Schleicher County Medical Center
104 N Us Hwy 277, Eldorado, TX 76936 · Schleicher County · (325) 853-3931
34 certified beds, about 31 residents a day · Government - Hospital district · Medicaid since 1974
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 45E631 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on December 8, 2025, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 13 health citations since June 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.37 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.55 of those hours.
37.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 13 health citations on file.
December 8, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- E Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents had the right to formulate an advance directive for 3 of 9 residents (Residents #1, #8, and #33) reviewed for advance directives. The facility failed to ensure Resident's #1, #8, and #33 Out-of-Hospital Do-Not-Resuscitate (OOH-DNR) forms were completed correctly. This failure could place residents at risk of having their end of life wishes dishonored, and of having CPR performed against their wishes.
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure in accordance with professional standards of practices, the medical records on each resident were accurately documented for 2 of 3 residents (Residents #33 and #34) reviewed for accurate medical records. The facility failed to accurately document the type of discharge for Residents #33 and #34. This failure could affect residents whose records are maintained by the facility and could place them at risk for errors in care and treatment.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of infections for 1 of 4 (Resident #21) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure Resident #21's oxygen nasal cannula tube was bagged when not in use and CNA A touched the nasal cannula with her bare hands to place it on the resident's nose. This failure could place the residents at risk of infection.
August 15, 2024Standard inspection · 4 citations
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen. The facility failed to ensure food items in the facility's only dry storage was sealed appropriately. These failures could place residents at risk for food-borne illness, and food contamination.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet, attain, and/or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #16) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to have a care plan in place to accurately address Resident #16's oxygen use. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of not receiving individualized care and services to meet their needs.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 of 1 medication rooms inspected for medication storage. The medication room had opened and undated vial of Tuberculin (TB) medication in the refrigerator. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving medications that were expired and not produce the therapeutic effect.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Resident #9) of 2 residents reviewed for infection control. CNA B failed to change her gloves when going from dirty to clean during peri-care for Resident #9. CNA C failed to wash her hands prior to putting gloves on and assisting Resident #9 with personal care. This failure could place residents at risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection.
October 2, 2023Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- G Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free from accident hazards was possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and supervision . 1. HA A failed to ensure Resident #1 was properly transferred by two persons using a Hoyer lift. 2. The facility failed to ensure HA A was properly trained before transferring Resident #1 by Hoyer lift . The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The noncompliance began on 8/29/23 and ended on 9/4/23. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the investigation began. This failure could place residents at risk of severe injury.
- G Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff had the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and supervision . 1. HA A failed to ensure Resident #1 was properly transferred by two persons using a Hoyer lift. 2. The facility failed to ensure HA A was properly trained and able to demonstrate compentency in skills and techniques before transferring Resident #1 by Hoyer lift . The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The noncompliance began on 8/29/23 and ended on 9/4/23. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the investigation began. This failure could place residents at risk of severe injury.
June 29, 2023Standard inspection · 4 citations
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that ensure the accurate administering of all drugs to meet the needs of the residents, for 1 of 1 medication room and 1 of 1 treatment cart inspected for medication storage. The medication room had opened, undated and an expired vials of tuberculin in the medication refrigerator. The treatment cart contained insulin pens without open dates. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving medications that were expired and not produce the desired effect, and at risk of not receiving the therapeutic benefit of medications or adverse reactions to medications.
- D Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents with bed rails were assessed for the risk of entrapment from bed rails, failed to provide ongoing monitoring and supervision for the use of bed rails, and failed to have a care plan in place for bed rails for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #7) reviewed for the use of full (4) bed rails. 1. Resident # 7 had full side rails at her request without a developed care plan with measurable goals benefits and risks related to side rail use. 2. The facility failed to routinely assess Resident #7 for ongoing need for and risks of side rail use (including entrapment). 3. The facility failed to conduct and document routine monitoring of Resident #7 while full side rails were in use. This failure could affect residents by putting them at an increased and unnecessary risk of harm, entrapment, and injury.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (Resident #4) of one resident reviewed for infection control. LVN C failed to sanitize the bedside table and put down a barrier to prevent cross contamination. LVN C failed to sanitize scissors after they became contaminated prior to ostomy care for Resident #4. LVN C failed to wash her hands prior to donning gloves for resident care. This failure could place resident's risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection. Findings Included: [...]
- C Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow guidelines for mandatory submission of staffing information based on payroll data in a uniform format. Long-term care facilities must electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS. The facility failed to submit PBJ staffing information to CMS for the 2nd quarter of the fiscal year 2023. The facility's failure could place residents at risk for personal needs not being identified and met, decreased quality of care, decline in health status, and decreased feelings of well-being within their living environment.
Fire safety inspections
4 fire safety citations on file: 3 on December 8, 2025, 1 on August 15, 2024.
Every fire safety citation4 citations
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- E Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
- E Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.37 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.55 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.73 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 3.01 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.81 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 37.8% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS expects 3.07 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.64 on weekdays and 3.73 on weekends, 20% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.62 in April to June 2025 to 4.37 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.37 | 0.55 | 4.64 | 3.73 | 0.4% | 0 of 90 | 31 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.63 | 0.70 | 4.92 | 3.91 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 30 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.87 | 0.65 | 5.29 | 3.80 | 1.2% | 0 of 92 | 30 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.62 | 0.68 | 4.95 | 3.78 | 2.0% | 0 of 91 | 30 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 22.8 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.6 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.5 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.5 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 19.2 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 5.1 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: Legal Business Name Not Available.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership data not available |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on December 8, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on December 8, 2025: "Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on August 15, 2024: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on October 2, 2023: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Schleicher County Medical Center's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Schleicher County Medical Center 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Schleicher County Medical Center get at its last inspection?
- 3 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on December 8, 2025. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has Schleicher County Medical Center been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Schleicher County Medical Center accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Schleicher County Medical Center?
- CMS lists 1 owner or manager. Legal business name: Legal Business Name Not Available.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.