Find a nursing home

Home / Missouri / Fulton

Kingdom Care Senior Living

811 Center Street, Fulton, MO 65251 · Callaway County · (573) 642-6646

36 certified beds, about 27 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1994

Part of a continuing care retirement community Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 265581 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on April 15, 2026, inspectors cited 10 health deficiencies (the Missouri average is 11.4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 27 health citations since September 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.89 hours per resident per day, against 3.43 across Missouri and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.55 of those hours.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 27 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
9D
12E
2F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
4C
April 15, 2026Standard inspection · 10 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 29, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to store and serve food at temperatures adequate to prevent food-borne illness and in a manner to prevent contamination and outdated use. Facility staff also failed to allow mechanically washed dishes to air-dry prior to stacking in storage and use to prevent the growth of food-borne pathogens. These failures have the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 27.1. Review of the facility's policy titled Record of Food Temperatures, undated, showed it is the policy of the facility to record food temperatures to ensure food is at the proper serving temperatures. Review showed potentially hazardous cold food temperatures will be kept at or below 41 degrees Fahrenheit (dF). Review showed the policy directed staff to measure and record temperatures for each food product and milk at all meals. [...]
  2. F
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    F838 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 29, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, facility staff failed to document a thorough facility-wide assessment to include specific staffing needs for each resident unit in the facility and consider specific staffing needs for each shift, such as day, evening, night or include active involvement in the process from direct care staff, including but not limited to: Registered Nurses (RN), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN), Nurse Aides (NA), and representatives of the direct care staff, if applicable, and/or solicit and consider input received from residents, resident representatives, and family members. The facility census was 27.1. Review of the facility's Facility Assessment policy, dated October 2018, showed the residents, representatives and family members may be asked to participate in the review of the care and services provided to meet the needs of our residents. [...]
  3. E
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 29, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan for four (Resident #1, # 9, #17, and #23) of twelve sampled residents. The facility census was 27.1. Review of the facility's Comprehensive Care Plan policy, dated March 2022, showed: -The care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment;-The comprehensive, person-centered care plan:-Includes measurable objectives and timeframes;-Describes services to be furnished to attain or maintain the residents highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being;-Includes resident stated goals and outcomes;-Builds on resident strengths;-Reflects current recognized standards of practice for problem areas and conditions. 2. [...]
  4. E
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 29, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for five residents (Resident #2, #8, #13, #19, and #23) out of twelve sampled resident care plans. The facility census was 27.1. Review of the facility's Comprehensive, Care Plan policy, dated March 2022, showed: -The care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment; -The comprehensive, person-centered care plan: -Includes measurable objectives and timeframes; -Describes services to be furnished to attain or maintain the residents highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being; -Includes resident stated goals and outcomes; -Builds on resident strengths; -Reflects current recognized standards of practice for problem areas and conditions. [...]
  5. E
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 29, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide an environment free from accident hazards, when staff failed to lock medication carts when unattended and not in use and store chemicals when not in use. The facility census was 27.1. Review of the facility's Medication Storage policy, dated 2026, showed: -All drugs and biologicals will be stored in locked compartments (i.e., medication carts, cabinets, drawers, refrigerators, medication rooms) under proper temperature controls;-Only authorized personnel will have access to the keys to locked compartments;-During a medication pass, medications must be under the direct observation of the person administering medications or locked in the medication storage area/cart. 2. [...]
  6. E
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    F887 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 29, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, facility staff failed to educate and offer Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a respiratory disease that can cause severe illness, immunizations to residents as required for four residents (Residents #8, #13, #15, and #25) of five sampled residents. The facility census was 27.1. Review of the facility's policy COVID-19 Vaccination dated 2025, showed the facility will educate and offer the COVID-19 vaccine to residents, resident representatives and staff and maintain documentation of each. A copy of the Vaccine Information Statement will be given to staff, residents and resident representatives prior to administration. Review of Resident #8's medical record showed the record did not contain documentation of education, administration or refusal of the COVID-19 vaccination for the 2025-2026 season. [...]
  7. D
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    F637 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 29, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, facility staff failed to perform a significant change in status (SCSA) Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, a federally mandated assessment tool, for two (Resident #8 and #23) of three residents who elected hospice services and one (Resident #19) of four sampled residents who had a change in activities of daily living. The facility census was 27.1. [...]
  8. D
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 29, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to obtain orders for an indwelling urinary catheter and catheter care for one resident (Resident #2) out of one sampled resident, failed to obtain an order for hospice for one (Resident #23) out of three sampled residents, and failed to notify the physician when one (Resident #17) of four sampled residents did not receive his/her medication as ordered. The facility census was 27.1. [...]
  9. D
    Employ or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
    F840 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 29, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record review, facility staff failed to ensure arrangements were made for nephrology (services that provide care for kidney related conditions) services outside of the facility for one resident (Resident #35) of one sampled resident with kidney disease. The facility census was 27.1. Review of the facility's admission Agreement, undated, showed if a resident chose a physician who does not have privileges at the facility, the resident must travel, at their own expense, to the healthcare provider to receive services from that provider. The agreement did not contain direction or guidance on assistance to set up transportation for ordered services or assistance in set up for the appointments. Review of Resident #35's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 01/01/26, showed staff assessed the resident as: [...]
  10. C
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 29, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to provide a clean, comfortable and homelike environment for residents, when staff failed to maintain one of one shower rooms free of an excessive buildup of foreign material. This failure has the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 27. F1. Review of the facility's policy titled Safe and Homelike Environment, dated 2025, showed housekeeping and maintenance services will be provided as necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly and comfortable environment. Review showed the policy did not contain specific guidance related to the resident shower room. Observation on 04/14/26 during the Life Safety Code tour showed the facility equipped with one shower room for use by all residents. [...]
January 6, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    F838 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 12, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, facility staff failed to conduct and document an annual facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for facility residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies as required. The facility census was 26. 1. Review of the facility's Facility Assessment Report, dated July 2024, showed the assessment did not contain information on staffing for day-to-day operations and emergencies as required. During an interview on 1/6/25 at 10:02 A.M., Licensed practical Nuse (LPN) A said he/she is responsible for the nursing staff schedule. He/She said he/she schedules a consistent schedule based on the census and not according to resident acuity. He/She said he/she does not know what the facility assessment directs for staffing. [...]
December 17, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. E
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    F567 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 30, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, facility staff failed to prevent the commingling of nine residents (Resident #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, and #14) personal funds with the facility operating funds out of 13 sampled residents. The facility census was 28.1. [...]
September 12, 2024Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. E
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 21, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide a clean, safe, and comfortable home-like environment when staff failed to adequately maintain doors and keep walls in resident rooms free of gouges in the drywall and scrapes in the paint. The facility census was 26. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Quality of Life-Homelike Environment, dated May 2017, showed residents are provided with safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. The facility staff and management shall maximize, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting, to include clean, sanitary and orderly environment. 2. [...]
  2. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 21, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) to prevent the spread of bacteria and other infection causing contaminants during the provision of care for two residents (Residents #9 and #28) of a sample of two residents. The facility census was 26. 1. Review of the facility's titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions, undated, showed EBP are an infection control intervention designed to reduce the transmission of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms (MDROs) in nursing homes. EBP expands upon Standard Precautions by requiring the use of gowns and gloves during specific high-contact resident care activities. High-contact resident care activities are activities that have been demonstrated to result in the transfer of MDROs to hands or clothing of healthcare personnel, even if blood and body fluid exposure is not anticipated. [...]
  3. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 21, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to update the care plans for meal assistance for two residents (Resident #3 and #24) and for bed rail usage for one resident (Resident #3) of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 26. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centers dated, December 2016 says; [...]
  4. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 21, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to obtain a physician's order for and failed to update the plan of care for one resident (Resident #23) out of two sampled residents who received oxygen therapy. The facility census was 26. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Oxygen Administration, dated October 2010, showed staff are directed to verify there is a physician's order. Review the physician's order or facility protocol for oxygen administration. Review the care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident. 2. Review of Resident #23's admission Minimum Data set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 07/07/24, showed staff assessed the resident used oxygen. Review of the resident's Physician Orders Sheet (POS), dated September 2024, showed it did not contain an order for oxygen. [...]
  5. C
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    F732 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 21, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to post the required nurse staffing information, which included the total number of staff and the actual hours worked, by both licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care, per shift, and on a daily basis. The facility census was 26. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers, dated August 2022, showed staff were directed to do the following: -Our facility will post on a daily basis for each shift nurse staffing data, including the number of nursing personnel responsible for providing direct care to residents; [...]
September 13, 2023Standard inspection · 10 citations
  1. E
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    F607 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 28, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, facility staff failed to check the Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) Registry for all staff to ensure they did not have a Federal Indicator (a marker given by the federal government to individuals who have committed abuse and/or neglect) as directed in their policy. The facility census was 29. 1. Review of the facility's policy, titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program, revised April 2021, showed staff were directed to conduct employee background checks and not knowingly employ or otherwise engage any individual who has a finding entered into the state nurse aide registry concerning abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment of residents or misappropriation of their property; [...]
  2. E
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 28, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility staff, failed to update and revise care plans with the interdisciplinary team (IDT) for three residents (Resident #1, #2, and #8). The facility census was 29. 1. Review of the facility's policies showed staff did not provide a policy for care plan meetings. 2. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated, showed staff assessed the resident as: -Moderate cognitive impairment; -Required limited one person assistance for bed mobility, transfers, toileting, and personal hygiene; -Diagnosis of Depression (a depressed mood or loss if pleasure or interest in activities for long periods of time). Review of the resident's care plan signature sheet, dated 06/16/23, showed the sheet did not consist of an IDT team. [...]
  3. E
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 28, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to ensure the residents' environment remained free of accident hazards when staff failed to ensure safe propulsion for three residents (Resident #4, #8, #12, and #15) in wheelchairs in a manner to prevent accidents. The facility census was 29. 1. Review of the facility's Manual Wheelchair safety and Maintenance policy, undated, showed the following: -No pedals-No push; -Always propel a resident in a forward position; -Always ensure leg rests and foot pedals are in the correct position and in use when propelling a resident in a wheelchair. 2. Review of Resident #4's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 07/03/23, showed staff assessed the resident as: -Severe cognitive impairment; [...]
  4. E
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    F700 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 28, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to accurately complete entrapment assessments, side rails assessments, obtain informed consent and a physician order for the use of side rails and/or grab bars for four residents (Residents #4, #9, #18, and #25). The facility census was 29. 1. Review of the facility's Bed Safety, revised December 2007, directed staff as follows: -Inspection by maintenance staff of all beds and related equipment as part of our regular bed safety program to identify risks and problems including potential entrapment risks; -Review of the gaps within the bed system are within the dimensions established by the FDA (Note: the review shall consider situations that could be caused by the resident's weight, movement or bed position); [...]
  5. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 28, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review facility staff failed to use appropriate infection control procedures to prevent the spread of bacteria or other infectious causing contaminants during perineal care, when staff failed to perform appropriate hand hygiene, and glove changes for two residents (Resident #8 and #12), when staff failed to change oxygen tubing for three residents (Resident # 1, #17 and #178), and prevent one resident's (Resident #11) catheter tubing from laying on the ground. Additionally the facility failed to ensure the two-step purified protein derivative (PPD) (skin test for Tuberculosis (TB)) was completed and on file in accordance with their policy for four employees (Certified nursing assistant (CNA) E, F and G, and housekeeper A). The facility census was 29. 1. [...]
  6. D
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    F578 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 28, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility staff failed to document residents' code status consistently, Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) or Full Code (Resuscitate refers to cardiopulmonary resuscitation-CPR) for one resident (Resident #1). The facility census was 29. 1. Review of the facility's Do Not Resuscitate Order Policy, revised [DATE], showed staff are directed as follows: -Do not resuscitate orders must be signed by the resident's Attending Physician on the physician's order sheet maintained in the resident's medical record; -The Interdisciplinary Care Planning Team will review advance directives with the resident during quarterly care planning sessions to determine the resident wishes to make changes in such directives. [...]
  7. D
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    F692 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 28, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review facility staff failed to implement dietician recommendations after an acute illness and change in appetite to prevent weight loss for one of one sampled resident (Resident #21). The facility census was 29. 1. Review of the facility's Nutritional Assessment Policy revised October 2017, showed as part of the comprehensive assessment, a nutritional assessment including current nutritional status and risk factors for impaired nutrition, shall be conducted for each resident. The dietician, in conjunction with the nursing staff and healthcare practioners, will conduct a nutritional assessment for each resident upon admission and as indicated by a change in condition that places the resident at risk for impaired nutrition. [...]
  8. D
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    F698 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 28, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure one (Resident #20) of one sampled residents received care and services for the provision of hemodialysis (the clinical purification of blood by dialysis, as a substitute for the normal function of the kidney) consistent with professional standards of practice when staff failed to obtain orders for dialysis and provide ongoing assessments of the resident's condition, and monitoring for complications after dialysis treatments. The facility census was 29. 1. Review of the policies provided by the facility showed no direction for staff in regard to dialysis care for residents. 2. Review of Resident #20's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 08/21/23, showed facility staff assessed the resident as: -Moderate cognitive impairment; -Received dialysis; [...]
  9. C
    Post a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
    F575 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 28, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview and record review, the facility staff failed to post, in a form and manner accessible to the residents and resident representatives, the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) Elder Abuse hotline information (to report allegations of abuse and neglect), or a list of names, addresses, and phone numbers of the State Survey Agency (SA). The facility census was 29. 1. Review of the facility's Resident's Rights Policy, revised 03/01/2023, showed: -The facility must post, in a form and manner accessible and understandable to residents, and resident representatives: -A list of names, addresses (mailing and email), and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups, such as the state survey agency, the state licensure office, adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities; [...]
  10. C
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    F625 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 28, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide written information to the resident and/or the resident's representative of their bed hold policy at the time of transfer to the hospital for three residents (Resident #9, #14, and #179) out of three sampled residents. The facility's census was 29. 1. Review of the facility's policies showed staff did not provide a policy for bed holds. 2. Review of Resident #9's medical record showed the following: -Cognitively intact; -discharged from the facility on 06/18/23 and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]; -Did not contain written documentation staff notified the resident or the resident's responsible party of the facility's bed-hold policy. 3. Review of Resident #14's medical record showed the following: -Cognitively intact; -discharged from the facility on 07/04/23 and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. [...]

Fire safety inspections

9 fire safety citations on file: 6 on April 15, 2026, 2 on September 12, 2024, 1 on September 13, 2023.

Every fire safety citation9 citations
  1. F
    Conduct testing and exercise requirements.
    E 39 · April 15, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
    K 222 · April 15, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. F
    Follow proper procedures when the fire alarm was out of service for more than 4 hours.
    K 346 · April 15, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · April 15, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. F
    Follow proper procedures when the automatic sprinkler systems was out of service for more than 10 hours.
    K 354 · April 15, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. F
    Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
    K 923 · April 15, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. F
    Install emergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.
    K 291 · September 12, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · September 12, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · September 13, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeMissouriUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.893.433.86
Registered nurses0.550.460.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.483.013.42
Nurse aides2.37
Licensed practical nurses0.97
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)not reported56.0%45.8%
Registered nurse turnovernot reported47.8%42.9%
Administrators who leftnot reported

CMS expects 2.96 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.06 on weekdays and 3.48 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.33 in April to June 2025 to 3.89 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.890.554.063.48 0.0%3 of 9027
Jul to Sep 20254.360.604.583.82 0.0%0 of 9227
Apr to Jun 20254.330.644.583.72 0.0%2 of 9127
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Missouri, Jan to Mar 20263.340.403.502.933.9%1.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeMissouriUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
20.018.113.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.10.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.42.31.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.54.13.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.02.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
10.317.414.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.24.54.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.123.515.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
37.426.123.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
10.413.712.0

Owners and operators

Legal business name: KINGDOM CARE SENIOR LIVING, LLC.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Aycock, MichelleDirect ownership interestIndividual09/15/2020
Aycock, WilliamDirect ownership interestIndividual09/15/2020
Gerard, ChandaOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/01/2021
Young, BobbieOperational/managerial controlIndividual09/15/2020
Aycock, MichelleAdp of the SNFIndividual09/12/2020
Aycock, WilliamAdp of the SNFIndividual09/15/2020
Gerard, ChandaAdp of the SNFIndividual11/01/2021
Sjoblom, BethAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2023
Young, BobbieAdp of the SNFIndividual09/15/2020

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on April 15, 2026: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on April 15, 2026: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
  3. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on April 15, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely."
  4. Who is the administrator and director of nursing, and how long have they been in the job?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 15, 2026: "Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies."

Other nursing homes nearby

Missouri contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Missouri. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Kingdom Care Senior Living's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Kingdom Care Senior Living 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Kingdom Care Senior Living get at its last inspection?
10 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 15, 2026. The Missouri average is 11.4.
Has Kingdom Care Senior Living been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Kingdom Care Senior Living accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Kingdom Care Senior Living?
CMS lists 9 owners and managers. Legal business name: KINGDOM CARE SENIOR LIVING, LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection