Maranatha Village, Inc
233 East Norton Road, Springfield, MO 65803 · Greene County · (417) 833-0016
120 certified beds, about 102 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1991
Last standard inspection more than 2 years ago Part of a continuing care retirement community Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 265475 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 19, 2024, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Missouri average is 11.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 26 health citations since May 2019 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $16,335 in the last three years; the largest was $16,335, and the latest is dated May 4, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.94 hours per resident per day, against 3.43 across Missouri and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.46 of those hours.
40.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Missouri average 56.0%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
205/19
706/21
511/23
804/24
108/24
112/24
104/25
106/25
Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 26 health citations on file.
Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
14D
9E
3F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
June 3, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed provide care per standards of practice to all residents when staff failed to document timely and complete assessments and monitoring, and failed to notify the physician in a timely fashion for one resident (Resident #1) after the reisdent fell and when the resident began having low blood oxygen readings. The facility census was 102 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Change in Resident's Condition or Status, revised on 02/2021, showed the following: -The facility promptly notifies the resident, his/her attending physician, and the resident's representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and or status; [...]
April 9, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect all residents from misappropriation of property when a facility staff member (Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A) received multiple checks from one resident's (Resident #1's) checking account after expressing his/her financial need to the resident. The facility census was 101. Review of the facility policy titled, Identifying Exploitation, Theft and Misappropriation of Resident Property, dated April 2021, showed the following: -Exploitation, theft, and misappropriation of resident property are strictly prohibited; -Exploitation means taking advantage of a resident for personal gain, through the use of manipulation, intimidation, threats or coercion; [...]
December 3, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure documentation was present in the medical record to support any discharge when staff failed to document to the resident's medical records the specific needs the facility could not meet, the attempts the facility made to meet those needs, and the services available at the receiving facility to meet the need, including documentation from the physician, for one resident (Resident #1) who was issued a facility initiated discharge notice. The facility's census was 87. Review of a facility policy titled Transfer or Discharge, Facility-Initiated, revised October 2022, showed the following: -Once admitted to the facility, residents have the right to remain in the facility; [...]
August 30, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff treated all residents in a dignified fashion when one staff member (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B) made rude and degrading comments during a procedure to replace an indwelling (Foley) catheter (sterile tube inserted to drain the bladder) for one resident (Resident #1). A sample of eight residents with catheters was reviewed. The facility census was 94. Review of the facility policy entitled Resident Rights, revised February 2021, showed the following: -Employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity; -All residents of the facility have the right to a dignified existence; -Orientation and in-service training programs are conducted quarterly to assist employees in understanding the residents' rights. [...]
April 19, 2024Standard inspection · 8 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect food from possible contamination at all times in accordance with professional standards of practice when staff failed to wear hairnets in the kitchen, failed to store the ice scoop outside of the ice container, and failed to complete proper handwashing during meal service/prep. The facility census was 85. 1. Observations on 04/16/24, from 9:15 A.M. to 10:20 A.M., showed the following: -In the serving kitchen, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 1 was inside the kitchen, scooping ice into a cooler without wearing a hairnet. At the time of the observation, food preparation was in process. The Dietary Manager (DM) told CNA 1 that he/she needed to have a hairnet on anytime he/she entered the kitchen. CNA 1 replied I know I do. Observation on 04/19/24, at 10:00 A.M., showed the following: [...]
- F Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain their infection prevention program to reduce the likelihood of a legionella (the bacterium which causes legionnaires' disease (a severe form of pneumonia) which can grow in areas with stagnant water) in the water when the facility failed to follow their water management program by not completing the preventative steps outlined and when the facility failed to ensure staff were educated regarding the water management program. The facility census was 85. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Water Management Program, undated, showed the following: -Specific measures used to control the introduction and/or spread of Legionella; -The control limits or parameters that are acceptable and that are monitored; -A diagram of where control measures are applied; [...]
- E Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the resident and/or responsible party (RP) information regarding a Bed Hold for three residents (Resident #30, #50, and #67) of a sample of three residents reviewed for hospitalizations of 33 sampled residents. The facility census was 85. Review of the facility's policy titled, Bed Hold Policy, undated, showed the following: -The resident and/or responsible party will be held responsible for 75% of the daily room rate should they wish to reserve their room while in the hospital; -The nursing home has an obligation to inform the resident or the responsible person that is paying them to hold a bed is voluntary; [...]
- E Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and update comprehensive care plan to ensure their accuracy when staff failed to care plan the use of usage for four residents (Resident #9, #30, #45, and #54) and failed to care plan anticoagulant (medicines that help prevent blood clots) usage for one resident (Resident #75). The facility census was 85. Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised March 2022, showed the following: -A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident; -The comprehensive, person-centered care plan includes measurable objectives and timeframes; [...]
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to protect the dignity of all residents when the facility failed to respect one resident's (Resident #50) preference to help with nighttime care and when staff failed to protect one resident's (Resident #39) health information from public viewing. A sample of 33 residents was reviewed in a home with a census of 85. Review of the facility's policy titled, Dignity, dated 02/21, showed the following: -Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his or her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth and self-esteem; -Residents are treated with dignity, and respect at all times; -The facility culture supports dignity and respect for residents by honoring resident goals, choices, preferences, values, and beliefs. [...]
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed provide respiratory care per standards of practice when staff did not have physician orders for oxygen usage for two residents (Residents #37 and #9). A sample of residents was reviewed in a facility with a census of 85. Review of the facility's policy titled, Oxygen Administration, dated October 2010, showed the following: -The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration; -Verify there is a physician's order for this procedure; -Review the physician's order or facility protocol for oxygen administration. 1. Review of Resident 37's admission Record located in the Profile tab of the EMR, showed the following: -admission date of 01/23/24; [...]
- D Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accommodate one resident's (Resident #88) known dietary preferences. A sample of 33 residents were reviewed in a home with a census of 85. Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Food Preferences, revised July 2017, showed the following: -Individual food preferences will be assessed upon admission and communicated to the interdisciplinary team; -Upon the resident's admission (or within twenty-four (24) hours after his/her admission) the dietitian or nursing staff will identify a resident's food preferences; -The food services department will offer a variety of foods at each scheduled meal, as well as access to nourishing snacks throughout the day and night. 1. Review of Resident #88's admission Record from the electronic medical record (EMR) Profile tab showed an admission date of 03/25/24. [...]
- D Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide the pneumococcal vaccine as ordered for two residents (Resident #43 and #75) of the seven residents reviewed for immunization out of 33 sampled residents. The facility census was 85. Review of the facility's policy titled, Pneumonia Vaccine, revised March 2022, showed the policy did not address the procedure of who should administer the vaccine when ordered and arrived at the facility. 1. Review of Resident #43's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated November 2023, from the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Orders tab, showed the following: -The PCV 20 (pneumonia vaccine) was ordered and scheduled to be administered either on 11/21/23 or 11/22/23; -On 11/21/23, at 10:29 A.M., the nurse on duty charted a code 9 which, according to the legend, was Other / See Nurse Note. [...]
November 6, 2023Complaint inspection · 5 citations
- D Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to allow all resident the right of self-determination when staff failed to honor the one resident's (Resident #1) wishes to have an ambulance called and blocked the resident from exiting the facility to await an ambulance. The facility census was 93. Review of the facility policy titled Resident Rights, revised February 2021, showed, federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of the facility. These rights include the resident's right to: -A dignified existence; -Be treated with respect, kindness, and dignity; -Be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, and exploitation; -Be free from corporal punishment or involuntary seclusion, and physical or chemical restraints not required to treat the resident's symptom's; -Self-determination; [...]
- D Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of all changes in condition when staff failed to notify the physician that one resident (Resident #1) verbalized a change in condition and requested to go to the emergency room for evaluation. The facility census was 93. Review of the facility policy titled, Discharging a Resident Without a Physician's Approval, revised October 2012, showed: -A physician's order should be obtained for all discharges, unless a resident or representative is discharging himself or herself against medical advice; -Should a resident, or his or her representative, request an immediate discharge, the resident's attending physician will be promptly notified; [...]
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide all residents with care per standards of practice when staff failed to remove one resident's (Resident #2's) topical dressings, located on the resident's arms, and failed to complete a head to toe skin assessment upon admission to the facility. The facility census was 93. Review of the facility protocol titled, Pressure Ulcers/Skin Breakdown - Clinical Protocol, revised April 2018, showed the following: -The staff and practitioner will examine the skin of newly admitted residents for evidence of existing pressure ulcers or other skin conditions; -The physician will order pertinent wound treatments, including pressure reduction surfaces, wound cleansing and debridement approaches, dressings, and application of topical agents. 1. [...]
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide all residents with care of pressure ulcers and pressure sore prevention per standards of practice when staff failed to remove preventative pressure dressing for two residents (Resident #2 and #3) and failed to complete a head to toe skin assessment upon admission to the facility for both residents. The facility census was 93. Review of the facility policy titled, Prevention of Pressure Injuries, revised April 2020, showed the following: -The purpose of this procedure is to provide information regarding identification of pressure injury risk factors and interventions for specific risk factors; -Assess the resident on admission (within eight hours) for existing pressure injury risk factors. Repeat the risk assessment weekly and upon any changes in condition; [...]
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete when staff failed to document an assessment and vital signs for one resident (Resident #1) when the resident expressed a change in condition. The facility census was 93. Review of the facility policy titled, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, revised February 2021, showed the following: -A significant change in the resident's condition is a major decline or improvement in the resident's status that will not normally resolve itself without intervention by staff or by implementing standard disease related clinical interventions, impacts more than one area of the resident's health status, requires interdisciplinary review and/or revision to the care plan, and ultimately is based on the judgement of the clinical staff and the guidelines outlined in the resident assessment instrument. [...]
June 17, 2021Standard inspection · 7 citations
- E Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN - form CMS-10055) or a denial letter at the initiation, reduction, or termination of Medicare Part A benefits for three residents (Resident #27, #68 and #278) out of three sampled residents who remained in the facility upon discharge from Medicare Part A services. The facility census was 74. Record review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Survey and Certification memo (S&C -09-20), dated 1/9/09, showed the following information: -The Notice of Medicare Provider Non-Coverage (NOMNC - form CMS-10123) is issued when all covered Medicare services end for coverage reasons; [...]
- E Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to protect four residents (Resident #273, #274, #275, and #276) from misappropriation of medications when narcotic pain medications went missing while in the possession of the facility staff. The facility census was 74. Record review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect Policy and Procedures Reporting Reasonable Suspicion of a Crime, dated 3/1/2017 showed the following information: -Purpose: This policy and procedure is implemented to provide a system to prevent and detect abuse, neglect, exploitation and mistreatment to provide a system of reporting suspected cases of abuse and neglect and to assure thorough investigation and appropriate follow-up action in alleged incidents of abuse, neglect, exploitation and mistreatment; [...]
- E Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to check criminal background checks (CBC) or Nurse Aide (NA) registry for a Federal Indicator (a registry that indicated a list of individuals who had a previous incident involving abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of property that would prevent the employee from working in a certified long-term are facility) prior to starting employment and continued resident contact for three staff (Maintenance Staff D, Administration Staff E, and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) F) out of ten sampled staff. The facility census was 74. Record review of the facility's undated policy titled, Employee Screening, showed the following information: [...]
- E Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of misappropriation of resident property to the state licensing agency (Department of Health and Senior Services - DHSS) within the required time frame of 24 hours. The facility census was 74. Record review of the facility policy, dated 3/1/2017, abuse and neglect policy and procedures reporting reasonable suspicion of a crime, showed the following information: -This policy and procedure is implemented to provide a system to prevent and detect abuse, neglect, exploitation and mistreatment to provide a system of reporting suspected cases of abuse and neglect and to assure thorough investigation and appropriate follow-up action in alleged incidents of abuse, neglect, exploitation and mistreatment; [...]
- E Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately investigate an allegation of misappropriation of medications by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A, failed to take steps to protect residents from further misappropriation during an investigation, and failed to submit the investigation to the state agency (Department of Health and Senior Services) within the required five days after the allegation was made. The facility census was 74. Record review of the facility's policy Abuse and Neglect Policy and Procedures Reporting Reasonable Suspicion of a Crime, dated 3/1/2017, showed the following information: [...]
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to dispose of expired medications and supplies stored in the 100/200 hall medication storage room and the 300/400 hall medication cart. The facility census was 74. Record review of the facility's Storage of Medications Policy, dated November 2020, showed the following information: -The nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner; -Discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals are returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed. 1. Observation of the 100/200 hall medication storage room on 6/15/2021, at 9:53 A.M., showed the following medications stored for current and future use: -One bottle of oyster shell calcium 500 milligram (mg), with best by date 4/2021; [...]
- D Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors when staff failed to give the correct amount of sliding scale insulin (medication used to manage elevated blood glucose (sugar) levels) to one resident (Resident #17) during random medication pass observations. The facility had a census of 38. Record review of the facility's policy, titled Insulin Administration, dated September 2014, included the following information: -The type of insulin, dosage requirements, strength, and method of administration must be verified before administration, to assure that it corresponds with the order on the medication sheet and the physician's order; -Check blood glucose per physician order or facility protocol; -Remove insulin vial/pen from storage point; [...]
May 22, 2019Standard inspection · 2 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff was prepared and stored food under sanitary conditions when staff did not keep potentially hazardous food at the proper temperature; staff failed date open food containers; staff failed to ensure the dish machine worked properly; staff failed to follow proper hand hygiene while serving food; and failed to wear hair restraints. The facility census was 96. 1. Record review of the facility's (undated) policy titled, cold holding, showed the following information: -Foods that require cold holding must remain at or below 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F); -Store the food in a refrigerated unit or refrigerated serving unit; -Do not let food stand at room temperatures because bacteria will grow; -Harmful microorganisms can grow on foods and cause illnesses when between 41 degrees F and 135 degrees F; [...]
- E Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff administered medications with an error rate of less than five percent (5%) when staff made three errors out of 28 opportunities, resulting in an error rate of 10.71%, affecting three residents (Resident #22, #54, and #80). The facility census was 96. Record review of the Novolog and Humalog (rapid-acting insulins) manufacturer's inserts showed the following information: -Novolog and Humalog start acting fast; -A meal should be eaten within five to ten minutes of taking a dose of Novolog or Humalog; -Dosage adjustments may be needed in regards to timing of food intake. Record review of Medscape website (medical reference website for healthcare professionals) showed the following information: -Rapid acting insulins can cause hypoglycemia (low blood glucose). [...]
Fire safety inspections
10 fire safety citations on file: 4 on April 19, 2024, 4 on June 17, 2021, 2 on May 22, 2019.
Every fire safety citation10 citations
- F Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- F Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
- E Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
- E Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- E Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- E Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
- E Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
- F Establish policies and procedures for volunteers.
- E Use approved construction type or materials.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2026 | Fine | $16,335 |
| May 4, 2026 | Payment Denial | 5 days from June 13, 2026 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Missouri | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.94 | 3.43 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.39 | 3.01 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.82 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.66 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 40.8% | 56.0% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 11.1% | 47.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.23 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.16 on weekdays and 3.39 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 9.3% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.97 in April to June 2025 to 3.94 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.94 | 0.46 | 4.16 | 3.39 | 9.3% | 0 of 90 | 102 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.86 | 0.44 | 4.07 | 3.33 | 17.2% | 0 of 92 | 104 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.88 | 0.45 | 4.10 | 3.30 | 17.0% | 0 of 92 | 105 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.97 | 0.48 | 4.19 | 3.41 | 9.3% | 0 of 91 | 102 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Missouri, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.34 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 3.9% | 1.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
Staff pay at this home
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
Official wage estimates for Missouri
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Missouri, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.11 | $17.02 to $20.00 | 34,050 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.58 | $27.06 to $33.77 | 14,700 |
| Registered nurses | $39.32 | $36.56 to $47.39 | 76,310 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Missouri | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.5 | 18.1 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.7 | 2.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.3 | 2.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 18.6 | 17.4 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 17.7 | 23.5 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 18.0 | 26.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 7.8 | 13.7 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.4 | 2.3 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: MARANATHA VILLAGE INC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brodersen, Jennifer | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 02/01/2022 | |
| Dimos, Roland | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Mundis, Gregory | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/17/2024 | |
| Wiebe, Christy | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 02/01/2022 | |
| Miller, Brian | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2021 | |
| Reinold, Jeffrey | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/08/2023 | |
| Maranatha Village Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/08/2008 | |
| Reinold, Jeffrey | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/08/2023 | |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2023 | |
| Miller, Brian | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/24/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on December 3, 2024: "Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged."
- How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on April 9, 2025: "Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on June 3, 2025: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 19, 2024: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Woodland Care & Rehab Center Springfield, 1.4 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 40 citations
- Wilson's Creek Nursing & Rehab Springfield, 4.5 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 15 citations
- Brookhaven Nursing & Rehab Springfield, 4.5 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 36 citations
- Manor at Elfindale, the Springfield, 4.8 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 10 citations
- Springfield Skilled Care Center Springfield, 5.4 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 102 citations
- Maples Health and Rehabilitation, the Springfield, 5.9 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 22 citations
- Magnolia Square Nursing and Rehab Springfield, 5.9 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 7 citations
- Springfield Rehabilitation & Health Care Center Springfield, 6.1 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 28 citations
Missouri contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Missouri. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services, Section for Long-Term Care Regulation, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Missouri Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, 800-309-3282. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Show Me Long Term Care in Missouri, where Missouri publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Maranatha Village, Inc's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Maranatha Village, Inc 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Maranatha Village, Inc get at its last inspection?
- 8 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 19, 2024. The Missouri average is 11.4.
- Has Maranatha Village, Inc been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $16,335 in the last three years.
- Does Maranatha Village, Inc accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Maranatha Village, Inc?
- CMS lists 10 owners and managers. Legal business name: MARANATHA VILLAGE INC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.