Balch Springs Nursing Home
4200 Shepard Lane, Balch Springs, TX 75180 · Dallas County · (972) 286-0335
120 certified beds, about 73 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1992
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 675057 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 7, 2026, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 21 health citations since February 2024, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (2 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $28,012 in the last three years; the largest was $28,012, and the latest is dated March 30, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.72 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.35 of those hours.
56.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Advanced Healthcare Solutions, an affiliated group of 28 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 21 health citations on file.
May 7, 2026Standard inspection · 5 citations
- E Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain documentation that the residents representative has been delegated the necessary authority to exercise the resident's rights and must verify that a court-appointed representative has the necessary authority for the decision-making at issue as determined by the court. For example, a court-appointed representative might have the power to make financial decisions, but not health care decisions. Additionally, the facility must make reasonable efforts to ensure that it has access to documentation of any change related to the delegation of rights, including a resident's revocation of delegated rights, to ensure that the resident's preferences are being upheld for 1 (Resident #13)of 5 residents (Resident #32, #40, #77, and #80) reviewed for resident representative rights. [...]
- E Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to send and receive mail, and to receive letters, packages, and other materials delivered to the facility for the residents through the means other than a postal service for 6 (confidential residents) of 75 residents reviewed for rights to forms of communication with privacy. The facility failed to deliver mail to the residents within twenty-four hours of delivery on premises or the facility's post office box according to their policy. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving mail in a timely manner and could result in a decline in residents' psychosocial well-being and quality of life.
- E Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to send a copy of the residents' discharge notice, prior to discharge, to the representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman of the residents' transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move for 1 resident (Resident #8) of 5 reviewed for notifying the LTC Ombudsman of the residents' discharge. The facility failed to ensure Resident #8 was not discharged on 04/13/2026 without a notice to the LTC state ombudsman. This failure could place residents at risk of not knowing their rights or receiving the services of the state LTC Ombudsman.
- D Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the PASRR program for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #55) reviewed for PASRR assessments. The facility failed to ensure Resident #55 was referred to the appropriate state-designated mental health authority for review when she received a new diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder and anxiety disorder. This failure could place residents at risk of not being evaluated and receiving needed PASRR services.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (Resident #18) of five residents, reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA A performed hand hygiene during incontinence care for Resident #18 and changed her soiled gloves before placing items in her pocket. This failure placed residents at risk for healthcare associated cross contamination and infections.
March 30, 2026Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- K Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 (Resident #1) of 14 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to address Resident #1 required off-loading of heels and repositioning every two hours. Resident #1 developed a Stage 4 Pressure Wound. On 03/25/2026 at 6:22 p.m. an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 6:22 PM. [...]
- J Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for one (Resident #1) of 14 residents, reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to address Resident #1's required off-loading of heels and repositioning every two hours, as these orders were not reflected in Resident #1's Comprehensive Care Plan. Resident #1 developed a Stage 4 Pressure Wound. On 03/25/2026 at 6:22 p.m. an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 6:22 PM. [...]
March 6, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 5 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's only kitchen reviewed for food safety. 1. The facility failed to ensure food items were accurately labeled and dated with the received or expiration date. 2. The facility failed to ensure dented cans were placed in a separate storage area. 3. The facility failed to ensure opened items were sealed or resealed effectively. These failures could place residents at risk for food-borne illness and cross contamination. Findings Included: Observation of dry storage on 03/04/2025 at 9:13am revealed the following: -1, 1lbs box of cream of wheat dated 02/08/2025 opened and exposed to the air. - 6 bags of hot dog buns with no use by or expiration date. [...]
- E Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received care and treatment consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing and to prevent further development of skin breakdown or pressure ulcers for two (Resident #10 and Resident #32) of five residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #10 was repositioned every two hours as indicated in Resident #10's physician orders. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #32 was repositioned every two hours as indicated in Resident #32's care plan. These failures could place residents at risk for worsening pressure ulcers, new pressure ulcers, or infection.
- E Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure any drug regimen irregularities reported by the Pharmacist Consultant were acted upon for two (Residents #19 and Resident #9) out of six residents and failed to ensure the Pharmacist Consultant reported irregularities to the Physician whose medications were reviewed. 1. Resident 19's Pharmacist consultant recommendation for a gradual dose reduction of Citalopram (antidepressant medication) had no physician rationale for continued use. 2. Resident 19's Pharmacist consultant recommendation for a gradual dose reduction of Quetiapine (antipsychotic medication) had no physician rationale for continued use. 3. Resident 9's Pharmacist consultant recommendation for a gradual dose reduction of Risperidone (antipsychotic medication) had no physician rationale for continued use. 4. [...]
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for one (200 hall medication cart) of three medication carts reviewed for medication labeling. The facility failed to ensure two insulin pens (one Aspart insulin syringe and one Tresiba insulin syringe) on the 200 hall medication cart had open dates. The facility failed to ensure two insulin pens on the 200-hall medication cart were discarded 28 days after being opened. One Lyumjev insulin pen and one Admelog insulin pen had an open date of 1/20/2025 and was found in the cart on 3/04/2025 (46 days after being opened). These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving the intended therapeutic effects of prescribed medication.
- D Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight for one (Resident #99) of seven residents reviewed for nutrition. 1. The facility failed to complete an annual comprehensive nutritional assessment or a nutrition assessment after identified weight loss by the dietician on 8/12/2024 per facility policy. 2. The facility failed to implement dietary recommendations on 8/12/2024 that included ordering a magic cup and obtaining weekly weights for four weeks. These failures could place residents at risk for unplanned weight loss and place them at risk of not having their nutritional needs met.
August 28, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assured the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of each resident f The facility failed to document that Resident #1 was given insulin on 08/20/24, 08/21/24, 08/23/24. This failure could place residents at risk of medical complications and a decrease in therapeutic dosages of their medications as ordered by the physician.
May 31, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments and permit only authorized personnel to have access for one of four (Medication Cart #1) medication carts reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Medication Cart #1 was locked when unattended on 05/24/24. This failure could place residents at risk of having access to unauthorized medications and/or lead to possible harm or drug diversion.
February 14, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 7 citations
- F Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to conduct and document a completed facility-wide assessment which included a current (EPP) Emergency Preparedness Plan to determine what resources were necessary to care for its residents competently during emergencies as necesarry and at least annually for one (facility) of one facility reviewed for Emergency service planning. The facility failed to review, revise and update their Emergency Preparedness Plan at least annually; the most current EPP was not in the EPP binder. And after inquiry on 02/14/24, the Administrator provided the surveyor a four-page EPP dated 01/17/23 by former Administrator G that was unsigned by anyone and without proof of all of the completed employee trainings and drills. [...]
- E Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents for two (Hall 200, and 300) of four halls observed for environment. The facility failed to ensure bathrooms on Hall 200 and 300, were clean, safe, and in good repair. This failure could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life due to the lack of a well-kept environment and equipment.
- E Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all assistive devices and overbed tables were maintained and free of hazards for five (Residents #10, #12, #19, #35 and #44) of eighteen residents reviewed for essential equipment. The facility failed to properly maintain wheelchairs for Residents #10, #12, #35 and #44. The facility failed to properly maintain overbed tables for Resident #19. These failures could place residents at risk for equipment that was in unsafe operating condition, which could cause injury.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designated to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 3 (Residents #53, #57, and #174) of 6 residents reviewed for infection control. 1. CNA D failed to put on PPE prior to entering three contact isolation rooms to serve the lunch trays. 2. CNA D failed to disinfect her hands while servicing food trays to the residents on Hall 100. These failures could place residents at-risk of cross contamination which could result in infections or illness.
- E Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for hall 300, entry to the dining area, and one out of four resident door knobs not repaired that was observed for environment The facility failed to ensure the floor between room [ROOM NUMBER] and 309, and the right side entryway into the dining room . and the and door handles were in good repair. These failures could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life due to the lack of a well-kept environment and equipment.
- D Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who required dialysis received such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, for 1 (Resident #53) of 1 resident's reviewed for dialysis. The facility failed to ensure post-dialysis assessments were completed for Resident #53 after return from dialysis treatment. This failure could place residents at risk of inadequate post dialysis care.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that medications were secure and inaccessible to unauthorized staff and residents for 1 (one medication cart for Hall 100) of 6 medication carts. The facility failed to ensure medication supplies were all stored in locked compartments and permit only authorized personnel to have keys, when LVN A's one medication cart for Hall 100, was left unlocked and unattended by LVN A. This failure could result in resident access and ingestion of medications leading to a risk for harm and possible drug diversion.
Fire safety inspections
9 fire safety citations on file: 2 on May 7, 2026, 2 on March 6, 2025, 5 on February 14, 2024.
Every fire safety citation9 citations
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- E Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- E Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
- C Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- E Have exits that are accessible at all times.
- E Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- E Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- E Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| March 30, 2026 | Fine | $28,012 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 2.72 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.35 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.33 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.63 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.75 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 56.5% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 72.7% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.23 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 2.88 on weekdays and 2.33 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.72 in April to June 2025 to 2.72 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 2.72 | 0.35 | 2.88 | 2.33 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 73 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 2.90 | 0.35 | 3.04 | 2.53 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 68 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 2.97 | 0.29 | 3.13 | 2.57 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 67 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.72 | 0.39 | 2.90 | 2.25 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 73 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.5 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.6 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.6 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.5 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.5 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 13.3 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 6.4 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.5 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.0 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: HAMILTON COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to Advanced Healthcare Solutions, a group of 28 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hooper, Grady | Corporate director | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Muxworthy, Neil | Corporate director | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Hooper, Grady | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Balch Springs Hc LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Scheiner, Eliezer | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Silberstein, Ari | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on March 30, 2026: "Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on March 6, 2025: "Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on May 7, 2026: "Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on May 7, 2026: "Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.33 hours per resident per day, below the Texas average of 2.98.
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Mesquite Tree Nursing Center Mesquite, 3 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 25 citations
- Mesquite Village Wellness & Rehabilitation Mesquite, 3.7 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 26 citations
- Edgewood Rehabilitation and Care Center Mesquite, 4.3 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 18 citations
- Cheyenne Medical Lodge Mesquite, 4.6 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 22 citations
- The Manor at Seagoville Seagoville, 4.8 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 32 citations
- Willowbend Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Mesquite, 5.2 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 31 citations
- Palomino Place Mesquite, 6.3 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 32 citations
- Town East Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center Mesquite, 6.8 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 37 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Balch Springs Nursing Home's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Balch Springs Nursing Home 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 1 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Balch Springs Nursing Home get at its last inspection?
- 5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on May 7, 2026. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has Balch Springs Nursing Home been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $28,012 in the last three years.
- Does Balch Springs Nursing Home accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Balch Springs Nursing Home?
- CMS lists 6 owners and managers, and links the home to Advanced Healthcare Solutions. Legal business name: HAMILTON COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.