Find a nursing home

Home / Alabama / Elba

Elba Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC

987 Drayton Street, Elba, AL 36323 · Coffee County · (334) 897-2257

111 certified beds, about 83 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1967

Last standard inspection more than 2 years ago Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
1 of 5
Health inspections
2 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
1 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 015083 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on May 17, 2022, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Alabama average is 4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 11 health citations since March 2019 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.71 hours per resident per day, against 3.88 across Alabama and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.92 of those hours.

47.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Alabama average 46.9%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 11 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
9D
0E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
1C
May 17, 2022Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. F
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    F576 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 20, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, discussion during the resident group meeting, and review of the facility's admission Agreement, the facility failed to ensure mail was delivered to residents on Saturdays. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 90 out of 90 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: A review of the facility's admission AGREEMENT, with an effective date of 9/16/19, revealed: . RESIDENT BILL OF RIGHTS . A. Facility Residents shall have the right to: . 26. To send and receive mail promptly and unopened. On 5/16/22 at 10:00AM, a group meeting was held with 18 residents present. No one stated they received mail on Saturdays. In an interview on 5/16/22 at 11:29AM, Resident Identifier (RI) #40 stated no one received mail on Saturday because the main office staff were not present on Saturdays. [...]
  2. D
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    F636 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 20, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident Identifier (RI) #233 was completed in a timely manner. This deficient practice affected one out of 18 resident MDS's reviewed. Findings Include: Review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual dated 10/19, page 2-16, revealed the following: . RAI OBRA-required Assessment Summary . Assessment Type/Item Set . admission . MDS Completion Date (Item Z0500B) No Later Than . 14th calendar day of the resident's admission (admission date + 13 calendar days) . RI #233 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. RI #233's admission MDS had an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4/27/22. The status of the MDS was Open. No information was entered at Z0500. [...]
  3. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 20, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview and review of a facility policy MDS ASSESSMENT, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident Identifier (RI) #32 dated 2/25/22 was coded for anticoagulation medication. This affected one of one resident records reviewed for anticoagulation medication. Findings Include: A review of a facility policy titled MDS ASSESSMENT, with a date of 11/17 revealed POLICY: The facility shall conduct interdisciplinary assessments using the MDS item sets a .These assessments provide information on the resident's condition . RI #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis to include unspecified Atrial Fibrillation. A review of RI #32's Physician orders revealed . Order Date 2/18/22 . ELIQUIS 2.5 mg (milligram) . By MOUTH TWICE DAILY . [...]
  4. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 20, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview and a review of the facility policy COMPREHENSIVE PERSON CENTERED CARE PLANS, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #58 was care planned for a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) upon readmission to the facility on 3/23/22. This affected one of 18 resident care plans reviewed. Findings Include: A review of a facility policy COMPREHENSIVE PERSON CENTERED CARE PLANS, with an effective date of 3/18 revealed POLICY: Each resident will have a person centered plan of care to identify problems, needs, strengths, preferences, and goals that will identify how the interdisciplinary team will provide care. 9. Upon a change in condition, the Comprehensive Person Centered Care Plan . will be updated . RI #58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection. [...]
July 8, 2021Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. D
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    F580 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 10, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record review and a review of the facility policies titled NOTIFICATION OF A CHANGE IN A RESIDENT'S STATUS, and GUIDE FOR WOUND EVALUATION, the facility failed to provide evidence Resident Identifier (RI) #74's responsible party was notified when: 1) RI #74 developed an open area to the right ankle on 6/15/2021; and 2) when the area to RI #72's right ankle was observed to have worsened on 6/27/2021. These deficient practices affected RI #74, one of three residents sampled for notification.
  2. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 10, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review and review of the Centers for Medicare & (and) Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instruction (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #82's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/21/2021, did not code RI #82 as receiving an Anticoagulant medication during this assessment period. This deficient practice affected RI #82, one of 31 residents whose MDS assessments were reviewed.
  3. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 10, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review and review of a facility policy titled COMPREHENSIVE PERSON CENTERED CARE PLANS, the facility failed to initiate an Instant Care Plan when Resident Identifier (RI) #74 developed an open area to his/her right ankle on 06/15/2021. This deficient practice affected RI #74, one of three residents sampled for pressure ulcers.
  4. D
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 10, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, review of the facility's Record of Medication Destruction forms, and review of a facility policy titled, MEDICATION DESTRUCTION the facility failed to ensure the Medication Destruction forms contained the required signatures. This was observed on four out of fifteen months of non-controlled drug destruction forms viewed.
March 20, 2019Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 19, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and review of facility policies tithed, Tube feeding and Resident Rights, the facility failed to ensure (Resident Identifier) RI #5 was treated with dignity while a nurse provided nutritional care. This affected 1 of 32 residents who was observed for dignity. Findings Include: A review of a document titled Resident [NAME] of Rights revealed: Each resident has a right to a dignified existence. A. Facility Residents shall have the right to: .33 To personal privacy . in his or her personal care. A review of a facility policy titled, Tube Feeding with a history date of 11/17, revealed, . Procedure: 1. Provide privacy. RI #5 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Ventricular Tachycardia, Gastrostomy Status, and Cerebral Palsy. [...]
  2. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 19, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, review of a facility policy Contact Precautions and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff put on Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) prior to entering Resident Identifier (RI) #89's room to provide care. This affected one of 4 residents on contact isolation. Findings Include: 1. A review of a undated facility policy titled, CONTACT PRECAUTIONS revealed: POLICY: Contact Precautions are a transmission based precaution that will be utilized to reduce the risk of transmission of epidemiologically important micro-organisms by direct of indirect contact. DEFINITION: Transmission Based Precautions are designed for residents documented or suspected to be infected or colonized with highly transmissible or . Three types of precautions utilized are Contact Precautions . PROCEDURE: . 3 Apply protective equipment as indicated upon entering the room. a. [...]
  3. C
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    F814 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 19, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and a review of a facility document tiled, Garbage and Rubbish Disposal, the facility failed to ensure dumpsters number one and number three were closed tightly on 3/17/19. This was observed of 2 of 3 dumpsters and had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: A review of a policy titled, Garbage and Rubbish Disposal with an edition date of 2016 revealed: .Procedure: 1. All garbage or rubbish is to be put into waste containers which are emptied as often as necessary to prevent overfilling. This will assist in the prevention of odors, pets, and possible contamination. 6. Outdoor trash receptacles will be kept covered . On 3/17/19 at 11:00 a.m., the surveyor observed dumpsters number one and number three lids opened. The dumpsters had three compartments to them. [...]

Fire safety inspections

10 fire safety citations on file: 4 on July 8, 2021, 6 on March 20, 2019.

Every fire safety citation10 citations
  1. E
    Ensure that corridors are separated from use areas by walls constructed to limit the passage of smoke.
    K 362 · July 8, 2021 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. D
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · July 8, 2021 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. D
    Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
    K 355 · July 8, 2021 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. D
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · July 8, 2021 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. F
    Ensure that personnel concerned with handling of medical gases and cylinders are trained on the risk.
    K 926 · March 20, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. E
    Have a fire alarm with audible and visual signals that transmits the alarm automatically to notify emergency forces in event of fire.
    K 343 · March 20, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. D
    Have corridors or aisles that are unobstructed and are at least 8 feet in width.
    K 232 · March 20, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. D
    Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
    K 372 · March 20, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. D
    Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
    K 741 · March 20, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. D
    Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
    K 920 · March 20, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeAlabamaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.713.883.86
Registered nurses0.920.650.69
All nursing staff on weekends2.923.263.42
Nurse aides2.29
Licensed practical nurses0.51
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)47.1%46.9%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover35.0%39.5%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.25 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.04 on weekdays and 2.93 on weekends, 27% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.58 in April to June 2025 to 3.71 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.710.924.042.93 0.0%0 of 9083
Oct to Dec 20253.710.874.002.99 0.0%0 of 9281
Jul to Sep 20253.470.843.702.87 0.0%0 of 9286
Apr to Jun 20253.580.813.832.95 0.0%0 of 9190
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Alabama, Jan to Mar 20263.880.634.133.270.9%0.2% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeAlabamaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
18.612.013.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.50.90.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.02.41.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.73.33.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.62.01.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
24.912.114.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
8.25.44.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
20.921.215.4
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.82.01.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.91.71.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: Legal Business Name Not Available.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Ownership data not available

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on May 17, 2022: "Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months."
  2. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on May 17, 2022: "Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods."
  3. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on July 8, 2021: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
  4. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on March 20, 2019: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.92 hours per resident per day, below the Alabama average of 3.26.

Other nursing homes nearby

Alabama contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Alabama. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Elba Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Elba Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC 1 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 1 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Elba Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC get at its last inspection?
4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on May 17, 2022. The Alabama average is 4.
Has Elba Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Elba Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Elba Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC?
CMS lists 1 owner or manager. Legal business name: Legal Business Name Not Available.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection