Home / California / Thousand Oaks
Oakview Skilled Nursing
3557 Campus Drive, Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 · Ventura County · (805) 241-2000
48 certified beds, about 43 residents a day · For profit - Partnership · Medicare since 2009
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 555857 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 16, 2026, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the California average is 15.6, the national average 9.2).
None of its 10 health citations since April 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.73 hours per resident per day, against 4.52 across California and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.73 of those hours.
21.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (California average 36.7%).
CMS links it to Continuing Life, an affiliated group of 6 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 10 health citations on file.
July 16, 2026Standard inspection · 4 citations
- D Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure written bed-hold notice was provided to the resident representative at the time of transfer to the hospital for 1 of 12 sampled residents (Resident 51). This failure had the potential to prevent the resident representative from understanding the duration of the bed hold policy and the resident's rights to return to the facility. During a review of Resident 51's admission Record (AR), dated 7/16/26, the AR indicated, Resident 51 was admitted in the facility on 5/2/26. During a review of Resident 51's Progress Note (PN), dated 5/26/26, the note indicated, Resident 51 was transferred to hospital for further evaluations. During a review of Resident 51's admission Note (AN), dated 5/27/26, the note indicated staff spoke with Resident 51's wife regarding holding the resident's bed. The wife declined to hold the bed. [...]
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure specific diagnoses were included in the MDS (Minimum Data Set - a health status screening and assessment tool used for all residents of long term care nursing facilities) assessment for 1 of 12 sampled residents (Resident 22). This oversight resulted in an inaccurate representation of Resident 22's health condition and could potentially introduce risks to the resident's health and safety. During a review of Resident 22's hospital records, prior to admission to this facility, the Emergency Provider Report (emergency room physician documentation that details a patient's urgent medical visit. assessment findings. [...]
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan addressing anticoagulant medication use and the associated risk for bleeding for one of 12 sampled residents (Resident 17). This failure had the potential for staff to be unaware of the interventions necessary to monitor for and reduce the risk of bleeding complications. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Nursing Services - Care Plan, dated 10/24/25, the P&P indicated, The facility shall implement each patient's care plan according to patient needs, physician orders, resident preferences, and facility protocols as indicated. [...]
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the care plan on self-administration of medications was updated accordingly based on staff evaluation and resident preferences for 1 of 12 sampled residents (Resident 47). This failure had the potential to negatively affect Resident 47's responsiveness to care and treatment. During a review of Resident 47's admission Record (AR), dated 7/16/26, the AR indicated in part that Resident 47 is a [AGE] year-old female who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with admitting diagnoses including chronic diastolic congestive heart failure (a condition where the heart becomes stiff and can not relax properly between beats), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD - a chronic digestive condition where stomach acid repeatedly flows back into the esophagus), and dependence on supplemental oxygen. [...]
August 12, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure policies and procedures (P&P) were implemented for two of three sampled Residents (Resident 1 and Resident 3) when nursing staff failed to verify residents' wishes regarding Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR - is an emergency lifesaving procedure performed when the heart stops beating) upon admission. This failure had the potential to result in the facility staff providing or delaying medical treatment and services against the will of the residents. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Resident Rights, dated 05/2024, the P&P indicated, Policy: . [facility name] shall promote the exercise of rights for all residents, including those who face, barriers, such as communication problems, hearing problems, and cognition limits, in the exercise of these rights .13. [...]
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented when: 1. Rehabilitation staff entered a Contact Isolation (infection control measures used to prevent spread of infections through direct (touching resident) or indirect (residents environment)) room without personal protective equipment (PPE - protective clothing such as gowns, gloves, face shields or other equipment) for one of three sampled Residents (Resident 2). 2. Proper identifier for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP - an infection control intervention used to reduce transmission of MDROs (multidrug-resistant organisms that includes use of PPE during high-contact resident care) was not placed on Residents door alerting staff to use PPE, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 3). [...]
January 31, 2025Standard inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an opioid medication (pain medication that has a high risk of addiction) that was administered was documented on the appropriate record. This failure resulted in an inaccurate narcotic count and had the potential to result in diversion of a controlled medication.
December 5, 2023Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow it's policy and procedure to consistently monitor temperature controls from the time food leaves the kitchen to transport and distribution to residents. This failure occurred in 1 of 21 opportunities for monitoring. This failure risks residents receiving their food outside of appropriate temperature range.
September 19, 2023Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1), had an accurate assessment recorded on their Minimum Data Set Assessment ((MDS) a tool for implementing standardized assessment and for planning care). For Resident 1, this failure had the potential to result in a plan of care (a communication tool for healthcare providers to ensure quality care is being provided) that did not match their actual needs.
April 27, 2023Standard inspection · 1 citation
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately document the health condition related to medical condition for two of five sampled residents (Resident 9 and Resident 196), using the Minimum Data Set ((MDS - a tool used to assess and plan care of residents in a nursing facility) when: 1. For Resident 9 - had a missing diagnosis for anxiety. 2. For Resident 196 - had a missing diagnosis for depression. This facility failure resulted in the facility reporting inaccurate data to Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).
Fire safety inspections
13 fire safety citations on file: 3 on July 16, 2026, 7 on January 31, 2025, 3 on April 27, 2023.
Every fire safety citation13 citations
- F Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
- D Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- C Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- E Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- D Install emergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.
- D Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- D Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- D Provide a written emergency evacuation plan.
- D Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
- C Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Establish roles under a Waiver declared by secretary.
- E Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- E Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | California | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 5.73 | 4.52 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 5.07 | 4.09 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 3.52 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.49 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 21.1% | 36.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 20.0% | 38.1% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.85 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 6.01 on weekdays and 5.07 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.18 in April to June 2025 to 5.73 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 5.73 | 0.73 | 6.01 | 5.07 | 0.4% | 0 of 90 | 43 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 5.96 | 0.62 | 6.23 | 5.25 | 1.7% | 0 of 92 | 43 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 5.33 | 0.54 | 5.59 | 4.67 | 1.4% | 0 of 92 | 43 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 5.18 | 0.54 | 5.47 | 4.46 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 43 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| California, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.36 | 0.59 | 4.52 | 3.97 | 2.3% | 0.5% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
Staff pay at this home
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
Official wage estimates for California
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| California, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.90 | $22.04 to $26.35 | 110,060 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $38.34 | $35.98 to $45.06 | 82,850 |
| Registered nurses | $67.44 | $58.87 to $83.25 | 338,940 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | California | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 17.2 | 10.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.2 | 1.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 18.7 | 9.8 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.2 | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 18.9 | 12.0 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 16.8 | 22.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 8.9 | 11.2 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.2 | 2.3 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.9 | 1.6 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: OAKVIEW HC LLC. CMS links this home to Continuing Life, a group of 6 nursing homes averaging 4.8 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bouchard Family Revocable Trust | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 8% | 06/07/2005 |
| Spieker Clc LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 05/07/2008 | |
| Aschenbrenner, Richard | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 28% | 06/07/2005 |
| Bouchard, George | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 8% | 06/07/2005 |
| Spieker, Warren | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 8% | 06/07/2005 |
| Wilson, Elwood | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 5% | 06/07/2005 |
| Spieker 1991 Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 25% | 06/07/2008 |
| Spieker Living Trust U/a/D 3/12/02 | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 27% | 06/07/2005 |
| Spieker, Warren | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 27% | 03/12/2002 |
| Estrin, Dmitry | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 05/06/2019 | |
| Aschenbrenner, Richard | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/07/2005 | |
| Wilson, Elwood | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/07/2005 | |
| Continuing Life, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 06/13/2013 | |
| Life Care Services LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/01/2006 | |
| Jorgensen-Kares, Darolyn | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/13/2013 | |
| Ruggiero, Jeannette | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2018 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on July 16, 2026: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on July 16, 2026: "Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on August 12, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on January 31, 2025: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Thousand Oaks Post Acute, LLC Thousand Oaks, 0.8 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 37 citations
- Mary Health of the Sick Convalescent & Nursing Hos Newbury Park, 4.9 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 14 citations
- Sherwood Oaks Post Acute Thousand Oaks, 5 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 35 citations
- Alta Healthcare Center of Camarillo Camarillo, 6.3 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 22 citations
- St. John's Hospital Camarillo D/P SNF Camarillo, 8 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 22 citations
- Camarillo Healthcare Center Camarillo, 9.8 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 33 citations
- Simi Healthcare Center Simi Valley, 11.2 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 58 citations
- Greenfield Care Center of Fillmore, LLC Fillmore, 11.6 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 35 citations
California contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in California. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: California Department of Public Health, Center for Health Care Quality, Licensing and Certification Program, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: California Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, 1-800-231-4024. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Cal Health Find, where California publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Oakview Skilled Nursing's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Oakview Skilled Nursing 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Oakview Skilled Nursing get at its last inspection?
- 4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on July 16, 2026. The California average is 15.6.
- Has Oakview Skilled Nursing been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Oakview Skilled Nursing accept Medicaid?
- CMS lists it as "Medicare", so it is not certified for Medicaid.
- Who owns Oakview Skilled Nursing?
- CMS lists 16 owners and managers, and links the home to Continuing Life. Legal business name: OAKVIEW HC LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.