Home / New Jersey / Edison
10 Brunswick Avenue, Edison, NJ 08817 · Middlesex County · (732) 985-1500
280 certified beds, about 223 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1989
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 315279 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 12, 2025, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the New Jersey average is 8.6, the national average 9.2).
Of 26 health citations since February 2021, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (2 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $102,840 in the last three years; the largest was $102,840, and the latest is dated May 12, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.31 hours per resident per day, against 3.85 across New Jersey and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.67 of those hours.
39.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (New Jersey average 39.7%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 26 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteComplaint #: 3009338 Based on interviews, record reviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct and document a thorough investigation of an allegation of resident neglect. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #3). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:A Facility Reportable Event (FRE) form, submitted by the facility to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH), was reviewed. The FRE revealed that on 05/06/2026 at 11:30 AM, a Nurse Investigator (RN #1) from [a state agency] conducted an investigation at the facility in response to allegations of neglect and weight loss made by Resident #3's visitor. The FRE revealed that the resident's medical records were reviewed by RN #1 and the resident's weight was noted to be stable. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) maintain kitchen equipment in a clean and sanitary manner and b,) maintain 2 of 6 nourishment room refrigerators in a sanitary manner. The evidence was as follows: On 4/29/25 at 10:20 AM, in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD) and the Regional FSD, the surveyor observed the following during kitchen tour: 1. The steamer unit floor drain was filled with debris and sediment. The FSD acknowledge it was not properly cleaned according to facility policy. 2. Two convection ovens were soiled with baked on brown coloring on the glass doors and interior of the unit. The FSD acknowledged and stated, it was not cleaned according to facility policy. 3. Two steamer units were drained into a floor trap and the trap screen had debris covering it. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to administer ten doses of an anti-convalescent medication (clonazepam) prescribed for seizures according to physician's orders. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 35 residents reviewed for quality of care (Resident #47), and was evidenced by the following: On 4/29/25 at 11:324 AM, during initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed Resident #47 lying in their bed with the bed positioned low with a fall mat located at the side. On 4/30/25 at 10:49 AM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #47. A review of the admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed a.) to treat each resident with respect and dignity and b.) care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of quality of life recognizing each resident's individuality. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 35 residents reviewed for dignity (Resident #206), and was evidenced by the following: On 4/29/25 at 11:09 AM, during initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA #1) walking alongside Resident #206 in the hallway towards the shower room. CNA #1 and Resident #206 entered the shower room, and the door closed. The surveyor then heard Resident #206 begin to yell inside the shower room. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain a physician's order to carry out a resident's wishes for code status. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 38 residents reviewed for code status and advanced directives (Residents #167 and #230), and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 4/29/25 at 12:34 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #167's electronic medical record (EMR). A review of the admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) indicated that the resident was re-admitted to the facility with diagnosis which included but were not limited to; malignant neoplasm of colon (malignant colon cancer), malignant neoplasm of the liver (liver cancer), and malignant neoplasm of the lung (lung cancer). [...]
Inspectors wroteComplaint #NJ183871, NJ183873 Based on observation, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for a.) a resident who was receiving dialysis (a medical procedure that acts as an artificial kidney filtering waste and excess fluid from the blood) treatments and b.) a resident with a surgical wound. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 35 residents reviewed for care plans (Resident #73 and Resident #531), and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 4/29/25 at 12:13 PM, the Resident #73 was observed in bed with a blanket pulled over their head. The resident did not want to be interviewed. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #73. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure recommendations by the wound care consultant were implemented to prevent worsening of a pressure ulcer. This deficient practice was identified in 1 of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident #333), and was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #333. A review of the admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to; kidney failure, hypertension (high blood pressure), and pneumonia. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments and b.) properly store medications and maintain clean and sanitary medication storage areas. This deficient practice was identified in 1 of 1 observed treatment cart and 2 of 6 observed medication carts, and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 4/30/25 at 12:12 PM, the surveyor observed a wound treatment cart on the Second-floor nursing unit by the nurse's station in front of the elevators which was unattended and left unlocked. The surveyor remained near the treatment cart and observed two nursing staff members walk past the treatment cart and did not acknowledge or identify that the treatment cart was unsecured. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of facility provided documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents. This deficient practice was identified for 4 of 5 observed resident pantry rooms as evidence by the following: On 5/6/25 at 1:00 PM, the surveyor toured the 1st floor Subacute unit pantry room in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD). The surveyor observed the following: the counter around the sink and backsplash had black discoloration. The caulking was peeling and blackened along the edge of the sink, behind the sink, and around the faucet. On 5/6/25 at 1:11 PM, the surveyor toured the 2nd floor, 2A, and Chinese unit pantry room, in the presence of the FSD. The surveyor observed the following: [...]
Inspectors wroteComplaint #NJ182121Based on interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to report within two hours to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) an allegation of staff-to-resident physical abuse for a cognitively intact resident (Resident #381) who reported being roughly handled by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA #1). This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #381). A review of the Progress Note (PN) dated 12/28/24 at 9:16 AM, revealed that Resident #381, a cognitively intact resident, reported to the Registered Nurse (RN #1) that they were fearful of staff and the facility due to an incident that had occurred two days prior (12/26/24). [...]
Inspectors wroteComplaint #NJ182121Based on interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their abuse policy by thoroughly investigating an allegation of staff-to-resident physical abuse to a cognitively intact resident (Resident #381) who reported the allegation to the Registered Nurse (RN #1) on 12/28/24. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #381). A review of the Progress Note (PN) dated 12/28/24 at 9:16 AM, revealed that Resident #381, a cognitively intact resident, reported to the Registered Nurse (RN #1) that they were fearful of staff at the facility due to an incident that had occurred two days prior (12/26/24). [...]
Inspectors wroteComplaint #NJ182121, NJ183873 Based on interview, record review, and other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that facility to failed to ensure residents received the appropriate pain management by a.) administering pain medications according to the physician's ordered pain level parameters and b.) obtaining and administering pain medications as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for pain management (Residents #381 and Resident #531), and was evidenced by the following: 1. The surveyor reviewed the closed medical record for Resident #381. A review of the admission Record face sheet (admission summary) reflected that Resident #381 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses that included but were not limited to; [...]
Inspectors wroteComplaint # NJ160740, NJ166295, NJ167271, NJ169912 Based on observations, interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 07/24/2024, it was determined that the facility failed to administer medications according to the acceptable standards of nursing practice for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #3) . The facility also failed to follow its policy titled Administering Medications. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated Title 45. Chapter 11. New Jersey Board of Nursing Statutes 45:11-23. Definitions b. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) provide privacy and promote dignity during podiatry care for 3 of 3 residents observed (Residents #180, #205 and #264) and b.) provide care and services in a dignified and respectful manner during dining in 1 of 4 dining rooms observed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. During the initial tour of the 2A unit on 2/21/23 at 11:13 AM, the surveyor observed the facility's podiatrist and his assistant enter Resident #205's room. Resident #205 was awake and seated in their wheelchair. The podiatrist sat on the floor in front of the resident, put on gloves and removed the resident's socks exposing the resident's toe nails. The Podiatrist opened a blue pad, chux (a disposable under pad) and placed it on the floor underneath the resident's feet. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) accurately transcribe a physician's order for enteral flushes for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for tube feeding (Resident #23), b.) accurately transcribe a physician's order for contractures for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for range of motion (Resident #77), c.) follow a physician's order for weekly weights for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for weights (Resident #183), d.) ensure urinary output was accurately documented in the medical record for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for foley catheters (Resident #199), and e.) ensure neurological assessments neuro checks were completed for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents (Residents #130 and #264). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, review of the medical record and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's medication times were adjusted to accommodate their dialysis schedule for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #71) reviewed for dialysis. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: During the initial tour of the facility on 02/21/23 at 11:22 AM, the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 informed the surveyor that Resident #71 had begun dialysis (the process of removal of excess water, solutes, and toxins from the blood in people whose kidneys can no longer perform these functions naturally) approximately one month ago and was presently out of the facility for dialysis treatment. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and policy review it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous foods and maintain sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 2/21/23 at 9:43 AM, the surveyor, in the presence of the Dietary Director (DD), observed the following during the kitchen tour: 1. In the food preparation area, Dietary Aide #1 and Dietary Aide #2 were observed wearing baseball caps with their hair at the back of the head exposed and were not wearing hairnets. The DD acknowledged the dietary aides should have been wearing hairnets. 2. In the food preparation area, Dietary Aide #2 was observed wearing a surgical mask above his chin area and his facial hair was exposed. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) perform hand hygiene before and after podiatry care for 3 of 3 residents (Residents #180, #205 and #264). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. During the initial tour of the 2A unit on 2/21/23 at 11:13 AM, the surveyor observed the facility's podiatrist and his assistant enter Resident #205's room. Resident #205 was awake and seated in their wheelchair. The podiatrist sat on the floor in front of the resident, put on gloves and removed the resident's socks exposing the resident's toe nails. The Podiatrist opened a blue pad, chux (a disposable under pad) and placed it on the floor underneath the resident's feet. The door to the resident's room remained opened as the podiatrist performed toenail care to the resident which was visible to the surveyor in the hallway. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, review of the medical record and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's mattress was maintained in a clean, sanitary, and homelike manner on 1 of 8 nursing units (Memory Care Unit). This deficient practice was evidenced by: During the initial tour of the facility on 02/21/21 at 11:08 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #108 seated in a wheelchair at the bedside beside his/her bed which was stripped. The mattress was heavily stained and soiled, with deep creases noted to the upper portion of the mattress. There was a strong smell of urine in the resident's room. The resident appeared well groomed and dressed and was not able to be interviewed due to his/her cognitive status. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a person-centered comprehensive care plan to address a resident's contracture for 1 of 3 Residents (Resident #77) reviewed for range of motion. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 2/21/23 at 11:52 AM, Resident #77 was observed in wheelchair with their right hand contracted and bent at wrist with downward flexion. The resident was unable to follow commands. A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate care, dated 1/22/23, identified the resident as severely impaired and with impairments on both sides of the upper and lower extremities. A review of the medical record indicated that Resident #77 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included, but not limited to: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to revise and update the care plan (CP) in a timely manner for residents who had falls. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 35 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans, (Residents #130 and #264) and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 2/21/23 at 11:22 AM, Resident #130 was observed sleeping in bed. According to the admission Record, Resident #130 was admitted to the facility in July 2022 with diagnoses which included but were not limited to; unspecified dementia. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated, 2/13/23, revealed that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 5 out of 15 which indicated that the resident had severely impaired cognition. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, review of medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident who was dependent on supplemental oxygen via a tracheostomy tube (a surgically created hole (stoma) in the windpipe (trachea)) received supplemental oxygen in accordance with physician orders for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for tracheostomy care (Resident #66). This deficient practice was evidenced by: During the initial tour of the building on 02/21/23 at 12:36 PM, the surveyor observed a stop sign posted outside of Resident #66's room which cautioned that an N 95 mask (filters 95% of particles) was required to enter the resident's room. From the doorway, the surveyor observed Resident #66 lying in bed asleep with the head of bed elevated. The resident had a tracheostomy tube and was noted to have a positive cough. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to don appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while in the rooms of residents placed on transmission-based contact and droplet precautions residing on the units designated for Persons Under Investigation (PUI) and on the COVID-19 positive unit. This deficient practice was identified for 6 of 6 staff members observed on 2 of 2 PUI units and for 2 of 2 staff members a COVID-19 positive unit in the facility. The deficient practice was evidenced as follows: 1. On 02/19/21 at 12:48 PM, the surveyor observed lunch meal service on the second floor unit, A/C- wing which had been designated as a PUI area for new and readmissions. The surveyor observed a PUI room with signs on the door which indicated to stop. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) identify the use of bilateral hand mittens as a physical restraint, b.) assess and implement the least restrictive measures prior to the use of a physical restraint, and c.) obtain a consent with disclosure of risk versus benefits for the use of a physical restraint. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 residents (Residents #131 and #330) who were reviewed for the use of physical restraints and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 02/19/21 at 12:21 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #330 in his/her bed, wearing white hand mittens on both the right and left hands. The hand mitts were tied at the wrist to hold them in place on the resident's hands but were not tied to the side rails or any other surface. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to address in a timely manner the recommendations made by the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) during the Monthly Medication Review. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents #73) and was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed Resident #73's 08/2020 Physician Order Sheet (POS) which revealed a physician Order (PO) dated 07/03/20 for Voltaren 1% gel (topical gel medication used to treat pain) to be applied twice daily to the left shoulder. The surveyor noted that there was no dosage amount documented for the Voltaren gel. The surveyor noted that both the 09/2020 and 10/2020 POS had the same order for Voltaren 1% Gel and no dosage amount. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, and review of other facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from unnecessary psychoactive medications. This deficient practice was identified for Resident #17, 1 of 2 resident reviewed for psychoactive medications and was evidenced by the following: Review of Resident #17's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included: Coronary Artery Disease (Heart disease), Hypertension, aphasia (difficulty speaking) and cerebro-cascular accident (CVA- stroke). The resident's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) an assessment tool dated 02/02/2021, reflected that the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The surveyor observed the resident in bed with eyes closed during the initial unit tour on 02/19/2021 at 11:30 AM. [...]
21 fire safety citations on file: 11 on May 12, 2025, 9 on March 10, 2023, 1 on February 26, 2021.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2025 | Fine | $102,840 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | New Jersey | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.31 | 3.85 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.94 | 3.50 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.27 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.38 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 39.8% | 39.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 35.5% | 37.7% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.38 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.46 on weekdays and 2.94 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 9.5% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.42 in April to June 2025 to 3.31 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.31 | 0.67 | 3.46 | 2.94 | 9.5% | 0 of 90 | 223 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.22 | 0.64 | 3.33 | 2.94 | 8.2% | 0 of 92 | 227 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.30 | 0.60 | 3.41 | 3.02 | 18.6% | 0 of 92 | 220 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.42 | 0.57 | 3.53 | 3.15 | 25.0% | 0 of 91 | 226 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| New Jersey, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.68 | 0.59 | 3.82 | 3.34 | 11.6% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Jersey, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.52 | $21.13 to $23.44 | 32,400 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $36.13 | $32.16 to $38.45 | 17,410 |
| Registered nurses | $51.20 | $47.94 to $61.41 | 92,680 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | New Jersey | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.1 | 8.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.3 | 2.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.8 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.0 | 8.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.3 | 5.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.5 | 12.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 21.0 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 5.8 | 8.1 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Embassy Manor at Edison Nursing and Rehabilitation's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it worse than the national rate (32.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
32.1% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · New Jersey: 130 better, 19 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 103 eligible stays.
11.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · New Jersey: 2 better, 8 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 185 eligible stays.
6.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · New Jersey: 3 better, 13 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 102 eligible stays.
53.9% this home
Median of homes: New Jersey68.7% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 65 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: New Jersey0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 104 residents counted.
1.7% this home
Median of homes: New Jersey1.7% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 104 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: New Jersey99.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 27 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: EDISON HEALTHCARE LLC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antala, Rakesh | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 20% | 02/01/2021 |
| Dasondi, Nilesh | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 21% | 02/01/2021 |
| Joshi, Darshna | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 11% | 02/01/2021 |
| Pandya, Yash | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 38% | 02/01/2021 |
| Patel, Vishal | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 10% | 02/01/2021 |
| Weissman, Moshe | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 02/01/2021 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in New Jersey. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.