Town of Vici Nursing Home
619 Speck, Vici, OK 73859 · Dewey County · (580) 995-4216
73 certified beds, about 39 residents a day · Government - City/county · Medicare and Medicaid since 2011
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 375545 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 9, 2025, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Oklahoma average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 15 health citations since October 2022, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,018 in the last three years; the largest was $8,018, and the latest is dated June 25, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.21 hours per resident per day, against 3.79 across Oklahoma and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.30 of those hours.
50.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oklahoma average 55.5%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 15 health citations on file.
April 9, 2025Standard inspection · 3 citations
- E Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of insulin being held for 1 (#19) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for notification. LPN #3 identified eight residents received insulin.
- E Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. BP monitoring for a PRN antihypertensive medication for 1 (#3); and b. medications were available for 1 (#11) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for medications. The administrator identified 37 residents resided in the facility. LPN #3 identified three residents had orders for clonidine.
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure nail care was provided for a dependent resident for 1 (#18) of 16 sampled residents reviewed for ADLs. The administrator identified 37 residents resided in the facility.
June 25, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- G Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff used a mechanical lift for one (#3) of four sampled residents reviewed for the use of mechanical lifts. On 06/09/24 CNA #4 attempted a one person transfer with Resident #3 without using the mechanical lift and was lowered to the floor. Resident #3 required the assistance of two staff with the use of a maxi lift for transfers per the care plan. An X-ray was completed two days later when the resident continued to complain of pain and had swelling and warmth to their leg. The X-ray documented Resident #3 had an oblique fracture of the left distal femur. The census was 43. The DON identified 18 residents in the facility that required the use of a mechanical lift.
- D Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for one (#4) of four sampled residents reviewed for care plans. Faciilty census was 43.
December 6, 2023Standard inspection · 6 citations
- E Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive MDS assessments were completed timely for three (#27, 38, and #140) of 12 sampled residents reviewed for assessments. The administrator identified 36 residents resided in the facility.
- E Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure quarterly MDS assessments were completed timely for four (#15, 32, 19, and #2) of 12 sampled residents reviewed for assessments. The administrator identified 36 residents resided in the facility.
- E Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure MDS assessments were transmitted timely for seven (#15, 32, 19, 2, 27, 38, and #140) of 12 sampled residents reviewed for assessments. The administrator identified 36 residents resided in the facility.
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents were assisted to be changed for one (#2) of two sampled residents reviewed for ADLs. The administrator identified 36 residents resided in the facility.
- D Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement a dementia focused care area on a comprehensive care plan for one (#140) of 12 sampled residents reviewed for care plans. The administrator identified 36 residents resided in the facility.
- D Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure laboratory orders were obtained per physician's orders for one (#38) of three sampled residents reviewed for laboratory orders. The administrator identified 36 residents resided in the facility.
October 20, 2022Standard inspection · 4 citations
- E Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to a. ensure an antibiotic was started in a timely manner for one (#14) of two sampled residents reviewed for antibiotic use, and b. assess, intervene and consult the physician for a resident with a rash for one (#2) of two sampled residents reviewed for impaired skin integrity. The Resident Census and Condition Report, dated 10/16/22, documented 39 residents resided in the facility.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. staff wore appropriate PPE for residents in isolation and while performing COVID-19 testing on the residents, b. infections were tracked to identify any trends, c. ensure blood pressure cuff and stethoscope were sanitized between resident use for three (#12, #25, and #2) of four sampled residents observed during medication administration, d. staff were monitored and screened for COVID-19 signs and symptoms for three (CNA #3, LPN #3 and CMA #3) on entrance to the facility, and e. residents were screened every shift for COVID-19 signs and symptoms for 15 ( #31, #27, #25, #12, #16, #34, 33, #40, #17, #20, #29, #3, #14, #18, and #30) of 17 sampled residents reviewed for COVID-19 screenings. The Resident Census and Conditions report, dated 10/16/22, documented 39 residents resided in the facility.
- D Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to honor a resident's choice by performing CPR when the resident had a DNR and ensured staff were aware of code status, immediately, when a resident had no breathing or pulse for one (#42) of 16 sampled residents reviewed for advance directives. The DON identified 28 residents had DNRs.
- D Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure staff were tested for COVID-19 and results documented during outbreak testing for two (CMA #3 and LPN #3) of five staff reviewed for COVID-19 testing. The Resident Census and Condition Report form, dated 10/16/22, documented 39 residents resided in the facility.
Fire safety inspections
3 fire safety citations on file: 3 on April 9, 2025.
Every fire safety citation3 citations
- E Install emergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.
- E Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| June 25, 2024 | Fine | $8,018 |
| June 25, 2024 | Payment Denial | 13 days from July 18, 2024 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Oklahoma | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.21 | 3.79 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.30 | 0.34 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.75 | 3.44 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 3.39 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.52 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 50.0% | 55.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 53.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.20 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.39 on weekdays and 3.75 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.64 in April to June 2025 to 4.21 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.21 | 0.30 | 4.39 | 3.75 | 0.0% | 1 of 90 | 39 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.79 | 0.37 | 5.05 | 4.12 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 33 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.96 | 0.44 | 5.31 | 4.06 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 33 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.64 | 0.46 | 4.98 | 3.79 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 34 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Oklahoma, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.79 | 0.32 | 3.94 | 3.42 | 2.2% | 1.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Oklahoma | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.3 | 13.6 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.5 | 1.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.1 | 2.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.2 | 4.7 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.8 | 13.7 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.2 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 36.5 | 17.5 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 43.0 | 27.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 27.7 | 16.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: TOWN OF VICI.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Town of Vici | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 07/01/2011 | |
| Parry, Maurena | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 02/01/2014 | |
| Parry, Maurena | Corporate director | Individual | 02/14/2014 | |
| Parry, Maurena | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2014 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on April 9, 2025: "Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on June 25, 2024: "Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on October 20, 2022: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on April 9, 2025: "Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Woodward Skilled Nursing and Therapy Woodward, 19 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 12 citations
- Seiling Nursing Center Seiling, 21.3 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 14 citations
Oklahoma contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Oklahoma. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Oklahoma State Department of Health, Long Term Care Service, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Oklahoma Long-Term Care Ombudsman, Office of the Attorney General, 1-800-211-2116. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: OSDH Long Term Care Surveys search, where Oklahoma publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Town of Vici Nursing Home's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Town of Vici Nursing Home 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Town of Vici Nursing Home get at its last inspection?
- 3 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 9, 2025. The Oklahoma average is 6.4.
- Has Town of Vici Nursing Home been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,018 in the last three years.
- Does Town of Vici Nursing Home accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Town of Vici Nursing Home?
- CMS lists 4 owners and managers. Legal business name: TOWN OF VICI.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.