Bay County Medical Care Facility
564 West Hampton Road, Essexville, MI 48732 · Bay County · (989) 892-3591
161 certified beds, about 94 residents a day · Government - County · Medicare and Medicaid since 1967
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 235044 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 29, 2026, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Michigan average is 9.9, the national average 9.2).
Of 26 health citations since March 2024, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $165,536 in the last three years; the largest was $116,805, and the latest is dated March 11, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 6.39 hours per resident per day, against 3.99 across Michigan and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.32 of those hours.
53.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Michigan average 44.1%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 26 health citations on file.
April 29, 2026Standard inspection · 8 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices in the food service area resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness to all residents that consume food from the kitchen.
- F Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have an active plan for reducing the risk of legionella and other opportunistic pathogens of premise plumbing (OPPP) and, follow enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for residents identified with qualifying wounds, for one resident #65 (R65) of three residents reviewed for infection prevention. This deficient practice has the increased potential to result in waterborne pathogens to exist and spread in the facility's plumbing system and an increased risk of respiratory infection among all residents in the facility.
- F Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate backflow prevention was installed at plumbing fixtures, resulting in the potential for contamination to the water supply, affecting all residents.
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that timely care was provided in a dignified manor to 3 of 3 residents reviewed for dignity (Residents R4, R10 and R45).
- D Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure advance directives were in place and completed appropriately for one resident (Resident #99) of one resident reviewed for advanced directives.
- D Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to provide clinical rationale for administration of duplicate/triplicate antidepressant therapy of two (#6 & #55) residents of six reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings Include:Resident #6On 4/28/2026 at approximately 1:00 PM, a review was completed of Resident #6's medical records and it revealed she admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, Alzheimer's Disease, Major Depressive Disorder, Insomnia and Generalized Anxiety Disorder. Further review of Resident #6's chart yielded the following:Physician Orders:Escitalopram (Lexapro) Oxalate Oral Tablet 20 MG (milligrams) for Major Depressive Disorder. Trazadone HCI (hydrochloride) Oral Tablet 50 MG for Major Depressive DisorderLexapro and Trazadone are both antidepressants. Care Plan: [...]
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) dressing changes were completed timely for one resident (R23) of one reviewed for PICC lines.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was changed out weekly and nebulizers were stored properly for two residents (R2 and R75) of five residents reviewed for respiratory care.
January 27, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to Intake Numbers 2716028, 2716054 and 2723179. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that staff followed 2 resident's (Resident #101 and Resident #104) plans of care for safe transfers of 5 residents reviewed, resulting in falls with a fracture, and a head injury, with hospitalization. Findings Include: Resident #101:Review of the Face Sheet, physician orders and care plans dated 9/2018 through current, revealed Resident #101 was 88 years-old, admitted to the facility on [DATE], had cognitive impairment, required assistance with all Activities of daily Living/ADL's and was a two person assist for all transfers. The residents diagnosis included, Vascular Dementia with behaviors, Stroke with Hemiplegia and weakness of the right side, and Heart Disease. [...]
December 19, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- G Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteThis Citation Pertains to Intake 2660956. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the one (#701) resident's right to be free from sexual abuse by another resident of three residents reviewed resulting in a non-verbal, severely cognitively impaired resident (#701) having their genital area touched by Resident #702, and staff not immediately separating the residents.
April 17, 2025Standard inspection · 5 citations
- G Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) Prevent and implement preventive measures to avoid pressure ulcers for 2 residents (Resident #39 and Resident #62) of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers and 2) Follow through with the intervention of an air mattress for 1 resident (Resident #39), resulting in Resident #62 having a facility-acquired, preventable, Stage IV pressure ulcer and, for both residents, an increased likelihood for infection, cross contamination, antibiotic usage with side effects, pain, and discomfort. Findings Include: Resident #39: [...]
- F Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure clean, reusable medical equipment for one resident (Resident #12) and hand hygiene for one resident (Resident #62), resulting in cross-contamination and the likelihood of further cross-contamination.
- E Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to update and/or revise individualized, person-centered care plans to reflect changing needs for 4 residents (#6, #39, #52, #62) of 18 residents reviewed for care plans, resulting in the potential for unmet care needs.
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignity for 2 residents (Resident's #39 and Resident #51) of 3 residents reviewed for dignity (call light response time) and residents from the confidential Resident Council group meeting (held on 4/16/25), regarding call light response times. Findings Include: Resident #51: Review of the Face Sheet, MDS dated 2/24, nurse's progress notes dated 2/1/24 through 4/15/25, revealed Resident #39 was [AGE] years old, mild cognitive impairment, admitted to the facility on [DATE], and dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living/ADL's. The resident's diagnosis included, high blood pressure, heart failure, lymphedema, unsteadiness, lack of coordination, chronic kidney disease, anxiety disorder, cardiac pacemaker with a history of right breast cancer. [...]
- D Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to inform/educate 13 of 13 residents who attended the confidential group meeting about the location of the survey results and failed to ensure that the recent State Survey and Plan of Correction were readily accessible, affecting all Residents in the facility of a census of 89, resulting in Residents, Resident Representatives, visitors and staff being unable to review the survey results and plan of correction.
March 11, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) Maintain food preparation and kitchen equipment in a sanitary condition, and 2) Ensure that all partly used, opened foods had a use-by date. Findings Include: Review of the Public Health Service 2009 Food Code, adopted by the Michigan Food Law, effective October 1, 2012, Chapter 4-501.14 directs that equipment cleaning frequency is to be throughout the day at frequency necessary to prevent recontamination of equipment and utensils. 4-602.11 Equipment Food-Contact Surfaces and Utensils. (A) EQUIPMENT FOOD-CONTACT SURFACES and UTENSILS shall be cleaned: (5) At any time during the operation when contamination may have occurred. During the initial kitchen tour done on 3/11/25 at 7:35 AM, accompanied by Dietary [NAME] C, the following observations were made: [...]
March 13, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 10 citations
- G Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to adequately supervise and prevent injuries/falls for three residents (Resident #7, Resident #18, Resident #279), resulting in multiple injuries of residents and prolonged illness and hospitalizations.
- F Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow policies and procedures for medication labeling and storage in 3 of 3 Medication carts reviewed, 1 of 2 Medication rooms reviewed and narcotic reconciliation, resulting in opened and undated multi-dose medications, and the disposal of expired medications and altered medication efficiency with the likelihood of misappropriation going unnoticed.
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly wash food contact surfaces, resulting in an increased risk of foodborne illness, affecting all residents that consume food from the kitchen.
- F Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteDeficient Practice Statement (DPS) One: Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize a comprehensive infection control program, encompassing effective outcome and process surveillance, accurate data collection/documentation/analysis and failed to ensure appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) utilization and staff knowledge for transmission-based isolation precautions resulting in lack of accurate and comprehensive infection control tracking, surveillance and data monitoring/analysis and the likelihood for spread of microorganisms and illness to all 71 facility residents.
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteThis Citation Pertains to Intake Number MI00143143. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent staff-to-resident verbal abuse for one resident (Resident #47) of three residents reviewed, resulting in a staff yelling at and calling Resident #47 derogatory names, Resident #47 expressing signs and symptoms of distress and fear, and the likelihood for ongoing psychosocial distress utilizing the reasonable person concept.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility 1) Failed to document abdominal/bowel assessment and treatment for a change of condition for one resident (Resident #279) and 2) Failed to thoroughly assess a resident with new onset pain and swelling, notify the physician and provide timely interventions for one resident (Resident #18) resulting in the likelihood for missed identification and assessment of changes in condition and delays in treatment.
- D Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow up on a change in nutritional status for one (Resident #12) resulting in weight changes going unassessed with the likelihood of further weight change going unassessed.
- D Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly label and date an Intravenous (IV) medication for one (Resident #32), resulting in the lack of date and time of administration with the likelihood of reuse of IV tubing and/or wrong administration times.
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize procedures to ensure accurate documentation, reconciliation, and oversight of controlled drugs in one (Two East) of six medication carts resulting in inaccurate narcotic medication documentation and reconciliation.
- D Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review the facility failed to follow up on an as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication (Ativan) for one (Resident #7), resulting in the lack of documented assessment of the need for the continued PRN medication.
Fire safety inspections
15 fire safety citations on file: 4 on April 29, 2026, 6 on April 17, 2025, 5 on March 13, 2024.
Every fire safety citation15 citations
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- E Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- E Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- E Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
- E Have corridors or aisles that are unobstructed and are at least 8 feet in width.
- E Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
- F Conduct testing and exercise requirements.
- F Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Have a battery powered remote alarm panel in a location accessible by operating personnel.
- E Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| March 11, 2025 | Fine | $116,805 |
| March 11, 2025 | Payment Denial | 29 days from May 16, 2025 |
| March 13, 2024 | Fine | $48,731 |
| March 13, 2024 | Payment Denial | 11 days from April 11, 2024 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Michigan | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 6.39 | 3.99 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.32 | 0.78 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 5.39 | 3.50 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 3.75 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.32 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 53.9% | 44.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 80.8% | 39.2% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.93 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 6.79 on weekdays and 5.39 on weekends, 21% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.6% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 6.64 in April to June 2025 to 6.39 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 6.39 | 1.32 | 6.79 | 5.39 | 0.6% | 0 of 90 | 94 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 6.22 | 1.28 | 6.54 | 5.39 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 93 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 6.26 | 1.32 | 6.63 | 5.34 | 0.6% | 0 of 92 | 90 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 6.64 | 1.44 | 6.96 | 5.83 | 1.5% | 0 of 91 | 84 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Michigan, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.95 | 0.70 | 4.14 | 3.45 | 3.3% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
Staff pay at this home
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
Official wage estimates for Michigan
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $19.03 | $18.35 to $21.59 | 43,290 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.47 | $29.83 to $35.52 | 10,880 |
| Registered nurses | $45.34 | $39.46 to $49.74 | 104,950 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Michigan | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.9 | 10.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.3 | 3.0 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.1 | 12.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.0 | 5.1 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.8 | 14.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 29.3 | 24.0 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 10.6 | 11.7 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.5 | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.2 | 1.6 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: COUNTY OF BAY.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| County of Bay | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 05/01/1966 |
| Weidman, Kyle | Corporate director | Individual | 12/12/2022 | |
| McCarthy, Jacqueline | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/01/2021 | |
| Ahmed, Tazeen | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2018 | |
| Weidman, Kyle | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/12/2022 | |
| Ahmed, Tazeen | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2018 | |
| McCarthy, Jacqueline | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2021 | |
| Weidman, Kyle | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/12/2022 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on April 29, 2026: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on April 29, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 29, 2026: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 29, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Hampton Nursing and Rehabilitation Bay City, 4 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 26 citations
- Bay Shores Senior Care and Rehab Center Bay City, 6.2 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 29 citations
- Carriage House Nursing and Rehabilitation Bay City, 7.8 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 34 citations
- Caretel Inns of Tri-Cities Bay City, 9.1 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 46 citations
- Huron Woods Nursing Center Kawkawlin, 10.1 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 31 citations
- Great Lakes Rehabilitation Center Saginaw, 13.6 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 39 citations
- Hoyt Nursing & Rehab Centre Saginaw, 14.2 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 40 citations
- Saginaw Senior Care and Rehabilitation Center, LLC Saginaw, 15.3 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 29 citations
Michigan contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Michigan. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs, Bureau of Survey and Certification, Long Term Care Division, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Michigan Long Term Care Ombudsman Program, 1-866-485-9393. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: LARA State Licensing Search, where Michigan publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Bay County Medical Care Facility's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Bay County Medical Care Facility 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Bay County Medical Care Facility get at its last inspection?
- 8 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 29, 2026. The Michigan average is 9.9.
- Has Bay County Medical Care Facility been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 2 fines totaling $165,536 in the last three years.
- Does Bay County Medical Care Facility accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Bay County Medical Care Facility?
- CMS lists 8 owners and managers. Legal business name: COUNTY OF BAY.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.