Find a nursing home

Home / Missouri / Willow Springs

Willow Care Nursing Home

2646 State Route 76, Willow Springs, MO 65793 · Howell County · (417) 469-3152

105 certified beds, about 68 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1988

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
3 of 5
Quality measures
1 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 265335 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on January 8, 2026, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Missouri average is 11.4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 16 health citations since February 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.67 hours per resident per day, against 3.43 across Missouri and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.45 of those hours.

58.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Missouri average 56.0%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 16 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
9D
5E
2F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
January 8, 2026Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 30, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and distribute food under sanitary conditions, increasing the risk of cross-contamination and food-borne illness. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 68. The facility did not provide a dietary cleaning rotation or food storage policy. 1. [...]
  2. E
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    F569 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 30, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to refund resident funds within 30 days of when a resident expired for seven residents (Residents #80, #81, #83, #84, #85, #86, and #87) out of a sample of eight residents, and failed to complete a final accounting of resident personal funds within 30 days of discharge for six residents (Residents #88, #89, #90, #91, #93, and #94) out of a sample of seven residents. The facility also failed to ensure residents and/or responsible parties were notified in a timely manner when a resident's account was within the $200.00 Social Security Income (SSI) limit ($6,068.80) or when the resident's account was over the SSI limit. This affected one resident (Resident #43) out of a sample of 17 residents reviewed who received Medicaid benefits. The facility census was 68. [...]
  3. E
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    F881 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 30, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) that included an antibiotic stewardship program to include an infection surveillance program and antibiotic use protocols. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility also failed to ensure correct antibiotic therapy duration for one resident (Resident #73) out of two sampled residents. The facility census was 69. Review of the facility's policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program, revised October 2018, showed:- Infection prevention and control program is developed to address the facility specific infection control needs and requirements identified in the facility assessment and the infection control risk assessment. [...]
  4. D
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 30, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a urinary indwelling catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) drainage bag was maintained in the proper position for one resident (Resident #45) out of one sampled resident. The facility census was 68. Review of the facility's policy titled, Urinary Catheter Care, dated December 2025, showed:- Be sure the catheter tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor. 1. Review of Resident #45's medical record showed:- admitted on [DATE];- Diagnoses of urinary tract infection (UTI - a bacterial infection of the bladder and associated structures), benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH - a noncancerous enlargement of the prostate), and retention of urine. [...]
September 26, 2024Standard inspection · 8 citations
  1. D
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    F582 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to issue a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) to the resident and/or the resident's representative in writing at least two calendar days before discharge from skilled services. This notice informs the beneficiary about potential non-coverage and the option to continue services with the beneficiary accepting the financial liability for those services. This practice affected two residents (Residents #15 and #56) out of three sampled residents. The facility census was 72. The facility did not provide a policy regarding SNF ABN forms. 1. Review of Resident #15's medical record showed: - The resident was discharged from skilled Medicare services on 08/16/24, and remained in the facility; - No documentation the resident and/or the representative received a SNF ABN; [...]
  2. D
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    F623 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or the resident's representative in writing of a transfer or discharge to a hospital, including the reasons for transfer for three residents (Residents #15, #34, and #70) out of six sampled residents. The facility's census was 72. The facility did not provide a policy for transfer/discharge notifications. 1. Review of Resident #15's medical record showed: - The resident transferred to the hospital on [DATE], and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]; - The resident transferred to the hospital on [DATE], and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]; - No documentation of written notification to the resident and/or the resident's representative of the resident's transfer to the hospital on [DATE] and 05/13/24. 2. Review of Resident #34's medical record showed: [...]
  3. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) for four residents (Residents #22, #42, #52, and #63) out of 19 sampled residents and one resident (Resident #42) outside the sample. The facility census was 72. The facility did not provide a policy related to the accuracy of the MDS assessments. 1. Review of Resident #22's medical record showed: - Diagnoses of Parkinson's disease (a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow, imprecise movement), dementia (a condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning, especially with impairment of memory and abstract thinking), and heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should); [...]
  4. D
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for two residents (Residents #9 and #20) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 72. Review of the facility policy titled, Policy and Procedure Physician Orders, revised 07/01/17, showed: - Written/faxed orders require a physician signature in order to constitute a valid order; - The order should be clear, concise and contain the required components; - Orders that are missing required components, illegible or are unclear, will be clarified prior to implementation; - The licensed nurse is required to record the order in Point Click Care (PCC), the Physician Order Sheet (POS) and on the appropriate Medication Administration Record (MAR)/ Treatment Administration Record (TAR). 1. Review of Resident #9's medical record showed: - admission date of 01/12/22; [...]
  5. D
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician orders for placement and care of an indwelling catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) for one resident (Resident #323) out of two sampled residents. The facility census was 72. Review of the facility policy titled, Policy and Procedures Physician Orders, dated 07/01/17, showed: - An order must be recorded in the medical record by the licensed nurse authorized to transcribe such orders; - Physician's orders must be documented clearly in the medical record. Review of the facility policy titled, Catheter Care, Urinary, dated September 2014, showed: - Notify the physician or supervisor if the catheter is accidentally removed. 1. Review of Resident #323's medical record showed: - Date of admission [DATE]; [...]
  6. D
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    F697 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #9) out of one sampled resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive care plan, and the resident's choices, related to pain management. The facility's census was 72. Review of the facility policy titled, Pain Assessment and Management, dated March 2020, showed: - The purposes of this procedure are to help the staff identify pain in the resident, and to develop interventions that are consistent with the resident's goals and needs and that address the underlying causes of pain; - The pain management program is based on a facility-wide commitment to appropriate assessment and treatment of pain, based on professional standards of practice, the comprehensive care plan, and the resident's choices related to pain management; [...]
  7. D
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    F699 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify, assess, and provide supportive interventions for two residents (Resident #6 and #9) with a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD - a mental health condition triggered by a terrifying event - either experiencing it or witnessing it; symptoms may include flashbacks, nightmares and severe anxiety, as well as uncontrollable thoughts about the event) out of two sampled residents. The facility's census was 72. Review of the facility policy titled, Trauma Informed Care, dated March 2019, showed: - The purpose is to guide staff in appropriate and compassionate care specific to individuals who have experienced trauma; - Nursing staff are trained on screening tools, trauma assessment and how to identify triggers associated with re-traumatization; [...]
  8. D
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    F947 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct at least twelve hours of nurse aide in-service education per year. This affected two out of two sampled Certified Nurse Assistants (CNA) (CNA D and CNA E). The facility's census was 72. Review of the facility's policy titled, In-Service Training Program, Nurse Aide, revised 08/2010, showed: - Each nursing assistant must attend, at a minimum, twelve hours of continuing education annually. 1. Review of CNA D's in-service record showed: - A hire date of 07/28/21; - A total of three hours and 30 minutes of annual in-service training for July 2023 through July 2024; - Less than twelve hours of in-service education for July 2023 through July 2024. 2. Review of CNA E's in-service record showed: - A hire date of 04/12/13; - A total of three hours and 30 minutes of annual in-service training for April 2023 through April 2024; [...]
February 10, 2023Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. F
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 22, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program for all residents when the facility failed to have a program in place for the prevention of the growth of Legionella bacteria (a bacteria which causes a respiratory disease when breathing in small droplets of water in the air that contain Legionella. It can become a health concern when it grows and spreads in human-made water systems) in the facility water supply or where moist conditions existed. The facility had a census of 73. Record review of the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) Toolkit for Legionella (also titled Developing a Water Management Program to Reduce Legionella Growth & Spread in Buildings), dated 03/25/2021, showed healthcare facilities need to actively identify and manage hazardous conditions that support growth and spread of Legionella by: [...]
  2. E
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    F625 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 22, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents received a written notice of the bed-hold policy upon transfer when staff failed to provide three residents (Residents #24, #32 and #39) written notices of the facility's bed-hold policy when transferred to the hospital. The facility census was 73. Record review of the facility's policy entitled Bed-Holds and Returns, revised March 2017, showed the following information: -Prior to transfers and therapeutic leaves, residents or resident representatives will be informed in writing of the bed-hold and return policy; -Residents may return to and resume residence in the facility after hospitalization as outlined in this policy; [...]
  3. E
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    F679 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 22, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of meaningful activities based on residents' interests and abilities when the staff did not provide activities scheduled, did not provide a calendar with times of activities noted, and did not track attendance of activities to evaluate if activities needs were being met for four residents (Resident #9, #25, #59, and #65). The facility's census was 73. Record review of the facility's policy titled, Group Programs and Activities Calendar (Revised January 2011), showed the following: -Group activities are available in this facility and an activities calendar is completed to inform residents, families and staff of the activity opportunities available; -The activities calendar states all activities available for the entire month; [...]
  4. E
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    F919 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 22, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure call light cords were available to residents at all times when staff stored emergency call light pull cords where residents could not access the pull cord to call for staff assistance in the bathrooms of seven residents (Residents #15, #25, #30, #34, #41, #59, and #73). The facility census was 73 residents. Review of a facility policy and procedure entitled Answering the Call Light (Revised March 2021) showed the following information: -The purpose of the procedure is to ensure timely responses to the resident's requests and needs; -Upon admission and periodically as needed, explain and demonstrate use of the call light to the resident. Ask the resident to return the demonstration; -Explain to the resident that a call system is also located in his/her bathroom; [...]

Fire safety inspections

15 fire safety citations on file: 4 on January 8, 2026, 4 on September 26, 2024, 7 on February 10, 2023.

Every fire safety citation15 citations
  1. F
    Have restrictions on the use of portable space heaters.
    K 781 · January 8, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. E
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · January 8, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. E
    Have restrictions on the use of highly flammable decorations.
    K 753 · January 8, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. E
    Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
    K 920 · January 8, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. F
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · September 26, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. F
    Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
    K 351 · September 26, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. F
    Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
    K 374 · September 26, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. F
    Have restrictions on the use of highly flammable decorations.
    K 753 · September 26, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. F
    Use approved construction type or materials.
    K 161 · February 10, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. F
    Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
    K 355 · February 10, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  11. E
    Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
    K 222 · February 10, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  12. E
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · February 10, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  13. E
    Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
    K 372 · February 10, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  14. E
    Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
    K 741 · February 10, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  15. E
    Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
    K 923 · February 10, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeMissouriUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.673.433.86
Registered nurses0.450.460.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.043.013.42
Nurse aides2.52
Licensed practical nurses0.70
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)58.6%56.0%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover20.0%47.8%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.49 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.93 on weekdays and 3.04 on weekends, 23% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.61 in April to June 2025 to 3.67 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.670.453.933.04 0.0%0 of 9068
Oct to Dec 20253.880.444.093.34 0.0%0 of 9267
Jul to Sep 20253.690.403.972.97 0.0%0 of 9268
Apr to Jun 20253.610.343.833.05 0.0%0 of 9171
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Missouri, Jan to Mar 20263.340.403.502.933.9%1.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Missouri

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Missouri, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$18.11$17.02 to $20.0034,050
LPNs and LVNs$29.58$27.06 to $33.7714,700
Registered nurses$39.32$36.56 to $47.3976,310
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeMissouriUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
16.118.113.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.10.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.02.31.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
9.64.13.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
10.02.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
20.017.414.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.24.54.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
35.023.515.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
28.126.123.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
21.613.712.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.62.11.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.72.31.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Willow Care Nursing Home's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (53.6% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

53.6% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Missouri: 41 better, 31 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 34 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.3% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Missouri: 0 better, 7 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 54 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

7.1% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Missouri: 1 better, 5 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 29 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

50.0% this home

Median of homes: Missouri51.6% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 28 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Missouri0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 40 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

4.7% this home

Median of homes: Missouri2.0% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 40 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Missouri100.0% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 13 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: WILLOW HEALTH CARE INC.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Willow Health Care Inc5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%12/02/2009
Alter, ShirleyW-2 managing employeeIndividual12/02/2009
Clark, SheilaW-2 managing employeeIndividual12/02/2009
Head, BarbaraW-2 managing employeeIndividual05/01/2017
Miller, SherryW-2 managing employeeIndividual12/02/2009
Williamson, JackieW-2 managing employeeIndividual12/02/2009
Miller, SherryCorporate directorIndividual10/16/1994
Ogden, JamesCorporate directorIndividual07/20/1987

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on January 8, 2026: "Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections."
  2. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on January 8, 2026: "Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death."
  3. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on January 8, 2026: "Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use."
  4. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on September 26, 2024: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."

Other nursing homes nearby

Missouri contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Missouri. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Willow Care Nursing Home's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Willow Care Nursing Home 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 1 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Willow Care Nursing Home get at its last inspection?
4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on January 8, 2026. The Missouri average is 11.4.
Has Willow Care Nursing Home been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Willow Care Nursing Home accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Willow Care Nursing Home?
CMS lists 8 owners and managers. Legal business name: WILLOW HEALTH CARE INC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection