Bay Shores Senior Care and Rehab Center
3254 E Midland Rd, Bay City, MI 48706 · Bay County · (989) 686-3770
126 certified beds, about 118 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1979
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 235388 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 12, 2026, inspectors cited 9 health deficiencies (the Michigan average is 9.9, the national average 9.2).
None of its 29 health citations since February 2024 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.72 hours per resident per day, against 3.99 across Michigan and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.78 of those hours.
35.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Michigan average 44.1%).
CMS links it to Nexcare Health Systems, an affiliated group of 20 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 29 health citations on file.
March 12, 2026Standard inspection · 9 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices in the food service area, resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness to all residents who consume food from the kitchen.
- F Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have an active plan for reducing the risk of l\Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens of premise plumbing (OPPP). This deficient practice has the increased potential to result in waterborne pathogens being allowed to exist and spread in the facility's plumbing system with an increased risk of respiratory infection among all residents in the facility.
- E Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were treated in a dignified and respectful manner by respond to call lights timely and complaints of Staff cell phone use in resident care areas for anonymous resident council residents and residents ( #1, #12, #13, #90, #46, #117, #138) resulting in a lack of timely response of care needs, extended wait times for assistance, and residents verbalizations of discourteous staff, feelings of being a burden, frustration and sadness.
- E Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate indication of a psychotropic/antidepressant drug dosage for 4 residents (#2, #9, #94, and #138), resulting in the facility's failure to fully inform the resident or responsible party by obtained signed consents with no medication dosage noted, doses per day or the route of the medication.
- E PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that annual Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) assessments were completed for 4 residents (#2, #46, #113, #116) of 8 residents reviewed.
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to operationalize policies and procedures for safe medication storage for two residents (# 29 and #90) of two residents and one ([NAME] One) of four medication carts reviewed.
- D Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a pummel cushion (wheelchair cushion with a raised wedge in the center) was used for the treatment of documented medical symptoms for one resident (Resident #88) of one resident reviewed for restraints, resulting in a lack of a clear indication for use and ongoing assessment/reassessment for use.
- D Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to transmit a Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) for one resident (Resident #108) of one resident reviewed for resident assessments.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store nebulizer equipment in a sanitary manner for one resident (R11) of one resident reviewed for respiratory care.
February 7, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 11 citations
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) Provide antiviral medication timely for one resident (Resident #61), 2) Ensure barrier use, and 3) Ensure reusable medical equipment was sanitized prior to clean storage, resulting in influenza symptoms going untreated, contamination of medication cart with the likelihood of continued contamination.
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility to accurately code the MDS (Minimum Data Set) for one resident (#24) and properly reflect one resident's (#61) pertinent care categories on the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid) 802 form of 22 residents reviewed for assessment accuracy, resulting in Resident #24 being miscoded as utilizing restraints on the MDS and Resident #61's infection not being designated on the CMS 802.
- D Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely assessment of transfer/mobility status for one resident (Resident #315) of four residents reviewed for care planning, resulting in unsupervised self-ambulation and transfer and an incomplete baseline care plan.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to update care plan interventions for 3 residents (R23, R24, R164) of 4 residents reviewed, resulting in the likelihood for missed interventions in treatment and unmet needs.
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) for one resident (R164) of 18 residents reviewed for ADL care, resulting in residents feeling frustrated, anger, embarrassment from poor hygiene, unmet needs and complaints to the state surveyor.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteThis Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00150074. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely completion of wound care for one resident (Resident #93) of one resident reviewed for dressing changes, resulting in missed wound care treatments, not following physician's orders and voiced frustration.
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize policies and procedures to prevent pressure ulcer (wounds caused by pressure) development and worsening for two residents (#4 and #217) of two residents reviewed resulting in Resident #4's Stage II (partial thickness loss of first and second layer of skin) pressure ulcer progressing to a Stage IV (full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle), and Resident #217 developing an unstageable Deep Tissue Injury (DTI- pressure ulcer with unknown depth), unnecessary pain and the potential for decline in overall health.
- D Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide feeding assistance for Resident #43 and to prevent weight loss for Resident #23, resulting in Resident #43 to be observed with no dining assist at bedside and Resident #23 experiencing a 10 pound weight loss.
- D Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteThis Citation pertains to Intake Numbers MI00149163 and MI00149254. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure appropriate indication of a psychotropic drug dosage increase for one resident (Resident #47) and failed to ensure informed consent was obtained prior to administration of psychotropic medications for one resident (Resident #46) of four residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, resulting in Residents #46 and #47 bring administered antipsychotic medications without appropriate consent and risk versus benefit analysis of the medications explained to the resident/responsible party and the increased potential for serious side effects and adverse reactions . Assessment and Documentation: (c.) (ii.) Informed consent forms the resident and/or responsible party along with education regarding potential side-effects .
- D Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper insulin administration and provide the proper medication dosage for two residents (Resident #57, Resident #164) of five residents reviewed for medication administration, resulting in unsafe injection practices, the uncertainty of an accurate insulin dose administered and improper medication reconciliation after hospitalization.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe medication storage for one medication cart of four medication carts reviewed during the medication storage task, resulting in medications stored unlabeled in a clear plastic medication cup.
February 7, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 9 citations
- F Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control practices related to the use of: (1.) Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), follow-up with employee health call-ins and (2.) proper hand hygiene, clean accu-check machine properly during medication pass and keep wound vac tubing off floor resulting in the likelihood for cross contamination and prolonged illness.
- E Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the dignity of 6 residents (#21, #75, #65, #79, #151, and #148) and 4 of 4 residents from the confidential resident group, by answering call lights in a dignified and timely manner, resulting in verbalizations of anger, frustration, and fear, with the likelihood for falls with injuries and hospitalization. Findings Include: Resident # 75: Review of the Face Sheet, Minimum Data Set (MDS, dated [DATE]), nurse's and physician notes dated 1/24 through 2/24, revealed, Resident #75 was 94 years-old, admitted to the facility on [DATE], had cognitive decline and required staff assistance with all Activities of Daily Living (ADL's). The residents diagnosis included, Anxiety Disorder, [NAME] Lymphoma, Mood Disorder, Embolism and Thrombosis, Dementia, Hearing Loss and age related debility. [...]
- E Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that three Certified Nurse Assistant and three licensed nurses yearly performance reviews were conducted, resulting in the lack of yearly job performance evaluation for 6 of 8 staff reviewed.
- E Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to effectively clean and maintain the physical plant effecting 97 residents, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contamination, bacterial harborage, and decreased air quality.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and/or develop a care plan for two (R#6, R#59) Residents, resulting in Resident #6 to have a cardiac pacemaker with no interventions for pacemaker checks/follow-up and Resident #59 to not receive showers/bathes as care planned for twice weekly with likelihood for missed care intervention.
- D Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards, to ensure 1) medications were not left at the bedside for 1 resident (Resident #88) who verbalized she chocked on a medication, 2) to document the incident on the facility occurrence report, and 3) to make a swallowing referral for further evaluation of change of condition, resulting in verbalization of fear of chocking on medications. Findings Include: Review of the Face Sheet, nursing notes dated 2/1/24 through 2/7/24, physician orders dated 1/11/23 through 1/11/24, revealed Resident #88 was 69 years-old, alert with confusion, admitted to the facility on [DATE], and required staff assistance with Activities of Daily Living/ADL's. [...]
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the provision of bathing and hygiene care for one Resident (#59) of two reviewed, resulting in the likelihood for foul body odors, lack of bathing and showers per resident preference, and verbalization of dissatisfaction. Record review of facility 'Activities of Daily Living (ADL's)' policy dated 7/1/2008, revealed the purpose was to assist residents as needed in achieving maximum functional ability with dignity and self-esteem to improve quality of life. Procedure: (1.) Staff will utilize the care plan/[NAME] to determine level of assistance and interventions required for each resident to complete Activities of Daily Living which include transfers, toileting, bed mobility, locomotion, eating, dressing and personal hygiene . Resident #59: [...]
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and monitoring to prevent injuries from falls for two residents (Resident #33, Residednt #63), resulting in falls with injuries and the likelihood for a decline in overall health status.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure narcotic reconciliation was completed accurately, resulting in scribbled over narcotic numbers and lack of signature with the likelihood of narcotic diversion going unnoticed.
Fire safety inspections
6 fire safety citations on file: 1 on March 12, 2026, 2 on February 7, 2025, 3 on February 7, 2024.
Every fire safety citation6 citations
- E Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- E Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- F Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- E Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
- E Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Michigan | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.72 | 3.99 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.31 | 3.50 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.31 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.63 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 35.7% | 44.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 34.8% | 39.2% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.47 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.88 on weekdays and 3.31 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.93 in April to June 2025 to 3.72 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.72 | 0.78 | 3.88 | 3.31 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 118 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.73 | 0.75 | 3.90 | 3.29 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 118 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.67 | 0.78 | 3.83 | 3.26 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 117 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.93 | 0.84 | 4.09 | 3.56 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 111 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Michigan, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.95 | 0.70 | 4.14 | 3.45 | 3.3% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Michigan | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.5 | 10.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.9 | 3.0 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.5 | 12.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.7 | 5.1 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.2 | 14.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 23.2 | 24.0 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 10.6 | 11.7 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.9 | 1.6 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: BAY SHORES NURSING CENTER, LLC. CMS links this home to Nexcare Health Systems, a group of 20 nursing homes averaging 3.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nexcare Holdings, LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 11/01/2013 |
| Koch, William | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 08/10/2020 | |
| Perry, Michael | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2016 | |
| Sangster, Todd | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/04/2013 | |
| Nexcare Health Systems, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 05/01/2004 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on March 12, 2026: "PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities"
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on March 12, 2026: "Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on March 12, 2026: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on March 12, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.31 hours per resident per day, below the Michigan average of 3.50.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Carriage House Nursing and Rehabilitation Bay City, 1.6 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 34 citations
- Hampton Nursing and Rehabilitation Bay City, 3.1 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 26 citations
- Caretel Inns of Tri-Cities Bay City, 4.1 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 46 citations
- Bay County Medical Care Facility Essexville, 6.2 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 26 citations
- Huron Woods Nursing Center Kawkawlin, 7 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 31 citations
- Great Lakes Rehabilitation Center Saginaw, 9.2 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 39 citations
- Hoyt Nursing & Rehab Centre Saginaw, 11.1 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 40 citations
- Saginaw Senior Care and Rehabilitation Center, LLC Saginaw, 11.4 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 29 citations
Michigan contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Michigan. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs, Bureau of Survey and Certification, Long Term Care Division, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Michigan Long Term Care Ombudsman Program, 1-866-485-9393. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: LARA State Licensing Search, where Michigan publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Bay Shores Senior Care and Rehab Center's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Bay Shores Senior Care and Rehab Center 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Bay Shores Senior Care and Rehab Center get at its last inspection?
- 9 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on March 12, 2026. The Michigan average is 9.9.
- Has Bay Shores Senior Care and Rehab Center been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Bay Shores Senior Care and Rehab Center accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Bay Shores Senior Care and Rehab Center?
- CMS lists 5 owners and managers, and links the home to Nexcare Health Systems. Legal business name: BAY SHORES NURSING CENTER, LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.