training regarding 1-1 or notify management of 1-1 status. CNA A was the only staff assigned to the unit. After the altercation, CNA A was also assigned to provide 1-1 for 1.5 hours for Resident #1 but took Resident #2 with her as she cared for other residents and did not provide 1-1 for Resident #1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 and Resident #2 did not hit each other on 06/17/25 on the secure unit. [...]
  2. D
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 12, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported, immediately but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials, including the State Survey Agency in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for reporting allegations of abuse. The DON failed to ensure allegations of verbal abuse were reported to the Abuse Coordinator immediately or to the sState within 2 hours. On 06/09/25 at an unknown time, Resident #8 alleged to the Activity Director that MA C hated her and yelled at her. [...]
  3. D
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 12, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to investigate and report the findings of the investigation to the State Survey Agency within 5 working days of the incident for 1 of 8 residents (Residents #8) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to investigate and submit the results of their investigation within 5 days after Resident #8 alleged MA C yelled at her on 06/09/25. These failures could place residents at risk of abuse, physical harm, mental anguish, and emotional distress.
May 19, 2025Complaint inspection · 4 citations
  1. E
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 20, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services that determine that drug records were in order and that an account of all controlled drugs were maintained and periodically reconciled for 1 of 2 nurses' medication carts (100/300/unit nurses' medication cart) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure the 100/300/unit nurses' medication cart Controlled Drugs Audit Record was signed off before and after each shift for October 2024, November 2024, December 2024, January 2025, February 2025, March 2025, and April 2025. The Audit Record had a total of 28 missing nurse signatures. These failures could place residents at risk for medication errors and loss of medications through drug diversion.
  2. D
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    F602 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to be free from misappropriation of resident property for 1 of 5 (Resident # 1) residents reviewed for misappropriation of resident property. The facility failed to prevent a drug diversion (misappropriation) of Resident #1's liquid morphine sulfate, a controlled medication. During the narcotic count audit, on 10/17/24, LVN D and LVN F discovered approximately 1 mL of Resident #1's liquid morphine sulfate was missing. The non-compliance was identified as past non-compliance. The noncompliance began on 10/17/24 and ended on 10/17/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk for decreased quality of life, increased pain, and misappropriation of property or physician ordered medications.
  3. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 20, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop or implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans related to behaviors. (Resident #2 and Resident #3) 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's comprehensive care plan for physical aggression was personalized and person-centered. 2. The facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan for Resident #2's verbal and other (verbal/vocal symptoms like screaming, disruptive sounds) behaviors. 3. The facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan for Resident #3's verbal behaviors. These failures could place residents at risk of not having individual needs met and a decreased quality of life.
  4. D
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    F925 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 20, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that facility was free of pests and rodents for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #4) on the secured unit reviewed for pests. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4's room was free of ants, which resulted in 10 ant bites to her left arm, 2 ant bites for her right arm, and 2 ant bites to her left clavicle. The bites were identified on 12/18/24. These findings could place residents at risk for an injury or infection related to ant bites, an unsanitary environment, and a decreased quality of life.
July 24, 2024Standard inspection · 2 citations
  1. F
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    F727 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 26, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for 8 consecutive hours 7 days a week for 1 of 4 quarters of 2024 (Fiscal Year Quarter 2 January 1-March 1) PBJ reports reviewed for RN coverage. The facility did not have RN coverage for 8 consecutive hours on 01/25/2024, 01/26/2024, 01/27/2024, and 01/28/2024. This failure could place residents at risk of lack of nursing oversight and a higher level of care.
  2. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 26, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents unable to conduct activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for one of five residents (Resident # 38) reviewed for quality of life. The facility failed to ensure Resident #38 received nail care. This failure could place residents at risk for poor hygiene, dignity issues, and decreased quality of life.
June 19, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 20, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse of residents were reported to HHSC within the 2-hour period for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #1 and #2) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to report an allegation of physical abuse within 2 hours to the State Agency when Resident #1 struck Resident #2 in left upper arm with a closed fist. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, physical harm, mental anguish, and emotional distress.
April 4, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. J
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and supervision. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 did not sustain injuries of unknown origin. On 03/10/24 Resident #1 was diagnosed with a comminuted (broken in two places) intertrochanteric left femur (thigh bone) fracture with varus angulation, comminuted intertrochanteric right femur fracture with varus (inwards) angulation, and anteriorly displaced distal fracture fragment of the right femoral fracture, and an acute angulated displaced fracture of the left proximal humeral diaphysis (shaft). 2. [...]
  2. D
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    F580 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician and notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident representative when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for notification of changes. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's physician was notified when the resident's oxygen was at 77% on room air on 03/09/24. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The noncompliance began on 03/09/24 and ended on 03/10/24. The facility had corrected the non-compliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk for delay in treatment and decreased quality of life.
May 24, 2023Standard inspection · 0 citations

Fire safety inspections

3 fire safety citations on file: 1 on August 20, 2025, 2 on July 24, 2024.

Every fire safety citation3 citations
  1. E
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · August 20, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · July 24, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. E
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · July 24, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
July 11, 2025Fine $9,255
April 4, 2024Fine $13,849

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeTexasUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.383.393.86
Registered nurses0.190.430.69
All nursing staff on weekends2.972.983.42
Nurse aides2.00
Licensed practical nurses1.19
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)93.9%55.3%45.8%
Registered nurse turnovernot reported54.6%42.9%
Administrators who left1

CMS expects 3.52 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.55 on weekdays and 2.97 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.14 in April to June 2025 to 3.38 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.380.193.552.97 0.0%0 of 9050
Oct to Dec 20253.310.163.462.94 0.0%0 of 9256
Jul to Sep 20253.230.183.392.84 0.0%0 of 9261
Apr to Jun 20253.140.173.292.78 0.0%0 of 9161
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Texas, Jan to Mar 20263.330.403.502.932.2%0.7% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Texas

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Texas, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$18.03$16.97 to $20.7188,680
LPNs and LVNs$29.92$27.46 to $32.8957,560
Registered nurses$46.14$38.06 to $50.53271,380
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeTexasUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
22.115.813.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.70.30.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.30.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.93.33.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
28.314.014.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.63.84.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
10.79.615.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
34.425.723.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
30.812.312.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
3.72.21.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
4.02.11.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: WOODVILLE II ENTERPRISES, LLC. CMS links this home to Creative Solutions in Healthcare, a group of 149 nursing homes averaging 2.1 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Blake, Gary5% or greater direct ownership interestIndividual50%06/03/2003
Blake, Malisa5% or greater direct ownership interestIndividual50%06/03/2003
Huggins, LindaW-2 managing employeeIndividual07/01/2003
Creative Solutions in Healthcare IncOperational/managerial controlOrganization07/01/2003
Blake, GaryOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/01/2003
Blake, MalisaOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/01/2003

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on March 4, 2026: "Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money."
  2. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on November 21, 2025: "Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted"
  3. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on July 11, 2025: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
  4. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on August 20, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.97 hours per resident per day, below the Texas average of 2.98.
  6. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Dogwood Trails Manor's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Dogwood Trails Manor 1 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 1 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Dogwood Trails Manor get at its last inspection?
4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on August 20, 2025. The Texas average is 9.4.
Has Dogwood Trails Manor been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 2 fines totaling $23,104 in the last three years.
Does Dogwood Trails Manor accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Dogwood Trails Manor?
CMS lists 6 owners and managers, and links the home to Creative Solutions in Healthcare. Legal business name: WOODVILLE II ENTERPRISES, LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection