Home / California / Chino
Trellis Chino
5454 Walnut Ave, Chino, CA 91710 · San Bernardino County · (909) 465-0246
59 certified beds, about 57 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2018
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 555910 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 14, 2025, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the California average is 15.6, the national average 9.2).
None of its 15 health citations since January 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.53 hours per resident per day, against 4.52 across California and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.57 of those hours.
25.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (California average 36.7%).
CMS links it to PACS Group, an affiliated group of 275 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 15 health citations on file.
February 12, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Employ staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of the three licensed vocational nurses (LVN 1) held a valid and current license to practice when LVN 1 worked with an expired license from [DATE], through [DATE]. This failure had the potential to place 59 highly vulnerable residents at risk due to LVN 1's non-compliance with the legal requirement to practice nursing.
August 14, 2025Standard inspection · 6 citations
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the proper and safe infection control practices were followed when:1. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 did not perform hand hygiene in between Residents 33 and 80's rooms. CNA 1 did not disinfect vital signs machine in between Resident 33 and 80. 2. CNA 2 did not perform hand hygiene before and after perineal care (cleaning the genital and anal areas) and did not utilize personal protective equipment (PPE - clothing and gear designed to protect you from hazards at work or during certain activities) in isolation room (room used to keep germs from spreading) for Resident 11. 3. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 did not perform hand hygiene nor don gloves after medication preparation and before medication administration in an isolation room for Resident 7. [...]
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS- a computerized assessment instrument) Assessments were completed accurately for one of two residents reviewed for resident assessment (Resident 43). This failure resulted in an inaccurate assessment, potentially leading to a misidentification of Resident 43's care and support needs.
- D Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident food preferences were provided for one of seven residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident 37) when Resident 37 did not receive a fresh fruit cup for breakfast as indicated on meal ticket on August 11, 2025. This failure had the potential to cause nutritional decline and unmet care needs for Resident 37.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on the observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an appropriate environment for storing all drugs and biologicals in accordance with accepted professional principles and the facility's policies and procedures for one of two medication rooms (South Station medication room) and one of two treatment cart (Treatment Cart 2) reviewed for medication storage, when: 1. The medication refrigerator inside the South Station medication room was found to be unsanitary on August 12, 2025. 2. Three opened and used ointments tubes were found without documented opened dates inside Treatment Cart 2 on August 13, 2025. [...]
- D Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed for three residents reviewed for puree diets (Resident 4, 46, and 79) when the incorrect portion size of pureed meatball was served for lunch on August 11, 2025. This failure has the potential to cause unintended weight loss (a noticeable decrease in body weight that occurs without conscious effort, such as dieting or exercising more), and inadequate nutritional needs (a state where the body doesn't receive enough of the essential nutrients it needs to function properly) for medically compromised Residents 4, 46 and 79 on puree diet (a modified diet where regular foods are transformed into a smooth, lump-free consistency, resembling pudding).
- D Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the recipes were followed for puree (a modified diet where regular foods are transformed into a smooth, lump-free consistency, resembling pudding) diets for three residents reviewed for puree diet (Residents 4, 46, and 79) when the pureed lemon herb chicken, served for lunch on August 12, 2025, was crumbly and not smooth. This failure had the potential to cause choking and dissatisfaction for Residents 4, 46, and 79 who are medically compromised.
June 6, 2024Standard inspection · 5 citations
- D Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to transmit discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for 2 (Resident #16 and Resident #40) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for resident assessment.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide conduct an assessment and monitor the provision of a nebulizer treatment for 1 (Resident #165) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for respiratory care.
- D Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to monitor the dialysis fistula for 1 (Resident #165) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for dialysis.
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure ordered medication was available in the facility for 1 (Resident #32) of 6sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to store nebulizer equipment for 1 (Resident #165) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for respiratory care.
January 6, 2023Standard inspection · 3 citations
- E Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the policy and procedure for position change alarm (device place in the bed or wheelchair to alert staff when the person gets out from bed or wheelchair), for three of three residents (Residents 4, 5 and 7) reviewed for falls when position change alarms were used for Residents 4, 5, and 7 without a physician's order. This failure placed Residents 4, 5 and 7 at risk for decreased mobility, sleep disturbances, and agitation in response to the sound of the alarm.
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS- a computerized assessment instrument) Assessments were completed accurately to reflect the resident's status, care, and services in the skin conditions for one resident (Resident 52) reviewed for pressure ulcers (an open wound on the skin caused by a long period of constant pressure). This failure had the potential to cause inaccuracy in identifying Resident 52's care and support needs.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their infection control program to help prevent the spread of infections and other infectious diseases when four employees was not screened for Covid-19 (a highly infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus] symptoms and exposure upon entering the facility on January 4, 2023. This failure had the potential to cause harm to the 50 residents residing within the facility by causing cross contamination (the transfer of bacteria or viruses from one person to another) of the environment and increasing the risk of exposure and spread of the COVID-19 virus within the facility.
Fire safety inspections
16 fire safety citations on file: 10 on August 14, 2025, 3 on June 6, 2024, 3 on January 6, 2023.
Every fire safety citation16 citations
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- D Develop and maintain an Emergency Preparedness Program (EP).
- D Conduct testing and exercise requirements.
- D Provide exit doors that are held open by devices that will automatically close on the activation of a fire alarm or smoke detector.
- D Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- D Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
- D Meet requirements for the use of electrical equipment.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- E Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
- C Conduct testing and exercise requirements.
- D Conduct testing and exercise requirements.
- D Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- D Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | California | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.53 | 4.52 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.57 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.18 | 4.09 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.57 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.39 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 25.4% | 36.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 22.2% | 38.1% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 6.04 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.67 on weekdays and 4.18 on weekends, 10% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.59 in April to June 2025 to 4.53 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.53 | 0.57 | 4.67 | 4.18 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 57 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.31 | 0.58 | 4.45 | 3.95 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 58 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.50 | 0.59 | 4.69 | 3.99 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 57 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.59 | 0.53 | 4.80 | 4.06 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 57 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| California, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.36 | 0.59 | 4.52 | 3.97 | 2.3% | 0.5% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | California | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 22.0 | 22.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 4.8 | 11.2 | 12.0 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: MACADAMIA HOLDINGS, LLC. CMS links this home to PACS Group, a group of 275 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| California Opco LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 11/05/2021 |
| Bay Bridge Capital Partners, LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 11/05/2021 | |
| Opco Holdings LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 11/05/2021 | |
| Rutherford, Keino | Contracted managing employee | Individual | 03/01/2017 | |
| Lords, Trevor | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Apt, Frederick | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Jergensen, Joshua | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Mitchell, John | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Lords, Trevor | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on August 14, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on August 14, 2025: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on August 14, 2025: "Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on August 14, 2025: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Inland Christian Home Ontario, 1.4 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 25 citations
- Ontario Healthcare Center Ontario, 2.6 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 23 citations
- Montclair Manor Care Center Montclair, 2.7 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 27 citations
- Chino Valley Health Care Cente Pomona, 2.9 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 53 citations
- Community Extended Care Hospital of Montclair Montclair, 3.7 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 19 citations
- Pomona Vista Care Center Pomona, 4.3 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 60 citations
- Country Oaks Care Center Pomona, 4.3 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 70 citations
- Claremont Heights Post Acute Claremont, 4.4 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 85 citations
California contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in California. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: California Department of Public Health, Center for Health Care Quality, Licensing and Certification Program, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: California Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, 1-800-231-4024. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Cal Health Find, where California publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Trellis Chino's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Trellis Chino 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Trellis Chino get at its last inspection?
- 6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on August 14, 2025. The California average is 15.6.
- Has Trellis Chino been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Trellis Chino accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Trellis Chino?
- CMS lists 9 owners and managers, and links the home to PACS Group. Legal business name: MACADAMIA HOLDINGS, LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.