Find a nursing home

Home / Missouri / Ash Grove

Ash Grove Healthcare Facility

401 North Medical Drive, Ash Grove, MO 65604 · Greene County · (417) 751-2575

82 certified beds, about 73 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1994

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
3 of 5
Quality measures
1 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 265571 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on January 24, 2025, inspectors cited 1 health deficiency (the Missouri average is 11.4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 15 health citations since March 2020 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.20 hours per resident per day, against 3.43 across Missouri and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.78 of those hours.

63.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Missouri average 56.0%).

CMS links it to Citizens Memorial Health Care, an affiliated group of 6 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 15 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
8D
5E
2F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
November 20, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 3, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care per standards of practice when staff failed to complete weekly skin assessments, document accurate wound assessments, obtain orders timely, follow physician orders, and provide treatment as ordered for one resident (Resident #1) who admitted with multiple identified wounds. The facility census was 78. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding wound care. [...]
  2. D
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 3, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care per standards of practice when staff failed to complete weekly skin assessments, document accurate wound assessments, obtain orders timely, follow physician orders, and provide treatment as ordered for one resident (Resident #1) and failed to provide treatments as ordered for one resident (Resident #2) with pressure ulcers (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device). The facility census was 78. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding wound care. [...]
January 24, 2025Standard inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents received care per the residents' care plans and standards of practice when staff failed to obtain blood sugar parameters for administration of as needed insulin for one resident (Resident #23) and when staff failed to document placement of a physician ordered compression glove or document notification of refusals for one resident (Resident #62). The facility census was 75. Review of the facility policy titled, Physician Orders, last revised November 2024, showed, the following: -If an order is received that is unclear, incomplete, or illegible, clarify the order with the attending physician and document clarification of the order in the medical record; -If the licensed/certified personnel question the appropriateness of an order, the following steps will be taken: [...]
October 10, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. E
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    F568 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 14, 2024
August 22, 2024Complaint inspection · 3 citations
  1. E
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    F568 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 14, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a full accounting and record system of resident trust funds when the facility failed to provide a written statement of each resident's trust fund balance and activity to the the resident and/or his/her responsible party quarterly for three residents (Resident #1, Resident #2 and Resident #3). The facility census was 74. Review of the facility policy titled, Pre-Admissions, dated 2024, showed the following: -The business office will manage the resident trust account (RTA); -A quarterly RTA statement will be provided to the resident or responsible party. 1. Review of Resident #'1's face sheet showed the following: -admission date of 08/15/17; -Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease (gradual decline in mental and physical functions); -Resident had a family member listed as guarantor. [...]
  2. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 6, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure all residents were treated with respect and dignity when one staff (Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A) proceeded to give one resident (Resident #1) a shower when the resident resisted and called out and the CNA did not attempt alternate interventions to calm the resident. The facility census is 74. Review of the facility's policy on Resident Rights, updated 10/01/21, showed the following: -Residents have the right to be treated with dignity and respect; -Residents can make their own schedule and participate in activities of their choice; -Residents have the right to reasonable accommodation of needs and preferences. 1. Review of Resident #'1's face sheet showed the following: -admission date of 06/06/22; -Diagnoses included chronic Alzheimer's disease (loss of memory) with late onset. [...]
  3. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 6, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide care per standards of practice when staff failed to complete timely follow-up, assessment, documentation, and monitoring of a bruise discovered on one resident (Resident #2) who took medication to prevent blood clots. The facility census is 74. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding monitoring and documentation of bruises. Review of Drugs.com guidance on Plavix (a medication used to prevent platelets in the blood from sticking together to form an unwanted blood clot that could block an artery), dated 04/22/24, showed the following: -Plavix keeps blood from clotting to prevent unwanted blood clots that can occur with certain heart or blood vessel conditions; -Because of this drug action, Plavix can make it easier for a person to bleed, even from a minor injury;. [...]
March 7, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to protect one resident's (Resident #1) right to be free from verbal/emotional abuse by staff when one staff (Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A) yelled and cursed at the resident. The facility census was 80. The Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) were notified on the evening of 03/02/24 of the Past Non-Compliance which occurred earlier on 03/02/24. On 03/02/24, The CNA left for the night and the staff monitored the residents. On 03/03/24, in-services of all staff was started. Staff began the full investigation on 03/04/24 and completed resident interviews on 03/05/24. The facility implemented monitoring including weekly interviews with residents. The noncompliance was corrected on 03/05/24. Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Appendices, SS0S-09, revised 05/2021, showed the following: [...]
September 8, 2023Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 23, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse involving one resident (Resident #1) and one staff (Certified Nurses Assistant (CNA) A) to the State Survey Agency (Department of Health and Senior Services- DHSS) within two hours of receiving the allegation. The facility census was 78. Review of the facility's policy titled, Patient Abuse/Neglect, Elder Abuse, and Persons with Disability Abuse, ADM03-03, revised August 2021, showed the following: -Staff are to report or assist the person with direct knowledge of concerns to report immediately, within two hours of the allegation for mental, physical, verbal, or sexual abuse, or if there has been bodily injury related to abuse; [...]
June 2, 2023Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 17, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, facility policy review, and review of the dishwasher sanitation log, the facility failed to label, date, and cover food stored in refrigeration storage. The facility also failed to discard food in refrigeration storage with expired use by dates and ensure the kitchen's dish machine dispensed sufficient chlorine to sanitize items washed in the machine. This had the potential to affect 76 residents who consumed food prepared in the facility's kitchen.
  2. E
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    F567 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 17, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, review of facility managed resident fund accounts, and review of the facility's admission Agreement, the facility failed to provide four of four residents (Resident (R) 3, R4, R22 and R42), who had personal funds deposited in the facility, access to petty cash on an ongoing basis. Residents' funds were unavailable to them on weekdays after 4:30 PM and on weekends.
  3. E
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    F804 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 17, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, test tray observation, record review, review of Resident Council meeting minutes, and facility policy review, the facility failed to serve food that was palatable and hot to ten of ten residents (Resident (R) 3, R127, R4, R17, R22, R23, R42, R48, R59, and R77) reviewed for food palatability. This failure had the potential to affect all 76 residents who consumed food prepared from the facility's kitchen.
  4. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 17, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, including facility policy, the facility failed to transport linens in accordance with accepted national standards to prevent the spread of infection. This failure placed all 76 residents at risk of the spread of infectious agents.
  5. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 17, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for three in a total sample of 24 residents (Residents (R62, R2, and R73) whose assessments were reviewed. The facility failed to accurately assess bowel and bladder continence for R62, a prognosis of six or less months for R2, and discharge home for R73. These failures placed the residents at risk of having unmet care needs and services.
March 6, 2020Standard inspection · 1 citation
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 7, 2020
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect food from possible contamination when staff failed to ensure the required air gap for two facility ice machines had a two inch gap between the drain in the floor and the tubing from the ice machine that would prevent the backflow of wastewater. This facility practice could lead to contamination of ice and possible food-borne illness, potentially affecting all residents at the facility. The facility had a census of 75. According to the Missouri Food Code, adopted by the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) June 3, 2013, in order to prevent backflow, a direct connection may not exist between the sewage system and a drain originating from equipment in which food is placed. A backflow prevention device or an air gap must be in place to prevent wastewater back-siphonage. 1. [...]

Fire safety inspections

10 fire safety citations on file: 3 on January 24, 2025, 4 on June 2, 2023, 3 on March 6, 2020.

Every fire safety citation10 citations
  1. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · January 24, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. E
    Use approved construction type or materials.
    K 161 · January 24, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. E
    Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
    K 293 · January 24, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. F
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · June 2, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · June 2, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. F
    Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
    K 920 · June 2, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. E
    Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
    K 923 · June 2, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. F
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · March 6, 2020 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. E
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · March 6, 2020 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. E
    Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
    K 920 · March 6, 2020 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeMissouriUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.203.433.86
Registered nurses0.780.460.69
All nursing staff on weekends2.703.013.42
Nurse aides2.08
Licensed practical nurses0.33
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)63.6%56.0%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover60.0%47.8%42.9%
Administrators who left1

CMS expects 3.35 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.40 on weekdays and 2.70 on weekends, 21% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.43 in April to June 2025 to 3.20 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.200.783.402.70 0.0%0 of 9073
Oct to Dec 20252.780.572.932.40 0.0%0 of 9276
Jul to Sep 20252.890.643.032.54 0.0%0 of 9272
Apr to Jun 20253.430.603.583.04 0.0%0 of 9171
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Missouri, Jan to Mar 20263.340.403.502.933.9%1.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeMissouriUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
26.018.113.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.10.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.92.31.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
6.14.13.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.12.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
43.917.414.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.34.54.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
23.323.515.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
24.226.123.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
14.013.712.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.42.11.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.62.31.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: CITIZENS MEMORIAL HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION. CMS links this home to Citizens Memorial Health Care, a group of 6 nursing homes averaging 3 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Calhoun, MichaelW-2 managing employeeIndividual01/01/2022
Derrickson, BeverlyW-2 managing employeeIndividual11/21/2016
Finnell, HeatherW-2 managing employeeIndividual01/01/2022
McBratney, ChristopherW-2 managing employeeIndividual09/06/2011
Meyer, ReneeW-2 managing employeeIndividual07/01/1997
Ashworth, JamesCorporate directorIndividual06/17/2021
Babb, DonaldCorporate directorIndividual12/19/2019
Derrickson, BeverlyCorporate directorIndividual11/21/2016
Donnell, WilliamCorporate directorIndividual03/14/2012
Hancock, JaniecaCorporate directorIndividual03/15/2018
Johnson, BradCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2022
Kallenbach, JohnCorporate directorIndividual06/20/2019
Meents, DanaCorporate directorIndividual10/14/2010
Calhoun, MichaelCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2022
Derrickson, BeverlyCorporate officerIndividual01/27/2020
Hancock, JaniecaCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2022
Kallenbach, JohnCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2022
Meyer, ReneeCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2022
Molder, CatherineCorporate officerIndividual03/01/2002

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on November 20, 2025: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
  2. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on October 10, 2024: "Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home."
  3. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on June 2, 2023: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  4. How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on March 7, 2024: "Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.70 hours per resident per day, below the Missouri average of 3.01.
  6. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Missouri contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Missouri. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Ash Grove Healthcare Facility's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Ash Grove Healthcare Facility 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 1 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Ash Grove Healthcare Facility get at its last inspection?
1 health deficiency at the standard inspection on January 24, 2025. The Missouri average is 11.4.
Has Ash Grove Healthcare Facility been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Ash Grove Healthcare Facility accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Ash Grove Healthcare Facility?
CMS lists 19 owners and managers, and links the home to Citizens Memorial Health Care. Legal business name: CITIZENS MEMORIAL HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection