Home / North Dakota / Hatton
Hatton Prairie Village
950 Dakota Ave, Hatton, ND 58240 · Traill County · (701) 543-3102
38 certified beds, about 36 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1978
CMS high performing icon Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 355051 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on September 24, 2025, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the North Dakota average is 5.6, the national average 9.2).
None of its 13 health citations since October 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.97 hours per resident per day, against 4.42 across North Dakota and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.87 of those hours.
26.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (North Dakota average 48.8%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
110/23
809/24
409/25
Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 13 health citations on file.
Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
11D
2E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
September 24, 2025Standard inspection · 4 citations
- D Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment for 1 of 13 sampled residents (Resident #29) reviewed for advance directives. Failure to ensure the medical record accurately reflected each resident's code status limited the facility's ability to communicate to direct care staff and emergency personnel the residents' choice in the event of a medical emergency.
- D Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of facility policy, review of professional reference, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #6) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Failure to correctly transcribe physician orders placed residents at risk for medication errors and adverse health events.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview the facility failed to follow standards of infection control for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #12) observed during a dressing change. Failure to follow infection control practices during wound care has the potential to spread infection throughout the facility.
- D Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and recommendations, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents were offered the pneumococcal immunization for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #5) reviewed for immunizations. Failure to administer the pneumococcal vaccine to all eligible residents and document the administration has the potential for non-immunized residents to contract pneumonia and spread the infection to other residents, visitors, and staff.
September 5, 2024Standard inspection · 8 citations
- E Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to review and revise care plans to reflect residents' current status for 5 of 13 sampled residents (Resident #4, #13, #15, #30 and #32) and 1 supplemental resident (Resident #35). Failure to update care plans limited staffs' ability to communicate needs and ensure continuity of care.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of professional reference, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure food is stored in accordance with professional standards and in a sanitary environment in 1 of 1 kitchen (main kitchen). Failure to ensure food is safe from sources of contamination may result in a foodborne illness or adverse effects for residents, visitors, and staff.
- D Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the resident or the resident's representative a written notice of transfer or a copy of the notice to the State Long Term Care Ombudsman for 1of 1 resident (Resident #4) reviewed for hospital transfer. Failure to provide a written copy of the transfer notice does not allow the resident and/or their representative to make an informed decision regarding their rights and does not allow the ombudsman to be aware of facility practices regarding transfer and discharge or advocate on the resident's behalf.
- D Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the resident or resident's representative a written bed hold notice for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #4) reviewed for hospital transfer. Failure to provide a written copy of the bed hold notice and include the reserve bed amount does not allow the resident and/or their representative to make an informed decision regarding their rights.
- D Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual (Version 1.18.11), and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a significant change is status assessment (SCSA) for 1 of 1 supplemental resident (Resident #35) who elected hospice services. Failure to complete a SCSA may affect the development of a comprehensive care plan and the care provided to the resident.
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual (Version 1.18.11), and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate coding of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 3 of 13 sampled residents (Resident #4, #12, and #32). Failure to accurately complete the MDS does not allow each resident's assessment to reflect their current status/needs and may affect the accurate development of a comprehensive care plan and the care provided to the residents.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision and/or monitoring for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #28) with an elopement. Failure to identify the resident's risk for elopement and implement, monitor, and modify individualized resident-centered interventions when necessary placed the resident's health and safety at risk when they eloped from the facility.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #4, and #12) and 1 supplemental resident (Resident #35) observed during cares. Failure to follow infection control practices during resident cares related to hand hygiene, glove use, and enhanced barrier precautions (EBP), has the potential to spread infection throughout the facility.
October 5, 2023Standard inspection · 1 citation
- D Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of facility policy, review of professional reference, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide care in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 13 sampled residents (Resident #13) who experienced an unwitnessed fall. Failure to perform neurological assessments and follow up on a blood pressure identified as out-of-range following a fall may result in delayed identification and treatment of a resident's medical condition.
Fire safety inspections
2 fire safety citations on file: 1 on September 5, 2024, 1 on October 5, 2023.
Every fire safety citation2 citations
- D Ensure receptacles at patient bed locations and where general anesthesia is administered, are tested after initial installation, replacement or servicing.
- D Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | North Dakota | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.97 | 4.42 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.87 | 0.93 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.44 | 3.80 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.81 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.29 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 26.0% | 48.8% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 22.2% | 40.3% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.06 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.19 on weekdays and 3.44 on weekends, 18% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 2.3% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.30 in April to June 2025 to 3.97 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.97 | 0.87 | 4.19 | 3.44 | 2.3% | 0 of 90 | 36 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.13 | 0.89 | 4.35 | 3.58 | 0.8% | 0 of 92 | 35 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.27 | 0.95 | 4.48 | 3.74 | 2.0% | 0 of 92 | 35 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.30 | 0.92 | 4.60 | 3.55 | 2.9% | 0 of 91 | 35 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| North Dakota, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.57 | 0.92 | 4.81 | 3.96 | 11.7% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | North Dakota | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.5 | 19.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.2 | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.5 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 5.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.7 | 17.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 4.9 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.8 | 22.7 | 15.4 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.3 | 1.9 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: TRI-COUNTY RETIREMENT & NURSING.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beaver Creek Lutheran Church | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 20% | 05/01/2019 |
| Bethany Lutheran Church | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 20% | 05/01/2019 |
| Goose River Lutheran Church | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 20% | 05/01/2019 |
| Holmes United Methodist Church | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 20% | 05/01/2019 |
| St. John Lutheran Church | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 20% | 05/01/2019 |
| Bjerke, Joanna | Corporate director | Individual | 11/01/2020 | |
| Hedland, Laurel | Corporate director | Individual | 11/01/2016 | |
| Iverson, Steve | Corporate director | Individual | 11/01/2013 | |
| Reinhart, Betty | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2019 | |
| Reinhart, Linda | Corporate director | Individual | 11/01/2018 | |
| Vold, Bruce | Corporate director | Individual | 02/01/2019 | |
| Tredwell, Cynthia | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/01/2006 | |
| Tredwell, Cynthia | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2006 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on September 24, 2025: "Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on September 24, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on September 24, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on September 5, 2024: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.44 hours per resident per day, below the North Dakota average of 3.80.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Luther Memorial Home Mayville, 11.3 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 7 citations
- Good Samaritan Society - Larimore Larimore, 20 mi · not rated · 49 citations
- Sanford Hillsboro Care Center Hillsboro, 24.5 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 10 citations
- Woodside Village Grand Forks, 24.8 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 11 citations
North Dakota contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in North Dakota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: North Dakota Health and Human Services, Health Facilities Unit, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: North Dakota Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, (855) 462-5465. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: North Dakota Deficiency Statement Search, where North Dakota publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Hatton Prairie Village's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Hatton Prairie Village 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Hatton Prairie Village get at its last inspection?
- 4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on September 24, 2025. The North Dakota average is 5.6.
- Has Hatton Prairie Village been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Hatton Prairie Village accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Hatton Prairie Village?
- CMS lists 13 owners and managers. Legal business name: TRI-COUNTY RETIREMENT & NURSING.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.