Find a nursing home

Home / Minnesota / Woodbury

St. Therese of Woodbury LLC

7555 Bailey Road, Woodbury, MN 55129 · Washington County · (651) 209-9100

56 certified beds, about 54 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2016

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 245632 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on May 29, 2026, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Minnesota average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).

Of 20 health citations since October 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.70 hours per resident per day, against 4.19 across Minnesota and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.73 of those hours.

31.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Minnesota average 42.2%).

CMS links it to Saint Therese Senior Communities, an affiliated group of 4 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 20 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
2G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
15D
2E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
May 29, 2026Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 4 citations
  1. G
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 26, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure safe use of a wheelchair without foot pedals and added cushions was assessed for 1 of 2 residents (R28) reviewed for falls. This resulted in actual harm when R28 fell from the wheelchair during transport, sustained a right leg fracture and required hospitalization. The facility had implemented actions to prevent recurrence prior to survey on 5/26/26, therefore the citation was issued at past noncompliance. Furthermore, the facility failed to provide supervision with meals for 1 of 1 resident (R61) reviewed for nutrition.
  2. E
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    F919 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 26, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident's call light was accessible and within reach while the resident was in the shower for 1 of 1 resident (R47) reviewed for call light accessibility. This failure had the potential to impact all residents who use the shower.
  3. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 26, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure dignity was preserved for 1 of 1 resident (R50) reviewed for dignity.
  4. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 26, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure provider orders were transcribed accurately into the electronic medical record (EMR) for 2 of 2 residents (R25,R61) and failed to ensure verbal orders were received accurately for 1 of 1 resident (R15), for residents reviewed for order accuracy.
March 20, 2025Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 22, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure facial hair was covered when plating food for delivery and failed to ensure dishwasher temperatures were maintained at required temperatures needed for proper sanitization. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure refrigerated items were removed after expiration from 1 of 2 unit kitchens reviewed. This had the potential to impact all residents who reside in the facility.
  2. D
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    F578 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 22, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 2 residents (R147, R198) reviewed for Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) had the correct code status (i.e. full code, do not resuscitate-DNR) information outlined within the medical record. This could cause R147 and R198 to receive resuscitation efforts (i.e. cardiopulmonary resuscitation-CPR) against their wishes.
  3. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 22, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure bowel monitoring for 1 of 1 resident (R33) reviewed for constipation.
  4. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 22, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure recommendations were followed to minimize risk of aspiration for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for nutrition.
  5. D
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    F803 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 22, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure meal choices were provided as ordered for 1 of 2 (R147) residents reviewed for choices.
  6. D
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    F881 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 22, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure monitoring was in place for 1 of 1 resident (R9) reviewed who had an urinary tract infection (UTI).
September 17, 2024Complaint inspection · 3 citations
  1. G
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 21, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to comprehensively assess pressure ulcers and monitor for skin breakdown to prevent and/or mitigate the risk of deterioration resulting in actual harm for 2 of 3 residents when (R1) admitted with a stage 1 pressure ulcer that developed into an unstageable pressure ulcer and R2 admitted with a stage 2 pressure ulcer that developed into an unstageable pressure ulcer resulting in ongoing pain.
  2. D
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    F804 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 14, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure meals were served in a warm, palatable manner to promote quality of life and nutritional intake for 1 of 1 resident (R3) observed for short term stay. The facility further failed to offer an alternate meal option. This had the potential to affect all 16 of 16 residents identified to reside on the unit where the meal was served.
  3. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 14, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP)-(an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities.) were implemented for management of a pressure ulcer wound and a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) to reduce the risk of infection to others for 1 of 1 resident (R2). Further the facility failed to implement hand hygiene for 1 of 1 resident (R2) observed during incontinence care.
May 23, 2024Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 25, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 residents (R360) colonized with a multidrug resistant organism (MRDO) was placed on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). This had the potential to impact all residents who reside in the facility. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene and glove use was utilized for 1 of 1 residents (R360) observed during personal cares.
  2. D
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    F554 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 25, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a self-administration of medications (SAM) assessment was completed to allow residents to safely administer their own medications for 2 of 2 residents (R15, R360) observed with medications at bedside.
  3. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 25, 2024
    Inspectors wroteR355's admission MDS dated [DATE], indicated R355 had sever cognitive impairment and diagnoses of a hip fracture and spine fractures. R355's care plan dated 5/5/24, lacked indication R355 required a back brace. R355's [NAME] dated 5/5/24, lacked indication R355 required a back brace. R355's provider order dated 5/5/24, directed staff to have brace on when elevated above 30 degrees or up and active. An observation on 5/21/24 at 1:23 p.m., nursing assistant (NA)-B entered R355's room to assist him back to bed. R355 was sitting in the wheelchair with a black brace that went around his torso with straps over the shoulders. After NA-B was assisted back to bed, NA-B assisted R355 to remove the back brace. When interviewed on 5/21/24 at 1:55 p.m., NA-B- stated R355 had a back brace for when R355 was out of bed. [...]
  4. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 25, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure weekly wound assessments were completed to monitor wound healing and evaluate the residents response to interventions for 1 of 1 residents (R30) reviewed for non- pressure related wounds.
  5. D
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    F688 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 25, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure range of motion (ROM) exercises and a left hand splint was applied as ordered for 1 of 1 resident (R16) reviewed for range of motion.
  6. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 25, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure residents oxygen was adminstered according to doctor's orders for 1 of 1 resident (R305) reviewed for respiratory therapy.
October 11, 2023Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 13, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to complete weekly comprehensive skin assessments, failed to follow physician ordered treatments, and failed to revise the care plan for new ulcer development for 1 of 4 residents (R2). Additionally failed to complete an admission comprehensive skin assessment, develop a baseline care plan for pressure ulcers, and failed to implement pressure ulcer interventions for 1 of 4 residents (R4) reviewed for pressure ulcers.

Fire safety inspections

15 fire safety citations on file: 6 on May 29, 2026, 2 on March 20, 2025, 7 on May 23, 2024.

Every fire safety citation15 citations
  1. F
    Have an enclosure around a vertical opening shaft.
    K 311 · May 29, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · May 29, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · May 29, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. F
    Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
    K 923 · May 29, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. E
    Conduct testing and exercise requirements.
    E 39 · May 29, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. E
    Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
    K 511 · May 29, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. F
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · March 20, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. F
    Ensure proper storage of liquid oxygen.
    K 930 · March 20, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. F
    Establish roles under a Waiver declared by secretary.
    E 26 · May 23, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. F
    Provide primary/alternate means for communication.
    E 32 · May 23, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  11. F
    Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
    K 211 · May 23, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  12. F
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · May 23, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  13. F
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · May 23, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  14. F
    Install properly constructed and protected linen or trash chutes.
    K 541 · May 23, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  15. D
    Establish procedures for tracking staff and patients during an emergency.
    E 18 · May 23, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
May 29, 2026Payment Denial 2 days from July 1, 2026
September 17, 2024Payment Denial 4 days from October 17, 2024

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeMinnesotaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.704.193.86
Registered nurses1.731.060.69
All nursing staff on weekends4.143.713.42
Nurse aides2.31
Licensed practical nurses0.66
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)31.4%42.2%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover28.6%38.6%42.9%
Administrators who left2

CMS expects 3.93 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.92 on weekdays and 4.14 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.2% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.56 in April to June 2025 to 4.70 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.701.734.924.14 0.2%0 of 9054
Oct to Dec 20254.501.714.694.03 0.2%0 of 9255
Jul to Sep 20254.581.804.784.07 1.1%0 of 9253
Apr to Jun 20254.561.934.784.02 2.5%0 of 9155
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Minnesota, Jan to Mar 20264.191.054.383.735.2%0.8% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeMinnesotaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
21.618.213.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.90.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.42.61.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.84.03.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.21.91.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
22.720.514.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.85.24.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
9.117.115.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
26.023.523.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
12.314.812.0

Owners and operators

Legal business name: SAINT THERESE OF WOODBURY, LLC. CMS links this home to Saint Therese Senior Communities, a group of 4 nursing homes averaging 4.2 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Saint Therese Communities5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%06/28/2019
Abbott, CraigCorporate directorIndividual05/23/2022
Gillespie, JosephCorporate directorIndividual06/02/2011
Herb, MaryCorporate directorIndividual07/01/2023
Hoffmann, DavidCorporate directorIndividual06/01/2000
Horstmann, StevenCorporate directorIndividual04/01/2020
Krenn, DavidCorporate directorIndividual12/01/2011
McCluskey, PatriciaCorporate directorIndividual07/01/2023
McCrossan, JaneCorporate directorIndividual12/01/2010
Meads, StevenCorporate directorIndividual03/01/2015
Parmar, MonaCorporate directorIndividual08/22/2018
Taffe, PatrickCorporate directorIndividual12/01/2013
Wornson, KathrynCorporate directorIndividual06/01/2013
Abbott, CraigCorporate officerIndividual05/23/2022
Hoffmann, DavidCorporate officerIndividual07/01/2022
Shelangoski, CalCorporate officerIndividual03/05/2018
Wornson, KathrynCorporate officerIndividual07/01/2022
Saint ThereseOperational/managerial controlOrganization08/02/2013
Saint Therese CommunitiesOperational/managerial controlOrganization06/28/2019
Saint Therese Management Services, LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization06/28/2019
Gerland, SamanthaOperational/managerial controlIndividual02/26/2024
Keelin, AnthonyOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/17/2024
Saint Therese Management Services, LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization01/28/2025
Gerland, SamanthaAdp of the SNFIndividual02/26/2024
Keelin, AnthonyAdp of the SNFIndividual06/17/2024
Parmar, MonaAdp of the SNFIndividual01/28/2025
Shelangoski, CalAdp of the SNFIndividual03/05/2018

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 9 problems in this area, most recently on May 29, 2026: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
  2. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on May 29, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
  3. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on March 20, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  4. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on March 20, 2025: "Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use."
  5. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 2 administrators who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Minnesota contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Minnesota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is St. Therese of Woodbury LLC's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates St. Therese of Woodbury LLC 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did St. Therese of Woodbury LLC get at its last inspection?
4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on May 29, 2026. The Minnesota average is 7.1.
Has St. Therese of Woodbury LLC been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does St. Therese of Woodbury LLC accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns St. Therese of Woodbury LLC?
CMS lists 27 owners and managers, and links the home to Saint Therese Senior Communities. Legal business name: SAINT THERESE OF WOODBURY, LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection