Avir at Cotulla
369 Mars Dr, Cotulla, TX 78014 · La Salle County · (830) 879-4483
60 certified beds, about 52 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2011
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676288 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 8, 2026, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 16 health citations since September 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.28 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.29 of those hours.
35.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Avir Health Group, an affiliated group of 118 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 16 health citations on file.
January 8, 2026Standard inspection · 6 citations
- F Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week, of the 6-month review period for (25 of 184 days), reviewed for RN coverage. The facility failed to ensure the facility maintained the required RN coverage for 25 days between July 2025 to December 2025. The dates are: 7/3/2025 - 7/7/2025, 8/4/2025 - 8/8/2025, 9/8/2025 - 9/12/2025, 10/9/2025- 10/12/2025, 11/10/2025-11/12/2025 and 12/16/2025 - 12/18/2025This failure could place residents at risk of not having their nursing and medical needs met and receiving improper care.
- E Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 3 of 9 residents (Resident #6, Resident #41, and Resident #52) who were reviewed for resident assessments. 1. The facility failed to document Resident #6's lack of use of scheduled pain medication on the quarterly MDS assessment. 2. The facility failed to document Resident #41's diagnosis of anxiety on the quarterly MDS assessment. 3. The facility failed to document Resident #52's use of an antidepressant on the quarterly MDS assessment. These failures could place residents at risk of improper or incorrect care or of not receiving services necessary for their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food for 1 of 1 kitchen in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility failed to date items after receiving/opening them located in the kitchen pantry. 2. The facility failed to take temperatures for both breakfast and lunch meals on 01/05/2026. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for food borne illness.
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drug records were in order and that an account of all controlled drugs was maintained and periodically reconciled for 1 of 2 medication carts (Med Cart 2) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure the controlled substance reconciliation log was signed for accuracy of medication quantities during hand off of the cart key for Med Cart 2 during lunch. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving their prescribed medications, experiencing untreated pain and anxiety, and a decreased quality of life.
- D Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary storage handling, and consumption of residents' food items for 1 (refrigerators in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]-A) of 4 residents' refrigerators reviewed in that: The personal refrigerator in resident's room [ROOM NUMBER]-A contained unlabeled, undated food items. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of foodborne illness due to consuming foods which could be spoiled.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure LVN B wore a PPE gown while administering medication to Resident #6 via PEG tube (a flexible feeding tube inserted through the abdominal wall into the stomach that allows for the delivery of nutrition, fluids, and medications directly into the stomach). This failure could place residents at risk for cross contamination and infection.
May 9, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for infection control, in that: While providing incontinent care for Resident #6, CNA A did not change her gloves or wash her hands after touching the bed remote before starting to provide care. CNA B did not change her gloves or wash her hands after touching the privacy curtain before starting to provide care. CNA A changed gloves multiple times and did not sanitize between change of gloves. These deficient practices could place residents at-risk for infection due to improper care practices.
October 24, 2024Standard inspection · 2 citations
- D Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or prevent further decrease in range of motion for one (Resident #46) of 17 residents reviewed for range of motion. The facility failed to have interventions and monitoring in place to address Resident #46's left hand contracture. This failure could place residents with ROM issues at risk for decline in range of motion, decreased mobility, and worsening contractures.
- B Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to transmit encoded, accurate, and complete MDS data to the CMS System for 4 (Resident #3, Resident #35, Resident #45, and Resident #47) of 16 residents reviewed for MDS transmission, in that: 1. The facility failed to correct and resubmit incorrect MDS assessments for Resident #3, Resident #45, and Resident #47. 2. The facility failed to transmit a completed MDS assessment for Resident #35. These deficient practices placed residents at risk of not having assessments completed and submitted in a timely manner as required.
September 8, 2023Standard inspection · 7 citations
- E Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of resident needs for 3 of 23 (Residents #4, #22, #36) residents reviewed for call lights: 1. Resident # 4's call light was connected to the light string hanging behind her bed on the opposite side of the bed she was sitting on and not within reach. 2. Resident #2's call light was attached to the privacy curtain, out of reach. 3. Resident #36's call light was not within reach. This failure could place residents who used call lights for assistance at risk in maintaining and/or achieving independent functioning, dignity, and well-being.
- E Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff was able to demonstrate competency in skills and techniques for 1 of 2 (RN C) RNs observed during medication pass. The facility failed to prevent RN C from following: 1. Established Infection Control Procedures while passing medications to Resident #5 and Resident #10. 2. HIPAA privacy requirements to lock and close the laptop while passing medications to Resident #7. 3. The procedure to lock the medication cart before walking away during the medication pass. 4. The procedure to prime an Insulin Pen before administering the medication to Resident #7. These deficient practices could affect residents who were receiving medications leaving them at risk for infection, not receiving the proper amount of insulin and exposure of confidential information.
- E Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that it was free of medication error rate of 5 percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 6.67%, based on 2 errors out of 30 opportunities, which involved 2 of 5 residents (Resident #7 and #10) reviewed for medication administration in that: The facility to ensure RN C ensured the Insulin Pen was purged to ensure Resident #7 received her insulin as ordered. The facility failed to prevent RN C from giving Resident #10 the wrong dosage of Lorazepam 0.25mg tablet as ordered. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of their medications or receiving them as prescribed, per physician orders.
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure drugs and biological's used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #10) reviewed during the medication pass in that: The facility failed to prevent Resident #10 from being given 0.5mg of Lorazepam instead of 0.25mg tab. This deficient practice placed residents receiving medications at risk for receiving the wrong dosage as prescribed.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #7 and #10) reviewed for infection control practices, in that: The facility failed to prevent RN C from doing the following during medication pass: 1. Setup pills from the blister packs and bottles by using his bare thumb and index finger or palm of his hand to place the medication into the medication cups. 2. Administered by mouth medications for Resident #7 and #10 by placing his bare fingers inside the medication cups These failures could place residents at risk for infection, transmission for communicable diseases and or a decline in health.
- D Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to protect the confidentiality of personal health care information for 1 of 42 [Resident #7) residents reviewed for confidentiality of records during the survey in that: The facility failed to ensure RN C locked and closed the laptop during the medication pass exposing Resident #7's personal information to include some of her medications. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for loss of privacy and dignity.
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 2 (Resident #7 and #10) out of 5 residents reviewed for medication administration in that: The facility failed to ensure RN C ensured the Insulin Pen was purged before giving Resident #7 her insulin. The facility failed to prevent RN C from giving Resident #10 Lorazepam 0.5mg tab instead of 0.25mg tab. These deficient practices could affect residents with medications and place residents at risk for not receiving the proper dosage.
Fire safety inspections
14 fire safety citations on file: 8 on January 8, 2026, 4 on October 24, 2024, 2 on September 8, 2023.
Every fire safety citation14 citations
- F Develop and maintain an Emergency Preparedness Program (EP).
- F Create arrangements with other facilities to receive patients.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- E Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- E Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
- D Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- E Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
- D Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- E Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.28 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.29 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.03 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.96 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.03 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 35.9% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 83.3% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.19 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.38 on weekdays and 3.03 on weekends, 10% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.13 in April to June 2025 to 3.28 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.28 | 0.29 | 3.38 | 3.03 | 0.0% | 3 of 90 | 52 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.21 | 0.29 | 3.32 | 2.93 | 0.0% | 10 of 92 | 50 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.14 | 0.27 | 3.23 | 2.89 | 0.0% | 16 of 92 | 49 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.13 | 0.20 | 3.22 | 2.92 | 0.0% | 9 of 91 | 50 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
Staff pay at this home
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
Official wage estimates for Texas
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $16.97 to $20.71 | 88,680 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.92 | $27.46 to $32.89 | 57,560 |
| Registered nurses | $46.14 | $38.06 to $50.53 | 271,380 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.9 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.3 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.3 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.1 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.3 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.3 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: COUNTY OF LA SALLE. CMS links this home to Avir Health Group, a group of 118 nursing homes averaging 2.3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| County of La Salle | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 12/01/2022 |
| County of La Salle | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 12/01/2022 | |
| Martinez, Leodoro | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Martinez, Leodoro | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| 369 Mars Dr Opco, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/01/2025 | |
| Canales, Kristian | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/02/2024 | |
| Freund, Nochum | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/01/2025 | |
| Travitsky, Aaron | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/01/2025 | |
| Dagan, Amitai | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 02/03/2026 | |
| Goldberger, Abraham | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 03/31/2026 | |
| Goldberger, Faigy | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 03/31/2026 | |
| 369 Mars Dr Opco, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/03/2026 | |
| 369 Mars Dr Porperty Owner, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/01/2025 | |
| County of La Salle | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2022 | |
| Welltower Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/01/2025 | |
| Welltower Nnn Group, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/01/2025 | |
| Welltower Op, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/01/2025 | |
| Canales, Kristian | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/02/2024 | |
| Preddy, John | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/01/2022 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on January 8, 2026: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on January 8, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- How many nurses and aides work each shift, nights and weekends included?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on January 8, 2026: "Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on January 8, 2026: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Avir at Cotulla's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Avir at Cotulla 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Avir at Cotulla get at its last inspection?
- 6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on January 8, 2026. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has Avir at Cotulla been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Avir at Cotulla accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Avir at Cotulla?
- CMS lists 19 owners and managers, and links the home to Avir Health Group. Legal business name: COUNTY OF LA SALLE.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.