Augustana Care Hastings Health and Rehabilitation
930 West 16th Street, Hastings, MN 55033 · Dakota County · (651) 437-6176
72 certified beds, about 61 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1978
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 245224 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 7, 2026, inspectors cited 0 health deficiencies (the Minnesota average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).
Of 18 health citations since April 2024, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $21,645 in the last three years; the largest was $21,645, and the latest is dated March 19, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.60 hours per resident per day, against 4.19 across Minnesota and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.16 of those hours.
33.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Minnesota average 42.2%).
CMS links it to Cassia, an affiliated group of 16 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 18 health citations on file.
July 7, 2026Standard inspection · 0 citations
March 19, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- J Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a safe transfer with a mechanical lift was performed to reduce the risk of serious harm, injury, impairment, or death for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for mechanical lifts. This resulted in immediate jeopardy for R1. The immediate jeopardy (IJ) began on 3/16/26 when nursing assistant (NA)-A and NA-B did not check to ensure all four straps of the sling were attached to the lift, resulting in a fall, fractured ribs and hospitalization for R1 and was identified on 3/19/26. The regional nursing consultant, the assistant director of nursing, the administrator, medical records, the director of nursing, and the nurse manager were notified of the IJ on 3/19/26 at 3:45 p.m. The IJ was removed on 3/17/26 and the deficient practice corrected 3/17/26 prior to the start of survey and was therefore past noncompliance.
December 5, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to assess and monitor non-pressure related skin injuries for changes until resolved for 1 of 3 (R1), reviewed for quality of care.
May 23, 2025Standard inspection · 7 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure food temperatures were checked or obtained in a manner to reduce the risk for cross-contamination between food items prepared in the main production kitchen. In addition, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 can opener was kept in a clean and sanitary manner. These findings had the potential to affect 66 of 67 residents who consumed food from the main production kitchen.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteR32 R32's annual Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated was cognitively impaired, needed maximal assistance with eating, oral hygiene, showers, upper body dressing, personal hygiene and was dependent on staff with lower body dressing, toileting hygiene and transfers. R32 also included diagnoses of dementia, non-traumatic brain dysfunction, diabetes mellitus, arthritis and anxiety disorder. R32's eating care plan printed 5/22/25, indicated R32 required extensive assistance of one staff to eat meals due to weakness and dementia. During observation on 5/19/25 at 6:00 p.m., dinner was served in the second-floor dining room. The dinner consisted of a pulled pork sandwich, tater tots, mixed greens salad and mandarin oranges gelatin. Some of the residents did not require any assistance, some needed help to set up their meals, and others required maximal assistance to eat their meals. [...]
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident's needs were addressed in a respectful and dignified manner when a resident (R12) requested incontinence assistance.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with known heart failure was routinely assessed for new or worse symptoms as directed by the discharging hospital physician for 1 of 1 resident (R15). In addition, the facility failed to comprehensively assess a non-pressure skin condition, to ensure wound change could be adequately monitored and acted upon promptly to promote healing and reduce the risk of complication (i.e., infection, worsening) for 1 of 2 residents (R51) reviewed who had skin impairments.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen administration was administered according to physician orders for 1 of 1 resident (R11) observed for respiratory services.
- D Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to appropriately monitor and comprehensively assess complaints of pain for 1 of 5 residents (R2) reviewed for pain.
- D Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a routine dental referral for a missing front tooth was followed up on along with a recommendation for an over-the-counter fluoride rinse to maintain oral health for 1 of 2 residents (R18) reviewed for dental services.
April 11, 2024Standard inspection · 9 citations
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control measures were followed related to ensuring clean personal was transported intrafacility in a method that ensured cleanliness and protected the clean laundry . This had the potential to affect all 41 residents on the long-term care floor (LTC) along with an unspecified number of residents whose laundry is done by the facility in the transitional care unit (TCU).
- E Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to implement the current standards of vaccinations regarding pneumonia for 4 of 5 residents (R4, R32, R34, R44) over [AGE] years old whose vaccinations histories were reviewed.
- D Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a dry-powder inhaler was administered in accordance with manufacturer instructions and current standards of care for 1 of 1 resident (R121) observed to receive inhalers during the survey.
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure routine personal hygiene (i.e., nail care) was completed and provided to reduce the risk of complication (i.e., infection, skin scratches) for 1 of 1 residents (R38) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) and who were dependent on staff for their care.
- D Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure activities of interest were offered or provided to enhance quality of life for 1 of 1 resident (R19) reviewed who resided on the short-term stay (i.e., TCU) unit.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure the correct application of a neck brace to minimize the risk of spinal misalignment and corresponding adverse effects for 1 of 1 residents (R34) reviewed for neck brace application.
- D Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their antibiotic stewardship program, to include proper testing, to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use to ensure good clinical outcomes and to reduce potential drug resistance for 1 of 2 residents (R4) reviewed for antibiotic stewardship who received 2 antibiotics without proper testing.
- C Post nurse staffing information every day.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the required nurse staffing information was posted daily and updated with each shift. This had the potential to affect all 58 residents residing in the facility and/or visitors who may wish to view the information.
- B Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Office of Ombudsman for Long-Term Care (OOLTC) was notified in a timely manner of resident' hospitalizations (i.e., facility-initiated discharges) for 1 of 2 residents (R40) reviewed for hospitalization; and 11 of 11 residents identified to have been hospitalized within the last month.
Fire safety inspections
15 fire safety citations on file: 3 on July 7, 2026, 7 on May 23, 2025, 5 on April 11, 2024.
Every fire safety citation15 citations
- F Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- D Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- F Meet other general requirements.
- F Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
- F Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- F Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
- F Ensure receptacles at patient bed locations and where general anesthesia is administered, are tested after initial installation, replacement or servicing.
- D Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
- D Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- F Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| March 19, 2026 | Fine | $21,645 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Minnesota | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.60 | 4.19 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.16 | 1.06 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.02 | 3.71 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.63 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.81 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 33.3% | 42.2% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 12.5% | 38.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.37 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.84 on weekdays and 4.02 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.81 in April to June 2025 to 4.60 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.60 | 1.16 | 4.84 | 4.02 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 61 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.57 | 1.22 | 4.75 | 4.10 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 64 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.80 | 1.30 | 5.01 | 4.25 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 64 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.81 | 1.35 | 5.06 | 4.20 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 63 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Minnesota, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.19 | 1.05 | 4.38 | 3.73 | 5.2% | 0.8% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Minnesota | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.4 | 18.2 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 4.0 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.2 | 20.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.4 | 5.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.7 | 17.1 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 17.3 | 23.5 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 11.0 | 14.8 | 12.0 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: AUGUSTANA HEALTH CARE CENTER OF HASTINGS. CMS links this home to Cassia, a group of 16 nursing homes averaging 4.4 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Augustana Care | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 01/01/2018 |
| Szymanski, Kim | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 01/01/2020 | |
| Ellingson, Erik | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2018 | |
| Nye, Gerald | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2018 | |
| Parks, Charles | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2018 | |
| Ramsdale, Scott | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2018 | |
| Stadtherr, Seelochani | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Dahl, Robert | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2018 | |
| Kern, Matthew | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2018 | |
| Verlautz, Michelene | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Youngquist, Kathryn | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2018 | |
| Cassia | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2018 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 9 problems in this area, most recently on March 19, 2026: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on May 23, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on May 23, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on May 23, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Regina Senior Living Hastings, 1.4 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 29 citations
- Prescott Nursing and Rehab Community Prescott, 4.4 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 27 citations
- Norris Square Cottage Grove, 8.5 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 13 citations
- St. Therese of Woodbury LLC Woodbury, 12 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 20 citations
- Woodbury Health Care Center Woodbury, 13.2 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 46 citations
- Woodlyn Heights Healthcare Center Inver Grove Heights, 13.7 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 50 citations
- Trinity Care Center Farmington, 14.5 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 14 citations
- Southview Acres Healthcare Center West Saint Paul, 14.8 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 43 citations
Minnesota contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Minnesota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- State inspection reports: MDH Nursing and Boarding Care Home Survey and Complaint Inspection Findings, where Minnesota publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Augustana Care Hastings Health and Rehabilitation's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Augustana Care Hastings Health and Rehabilitation 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Augustana Care Hastings Health and Rehabilitation get at its last inspection?
- 0 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on July 7, 2026. The Minnesota average is 7.1.
- Has Augustana Care Hastings Health and Rehabilitation been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $21,645 in the last three years.
- Does Augustana Care Hastings Health and Rehabilitation accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Augustana Care Hastings Health and Rehabilitation?
- CMS lists 12 owners and managers, and links the home to Cassia. Legal business name: AUGUSTANA HEALTH CARE CENTER OF HASTINGS.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.