Home / New Jersey / Somerset
Regency Heritage Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
380 Demott Lane, Somerset, NJ 08873 · Somerset County · (732) 873-2000
265 certified beds, about 204 residents a day · For profit - Individual · Medicare and Medicaid since 1997
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 315367 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 27, 2025, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the New Jersey average is 8.6, the national average 9.2).
None of its 13 health citations since January 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.42 hours per resident per day, against 3.85 across New Jersey and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.77 of those hours.
42.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (New Jersey average 39.7%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 13 health citations on file.
July 10, 2026Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteCOMPLAINT #: 2727628 Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 7/9/26 and 7/10/26, it was determined that the facility failed to: a) ensure that Resident #1's pressure ulcer was consistently evaluated by wound care and b) develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan (CP) that addressed skin conditions identified in Resident #1's comprehensive assessment. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for wound care and was evidenced by the following:Resident #1 was not at the facility at the time of the survey. A closed medical record review was conducted. A review of Resident #1's admission Record (AR) revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: [...]
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteCOMPLAINT #2999892 Based on interviews, review of medical records and other pertinent facility documentation on 7/9/26 and 7/10/26, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an accurate and complete medical record in accordance with acceptable professional standards of practice when staff failed to consistently document on the 24 Hour Vital Signs/Neuro Checks form for a resident who had an unwitnessed fall and was observed with redness on their face. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for falls (Resident #8) and was evidenced by the following:A review of the admission Record revealed that Resident #8 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: [...]
June 27, 2025Standard inspection · 6 citations
- D Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, review of medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) using the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) process on a resident who was discharged from hospice benefits. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for hospice (Resident #122). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 6/19/25 at 9:22 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #122 lying in bed. The resident stated they were doing well today. On 6/19/25 at 11:14 AM, the surveyor reviewed the electronic medical record (EMR) which revealed orders for DNR (Do Not Resuscitate), DNI (Do Not Intubate), DNH (Do Not Hospitalize) dated 3/24/25. A physician order dated 1/25/25 was noted for [name redacted] hospice. [...]
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, review of medical records, other facility documentation, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, for 1 of 35 residents reviewed (Resident #122). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 6/19/25 at 9:22 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #122 lying in bed. The resident stated they were doing well today. On 6/19/25 at 11:14 AM, the surveyor reviewed the electronic medical record (EMR) which revealed a physician order dated 1/25/25 for [name redacted] hospice. [...]
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services in accordance with professional standards by not ensuring a.) accurate documentation for the inventory of a controlled medication (Marinol) for one (1) of five (5) medication carts, b.) refrigerated medications for discharged residents were removed from active inventory from one (1) of two (2) medication storage room refrigerators and, c.) accountability of the shift-to-shift inventory documentation for the count of controlled medications for one (1) of five (5) medication carts inspected. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: [...]
- D Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
Inspectors wroteRefer to F 881 Based on interview and review of pertinent facility documentation, the facility failed to a.) ensure the required committee members, the Infection Preventionist (IP), was present for one of four Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings and b.) ensure antibiotic stewardship was presented for two of the four QAPI meetings. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 6/18/25 at 10:57 AM, during entrance conference the surveyor requested the QAPI sign in sheets from April of 2024 to present. On 6/26/25 at 8:59 AM, the surveyor reviewed the In-Service sign in sheet;Topic: QAPI dated 8/27/24, which revealed the IP did not sign the sheet. On 6/26/25 at 11:27 AM, during the QAPI interview review, the Director of Nursing (DON) reviewed the In-Service sign in sheet; Topic: QAPI dated 8/27/24 and confirmed the IP did not sign the sign in sheet. [...]
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that facility staff members failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented by not appropriately donning (put on) and doffing (remove) Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and perform appropriate hand hygiene to prevent the spread of infection, in accordance with accepted national standards, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, before and after exiting one of one resident's room, (Resident #228), who was on Transmission Based Precautions (TBP) due to a Clostridium Difficile Infection (CDI) [infectious diarrhea that can be transmitted through direct contact], on one (1) of four (4) units. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the U.S. [...]
- D Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record reviews and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to utilize an infection assessment tool prior to prescribing antibiotics and conduct an ongoing review of this process for their Antibiotic Stewardship (AS) Program. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for antibiotic use (Resident's #114 and #155). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 6/18/25 at 9:50 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Infection Preventionist (IP) / Registered Nurse (RN) who stated that she started working at the facility in April 2025. She stated that the facility did not have a AS program in place and they were working on it. [...]
April 28, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- B Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteComplaint #s: NJ00185340, NJ00175616, NJ00183791 Based on interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents on 04/24/2025 and 04/28/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately and consistently document all the Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) of Residents #1,#2, and #3 in the Certified Nursing Assistant [CNA]Observation Sheet (COS)according to their facility's policy and procedure on ADL flow sheets. This deficient practice was observed in three out of five residents reviewed for ADLs documentation and was evidenced as follows: 1. [...]
April 26, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to notify the resident's responsible party regarding a new diagnosis of pneumonia and a change in antibiotic for one (Residents (R) 434) of three resident reviewed for change in condition.
- D PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that an accurate Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level I assessment was completed after admission for three (Resident (R)154, R61 and R84) out of 12 residents reviewed for PASARR I.
January 25, 2022Standard inspection · 2 citations
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous food and maintain sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 1/4/2022 from 9:53 to10:42 AM, the surveyors, accompanied by the Assistant Administrator (AA) observed the following in the kitchen: 1. In the dry storage room on a middle shelf a stack of Styrofoam bowls was removed from their original packaging. The bowls were uncovered, and the eating surface was exposed. On interview the AA stated, I'll take those. That shouldn't be like that. 2. On a middle shelf in the dry storage room a can of Cuts Hearts of Palm had a significant dent on the upper seam. The AA removed the can to the designated dented can area. 3. [...]
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to implement infection control measures for the handling and storage of respiratory equipment for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care, (Resident #34 and Resident #9). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 01/04/2022 at 10:32 AM, surveyor #1 observed Resident #34 lying in bed with the head of the bed elevated. Resident #34 had a tracheostomy (trach) (a surgical opening in the throat area with a tube for breathing) with a mask over the trach (used to deliver oxygen, humidification, and medications) connected to blue corrugated tubing. [...]
Fire safety inspections
17 fire safety citations on file: 10 on June 27, 2025, 1 on April 26, 2024, 6 on January 25, 2022.
Every fire safety citation17 citations
- F Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
- F Have stairways and smokeproof enclosures used as exits that meet safety requirements.
- F Install proper backup exit lighting.
- F Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- F Have a complete alarm system manually initiated and initiated by fire sprinkler system connection.
- F Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- F Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- F To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
- F Meet requirements for the installation and maintenance of electrical systems.
- F Ensure that testing and maintenance of electrical equipment is performed.
- F To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
- E Install a fire alarm system that can be heard throughout the facility.
- E Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
- D Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- D Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
- D Have properly sized and located compartments to protect residents from smoke.
- D Have power receptacles that are properly grounded.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | New Jersey | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.42 | 3.85 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.77 | 0.68 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.16 | 3.50 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.07 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.58 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 42.6% | 39.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 45.0% | 37.7% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.43 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.52 on weekdays and 3.16 on weekends, 10% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 13.6% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.44 in April to June 2025 to 3.42 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.42 | 0.77 | 3.52 | 3.16 | 13.6% | 0 of 90 | 204 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.23 | 0.82 | 3.33 | 2.97 | 8.4% | 0 of 92 | 197 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.37 | 1.00 | 3.50 | 3.06 | 4.8% | 0 of 92 | 189 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.44 | 1.07 | 3.57 | 3.10 | 3.0% | 0 of 91 | 183 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| New Jersey, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.68 | 0.59 | 3.82 | 3.34 | 11.6% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | New Jersey | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 17.3 | 8.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.9 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 2.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.5 | 8.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.8 | 5.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.9 | 12.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 22.7 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 6.1 | 8.1 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.8 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: REGENCY HERITAGE NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER LLC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross, David | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 99% | 03/01/2007 |
| Bengio, Marty | Corporate director | Individual | 03/01/2007 | |
| Gross, David | Corporate director | Individual | 03/01/2007 | |
| Bengio, Marty | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2007 | |
| Bengio, Marty | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2007 | |
| Bengio, Marty | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/09/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on July 10, 2026: "Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on July 10, 2026: "Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on June 27, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on June 27, 2025: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.16 hours per resident per day, below the New Jersey average of 3.50.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Parker at Somerset, Inc Somerset, 1.4 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 5 citations
- Somerset Woods Rehabilitation & Nursing Center Somerset, 2.2 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 14 citations
- Accelerate Skilled Nursing and Rehab Piscataway Piscataway, 3.3 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 37 citations
- Rose Mountain Care Center New Brunswick, 3.8 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 36 citations
- N J Eastern Star Home Bridgewater, 5.5 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 15 citations
- Careone at Somerset Valley Bound Brook, 5.7 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 17 citations
- Embassy Manor at Edison Nursing and Rehabilitation Edison, 5.8 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 26 citations
- Aristacare at Cedar Oaks South Plainfield, 6.4 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 28 citations
New Jersey contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in New Jersey. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: New Jersey Department of Health, Health Facilities, License Surveys and Inspections, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: New Jersey Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 1-877-582-6995. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: New Jersey Long Term Care Facilities Search, where New Jersey publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Regency Heritage Nursing and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Regency Heritage Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Regency Heritage Nursing and Rehabilitation Center get at its last inspection?
- 6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on June 27, 2025. The New Jersey average is 8.6.
- Has Regency Heritage Nursing and Rehabilitation Center been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Regency Heritage Nursing and Rehabilitation Center accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Regency Heritage Nursing and Rehabilitation Center?
- CMS lists 6 owners and managers. Legal business name: REGENCY HERITAGE NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.