Minerva Rehabilitation and Nursing Center
1035 East Lincolnway, Minerva, OH 44657 · Stark County · (330) 868-4147
32 certified beds, about 18 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1999
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 366187 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 22, 2026, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
None of its 22 health citations since April 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.42 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.67 of those hours.
52.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
CMS links it to Ephram Lahasky, an affiliated group of 22 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 22 health citations on file.
April 14, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- F Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure pre-employment tuberculosis (TB) testing was completed timely for all new staff and new residents received TB testing on admission. This affected one resident (Resident #7) out of three residents reviewed for TB control with the potential to affect all 15 residents residing in the facility.
January 22, 2026Standard inspection · 7 citations
- E Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were developed timely for Residents #4, #7, #16, #18, and #24. This affected five residents (#4, #7, #16, #18, and #24) of 15 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 16.
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, observations, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to respect the dignity of residents by failing to empty a urinal in full view of the hallway or cover a urinary catheter drainage bag. This affected two (Resident #16 and Resident #3) of two residents reviewed for dignity and respect. The facility census was 16.
- D Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a complete and accurate baseline care plan for Resident #25. This affect one resident (#25) of 15 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 16.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line (a long, thin, flexible tube inserted into a vein and threaded into a large vein near the heart) dressing was changed as ordered by the physician for Resident #24. This affected one resident (#24) of five residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 16.
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and individualized pressure ulcer prevention program for Resident #25. This affected one (Resident #25) of one resident reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 16.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure orders were obtained for residents requiring oxygen administration. This affected two (Resident #5 and Resident #25) of three residents reviewed for oxygen use. The facility census was 16.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, observations, interviews and reviews of facility policies, the facility failed to follow proper infection control processes during incontinence care and blood glucose testing for Resident #3 and wound care for Resident #25. This affected two (Residents #25 and #3) of four residents reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 16.
June 20, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #27's Gabapentin medication was not administered to Resident #21. This finding affected two (Residents #21 and #27) of six residents reviewed for medication administration.
July 25, 2024Standard inspection · 6 citations
- F Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of personnel files and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Activities Director #112 was qualified to direct the facility activities program. This had the potential to affect all 23 residents in the facility.
- F Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of personnel files, staff interview, and review of the job description and performance standards for the Administrator, the facility's Administrator failed to provide adequate oversight of hiring and promotion of facility staff to ensure minimum qualifications were met for their assigned duties in providing activities to meet resident needs/preferences This had the potential to affect all 23 residents in the facility.
- F Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct an annual review of the facility assessment between January 2023 and July 2024. This had the potential to affect all 23 residents in the facility.
- F Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wrote5. On 07/24/24 at 7:43 A.M., LPN #131 was observed administering medication to Resident #7. During the medication administration, LPN #131 was observed touching items in the environment such as the over bed table. LPN #131 returned to the medication cart and obtained a medication cup to prepare medication for Resident #10 without performing hand hygiene. LPN #131 verified she had not performed hand hygiene but continued to prepare and administer medication to Resident #10 including an inhaler and medications by mouth prior to washing her hands. Review of the facility's Administering Medications policy (revised December 2012) revealed staff were required to follow established facility infection control procedures (e.g. handwashing, antiseptic technique, gloves, isolation precautions, etc) for the administration of medications. [...]
- E Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, policy review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure activities were provided in accordance with resident preferences. This affected one (Resident #21) of 15 residents interviewed and/or observed for activity participation. This also had the potential to affect 20 of 23 residents who resided at the facility when scheduled activities were known to be of no interests to any of the residents and/or were placed on the activity schedule with the knowledge the activity was an individual and not group based activity. (Residents #10, family of Resident #19 and Resident #77 indicated they were not interested in group activities regardless of what might be offered.
- D Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of physician orders/medication administration records, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication rate of less than 5 percent (%). Two errors were identified out of 25 opportunities for error resulting in a 8% medication error rate. This affected one resident (Resident #7) of six residents observed for medication administration
April 13, 2022Standard inspection · 7 citations
- F Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of personnel files, review of the facility new hire list, review of the facility abuse policy and staff interview the facility failed to ensure all new staff hires were checked against the Nurse Aide Registry (NAR) prior to employment to ensure the employee did not have a finding entered into the State Nurse Aide Registry concerning abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment of residents or misappropriation of property. This affected one Licensed Social Worker (LSW), two housekeeping staff, one dietary staff, one Maintenance Director and one Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and had the potential to affect all 20 residents residing in the facility.
- F Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility assessment and interview the facility failed to ensure the development of an accurate assessment to determine what resources were necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. This had the potential to affect all 20 residents.
- E Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessments were accurate for Resident #9 related to oral/teeth status, Resident #12 related to pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR), Resident #13 related to Hospice, Resident #16 related to medications, Resident #17 related to nutrition and Resident #19 related to pressure ulcers. This affected six residents (#9, #12, #13, #16, #17 and #19) of 20 residents whose MDS 3.0 assessments were reviewed.
- D Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment was completed for Resident #1. This affected one resident (#1) of 20 residents whose MDS assessments were reviewed.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to develop an individualized and comprehensive care plan related to Resident #16's diagnosis of anxiety. This affected one resident (#16) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure care conference meetings included Resident #21 and/or the resident's family. This affected one resident (#21) of one resident reviewed for care conferences.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure medications were not left unattended at the bedside for Resident #9 without being administered to the resident by a licensed nurse. This affected one resident (#9) randomly observed during the initial tour of the facility of 20 residents residing in the facility.
Fire safety inspections
9 fire safety citations on file: 2 on January 22, 2026, 6 on July 25, 2024, 1 on April 13, 2022.
Every fire safety citation9 citations
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- E Have exits that are accessible at all times.
- E Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
- E Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.42 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.32 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.42 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.33 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 52.0% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 75.0% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.00 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.46 on weekdays and 3.32 on weekends, 4% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 2.7% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.53 in April to June 2025 to 3.42 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.42 | 0.67 | 3.46 | 3.32 | 2.7% | 2 of 90 | 18 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.62 | 0.80 | 3.85 | 3.07 | 3.0% | 3 of 92 | 16 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.60 | 0.76 | 3.76 | 3.20 | 2.6% | 0 of 92 | 17 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.53 | 0.67 | 4.75 | 3.97 | 1.8% | 3 of 91 | 18 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.8 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: MINERVA CENTER FOR LIVING LLC. CMS links this home to Ephram Lahasky, a group of 22 nursing homes averaging 1.7 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barr, Edward | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 02/15/2022 | |
| Cerny, Loree | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 02/12/2024 | |
| Lahasky, Ephram | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 02/15/2022 | |
| Lahasky, Ephram | Corporate officer | Individual | 02/15/2022 | |
| Barr, Edward | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/15/2022 | |
| Cerny, Loree | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/12/2024 | |
| Lahasky, Ephram | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/15/2022 | |
| Barr, Edward | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/15/2022 | |
| Cerny, Loree | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/12/2024 | |
| Katz, Larry | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/15/2022 | |
| Lahasky, Ephram | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/15/2022 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on January 22, 2026: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on January 22, 2026: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 14, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on June 20, 2025: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Arbors at Minerva Minerva, 1.8 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 36 citations
- Louisville Gardens Care Center Louisville, 8.5 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 53 citations
- Carroll Healthcare Center Inc Carrollton, 10.6 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 12 citations
- Bel Air Care Center Alliance, 11.9 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 14 citations
- Canterbury Villa of Alliance Alliance, 12.1 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 24 citations
- McCrea Manor Nsng and Rehab Ctr LLC Alliance, 12.5 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 31 citations
- Crandall Nursing Home Sebring, 12.6 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 12 citations
- Auburn Skilled Nursing and Rehab Salem, 13 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 20 citations
Ohio contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Ohio Department of Health, Nursing Homes and Facilities, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Ohio Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 1-800-282-1206. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Ohio Long-Term Care Quality Navigator (Ohio Department of Aging), where Ohio publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Minerva Rehabilitation and Nursing Center's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Minerva Rehabilitation and Nursing Center 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Minerva Rehabilitation and Nursing Center get at its last inspection?
- 7 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on January 22, 2026. The Ohio average is 10.5.
- Has Minerva Rehabilitation and Nursing Center been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Minerva Rehabilitation and Nursing Center accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Minerva Rehabilitation and Nursing Center?
- CMS lists 11 owners and managers, and links the home to Ephram Lahasky. Legal business name: MINERVA CENTER FOR LIVING LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.