Find a nursing home

Home / Colorado / Denver

Sloan's Lake Rehabilitation Center

1601 Lowell Blvd, Denver, CO 80204 · Denver County · (303) 534-2211

42 certified beds, about 39 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare since 2013

CMS high performing icon Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
5 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 065404 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on March 5, 2026, inspectors cited 1 health deficiency (the Colorado average is 8.7, the national average 9.2).

None of its 12 health citations since October 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.59 hours per resident per day, against 3.72 across Colorado and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.84 of those hours.

31.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Colorado average 47.1%).

CMS links it to The Ensign Group, an affiliated group of 344 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 12 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
10D
2E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
March 5, 2026Standard inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 19, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease on 2 out of 2 units. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff donned (put on) the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) when providing care to residents who were on enhanced barrier precautions.
January 23, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 7 citations
  1. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 9, 2024
    Inspectors wroteIII. Resident #96 A. Resident status Resident #96, age greater than 65, was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 2/24/23. According to the February 2023 CPO, diagnoses included major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, fracture of the upper and lower end of right fibula, muscle weakness, moderate obesity and presence of an artificial knee joint. The 1/8/23 MDS assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a BIM) score of 15 out of 15. The resident required supervision with oral hygiene, dependent with bed mobility, toileting, and maximal assistance with personal hygiene which included showers. He had no behaviors or refusals of care. B. [...]
  2. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 9, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on resident observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received proper respiratory treatment and care for one (#12) of four residents reviewed for supplemental oxygen use out of 30 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure a physician's order was in place for Resident #12's continuous oxygen use.
  3. D
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    F697 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 9, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to establish parameters for pain medication for one (#105) of five residents in a manner consistent with professional standards of practice out of 30 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure pain parameters were established and implemented for physician ordered as needed (PRN) pain medications; and, -Ensure non pharmacological interventions were implemented before administration of an opioid pain medication.
  4. D
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    F698 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 9, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#191) of two residents out of 30 sample residents received dialysis services consistent with professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure consistent communication and documentation with the dialysis center regarding care and services was completed for Resident #191.
  5. D
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    F760 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 9, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for one (#196) of five residents reviewed for medication errors of 30 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #196 was administered an anticoagulant medication correctly by removing the medication from a capsule before administration to the resident.
  6. D
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    F806 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 9, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide each resident with a nourishing, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs that accommodated resident allergies, intolerances and preferences for two (#106 and #191) of six residents out of 30 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #106 was provided appropriate vegetarian meal items per the menu spreadsheets after the meat was eliminated; -Ensure Resident #191 was provided or offered a substitute meal when the resident did not like the lunch item provided; -Ensure Resident #191 was provided with dinner after a late dialysis appointment; and, -Follow the therapeutic dialysis diet for Resident #191.
  7. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 9, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection on one out of two floors. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure a resident's room was cleaned in a sanitary manner; -Ensure that the proper cleaning agent was used to clean a resident's room who was on transmission based precautions; and -Ensure appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) was worn to clean a resident's room who was on transmission based precautions for Clostridium difficile.
October 13, 2022Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. E
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    F578 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 11, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to formulate advance directives for four (#140, #137, #141, and #188) out of seven residents reviewed for advance directives out of 21 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -Medical orders for scope and treatment (MOST) forms, used to summarize and consolidate important information about an individual's preferences for life-sustaining treatments including: cardiopulmonary recussications (CPR), artificial nutrition, and hydration, were completed accurately and thoroughly, for Residents #140, #137, #141, and #188; -That when an individual other than the resident signed and completed the resident's MOST form that resident representative had the legal authority to do so, for Residents #140, #137, #141 and #188; [...]
  2. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 11, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Clean glucometers between residents; and, -Properly don and doff personal protective equipment (PPE) for isolation rooms.
  3. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 11, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#191) resident reviewed of five sample residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice out of 21 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to have a wound care order in place prior to treatment being provided for Resident #191.
  4. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 11, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one of five residents (#197) reviewed for respiratory services out of 21 sample residents, received respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences. Specifically, the facility failed to have an order for oxygen in place for Resident #197.

Fire safety inspections

6 fire safety citations on file: 2 on March 5, 2026, 2 on January 23, 2024, 2 on October 13, 2022.

Every fire safety citation6 citations
  1. F
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · March 5, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
    K 372 · March 5, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · January 23, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. F
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · January 23, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. E
    Have proper fire barriers, ventilation and signs for the transfilling of oxygen.
    K 927 · October 13, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. D
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · October 13, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeColoradoUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.593.723.86
Registered nurses0.840.820.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.913.293.42
Nurse aides2.59
Licensed practical nurses1.16
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)31.0%47.1%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover50.0%44.6%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 4.46 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.87 on weekdays and 3.91 on weekends, 20% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 4.8% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.50 in April to June 2025 to 4.59 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.590.844.873.91 4.8%0 of 9039
Oct to Dec 20254.550.804.833.86 7.1%1 of 9241
Jul to Sep 20254.690.954.963.98 5.1%0 of 9239
Apr to Jun 20254.501.164.694.02 2.0%0 of 9139
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Colorado, Jan to Mar 20263.590.763.753.185.9%0.2% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeColoradoUS
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.21.61.6
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
6.520.323.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
6.312.112.0

Owners and operators

Legal business name: LAKEWOOD HEALTHCARE, INC.. CMS links this home to The Ensign Group, a group of 344 nursing homes averaging 3.2 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Horton, ChristopherManaging control - governing bodyIndividual04/01/2016
Jorgensen, DavidManaging control - governing bodyIndividual09/29/2016
Jorgensen, DavidCorporate directorIndividual09/29/2016
Burnam, SoonCorporate officerIndividual06/24/2009
Dunyon, DavidCorporate officerIndividual01/16/2013
Keetch, ChadCorporate officerIndividual03/01/2011
Sato, AmiCorporate officerIndividual09/09/2024
Kare Technologies LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization01/16/2013
Horton, ChristopherOperational/managerial controlIndividual04/01/2016
Jorgensen, DavidOperational/managerial controlIndividual09/29/2016
Port, BarryIndividual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNFIndividual08/04/2025
Ensign Services IncAdp of the SNFOrganization06/24/2009
Horton, ChristopherAdp of the SNFIndividual04/01/2016
Jorgensen, DavidAdp of the SNFIndividual09/29/2016

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on January 23, 2024: "Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable."
  2. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on March 5, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  3. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on January 23, 2024: "Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors."
  4. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on January 23, 2024: "Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options."

Other nursing homes nearby

Colorado contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Colorado. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Sloan's Lake Rehabilitation Center's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Sloan's Lake Rehabilitation Center 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Sloan's Lake Rehabilitation Center get at its last inspection?
1 health deficiency at the standard inspection on March 5, 2026. The Colorado average is 8.7.
Has Sloan's Lake Rehabilitation Center been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Sloan's Lake Rehabilitation Center accept Medicaid?
CMS lists it as "Medicare", so it is not certified for Medicaid.
Who owns Sloan's Lake Rehabilitation Center?
CMS lists 14 owners and managers, and links the home to The Ensign Group. Legal business name: LAKEWOOD HEALTHCARE, INC..

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection