Rowlett Health and Rehabilitation Center
9300 Lakeview Pkwy, Rowlett, TX 75088 · Dallas County · (972) 475-4700
163 certified beds, about 124 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1990
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 455904 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 24, 2025, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 14 health citations since May 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.17 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.24 of those hours.
53.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to The Ensign Group, an affiliated group of 344 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 14 health citations on file.
July 24, 2025Standard inspection · 5 citations
- E Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for 10 of 15 resident rooms on the 500 hall (Resident rooms #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9 and #10), and residents eating in the dining room, reviewed for environment. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for 10 of 15 resident rooms on the 500 hall (Resident rooms #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9 and #10), and residents eating in the dining room, reviewed for environment. 1. [...]
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen, reviewed for food and nutrition services. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen, reviewed for food and nutrition services. 1. The facility failed to place a cover on top of the tea dispenser to avoid air borne contaminants. 2. The facility failed to ensure food in the freezer and dry storage area was labeled and dated when stored. 3. The facility failed to ensure expired food in the refrigerator and dry storage area was discarded. 4. [...]
- D Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for two (Resident #76 and Resident #79) of twenty-four residents reviewed for reasonable accommodation of needs. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Resident #76's room was in a position that was accessible to the resident on 07/22/2025. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Resident #79's room was in a position that was accessible to the resident on 07/22/2025. This failure could place the residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance when needed and help in the event of an emergency.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents, who needed respiratory care, were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for two (Resident #1 and Resident #63) of six residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's yankauer suction tip (device used to suction fluids and secretions from the oral cavity) was stored in a bag when not in use on 07/22/2025. The facility failed to ensure Resident 63's oxygen tubing was properly stored in a bag when not in use on 07/22/2025. This failure could place the residents at risk for respiratory infection and not having their respiratory needs met.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (Resident #78) of six residents observed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure that CNA E changed gloves and performed hand hygiene, did not carry gloves in her pocket, and did not blow on her hands to dry the hand sanitizer, while providing incontinent care to Resident #78 on 07/22/2025. These failures could place the residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infections.
June 20, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 6 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen, reviewed for food storage, labeling, dating, and kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure food in the facility's refrigerator, was labeled and dated according to guidelines. The facility failed to ensure food in the facility's freezer, was labeled and dated according to guidelines. The facility failed to ensure the ice machine scoop holder, located in the facility's kitchen, was cleaned. The facility failed to ensure kitchen equipment (storage bins) was cleaned and sanitary. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and other air-borne illnesses.
- E Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for areas in the facility for 6 (Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], #513, #515, #517, #519, and #522) of 14 resident rooms observed for a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. The facility failed to ensure that Residents room [ROOM NUMBER], #513, #515, #517, #519, and #522 were cleaned and sanitized. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of living in an unclean and unsanitary environment which could lead to a decreased quality of life.
- D Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for one (Resident #78) of eight residents reviewed for reasonable accommodation of needs. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Resident #78's rooms were in a position that was accessible to the residents. This failure could place the residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance when needed and help in the event of an emergency.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents ' choices for 1 (Resident #46) of 1 resident reviewed. for quality of care. The facility failed to to obtain physician orders and assess Resident #46 for a scoop mattress and obtain physician orders prior to installing the scoop mattress. This failure could prevent the resident to be free from of any physical or chemical restraints.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Residents, who needed respiratory care, was provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 2 (Resident #321 and Resident #322) of ten residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #321's nebulizer masks and nasal cannula was properly stored. The facility failed to ensure Resident #322's nasal cannula was properly stored. The facility failed to ensure a Physician's Order was in place for Resident #322's oxygen administration. These failures could place the residents at risk for respiratory infection and not having their respiratory needs met.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for two (Resident #49 and Resident #89) of eight residents observed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure that CNA D changed his gloves and perform hand hygiene while providing incontinent care to Resident #49 and Resident #89. This failure could place the residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infection.
May 10, 2023Standard inspection · 3 citations
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assure that medications were secure and inaccessible to unauthorized staff and residents for 1 (medication aide cart) of 4 medication carts reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure the medications were placed inside of the medication cart when MA H left the medication cart on the hallway. This failure could place residents at risk of ingesting unprescribed medications resulting in adverse health consequences.
- D Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure special eating equipment and utensils were provided for residents who need them and appropriate assistance to ensure that the resident can use the assistive devices when consuming meals and snacks for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #69) reviewed for feeding assistance. The facility failed to provide Resident #69 an adaptive aid to assist her to eat independently. The failure could place residents who required adaptive feeding equipment at risk for loss of self-worth and empowerment for independent eating, which could lead to unplanned weight loss.
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are complete, accurately documented and readily accessible for one (Resident #85) of five residents reviewed for clinical records. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #85's physician's orders for tramadol were written to be given orally and not enterally. This failure could place residents at risk of inaccurate medical records that could affect monitoring and medical services provided.
Fire safety inspections
6 fire safety citations on file: 2 on July 24, 2025, 1 on June 20, 2024, 3 on May 10, 2023.
Every fire safety citation6 citations
- E Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- E Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
- E Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- E Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- D Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.17 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.24 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.89 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.05 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.87 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 53.9% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 62.5% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.76 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.28 on weekdays and 2.89 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.20 in April to June 2025 to 3.17 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.17 | 0.24 | 3.28 | 2.89 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 124 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.18 | 0.22 | 3.28 | 2.90 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 125 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.19 | 0.21 | 3.32 | 2.86 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 122 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.20 | 0.25 | 3.32 | 2.89 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 122 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 39.9 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.7 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 31.6 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.1 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 26.0 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 5.0 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.7 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: EASTLAND MEMORIAL HOSPITAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to The Ensign Group, a group of 344 nursing homes averaging 3.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eastland Memorial Hospital District | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 12/01/2023 |
| Howard, Scott | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Mostafa Elsawy, Bassem | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 02/01/2025 | |
| Burnam, Soon | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Keetch, Chad | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/31/2025 | |
| Taylor, Stephen | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2025 | |
| Forney Lake Healthcare, Inc. | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 12/01/2023 | |
| Howard, Scott | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Mostafa Elsawy, Bassem | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2025 | |
| Ensign Services Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2019 | |
| Forney Lake Healthcare, Inc. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/26/2025 | |
| Lake Morris Health Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/31/2025 | |
| Standard Bearer Healthcare Op, LP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/31/2025 | |
| The Ensign Group Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/31/2025 | |
| Howard, Scott | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/15/2025 | |
| Mostafa Elsawy, Bassem | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on July 24, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on July 24, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on July 24, 2025: "Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on July 24, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.89 hours per resident per day, below the Texas average of 2.98.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Beacon Harbor Healthcare and Rehabilitation Rockwall, 0.3 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 27 citations
- Rockwall Nursing Care Center Rockwall, 3.2 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 51 citations
- Broadmoor Medical Lodge Rockwall, 4.2 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 32 citations
- Highland Meadows Rockwall, 4.9 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 13 citations
- Pleasant Valley Healthcare and Rehabilitation Cent Garland, 5.6 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 22 citations
- Advanced Health & Rehab Center of Garland Garland, 6.6 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 41 citations
- Beltline Healthcare Center Garland, 6.9 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 21 citations
- Wylie Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation Wylie, 7 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 28 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Rowlett Health and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Rowlett Health and Rehabilitation Center 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Rowlett Health and Rehabilitation Center get at its last inspection?
- 5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on July 24, 2025. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has Rowlett Health and Rehabilitation Center been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Rowlett Health and Rehabilitation Center accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Rowlett Health and Rehabilitation Center?
- CMS lists 16 owners and managers, and links the home to The Ensign Group. Legal business name: EASTLAND MEMORIAL HOSPITAL DISTRICT.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.