Houston House
1000 North Industrial Drive, Houston, MO 65483 · Texas County · (417) 967-2527
96 certified beds, about 74 residents a day · For profit - Individual · Medicare and Medicaid since 1991
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 265470 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 2, 2026, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Missouri average is 11.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 14 health citations since December 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.86 hours per resident per day, against 3.43 across Missouri and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.41 of those hours.
47.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Missouri average 56.0%).
CMS links it to Circle B Enterprises, an affiliated group of 36 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 14 health citations on file.
April 2, 2026Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 7 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and distribute food under sanitary conditions, increasing the risk of cross-contamination and food-borne illness. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 74. Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Receiving and Storage, revised November 2022, showed: - Dry foods and goods are handled and stored in a manner that maintains the integrity of the packaging until they are ready to use;- Food in designated dry storage areas are kept at least six inches (in.) off the floor (unless packaged for case lot handling, for example, dollies, pallets, racks and skids) and clear of sprinkler heads, sewage/waste disposal pipes and vents. Review of the facility's policy titled, Cleaning Rotation, dated November 2016, showed: [...]
- D Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the bed hold fee on the bed-hold policy upon transfer to the hospital for five residents (Residents #3, #13, #20, #27, and #81), failed to include the name, address, or the telephone number of the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsmen (advocate for the resident in nursing facilities), mailing and email address for agency for protection and advocacy for residents with intellectual disabilities, and mailing, email address and telephone number for agency for protection and advocacy for residents with mental illness, within the transfer and discharge notices for six residents (Resident #1, #3, #13, #20, #27, and #81), and the facility failed to include the resident or responsible party's signature on the transfer/discharge form for one resident (Resident #27) out of six sampled residents. [...]
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to document an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) for two residents (Residents #13 and #47) out of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 74. Review of the facility policy, Resident Assessments, dated October 2023, showed:- Information in the MDS assessments will consistently reflect information in the progress notes, plans of care, and resident observations/interviews. Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, dated October 2025, showed:- H0300: Code 9, not rated: during the seven-day look-back period the resident had an indwelling bladder catheter (a sterile tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) for the entire seven days. 1. [...]
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #13) out of two sampled residents had a completed hospice (care for the terminally ill with a life expectancy of six months or less) coordinated plan of care with all of the care required by the resident such as a urinary catheter (a sterile tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) and wound care. The facility census was 74. [...]
- D Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure placement of the urinary indwelling catheter (a sterile tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) drainage bag and tubing was maintained for two residents (Residents #3 and #13) out of four sampled residents. The facility census was 74. Review of the facility's policy titled, Urinary Catheter Care, dated August 2022, showed:- The purpose of this procedure is to prevent urinary catheter associated complications;- Be sure the catheter tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor. 1. Review of Resident #3's medical record showed:- admission date of 05/09/23;- Diagnosis of obstructive and reflux uropathy (conditions where urine flow is blocked or flows backward into the kidneys, causing swelling and potential kidney damage). [...]
- D Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify, assess, and provide supportive interventions for one resident (Resident #4) with a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD - a mental health condition triggered by a terrifying event - either experiencing it or witnessing it; symptoms may include flashbacks, nightmares and severe anxiety, as well as uncontrollable thoughts about the event) out of one sampled resident. The facility's census was 74. [...]
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adhere to enhanced barrier precautions (EBP - precautions for use during high-contact resident care activities for residents infected with a multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO - microorganisms that are resistant to one or more classes of antimicrobial agents) or any resident who has a chronic wound and/or indwelling medical device) for two residents (Residents #13 and #25) when staff did not wear gowns to provide direct care and for one resident (Resident #25) during intravenous (IV - administer in the vein) medication administration out of six sampled residents. [...]
February 7, 2025Standard inspection · 2 citations
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by the facility staff, for one resident (Resident #55) out of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 76. Review of the facility's policy titled, Certifying Accuracy of the Resident Assessment, revised November 2019, showed: - The information captured on the assessment reflects the status of the resident during the observation (look back) period for that assessment. 1. Review of Resident #55's medical record showed: - An admission date of 11/03/23; [...]
- D Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and distribute food under sanitary conditions, increasing the risk of cross-contamination and food-borne illness when the facility failed to utilize pasteurized eggs to prepare fried eggs without a congealed yolk for seven residents (Residents #13, #42, #53, #54, #56, #57 and #63) out of 15 sampled residents. These practices had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 76. Review of the facility's policy titled, Hair Restraints, dated 2016, showed: - Staff shall wear hair restraints in all food production, dishwashing, and serving areas; - Hair restraints, hats, and/or beard guards shall be used to prevent hair from contacting exposed food. [...]
December 14, 2023Standard inspection · 5 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to store and distribute food under sanitary conditions, increasing the risk of cross-contamination and food-borne illness. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 74. The facility did not provide a dietary policy. Observations on 12/11/23 at 11:07 A.M., of the kitchen showed: - The top of the commercial range covered in food debris and a buildup of a brown substance; - The front door panel and the handle of the commercial range covered with a brown sticky substance; - An air vent located on the ceiling located near the entrance door covered with a dark brown substance; - 10 ceiling fluorescent light fixtures with no covers. Observation on 12/11/23 at 11:10 A.M., of the dry storage room showed one 6 pound (lb.) dented can of fruit mix on the canned food rack. [...]
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff treated residents with dignity and in a respectful manner by leaving two residents (Resident #69 and #225) out of nine sampled residents exposed during care. The census was 74. Review of the facility's policy titled Dignity, revised February 2022, showed: - Residents are treated with dignity and respect at all times; - Staff promote, maintain and protect resident privacy, including bodily privacy during assistance with personal care and during treatment procedures. 1. Review of Resident #69's medical record showed: - admission date of 11/03/23; [...]
- D Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete ongoing re-evaluations for the continued need of a restraint (a device that limits a person's movement) for three residents (Residents #6, #30, and #46) out of three sampled residents. The facility census was 74. The facility failed to provide a restraint policy. 1. Review of Resident #6's medical record showed: - An admission date of 06/23/21; - Diagnoses of dementia (a disorder marked by memory loss, personality changes, and impaired reasoning that interferes with daily functioning), weakness, confusion, anemia (a condition in which the blood doesn't have enough healthy red blood cells), degenerative joint disease (a type of arthritis that occurs when flexible tissue at the ends of bones wears down), and difficulty walking; - Required assistance of one staff for toileting; [...]
- D Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify, assess and provide supportive interventions for two residents (Resident #69 and #70) with a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (a mental health condition triggered by a terrifying event - either experiencing it or witnessing it; symptoms may include flashbacks, nightmares and severe anxiety, as well as uncontrollable thoughts about the event) out of two sampled residents. The facility's census was 74. The facility did not provide a PTSD policy. 1. Review of Resident #69's medical record showed: - Date of admission of 11/03/23; - Diagnosis of PTSD; - Trauma assessment dated [DATE] shows resident to trigger for PTSD. Review of the resident's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated December 2023, showed: [...]
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain adequate infection control practices to prevent the transmission of infection when staff demonstrated poor hand hygiene for eleven residents (Resident #17, #22, #30, #36, #43, #49, #50, #65, #69, #175 and #225) out of 12 sampled residents and one resident (Resident #15) outside the sample. The facility also failed to maintain adequate infection control practices during catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) care for two residents (Resident #36 and #69), emptying of the catheter drainage bag for one resident (Resident #69), and proper placement of a catheter drainage bag for one resident (Resident #36) out of three sampled residents. Review of the facility's policy titled,Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, dated August 2019, showed: [...]
Fire safety inspections
12 fire safety citations on file: 1 on April 2, 2026, 2 on February 7, 2025, 9 on December 14, 2023.
Every fire safety citation12 citations
- E Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
- F Install emergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.
- F Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
- F Address subsistence needs for staff and patients.
- F Provide exit doors that are held open by devices that will automatically close on the activation of a fire alarm or smoke detector.
- F Install proper backup exit lighting.
- F Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
- F Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- F Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Missouri | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.86 | 3.43 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.41 | 0.46 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.44 | 3.01 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.64 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.81 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 47.2% | 56.0% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 20.0% | 47.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.91 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.03 on weekdays and 3.44 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.85 in April to June 2025 to 3.86 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.86 | 0.41 | 4.03 | 3.44 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 74 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.90 | 0.44 | 4.09 | 3.40 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 72 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.75 | 0.34 | 3.94 | 3.26 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 74 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.85 | 0.40 | 4.08 | 3.27 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 74 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Missouri, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.34 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 3.9% | 1.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
Staff pay at this home
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
Official wage estimates for Missouri
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Missouri, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.11 | $17.02 to $20.00 | 34,050 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.58 | $27.06 to $33.77 | 14,700 |
| Registered nurses | $39.32 | $36.56 to $47.39 | 76,310 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Missouri | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 25.3 | 18.1 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 2.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 4.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.6 | 2.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 25.1 | 17.4 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.7 | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 25.9 | 23.5 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 11.6 | 26.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 11.9 | 13.7 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: HOUSTON NO 1 INC. CMS links this home to Circle B Enterprises, a group of 36 nursing homes averaging 2.5 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Circle B Enterprises Holding Company Inc | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 01/01/1996 |
| Bedell, Donald | Corporate director | Individual | 01/22/2001 | |
| Beaird, Todd | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Bedell, Donald | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/06/1997 | |
| Agh1 LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 12/02/2016 | |
| Sovereign Healthcare Group LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/23/2021 | |
| Bedell, Donald | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/06/1997 | |
| Beers, Jonathan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2021 | |
| Shafer, Jodi | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Bedell, Bryan | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 05/12/2025 | |
| Agh1 LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/13/2025 | |
| Dcb Real Estate Partnership LP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/11/2025 | |
| Fg LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/02/2016 | |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/16/2021 | |
| Houston Properties LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2010 | |
| Mid States Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2010 | |
| Sovereign Healthcare Group LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/06/2025 | |
| Van De Ven LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2000 | |
| Beaird, Todd | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Beers, Jonathan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2021 | |
| Shafer, Jodi | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on April 2, 2026: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 2, 2026: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on April 2, 2026: "Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on April 2, 2026: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Hickory Manor Licking, 13.6 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 38 citations
- Kabul Nursing Homes Inc Cabool, 15.2 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 12 citations
- Autumn Oaks Caring Center Mountain Grove, 19.8 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 30 citations
- Willow Care Nursing Home Willow Springs, 23.2 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 16 citations
Missouri contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Missouri. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services, Section for Long-Term Care Regulation, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Missouri Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, 800-309-3282. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Show Me Long Term Care in Missouri, where Missouri publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Houston House's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Houston House 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Houston House get at its last inspection?
- 7 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 2, 2026. The Missouri average is 11.4.
- Has Houston House been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Houston House accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Houston House?
- CMS lists 21 owners and managers, and links the home to Circle B Enterprises. Legal business name: HOUSTON NO 1 INC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.