Avante Rehabilitation Center
225 N Sowers Rd, Irving, TX 75061 · Dallas County · (972) 253-4173
120 certified beds, about 121 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2002
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 675908 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 31, 2025, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 19 health citations since June 2023, 6 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (6 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $24,542 in the last three years; the largest was $17,096, and the latest is dated March 28, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.58 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.30 of those hours.
66.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Hamilton County Hospital District, an affiliated group of 10 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 19 health citations on file.
April 23, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of infection for 1 resident (Resident #1) of 2 residents reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure LVN A performed hand hygiene and changed gloves during wound care for Resident #1 on 4/23/2026. This failure could place residents at risk for infection and cross contamination. [...]
July 31, 2025Standard inspection · 3 citations
- E Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure it was free of a medication rate of five percent (5%) or greater. There were three medication errors observed out of 31 opportunities resulting in an 9% medication error rate. One (LVN B) of two staff observed made two errors during the medication pass for one (Resident #81) of two residents observed. 1. LVN B on 07/29/2025 administered Resident #81 MiraLAX Oral powder 17grm (for constipation) without the appropriate amount of fluid. 2. LVN B on 07/29/2025 failed to administer Advair HFA Inhalation Aerosol 115-21 mcg to Resident #81. 3. LVN B on 07/29/2025 failed to administer Isosorbide Mononitrate ER oral tablets 60mg to Resident #81. [...]
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's only kitchen reviewed for food safety. 1. The facility failed to ensure food items in the freezer were stored sealed and not exposed to air in accordance with the professional standards for food service.2. The facility failed to ensure food items in the refrigerators and freezer were labeled with the item description (handwritten or manufacturer's label), had the received by date, the opened date and/or the consume by or expiration by dates. These failures could place residents at risk for food-borne illness and cross contamination. [...]
- D Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to assess a resident using the quarterly review instrument specified by the State and approved by CMS not less frequently than once every 3 months for review for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for assessments. The facility failed to complete a quarterly assessment for Resident #1 every 3 months since [DATE]. This failure could place residents at risk for not getting an accurate assessment and could result in lack of care.
August 1, 2024Standard inspection · 5 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's only kitchen. The facility failed to maintain quat sanitizer at a proper level in all three sanitation buckets, having levels of 500 ppm, and sanitation compartment of the three-compartment sink having level of 400 ppm. The facility failed to maintain the chlorine at a proper level in the dishwasher sanitizer cycle, having a level of 200 ppm. These failures could place all residents who eat off facility dishes at risk for exposure to higher than necessary levels of sanitizer chemicals, potentially leading to irritation of the digestive tract, and intestinal symptoms. Findings Included: [...]
- E Ensure a qualified health professional conducts resident assessments.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to submit discharge MDS assessments for five of fifteen residents (Residents #2, #37, #45, #80, and #82) reviewed for discharge MDS submission. The MDS Coordinator failed to successfully submit discharge MDS assessments Residents #2, #37, #45, #80, and #82 when they discharged from the facility. This failure could place residents at risk of communication about a resident's status from not being transmitted to CMS and could interfere with residents receiving needed services after discharge.
- E Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 8.57 % based on 3 errors out of 35 opportunities, which involved 3 of 9 residents (Resident #9, Resident #35, and Resident #46) reviewed for medication errors. The facility failed to ensure MA C and ADON B administered Resident #9's external pain reliving patch to her right lateral (directional term describing outer side of the body part) hip as ordered by the physician. The facility failed to ensure MA C administered Resident #35's antibiotic eye ointment only in the left eye as ordered by the physician. The facility failed to ensure Resident #46 received his daily Vitamin D tablet as prescribed on 07/31/24. [...]
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections for 4 (Residents #20, #46, #78 and #83) of 9 residents reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure MA D sanitized blood pressure cuff between use on Residents #20, #46, and Resident #83. The facility failed to implement an infection control and prevention plan that included gastronomy care (G-tube- resident received food through a tube into his stomach) for Resident #78. These failures could place residents at risk of cross contamination and infectious diseases.
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received an accurate assessment, reflective of the resident's status for one (Resident #73) 24 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility failed to ensure Resident #73's Significant Change MDS Assessment, dated 06/18/24, did not inaccurately reflect Resident #73 having had a tracheostomy (a surgical opening in the windpipe to allow air into the lungs). This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs, diminished function of health, and regressions in their overall health.
March 28, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- J Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure basic life support, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), was provided to a resident requiring such emergency care prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel and subject to related physician orders and the resident's advance directives for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for CPR. [...]
October 4, 2023Complaint inspection · 5 citations
- J Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to notify and consult with the resident's physician of a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status that is, a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status for one (Resident #1) of one resident reviewed for notification of changes. The facility failed to ensure LVN B immediately notified the physician on 08/14/23 when Resident #1 had an elevated temperature of 100.3 F and N/V brownish partially digested food. The facility failed to ensure LVN A notified the physician on 08/15/23 that Resident #1's laboratory results were released to the facility on [DATE] at 12:55 PM. On 08/16/23 at 1:23 PM, the NP reviewed labs in PCC. Labs resulted WBC 22. UA with many bacteria, dehydration, and UTI. [...]
- J Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for neglect. The facility failed to ensure LVN A and LVN B did not neglect Resident #1. They failed to implement nursing interventions as written in Resident #1's care plan. LVN B failed to immediately contact the physician when Resident #1 had an acute change in condition. LVN A failed to immediately contact the physician of abnormal labs results, which indicated infection and dehydration, when received. [...]
- J Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent neglect for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for provision of care and services by staff. The facility failed to oversee the implementation of required structures and processes to meet the needs of Resident #1. The facility failed to oversee LVN A and LVN B followed resident care policies and procedures during the provision of care and services to Resident #1. The facility failed to conduct ongoing monitoring and supervision of LVN A and LVN B to assure the implementation of Resident #1's care plan as written. The facility failed to ensure there was an effective communication system across all shifts for communicating necessary care and information between staff, practitioner, and resident representatives. [...]
- J Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with urinary incontinence, based on the resident's comprehensive assessment, who enters the facility with an indwelling catheter or subsequently receives one is assessed for removal of the catheter as soon as possible unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that catheterization is necessary and a resident who is incontinent of bladder receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for Urinary Tract Infection (UTI). On 08/10/23 Resident #1's FC was discontinued after unknown nurse reported leakage. The facility failed to ensure LVN B immediately notified the physician on 08/14/23 when Resident #1 had an elevated temperature of 100.3 F and N/V brownish partially digested food. [...]
- J Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to promptly notify the ordering physician, physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist of laboratory results that fall outside of clinical reference ranges for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for Laboratory Services. The facility failed to ensure LVN A notified the physician on 08/15/23 that Resident #1's laboratory results were released to the facility on [DATE] at 12:55 PM. On 08/16/23 at 1:23 PM, the NP reviewed labs in PCC. Labs resulted WBC 22. UA with many bacteria, dehydration, and UTI. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 10/02/23. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:20 PM. [...]
June 2, 2023Standard inspection · 4 citations
- E Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to within 14 days after a facility completed a resident's assessment, electronically transmit encoded, accurate, and complete MDS data to the CMS system for three (Residents #23, #36 and #88) of eight residents reviewed for resident assessments. The facility failed to ensure Residents #23, #36, #88's MDS discharge assessments was transmitted within 14 days after they discharged this facility. This failure could affect discharged residents from getting the appropriate continuity of care with other healthcare providers in the community or other Nursing facilities if they continued to appear to be a resident at this facility which could cause a decline in benefits and affect the facility's census statistics in the CMS database.
- E Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that were complete and accurately documented for four (Residents #23, #36, #54 and #88) of eight residents reviewed for Medical records. 1. The facility failed to ensure Residents #23, #36, #88's MDS discharge assessments were completed and in their medical records after they discharged this facility. 2 The facility failed to have accurate 14 day admission and Quarterly MDS Assessments completed for Resident #54, since she re-admitted [DATE]. These failures could cause all residents to be at risk of inadequate care if inaccurate diagnoses or missing documentation were not included in their medical records, resulting in not properly assessing, monitoring and treating a resident and causing them distress, pain and decreased psycho-social well- being.
- D Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for one (Resident #54) of eight residents reviewed for resident assessments. The facility failed to do Resident #54's admission and Quarterly MDS assessments, despite her being a private pay resident.
- D Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility must develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights set forth at, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for two (Resident #7 and Resident #72) of three residents reviewed. The facility failed to implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality for Resident #7 and Resident # 72. [...]
Fire safety inspections
4 fire safety citations on file: 1 on August 1, 2024, 3 on June 2, 2023.
Every fire safety citation4 citations
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- E Use approved construction type or materials.
- E Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
- E Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| March 28, 2024 | Fine | $17,096 |
| October 4, 2023 | Fine | $7,446 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 2.58 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.30 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.34 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.56 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.72 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 66.0% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 61.5% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.66 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 2.68 on weekdays and 2.34 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 8.5% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.79 in April to June 2025 to 2.58 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 2.58 | 0.30 | 2.68 | 2.34 | 8.5% | 0 of 90 | 121 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 2.88 | 0.35 | 2.96 | 2.66 | 12.5% | 0 of 92 | 110 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.76 | 0.48 | 3.91 | 3.38 | 10.0% | 0 of 92 | 80 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.79 | 0.51 | 3.88 | 3.54 | 18.6% | 0 of 91 | 78 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 21.3 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.4 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.6 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.9 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 19.4 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 9.0 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.0 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.8 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: HAMILTON COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to Hamilton County Hospital District, a group of 10 nursing homes averaging 2.3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dkp Investments, LLC | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 06/01/2023 | |
| Llld Associates, LP | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 06/01/2023 | |
| Port Au Prince LLC | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 06/01/2023 | |
| Prince, Danny | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Individual | 06/01/2023 | |
| Hooper, Grady | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/01/2023 | |
| Oxbow Healthcare, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 06/01/2023 | |
| Malik, Mohammad | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2023 | |
| Prince, Daniel | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2023 | |
| Dkp Investments, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/01/2023 | |
| Llld Associates, LP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/01/2023 | |
| Oxbow Healthcare, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/22/2025 | |
| Port Au Prince LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/01/2023 | |
| Malik, Mohammad | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2023 | |
| Prince, Daniel | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2023 | |
| Prince, Danny | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on July 31, 2025: "Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on April 23, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on July 31, 2025: "Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on July 31, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.34 hours per resident per day, below the Texas average of 2.98.
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Avir at Irving Irving, 0.7 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 18 citations
- Ashford Hall Irving, 1.4 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 33 citations
- The Villages on Macarthur Irving, 2.5 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 30 citations
- The Eden of Las Colinas Irving, 3 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 65 citations
- Las Brisas Rehabilitation and Wellness Center Irving, 4.4 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 9 citations
- Heritage at Turner Park Health & Rehab Grand Prairie, 5.2 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 17 citations
- Lakewest Rehabilitation and Skilled Care Dallas, 5.7 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 44 citations
- Forest Park Nursing & Rehabilitation Dallas, 5.8 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 51 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Avante Rehabilitation Center's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Avante Rehabilitation Center 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Avante Rehabilitation Center get at its last inspection?
- 3 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on July 31, 2025. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has Avante Rehabilitation Center been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 2 fines totaling $24,542 in the last three years.
- Does Avante Rehabilitation Center accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Avante Rehabilitation Center?
- CMS lists 15 owners and managers, and links the home to Hamilton County Hospital District. Legal business name: HAMILTON COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.