Madison Carriage Cove Short Stay Rehabilitation
410 West 1st North, Rexburg, ID 83440 · Madison County · (208) 359-7676
35 certified beds, about 29 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2015
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 135140 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 28, 2026, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Idaho average is 10.3, the national average 9.2).
Of 21 health citations since May 2024, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $11,297 in the last three years; the largest was $11,297, and the latest is dated January 23, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.25 hours per resident per day, against 4.04 across Idaho and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.98 of those hours.
63.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Idaho average 50.3%).
CMS links it to Tanabell Health Services, an affiliated group of 5 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 21 health citations on file.
January 28, 2026Standard inspection · 8 citations
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on the FDA Food Code, policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was appropriately stored, distributed, and labeled. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who received meals prepared in the facility's kitchen. This placed residents at risk for potential contamination and use of spoiled foods, and adverse health outcomes including food-borne illnesses.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure infection control prevention practices were maintained when 1) residents consumed meals prepared in the facility kitchen, and 2) residents received insulin injections to manage their diabetes. These failures put residents at risk for adverse outcomes including potential infections or food-borne illness due to cross contamination.
- D PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level 1, was completed prior to admitting 1 of 3 residents (Resident #32) whose medical records were reviewed for PASARR Level 1 screenings. This failure created the potential for harm if residents required but did not receive specialized services for mental health while residing in the facility.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, CPAP manufacturers warning guidelines, record review, and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide respiratory services consistent with manufacturers warning guidelines and professional standards of practice. This was true for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #8) whose respiratory equipment was observed. This failure created the potential for residents' respiratory equipment to malfunction and possibly increase the risk of fire.
- D Post nurse staffing information every day.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure daily nurse staffing sheets were maintained for a minimum of 18 months. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility and their representatives, visitors, and others who wanted to review the facility's staffing levels.
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure controlled medications were tracked and kept secure from potential theft and/or diversion. This was true for 1 of 2 medication carts reviewed. This failure created the potential for undetected misuse and/or diversion of controlled medications and had the potential to affect all residents who received controlled medication in the facility.
- D Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of medication preparation and administration errors for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #2) observed for medication preparation and administration of insulin. This failed practice placed the resident at risk for not receiving their prescribed medication dosage and other adverse outcomes.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, policy review and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored, not expired, and disposal of unused medications. This was true for the facility. This failure created the potential for residents to receive expired medications with decreased efficacy or cross contamination from topical products.
January 23, 2025Standard inspection · 11 citations
- G Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, I&A review, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and implement interventions to prevent falls. This was true for 1 of 1 resident, (Resident #24) whose records were reviewed for falls. This resulted in harm to Resident #24.
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, policy review, and review of the Idaho Food Code, the facility failed to appropriately store, label, and serve foods. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who received meals from the facility kitchen served in the dining room and resident rooms. This placed residents at risk for potential contamination and use of spoiled foods, and adverse health outcomes, including food-borne illnesses.
- D Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, observation, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed to determine if they were safe to self-administer medications. This was true for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #13) reviewed for self-administration of medications. This failure created the potential for adverse effects if residents self-administered medications inappropriately.
- D Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents and their representatives received assistance to exercise their right to formulate an advanced directive. This was true for 3 of 4 residents (#7, #185, and #186) whose records were reviewed for advanced directives. This deficient practice created the potential for harm or adverse outcomes if residents' wishes were not followed or documented.
- D Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
Inspectors wroteBased on policy and record review, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure pertinent health information was provided to the receiving hospital for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #14) reviewed for transfers. This deficient practice had the potential to result in adverse outcomes if the residents were not treated in a timely manner due to a lack of information provided upon transfer.
- D Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
Inspectors wroteBased on policy and record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a bed hold notice was provided to residents or their representatives upon transfer to the hospital. This was true for 2 of 2 residents (#14 and #24) reviewed for transfers. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if residents were not informed of their right to return to their former bed/room at the facility within a specified time.
- D Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to develop, review with the resident, and implement a baseline care plan. This was true for 1 of 13 residents (Resident #7) whose care plans were reviewed. These failures placed residents at risk of negative outcomes if services were not provided or provided incorrectly due to lack of information in their baseline care plans.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident comprehensive care plans were completed and reviewed with residents and update care plans when changes occur to resident's care. This was true for 3 of 13 residents (#7, #13, and #24) whose care plans were reviewed. This placed residents at risk of adverse outcomes if care and services were not provided as residents needs changed.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications available for residents were labeled, dated, and stored appropriately; this was true for 1 of 2 medication storage rooms inspected, and 1 of 2 medication carts audited for labeling and storage of medication. This failure created the potential for residents to miss doses of medication, to receive expired medications with decreased efficacy, and created the potential for misappropriation of resident's medications.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure infection control prevention practices were maintained to provide a safe and sanitary environment. These failures had the potential to impact all residents in the facility by placing them at risk for cross contamination and infection.
- D Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, document review, review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program (IPCP) that included a functional Antibiotic Stewardship Program that followed the McGeer Criteria for antibiotics for 1 of 13 residents (Resident #185) whose medical records were reviewed. This had the potential to affect residents being prescribed antibiotics that were potentially unnecessary.
May 3, 2024Standard inspection · 2 citations
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were followed for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #188) reviewed for insulin administration. This failed practice created the potential for harm should residents experience adverse outcomes from low blood sugar when the hypoglycemic (low blood sugar) protocol was not followed.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure expired medications and wound care supplies were not available for administration to residents. This was true for 2 of 2 medication storage rooms inspected. This failed practice created the potential for residents to receive expired medications or supplies with decreased efficacy.
Fire safety inspections
4 fire safety citations on file: 4 on January 28, 2026.
Every fire safety citation4 citations
- F Meet other general requirements.
- D Use approved construction type or materials.
- D Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- D Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| January 23, 2025 | Fine | $11,297 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Idaho | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.25 | 4.04 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.98 | 0.86 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.73 | 3.49 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.24 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.03 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 63.4% | 50.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 72.7% | 40.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.21 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.46 on weekdays and 3.73 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.36 in April to June 2025 to 4.25 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.25 | 0.98 | 4.46 | 3.73 | 0.0% | 1 of 90 | 29 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.26 | 1.10 | 4.52 | 3.60 | 0.0% | 1 of 92 | 29 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.69 | 1.38 | 5.01 | 3.88 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 26 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.36 | 1.38 | 4.55 | 3.85 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 29 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Idaho, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.90 | 0.80 | 4.11 | 3.37 | 4.9% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Idaho | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.4 | 15.6 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.1 | 3.0 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.0 | 16.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.3 | 3.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.0 | 20.1 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 15.9 | 17.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 10.1 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: TANABELL HEALTH SERVICES, INC.. CMS links this home to Tanabell Health Services, a group of 5 nursing homes averaging 3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Djt Rehab Property, LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 10/01/2017 | |
| Madison Co Memorial Hospital | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 10/01/2017 | |
| Tanabell Health Services, Inc. | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 10/01/2017 | |
| Bell, Troy | Direct ownership interest | Individual | 10/01/2017 | |
| Thueson, David | Direct ownership interest | Individual | 10/01/2017 | |
| Thueson, Jenelle | Direct ownership interest | Individual | 10/01/2017 | |
| Bell, Troy | Corporate director | Individual | 10/01/2017 | |
| Bell, Jamie | Corporate officer | Individual | 10/01/2017 | |
| Djt Rehab Property, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/01/2017 | |
| Madison Co Memorial Hospital | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/01/2017 | |
| Tanabell Health Services, Inc. | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/01/2017 | |
| Thueson, David | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/01/2017 | |
| Thueson, Jenelle | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/01/2017 | |
| Djt Rehab Property, LLC | General partnership interest | Organization | 10/01/2017 | |
| Madison Co Memorial Hospital | General partnership interest | Organization | 10/01/2017 | |
| Thueson, David | General partnership interest | Individual | 10/01/2017 | |
| Thueson, Jenelle | General partnership interest | Individual | 02/01/2017 | |
| Djt Rehab Property, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/01/2017 | |
| Madison Co Memorial Hospital | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/01/2017 | |
| Tanabell Health Services, Inc. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/19/2025 | |
| Bell, Jamie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/01/2017 | |
| Bell, Treyton | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/10/2020 | |
| Bell, Troy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/01/2017 | |
| Clark, Jack | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/10/2020 | |
| Thueson, David | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/01/2017 | |
| Thueson, Jenelle | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2017 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on January 28, 2026: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on January 23, 2025: "Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on January 28, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on January 28, 2026: "PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities"
Other nursing homes nearby
- Temple View Transitional Care Center Rexburg, 1.2 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 36 citations
- Ashton Memorial Living Center Ashton, 24.5 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 24 citations
- Eagle Rock Health and Rehabilitation of Cascadia Idaho Falls, 25 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 35 citations
Idaho contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Idaho. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, Bureau of Facility Standards, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Idaho Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, Idaho Commission on Aging, (877) 471-2777. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Madison Carriage Cove Short Stay Rehabilitation's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Madison Carriage Cove Short Stay Rehabilitation 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Madison Carriage Cove Short Stay Rehabilitation get at its last inspection?
- 8 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on January 28, 2026. The Idaho average is 10.3.
- Has Madison Carriage Cove Short Stay Rehabilitation been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $11,297 in the last three years.
- Does Madison Carriage Cove Short Stay Rehabilitation accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Madison Carriage Cove Short Stay Rehabilitation?
- CMS lists 26 owners and managers, and links the home to Tanabell Health Services. Legal business name: TANABELL HEALTH SERVICES, INC..
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.