Slaton Care Center
630 S 19th, Slaton, TX 79364 · Lubbock County · (806) 828-6268
120 certified beds, about 41 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1995
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 675496 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on December 4, 2025, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 20 health citations since August 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $23,491 in the last three years; the largest was $23,491, and the latest is dated May 1, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.84 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.23 of those hours.
CMS links it to Creative Solutions in Healthcare, an affiliated group of 149 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 20 health citations on file.
December 4, 2025Standard inspection · 6 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen (Kitchen A) reviewed for dietary services. 1. The facility failed to ensure dietary staff (DA C and [NAME] D) ensured food was stored, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions. Multiple food items which included cornbread mix, cooked cornbread, bread pudding, salad ingredients, and grilled cheese sandwiches were repeatedly left uncovered for extended periods while in the kitchen and on the serving line 2. The facility failed to ensure Dietary staff (Cook D) consistently performed required hand hygiene. The cook repeatedly donned and removed gloves without washing hands before or after glove use while preparing multiple food items. 3. [...]
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #44) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #44 had orders for the administration of oxygen. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the care and services to maintain their highest level of well-being. Record review of Resident #44's face sheet dated 12/02/25 reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #44 had diagnoses which included: [...]
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 2 of 2 medication carts (Medication Cart A, and Medication Cart B), reviewed for medication storage. 1. The facility failed to ensure Medication Cart B did not contain a loose pill. 2. The facility failed to ensure Medication Cart A did not contain a loose pill. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving prescribed medications as ordered and place the facility at risk of drug diversions. Observation on [DATE] at 3:09 PM, of Medication Cart B with MA A revealed a small, white, round, loose pill (1/2 pill) found in a drawer of the medication cart. [...]
- D Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure menus were followed for 1(Resident #28) of 17 residents reviewed for food and nutrition services. The facility failed to follow the week 1 menu for one lunch service served at the facility on Tuesday 12/2/25 for the one and only resident (Resident #28) that was on a puree therapeutic diet. This failure could place residents at risk of poor intake, and/or weight loss.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #20) reviewed for infection control. LVN A failed to wear proper PPE (a gown) when providing wound care for Resident #20 who was on EBP. This failure could place residents at risk for the spread of infection and cross contaminationRecord review of Resident #20's face sheet, dated 12/03/25, reflected an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #20 had diagnoses which included: [...]
- B Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident bedrooms measured at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple resident bedrooms, and at least 100 square feet in single resident rooms for 1 of 17 semi-private (room shared by two people, typically with a curtain dividing the room and providing some privacy) rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]) reviewed for useable living space. The facility failed to ensure room [ROOM NUMBER] (a semi-private room) provided 80 square feet per resident. The square footage was 153 instead of 160 square feet. This failure could place residents at risk of crowding in resident rooms and cause difficulty in providing resident care.
January 29, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional or special dietary needs for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1). The facility failed to provide Resident #1 with double portions at meals 3 times a day, per physician orders. This failure could place residents at risk for weight loss, altered nutritional status and diminished quality of life. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 01/28/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old male originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had the following diagnoses: [...]
September 12, 2024Standard inspection · 4 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for dietary services. 1) The facility failed to keep refrigerator, oven handles, freezer handles, and microwave handles clean. 2) The facility failed to keep all foods completely sealed when stored in the pantry and freezer. 3) The facility failed to store bowls upside down. 4) The facility failed to keep the kitchen free of expired food items. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness.
- E Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable, and at a safe, and appetizing temperature for 2 of 3 food forms (regular, mechanical soft) for 1 of 1 meal reviewed for palatability. 1. The facility lunch trays had vegetables that were lukewarm, the gravy for the meat was too salty, and the potatoes were too spicy for the regular texture and mechanical soft texture meals at lunch on 9/10/24. These failures could place residents at risk of decreased food intake, hunger, and unwanted weight loss.
- D Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident has a right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for 1 of 37 residents reviewed for physical environment. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #12 had a functioning bathroom light switch. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #12 had a safe and secure toilet in the shared bathroom. These failures could place residents at risk for injuries and falls.
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assured the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 1 treatment carts (Treatment Cart A) reviewed for pharmacy services 1. The facility failed to ensure the treatment carts were free of expired medical supplies. These failures could place all residents at risk of harm or decline in health due to expired medical supplies.
August 3, 2023Standard inspection · 9 citations
- F Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with appropriate competencies and skill sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service for 1 of 1 facility kitchen. The facility failed to designate a person to serve as the Dietary Manager who met the required qualifications. The facility designated Dietary Manager had not completed any Dietary Managers certification course or had any other qualifying credentials. This failure could place residents at risk for the spread of foodborne illness and residents not having their nutritional needs met.
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for dietary services. 1. The facility failed to ensure foods were processed under sanitary conditions. 2. The facility failed to ensure dietary staff maintained quaternary sanitizer levels within acceptable ranges and sanitizing solutions were tested according to manufacturer guidelines. 3. The facility failed to ensure food and non-food contact surfaces were cleaned. 4. The facility failed to ensure food was protected from possible contamination. 5. The facility failed to ensure staff used good hygienic practices. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness.
- E Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents had the right to formulate an advance directive for 3 of 16 residents (Residents #8, #26, and #29) reviewed for advanced directives, in that: Residents #8, #26 and #28 was listed as a DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) but had Out-of-Hospital Do Not Resuscitate (OOH-DNR) forms that were incorrectly filled out or missing required information. These failures could place residents at risk for not having their end of life wishes honored.
- E Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record, review the facility, failed to ensure sure each resident had a right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment in the facility and failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior in the central bath and 9 of 18 resident rooms (40, 42, 44, 46, 51, 52, 54, 56 and 62) reviewed for environment, The facility failed to ensure resident use common areas and rooms were clean and did not need repair, These failures could place residents at risk for living in an unsafe, unclean, uncomfortable, and unhomelike environment which could cause a decline in resident psychosocial well-being.
- E Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible; and that each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #33) reviewed for supervision, 1)The facility failed to provide effective monitoring and interventions to reduce Resident #33's wandering which was intrusive to other residents' privacy and unsafe for Resident #33 and other residents, 2)The facility failed to maintain the facility as free of accident hazards as possible, in that; oxygen was not stored in a safe manner, chemicals were not stored in a manner to prevent contamination of resident use items, hot water temperatures were not maintained in a safe range, and hazardous areas were not secured. [...]
- E Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure menus were followed for 3 of 3 food forms (regular, mechanical soft and pureed) for 3 residents (Residents #20, #23 and #27) reviewed for during mealtime. The facility failed to ensure Resident's #20, #23 and #27 received their meals according to the menu. This failure could place residents at risk for unwanted weight loss and hunger.
- E Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received, and the facility provided food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for 2 of 2 meals observe for 2 3 of 2 residents with orders for puréed diet (Residents #20 and 23 and 27 ) reviewed for nutrition services and one resident on a mechanical soft diet (Resident #27); in that: The facility failed to provide food that was in a form to meet resident needs for 2 of 2 meals observed (8/01/23 and 8/02/23 - Lunch) for 2 of 2 residents with the orders for puréed diets (Residents #20 and 23) and one resident on a mechanical soft diet (Resident #27). Foods were not in a pureed form and mechanical soft foods were not in the form called for on the menu. This failure could place residents at risk of decreased food intake and choking.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 16 residents (Residents #32) and 1 of 1 staff (CMA A) reviewed for infection control. 1. CMA A failed to properly clean multi-use equipment between each resident. 2. CNA A failed to perform hand hygiene between glove changes when providing wound care for Resident #32. These failures could place residents at risk for spread of infection and cross contamination during incontinent care and medication administration.
- B Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident bedrooms measured at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple resident bedrooms, and at least 100 square feet in single resident rooms for 1 of 61 semiprivate rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]) reviewed for useable living space. The facility failed to ensure Room # 7 (a semi-private room) provided 80 square feet per resident. The square footage was 153 instead of 160 square feet. This failure could place residents at risk of crowding in resident rooms and cause difficulty in providing resident care.
Fire safety inspections
7 fire safety citations on file: 2 on December 4, 2025, 1 on May 1, 2025, 1 on September 12, 2024, 3 on August 3, 2023.
Every fire safety citation7 citations
- D Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- C Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
- L Ensure that any exit in an area undergoing construction, repair, or improvements shall be inspected daily to ensure its ability to be used instantly in case of emergency.
- C Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
- E Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
- D Meet other general requirements.
- D Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2025 | Fine | $23,491 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 2.84 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.23 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.53 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.77 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.84 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | not reported | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 3.61 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 2.96 on weekdays and 2.53 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.33 in April to June 2025 to 2.84 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 2.84 | 0.23 | 2.96 | 2.53 | 0.0% | 4 of 90 | 41 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.04 | 0.24 | 3.20 | 2.65 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 38 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.15 | 0.29 | 3.27 | 2.84 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 35 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.33 | 0.35 | 3.47 | 2.96 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 32 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 24.2 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.6 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.9 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.3 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.1 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: SLATON I ENTERPRISES, LLC. CMS links this home to Creative Solutions in Healthcare, a group of 149 nursing homes averaging 2.1 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Huggins, Linda | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 01/30/2009 | |
| Creative Solutions in Healthcare Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/30/2009 | |
| Blake, Gary | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/30/2009 | |
| Blake, Malisa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2008 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 9 problems in this area, most recently on December 4, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on September 12, 2024: "Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on December 4, 2025: "Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on December 4, 2025: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.53 hours per resident per day, below the Texas average of 2.98.
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 2 administrators who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Windmill Village Rehabilitation & Care Center Lubbock, 14.3 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 28 citations
- Avir at Heritage Oaks Lubbock, 14.4 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 32 citations
- Hansford County Hospital District Dba Lakeridge Nu Lubbock, 15.8 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 31 citations
- Lakeside Rehabilitation and Care Center Lubbock, 16.8 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 50 citations
- Lubbock Health Care Center Lubbock, 16.9 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 21 citations
- Southern Specialty Rehab & Nursing Lubbock, 17 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 27 citations
- Avir at Lubbock Lubbock, 17 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 63 citations
- Mesquite Post Acute Care Lubbock, 17.2 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 42 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Slaton Care Center's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Slaton Care Center 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Slaton Care Center get at its last inspection?
- 6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on December 4, 2025. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has Slaton Care Center been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $23,491 in the last three years.
- Does Slaton Care Center accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Slaton Care Center?
- CMS lists 4 owners and managers, and links the home to Creative Solutions in Healthcare. Legal business name: SLATON I ENTERPRISES, LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.