Home / Colorado / Commerce City
Ridgeview Post Acute
5230 E 66th Way, Commerce City, CO 80022 · Adams County · (303) 289-1848
112 certified beds, about 97 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1990
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 065283 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 16, 2024, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Colorado average is 8.7, the national average 9.2).
Of 14 health citations since January 2022, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (3 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.00 hours per resident per day, against 3.72 across Colorado and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.54 of those hours.
42.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Colorado average 47.1%).
CMS links it to The Ensign Group, an affiliated group of 344 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 14 health citations on file.
April 8, 2026Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- E Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse to the State Survey and Certification Agency in accordance with state law for four of four allegations of abuse. Specifically, the facility failed to:-Report an allegation of physical abuse between Resident #1 and Resident #2 on 11/18/25 within two hours of the incident; .-Report an allegation of physical abuse between Resident #3 and Resident #4 on 1/19/26 within two hours of the incident;-Report an allegation of physical abuse between Resident #5 and Resident #6 on 2/8/26 within two hours of the incident; and,-Report an allegation of physical abuse between Resident #4 and Resident #11 on 3/22/26 within two hours of the incident.
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#3) of four residents reviewed out of 16 sample residents was kept free from resident-to resident physical abuse. Specifically, the facility failed to protect Resident #3 from physical abuse by Resident #4.
July 16, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 6 citations
- D Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public on one of four units. Specifically, the facility failed to provide the necessary housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain resident room [ROOM NUMBER], #307, #316, #318, #303, #302 and #311 in a sanitary and comfortable manner.
- D Protect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure two (#19 and #100) of three residents reviewed for out of 45 sample residents were free from involuntary seclusion. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #19 and Resident #100 who resided in the secured unit, had the required ongoing documentation of the review and revision to meet the criteria and if the interventions met the needs of the resident.
- D Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided services that meet professional standards. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure narcotic medications were documented on the narcotic log at the time of removal from the locked narcotic drawer on two of four medication carts.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were properly stored in two of four medication carts and one of two medication storage rooms. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -Medications were labeled with the date it was opened; -Discontinued medications were removed from the medication cart in a timely manner; -Medications were properly disposed in a disposal receptacle; and, -Resident medication was stored in the proper location.
- D Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the hospice services provided met professional standards and principles that applied to individuals providing services for one (#54) of one resident reviewed for hospice care services out of 45 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Establish a communication process, including how the communication would be documented between the facility and the hospice provider for Resident #54; and, -Ensure hospice agency staff notes were easily accessible to the facility staff and have consistent documentation of hospice care visits in Resident #54's record.
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to take steps to protect one (#19 and #256) of eight residents from physical abuse out of 45 sample residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, the facility failed to prevent Resident #19 from physical abuse by Resident #256.
February 17, 2023Standard inspection · 2 citations
- J Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, and facility policy the facility failed to ensure each resident received the care and supervision necessary to avoid accident hazards for three (#47, #85 and #92) of seven residents reviewed for accident hazards out of 52 sample residents. Specifically, The facility failed to: - Ensure Resident #47, who had severe cognitive impairment, received sufficient supervision to ensure safety while smoking on 2/13/23. Additionally, cigarette butts were not extinguished properly and placed in appropriate receptacles. A smoking blanket and smoking aprons were not readily available in the smoking area. Staff in the vicinity did not take action when a hot ash from the resident's cigarette fell into their lap after the resident burned themselves attempting to light one cigarette off of another; [...]
- F Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the employee performing the Registered Dietitian (RD) role and signing resident assessments as an RD was, in fact, registered as a dietitian with the Commission on Dietetic Registration (CDR). This had the potential to affect all 96 residents.
January 18, 2022Standard inspection · 4 citations
- L Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to follow infection control measures to prevent potential cross-contamination and spread of SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19, during testing procedures on staff and residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure COVID-19 testing of staff and residents was conducted properly to prevent the spread of an infectious disease, to include the utilization of proper personal protective equipment (PPE); -Maintain social distancing while performing the rapid (antigen) tests; and, -Properly disinfect the testing area between tests. On 1/12/22 at 9:28 a.m. outside agency staff were observed rapid testing Resident #80 for COVID-19 without wearing gloves and gown, with the resident's door open (see observation below). On 1/13/22 at 7:55 a.m. staff were observed self-testing for COVID-19. [...]
- K Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure an unvaccinated resident (Resident #11) was socially distanced (six feet apart) from a confirmed COVID-19 positive resident (Resident #14) and Resident #2 (who was not COVID-19 positive) while consuming their lunch meal; -Ensure staff wore proper personal protective equipment (PPE) when entering Resident #65's and Resident #293's isolation rooms for COVID-19; and, -Ensure staff wore PPE (N95 mask) correctly to ensure secure fit. On 1/12/22 at 12:10 p.m. [...]
- F Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective quality assurance program to identify and address facility compliance concerns was implemented, in order to facilitate improvement in the lives of nursing home residents, through continuous attention to quality of care, quality of life, and resident safety. Specifically, the quality assurance performance improvement (QAPI) program committee failed to identify and address concerns related to infection control and COVID-19 testing.
- D Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of quality for one (#79) of eight out of 47 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #79's blood pressure was within physician ordered parameters prior to administering hypertensive medication.
Fire safety inspections
2 fire safety citations on file: 2 on March 16, 2026.
Every fire safety citation2 citations
- F Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- E Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Colorado | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.00 | 3.72 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.54 | 0.82 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.56 | 3.29 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.96 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.49 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 42.1% | 47.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 41.2% | 44.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.77 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.18 on weekdays and 2.56 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 3.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.11 in April to June 2025 to 3.00 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.00 | 0.54 | 3.18 | 2.56 | 3.1% | 0 of 90 | 97 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.00 | 0.62 | 3.15 | 2.64 | 3.6% | 0 of 92 | 96 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.21 | 0.64 | 3.39 | 2.77 | 6.3% | 0 of 92 | 94 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.11 | 0.72 | 3.31 | 2.59 | 0.7% | 0 of 91 | 95 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Colorado, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.59 | 0.76 | 3.75 | 3.18 | 5.9% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Colorado | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.0 | 13.4 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.7 | 3.4 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.4 | 13.3 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 25.6 | 20.0 | 15.4 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.9 | 1.7 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: BARDWELL HEALTHCARE, INC.. CMS links this home to The Ensign Group, a group of 344 nursing homes averaging 3.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creason, Jonathan | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 03/01/2020 | |
| Horton, Christopher | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 03/01/2020 | |
| Jorgensen, David | Corporate director | Individual | 08/02/2019 | |
| Burnam, Soon | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/02/2019 | |
| Graham, Joseph | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2020 | |
| Keetch, Chad | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2011 | |
| Sato, Ami | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/09/2024 | |
| Prime Time Healthcare LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/01/2020 | |
| Creason, Jonathan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2020 | |
| Horton, Christopher | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2020 | |
| Port, Barry | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 08/04/2025 | |
| Ensign Services Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/02/2019 | |
| Creason, Jonathan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2020 | |
| Horton, Christopher | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2020 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on April 8, 2026: "Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on July 16, 2024: "Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality."
- Who is the administrator and director of nursing, and how long have they been in the job?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on July 16, 2024: "Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on January 18, 2022: "Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.56 hours per resident per day, below the Colorado average of 3.29.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Irondale Post Acute Commerce City, 1.3 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 27 citations
- City Scape Rehabilitation & Care Center LLC Denver, 3.6 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 36 citations
- Thornton Care Center Thornton, 4.6 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 62 citations
- Denver North Care Center Denver, 5 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 32 citations
- Villas at Sunny Acres, the Thornton, 5 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 28 citations
- City Park Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center Denver, 5.1 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 39 citations
- Clear Creek Care Center Westminster, 5.4 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 28 citations
- Briarwood Health Care Center Denver, 5.5 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 22 citations
Colorado contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Colorado. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Health Facilities and Emergency Medical Services Division, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Colorado State Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, 303-862-3524. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Find and compare facilities, where Colorado publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Ridgeview Post Acute's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Ridgeview Post Acute 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Ridgeview Post Acute get at its last inspection?
- 5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on July 16, 2024. The Colorado average is 8.7.
- Has Ridgeview Post Acute been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Ridgeview Post Acute accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Ridgeview Post Acute?
- CMS lists 14 owners and managers, and links the home to The Ensign Group. Legal business name: BARDWELL HEALTHCARE, INC..
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.