Find a nursing home

Home / Missouri / Springfield

Manor at Elfindale, the

1707 West Elfindale Street, Springfield, MO 65807 · Greene County · (417) 831-2273

100 certified beds, about 93 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare since 2006

Part of a continuing care retirement community Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 265804 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on November 17, 2025, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Missouri average is 11.4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 10 health citations since December 2021 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.43 hours per resident per day, against 3.43 across Missouri and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.61 of those hours.

34.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Missouri average 56.0%).

CMS links it to Vetter Senior Living, an affiliated group of 22 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 10 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
6D
1E
3F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
November 17, 2025Standard inspection · 7 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 29, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards when staff failed to use effective hair restraints; failed to consistently date opened foods and properly close frozen foods to prevent freezer burn; stored a measuring cup in the thickener container, and did not close the container; failed to clean the fans inside of the refrigerator; and failed to clean the deflector shield in the ice machine located in the kitchen. The facility census was 94.1. Review of the 2013 Food Code, issued by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), showed food employees shall wear hair restraints such as hats, hair coverings or nets, beard restraints, and clothing that covers body hair, that are designed and worn to effectively keep their hair from contacting exposed food; [...]
  2. F
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    F921 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 29, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility staff failed to ensure the facility was maintained in a sanitary and comfortable fashion when the outside of the ice machine had drips of lime down the side, the ice machine vent had fuzzy lint present, and one knob was missing from the cook stove. The facility census was 94.1. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding cleaning the ice machine. Review of the cleaning schedule for September 2025 showed the following:-The September cleaning schedules showed the night shift was to wipe down the ice machine and ice reflector guard on Fridays;-The week of 09/01/25, no staff initialed completing this task;-The week of 09/08/25, no staff initialed completing this task. [...]
  3. D
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    F655 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 29, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete the baseline care plans for all residents within 48 hours of admission and failed to document resident and/or representative was provided a copy of the baseline care plan when staff did not complete a full baseline care plans within 48 hours of admission for two residents (Residents #37 and #95) and failed to document representative or resident notification of the care plan for the residents. A sample of 19 residents was selected for review in a facility with a census of 94. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy related to Baseline Care Plans.1. [...]
  4. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 29, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a complete comprehensive person-centered care plan for all residents when staff did not care plan relating to a wound for one resident (Resident # 5), did not care plan oxygen usage for one resident (Resident #101), and did not care plan regarding a fracture for one resident (Resident #38). The facility census was 94. [...]
  5. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 29, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide respiratory care per standards of practice when staff failed to obtain orders for the use of oxygen and care plan the use of oxygen for one resident (Resident #3). The facility census was 94. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding oxygen therapy.1. Review of Resident #3's face sheet (a general information sheet) showed the following:-admission date of 03/06/25;-Diagnoses included sleep apnea (a potentially serious sleep disorder in which breathing repeatedly stops and starts), respiratory failure with hypoxia (low levels of oxygen) and hypercapnia (high levels of carbon dioxide in blood), congestive heart failure (CHF - a long-term condition that happens when the heart can't pump blood well enough to give the body a normal supply), and chronic kidney disease. [...]
  6. D
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    F759 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 29, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5% when staff made three errors out of 31 opportunities resulting in an 9.67% error rate when facility staff failed to administer one medication and administered a medication that did not indicate a dosage to one resident (Resident #47) and failed to prime an insulin pen to ensure an accurate dose to one resident (Resident #52) during medication pass observations. The facility had a census of 94.1. [...]
  7. D
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    F760 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 29, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed ensure all residents were free of significant medication errors when staff failed to prime one resident's (Resident #52) insulin pen prior to insulin administration to ensure accurate dosing. The facility census was 94. Review of the facility procedure titled Insulin Pen Use, dated 05/19/25, showed staff should prime the insulin pen by pointing it up in the air, dialing one or two units on the insulin pen, and then fully press the plunger. A drop of insulin should appear at the needle tip. Repeat the priming procedure until a drop appears. Review of the Humalog (fast acting insulin) Kwikpen packet insert, dated March 2023, showed the following: [...]
February 2, 2024Standard inspection · 0 citations
December 3, 2021Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 11, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the ice machine in a clean manner when the ice reflector shield in the ice machine located in the kitchen had a build-up of a black substance that appeared to be mold on the ice reflector shield, failed to ensure the air cooling vent in the walk in freezer was free of lint which could blow on to food stored in the walk-in freezer, and failed to ensure two fluorescent light fixtures in the dry storage pantry had covers and one cover for a fluorescent light fixture was broken. If the light bulbs were to shatter or break, food stored in the dry pantry could be contaminated by broken glass. The facility census was 90. The facility did not have a policy for the kitchen cleanliness. Record review of the Missouri 2013 Food code, showed the following information: [...]
  2. E
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    F700 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 11, 2022
    Inspectors wrote2. Record review of Resident #5's face sheet showed the following information: -admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -Diagnoses included dementia, muscle weakness, and stroke. Record review of the resident's significant change (major decline or improvement in the resident's status) MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following information: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Required extensive staff assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfer, dressing, and toilet use; -Bed rails not used. Record review of the resident's care plan, dated 4/17/2017 and last revised on 11/11/2021, showed the following information: -The resident had self-care deficits with activities of daily living (ADLs) to include bed mobility, transfers, dressing, mobility, hygiene, and toileting, related to disease process; -One turn rail on bed to assist with repositioning; [...]
  3. D
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 11, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse involving two residents (Resident #8 and Resident #58) to the State Survey Agency (Department of Health and Senior Services - DHSS) within two hours of receiving the allegation. A sample of 18 residents was selected for review. The facility census was 90. Record review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse and Neglect Prevention Standard, showed the following information: -The resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and any physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's symptoms; [...]

Fire safety inspections

9 fire safety citations on file: 3 on November 17, 2025, 4 on February 2, 2024, 2 on December 3, 2021.

Every fire safety citation9 citations
  1. F
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · November 17, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · November 17, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. E
    Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
    K 222 · November 17, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. F
    Install a fire alarm system that can be heard throughout the facility.
    K 341 · February 2, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · February 2, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · February 2, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. E
    Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
    K 372 · February 2, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. E
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · December 3, 2021 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. E
    Meet other general requirements that are deficient.
    K 500 · December 3, 2021 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeMissouriUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.433.433.86
Registered nurses0.610.460.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.743.013.42
Nurse aides2.81
Licensed practical nurses1.01
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)34.9%56.0%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover41.2%47.8%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.45 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.71 on weekdays and 3.74 on weekends, 21% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.44 in April to June 2025 to 4.43 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.430.614.713.74 0.0%0 of 9093
Oct to Dec 20254.450.574.723.75 0.0%0 of 9293
Jul to Sep 20254.380.644.613.78 0.0%0 of 9293
Apr to Jun 20254.440.784.693.81 0.0%0 of 9193
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Missouri, Jan to Mar 20263.340.403.502.933.9%1.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeMissouriUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
20.418.113.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.10.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.62.31.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.44.13.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.32.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
20.817.414.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.64.54.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
14.523.515.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
22.526.123.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
7.813.712.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.82.11.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.72.31.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: VSL SPRINGFIELD MANOR LLC. CMS links this home to Vetter Senior Living, a group of 22 nursing homes averaging 4.3 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Vetter Senior Living5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%12/23/2016
Dahlberg, ThomasContracted managing employeeIndividual01/01/2022
Gould, MatthewContracted managing employeeIndividual07/01/2017
Stuhr, BrianContracted managing employeeIndividual07/01/2017
Vanekeren, GlennContracted managing employeeIndividual07/01/2017
Vetter, EldoraContracted managing employeeIndividual07/01/2017
Vetter, JackContracted managing employeeIndividual07/01/2017
Stuhr, BrianCorporate officerIndividual06/15/2017
Vanekeren, GlennCorporate officerIndividual06/15/2017
Vetter, EldoraCorporate officerIndividual06/15/2017
Vetter, JackCorporate officerIndividual06/15/2017
Vetter Senior LivingOperational/managerial controlOrganization12/23/2016
Vsl Vetter Health Services LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization07/01/2017
Dahlberg, ThomasOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2022
Gould, MatthewOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/01/2017
Stuhr, BrianOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/01/2017
Vanekeren, GlennOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/01/2017
Vetter, EldoraOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/01/2017
Vetter, JackOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/01/2017

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on November 17, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  2. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on November 17, 2025: "Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted"
  3. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on November 17, 2025: "Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed."
  4. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on November 17, 2025: "Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater."

Other nursing homes nearby

Missouri contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Missouri. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Manor at Elfindale, the's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Manor at Elfindale, the 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Manor at Elfindale, the get at its last inspection?
7 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on November 17, 2025. The Missouri average is 11.4.
Has Manor at Elfindale, the been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Manor at Elfindale, the accept Medicaid?
CMS lists it as "Medicare", so it is not certified for Medicaid.
Who owns Manor at Elfindale, the?
CMS lists 19 owners and managers, and links the home to Vetter Senior Living. Legal business name: VSL SPRINGFIELD MANOR LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection