St. Therese of Woodbury LLC
7555 Bailey Road, Woodbury, MN 55129 · Washington County · (651) 209-9100
56 certified beds, about 54 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2016
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 245632 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 29, 2026, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Minnesota average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).
Of 20 health citations since October 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.70 hours per resident per day, against 4.19 across Minnesota and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.73 of those hours.
31.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Minnesota average 42.2%).
CMS links it to Saint Therese Senior Communities, an affiliated group of 4 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 20 health citations on file.
May 29, 2026Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 4 citations
- G Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure safe use of a wheelchair without foot pedals and added cushions was assessed for 1 of 2 residents (R28) reviewed for falls. This resulted in actual harm when R28 fell from the wheelchair during transport, sustained a right leg fracture and required hospitalization. The facility had implemented actions to prevent recurrence prior to survey on 5/26/26, therefore the citation was issued at past noncompliance. Furthermore, the facility failed to provide supervision with meals for 1 of 1 resident (R61) reviewed for nutrition.
- E Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident's call light was accessible and within reach while the resident was in the shower for 1 of 1 resident (R47) reviewed for call light accessibility. This failure had the potential to impact all residents who use the shower.
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure dignity was preserved for 1 of 1 resident (R50) reviewed for dignity.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure provider orders were transcribed accurately into the electronic medical record (EMR) for 2 of 2 residents (R25,R61) and failed to ensure verbal orders were received accurately for 1 of 1 resident (R15), for residents reviewed for order accuracy.
March 20, 2025Standard inspection · 6 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure facial hair was covered when plating food for delivery and failed to ensure dishwasher temperatures were maintained at required temperatures needed for proper sanitization. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure refrigerated items were removed after expiration from 1 of 2 unit kitchens reviewed. This had the potential to impact all residents who reside in the facility.
- D Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 2 residents (R147, R198) reviewed for Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) had the correct code status (i.e. full code, do not resuscitate-DNR) information outlined within the medical record. This could cause R147 and R198 to receive resuscitation efforts (i.e. cardiopulmonary resuscitation-CPR) against their wishes.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure bowel monitoring for 1 of 1 resident (R33) reviewed for constipation.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure recommendations were followed to minimize risk of aspiration for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for nutrition.
- D Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure meal choices were provided as ordered for 1 of 2 (R147) residents reviewed for choices.
- D Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure monitoring was in place for 1 of 1 resident (R9) reviewed who had an urinary tract infection (UTI).
September 17, 2024Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- G Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to comprehensively assess pressure ulcers and monitor for skin breakdown to prevent and/or mitigate the risk of deterioration resulting in actual harm for 2 of 3 residents when (R1) admitted with a stage 1 pressure ulcer that developed into an unstageable pressure ulcer and R2 admitted with a stage 2 pressure ulcer that developed into an unstageable pressure ulcer resulting in ongoing pain.
- D Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure meals were served in a warm, palatable manner to promote quality of life and nutritional intake for 1 of 1 resident (R3) observed for short term stay. The facility further failed to offer an alternate meal option. This had the potential to affect all 16 of 16 residents identified to reside on the unit where the meal was served.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP)-(an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities.) were implemented for management of a pressure ulcer wound and a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) to reduce the risk of infection to others for 1 of 1 resident (R2). Further the facility failed to implement hand hygiene for 1 of 1 resident (R2) observed during incontinence care.
May 23, 2024Standard inspection · 6 citations
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 residents (R360) colonized with a multidrug resistant organism (MRDO) was placed on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). This had the potential to impact all residents who reside in the facility. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene and glove use was utilized for 1 of 1 residents (R360) observed during personal cares.
- D Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a self-administration of medications (SAM) assessment was completed to allow residents to safely administer their own medications for 2 of 2 residents (R15, R360) observed with medications at bedside.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteR355's admission MDS dated [DATE], indicated R355 had sever cognitive impairment and diagnoses of a hip fracture and spine fractures. R355's care plan dated 5/5/24, lacked indication R355 required a back brace. R355's [NAME] dated 5/5/24, lacked indication R355 required a back brace. R355's provider order dated 5/5/24, directed staff to have brace on when elevated above 30 degrees or up and active. An observation on 5/21/24 at 1:23 p.m., nursing assistant (NA)-B entered R355's room to assist him back to bed. R355 was sitting in the wheelchair with a black brace that went around his torso with straps over the shoulders. After NA-B was assisted back to bed, NA-B assisted R355 to remove the back brace. When interviewed on 5/21/24 at 1:55 p.m., NA-B- stated R355 had a back brace for when R355 was out of bed. [...]
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure weekly wound assessments were completed to monitor wound healing and evaluate the residents response to interventions for 1 of 1 residents (R30) reviewed for non- pressure related wounds.
- D Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure range of motion (ROM) exercises and a left hand splint was applied as ordered for 1 of 1 resident (R16) reviewed for range of motion.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure residents oxygen was adminstered according to doctor's orders for 1 of 1 resident (R305) reviewed for respiratory therapy.
October 11, 2023Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to complete weekly comprehensive skin assessments, failed to follow physician ordered treatments, and failed to revise the care plan for new ulcer development for 1 of 4 residents (R2). Additionally failed to complete an admission comprehensive skin assessment, develop a baseline care plan for pressure ulcers, and failed to implement pressure ulcer interventions for 1 of 4 residents (R4) reviewed for pressure ulcers.
Fire safety inspections
15 fire safety citations on file: 6 on May 29, 2026, 2 on March 20, 2025, 7 on May 23, 2024.
Every fire safety citation15 citations
- F Have an enclosure around a vertical opening shaft.
- F Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- F Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
- E Conduct testing and exercise requirements.
- E Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
- F Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- F Ensure proper storage of liquid oxygen.
- F Establish roles under a Waiver declared by secretary.
- F Provide primary/alternate means for communication.
- F Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- F Install properly constructed and protected linen or trash chutes.
- D Establish procedures for tracking staff and patients during an emergency.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2026 | Payment Denial | 2 days from July 1, 2026 |
| September 17, 2024 | Payment Denial | 4 days from October 17, 2024 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Minnesota | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.70 | 4.19 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.73 | 1.06 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.14 | 3.71 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.31 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.66 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 31.4% | 42.2% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 28.6% | 38.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 3.93 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.92 on weekdays and 4.14 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.2% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.56 in April to June 2025 to 4.70 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.70 | 1.73 | 4.92 | 4.14 | 0.2% | 0 of 90 | 54 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.50 | 1.71 | 4.69 | 4.03 | 0.2% | 0 of 92 | 55 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.58 | 1.80 | 4.78 | 4.07 | 1.1% | 0 of 92 | 53 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.56 | 1.93 | 4.78 | 4.02 | 2.5% | 0 of 91 | 55 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Minnesota, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.19 | 1.05 | 4.38 | 3.73 | 5.2% | 0.8% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Minnesota | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 21.6 | 18.2 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.4 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.8 | 4.0 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 1.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 22.7 | 20.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.8 | 5.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.1 | 17.1 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 26.0 | 23.5 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 12.3 | 14.8 | 12.0 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: SAINT THERESE OF WOODBURY, LLC. CMS links this home to Saint Therese Senior Communities, a group of 4 nursing homes averaging 4.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saint Therese Communities | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 06/28/2019 |
| Abbott, Craig | Corporate director | Individual | 05/23/2022 | |
| Gillespie, Joseph | Corporate director | Individual | 06/02/2011 | |
| Herb, Mary | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2023 | |
| Hoffmann, David | Corporate director | Individual | 06/01/2000 | |
| Horstmann, Steven | Corporate director | Individual | 04/01/2020 | |
| Krenn, David | Corporate director | Individual | 12/01/2011 | |
| McCluskey, Patricia | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2023 | |
| McCrossan, Jane | Corporate director | Individual | 12/01/2010 | |
| Meads, Steven | Corporate director | Individual | 03/01/2015 | |
| Parmar, Mona | Corporate director | Individual | 08/22/2018 | |
| Taffe, Patrick | Corporate director | Individual | 12/01/2013 | |
| Wornson, Kathryn | Corporate director | Individual | 06/01/2013 | |
| Abbott, Craig | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/23/2022 | |
| Hoffmann, David | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Shelangoski, Cal | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/05/2018 | |
| Wornson, Kathryn | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Saint Therese | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 08/02/2013 | |
| Saint Therese Communities | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 06/28/2019 | |
| Saint Therese Management Services, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 06/28/2019 | |
| Gerland, Samantha | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/26/2024 | |
| Keelin, Anthony | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/17/2024 | |
| Saint Therese Management Services, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/28/2025 | |
| Gerland, Samantha | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/26/2024 | |
| Keelin, Anthony | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/17/2024 | |
| Parmar, Mona | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/28/2025 | |
| Shelangoski, Cal | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/05/2018 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 9 problems in this area, most recently on May 29, 2026: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on May 29, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on March 20, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on March 20, 2025: "Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use."
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 2 administrators who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Woodbury Health Care Center Woodbury, 1.2 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 46 citations
- Norris Square Cottage Grove, 4.3 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 13 citations
- Woodlyn Heights Healthcare Center Inver Grove Heights, 5.7 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 50 citations
- Southview Acres Healthcare Center West Saint Paul, 5.7 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 43 citations
- Good Samaritan Society - Inver Grove Heights Inver Grove Heights, 6.2 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 40 citations
- Cerenity Marian of St. Paul LLC Saint Paul, 6.4 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 16 citations
- Walker Methodist Westwood Ridge II West Saint Paul, 6.6 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 30 citations
- Cerenity Care Center on Humboldt Saint Paul, 7 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 42 citations
Minnesota contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Minnesota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- State inspection reports: MDH Nursing and Boarding Care Home Survey and Complaint Inspection Findings, where Minnesota publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is St. Therese of Woodbury LLC's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates St. Therese of Woodbury LLC 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did St. Therese of Woodbury LLC get at its last inspection?
- 4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on May 29, 2026. The Minnesota average is 7.1.
- Has St. Therese of Woodbury LLC been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does St. Therese of Woodbury LLC accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns St. Therese of Woodbury LLC?
- CMS lists 27 owners and managers, and links the home to Saint Therese Senior Communities. Legal business name: SAINT THERESE OF WOODBURY, LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.