Find a nursing home

Home / Florida / Hialeah Gardens

Waterford Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

8333 W Okeechobee Road, Hialeah Gardens, FL 33016 · Miami-Dade County · (305) 556-9900

214 certified beds, about 204 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1987

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 105554 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on March 5, 2026, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Florida average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).

None of its 13 health citations since April 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.53 hours per resident per day, against 3.82 across Florida and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.20 of those hours.

29.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Florida average 41.4%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 13 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
10D
3E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
March 5, 2026Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. E
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    F583 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 3, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed keep residents' medical information confidential on four (second-floor medication cart #1 and cart # 2, third-floor medication cart #1 and cart #2) out of eight medication carts; at one (first floor nursing station) out of four nursing stations and failed to provide privacy for one (Resident #116) out of three sampled residents during medication administration. Observations of unattended open computer screens on the second-floor medication cart # 2 and third-floor medication cart #1; unsecured paperwork left at the first-floor nursing station, on the second-floor medication cart #1 and on the third-floor medication cart #1 and cart #2 with resident's information visible. There were 206 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey.
  2. E
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 3, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews facility failed to keep residents' environment free of accident hazards on one (third-floor) out of four Soiled Utility Rooms that contained Biohazardous materials, on two (first and third floor) Clean Utility Rooms which locked from the inside and did not contain a call light, the Sprinkler Room which locked from the inside and contained hazardous materials and for one (Resident #142) out of three sampled residents during medication administration as evidenced by:1) Observation of an unlocked Soiled Utility Room on the third floor2) Observation of an unlocked Clean Utility Room on the first and third floor3) Observation of an unlocked Sprinkler Room on the first floor4) Observation of facility's staff leaving a lancet on top of the third-floor medication cart #1 and unattended at Resident #142's bedside. [...]
  3. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 3, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and records reviewed the facility did not honor resident's right to a dignified experience for one (Resident #77) out of two sampled residents with Percutaneous Enteral Gastronomy (PEG) feeding pumps. Resident #77's PEG pump was overtly visible while the resident received enteral feeding in common areas. there were nine residents residing in the facility with PEG tube feeding pumps at the time of the survey.
  4. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 3, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews, facility failed to properly store and label medications on two (first-floor medication cart #1 and the second-floor medication cart #1) out of eight medication carts as evidenced by: 1) Staff left a normal saline syringe on top of the first-floor medication cart #1 during medication administration. 2)An illegible label of a stock medication on the first-floor medication cart #1. 3) Second-floor medication cart #1 left unlocked. There were 206 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey.
  5. D
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    F867 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 3, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility's quality assurance and assessment committee failed to identify quality concerns to implement effective plans of action related to failed to properly store and label medications during medication administration; failed to prevent accident hazards and failed to protect resident's privacy resulting in repeated deficient practice. The facility was cited for Label/Store Drugs and Biologicals, Personal Privacy/Confidentiality of Records and Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices in 2024. This repeated deficiency practice has the potential to affect any of the 206 residents residing in the facility.
  6. D
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    F908 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 3, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure the walk-in freezer was working properly. The curtains in the walk-in freezer contained ice. This has the potential to affect one hundred and ninety-eight out of two-hundred and six residents who eat orally residing in the facility at the time of the survey.
August 15, 2024Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. E
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 18, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the safety for one out of nine sampled residents as evidenced by 1) Resident #54, a vulnerable resident with orders for bilateral floor mats was observed in bed with one floor mat 2) failed to ensure three out of four soiled utility rooms were locked. There were 201 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey.
  2. D
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    F583 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 18, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interviews, the facility failed to provide privacy for residents on one out of eight medications carts as evidenced an observation of residents' personal health information visible on an electronic medication administration screen left unattended. There were 201 residents residing the facility at the time of survey.
  3. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 18, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately code a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one (Resident number 199) out of three residents reviewed for hospital discharges. Resident number 199 was coded as being discharged to the hospital but the resident was discharged home. There were 201 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey.
  4. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 18, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were stored safely for one out of nine sampled residents (Resident #51). As evidenced by two ointments, one medicated powder and one cream were observed on the overbed table in Resident #51's room.
April 13, 2023Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 13, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, records reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure dignity during dining for one (Resident #90) out of 40 residents who are dependent on assistance with eating. As evidenced by one facility staff standing while feeding the resident.
  2. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 13, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for oxygen therapy as prescribed for one (Resident #118) out of 3 residents sampled. The Findings Included: During observation on 04/10/2023 at 08:56 AM, Resident #118 was observed sitting in the wheelchair in the room, the oxygen (02) was running at 3 liters per minute (LPM), via nasal cannula, the 02 tubing observed was not dated, no dated supplies were observed around the 02 concentrator. On 04/11/23 at 08:46 AM, Resident #118 was observed in the room in the wheelchair watching television, there was no 02 running, stated today is a great day, 02 tubing observed in a plastic bag dated 4/10/23. On 4/12/23 at 10:30AM, Resident #118 was observed in the Activities room fixing puzzles with other residents, no distress was noted. [...]
  3. D
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    F867 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 13, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility's quality assurance and assessment committee failed to identify quality concerns as evidenced by not implementing an effective plan of action to correct identified quality deficiencies in problem-prone areas, related to respiratory/tracheostomy care and suctioning as evidenced by repeated deficient practice during consecutive annual surveys. Cross reference F695 Respiratory/Tracheostomy Care and Suctioning. The facility had deficient practice during the last recertification survey conducted in 2022. The facility had a census of 191 residents at the time of the survey.

Fire safety inspections

8 fire safety citations on file: 2 on March 5, 2026, 3 on August 15, 2024, 3 on April 13, 2023.

Every fire safety citation8 citations
  1. E
    Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
    K 372 · March 5, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. D
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · March 5, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. E
    Have properly installed hallway dispensers for alcohol-based hand rub.
    K 325 · August 15, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. E
    Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
    K 920 · August 15, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. D
    Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
    K 923 · August 15, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. D
    Meet other general requirements.
    K 100 · April 13, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. D
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · April 13, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. D
    Have elevators that firefighters can control in the event of a fire.
    K 531 · April 13, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeFloridaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.533.823.86
Registered nurses1.200.730.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.333.493.42
Nurse aides2.22
Licensed practical nurses0.11
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)29.3%41.4%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover29.8%46.0%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 4.29 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.62 on weekdays and 3.33 on weekends, 8% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.60 in April to June 2025 to 3.53 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.531.203.623.33 0.0%0 of 90204
Oct to Dec 20253.721.223.853.38 0.0%0 of 92200
Jul to Sep 20253.561.103.663.32 0.0%0 of 92202
Apr to Jun 20253.601.133.693.36 0.0%0 of 91203
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Florida, Jan to Mar 20263.760.703.903.441.1%0.2% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Florida

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Florida, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$18.03$17.33 to $20.3496,960
LPNs and LVNs$29.70$28.14 to $31.1138,620
Registered nurses$40.48$37.82 to $48.64229,940
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeFloridaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.78.713.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.30.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.71.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.52.53.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.41.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.59.514.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.34.54.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
18.38.615.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
22.226.123.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
3.19.112.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
3.02.11.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.21.11.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: WATERFORD OPCO LLC.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Waterford Holdco LLCDirect ownership interestOrganization10/28/2022
Bengio, JacobCorporate officerIndividual10/26/2022
Bengio, JacobOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/26/2022
Paritzky, JeremieOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/26/2022
Reyes, EduardoOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/26/2022
Sebastian, DesireeOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/26/2022
Philipson, BentIndividual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNFIndividual07/01/2026
Philipson, GabrielleIndividual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNFIndividual07/01/2026
Philipson, RaquelIndividual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNFIndividual07/01/2026
Agrp 2011 TrustTrustee of the SNFOrganization10/26/2022
Deborah Philipson 2011 Family TrustTrustee of the SNFOrganization10/26/2022
Agrp 2011 TrustAdp of the SNFOrganization10/22/2022
Deborah Philipson 2011 Family TrustAdp of the SNFOrganization10/22/2022
Philipson Family Limited Liability Company, LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization10/26/2022
Richards Mitchell & Cross PaAdp of the SNFOrganization10/26/2022
Ventura Services - Florida, LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization10/26/2022
Bengio, JacobAdp of the SNFIndividual10/26/2022
Kraus, AbrahamAdp of the SNFIndividual10/26/2022
Paritzky, JeremieAdp of the SNFIndividual10/26/2022
Reyes, EduardoAdp of the SNFIndividual10/26/2022
Schaffer, DanielAdp of the SNFIndividual10/26/2022
Sebastian, DesireeAdp of the SNFIndividual10/26/2022
Tessler, NaomiAdp of the SNFIndividual10/26/2022

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on March 5, 2026: "Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on March 5, 2026: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
  3. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on March 5, 2026: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."
  4. Who is the administrator and director of nursing, and how long have they been in the job?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on March 5, 2026: "Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.33 hours per resident per day, below the Florida average of 3.49.

Other nursing homes nearby

Florida contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Florida. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Waterford Nursing and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Waterford Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Waterford Nursing and Rehabilitation Center get at its last inspection?
6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on March 5, 2026. The Florida average is 7.1.
Has Waterford Nursing and Rehabilitation Center been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Waterford Nursing and Rehabilitation Center accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Waterford Nursing and Rehabilitation Center?
CMS lists 23 owners and managers. Legal business name: WATERFORD OPCO LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection